K. Esmaili; B. Naghavi; F. Koorosh Vahid; J. Yazdi
Abstract
Abstract
Weirs are the most common structures for discharge measurement in engineering research. Streamline curvature, non hydrostatic pressure distribution on weir and nappe adherence to the weir lead to differences between calculated and measured discharges. Thus discharge coefficient, which is the ...
Read More
Abstract
Weirs are the most common structures for discharge measurement in engineering research. Streamline curvature, non hydrostatic pressure distribution on weir and nappe adherence to the weir lead to differences between calculated and measured discharges. Thus discharge coefficient, which is the ratio of real and theoretic discharges, is usually less than unity. In circular weirs the pressure distribution and velocity differs from sharp crested weirs which affect on flow discharge and extend the discharge coefficient more than unity. In this study, pressure distribution and velocity of different circular weir measured in laboratory models and compared with Fluent simulation as a numerical code. The results showed significant relation between measured and simulated data. Also it is found that the critical flow depth and separated flow are located respectively before and after the crest of weir. Nappe separation depends on overflow discharge and will shift to the downstream face of the cylinder in high discharges. To recognize the location of critical flow conditions and nappe separations, theoretical formulations has is proposed. The equations are found to be dependent on weir size and inflow conditions. The theoretical predictions showed good agreement in comparison with experimental results.
Keywords: Circular weir, Velocity and pressure distribution, Nappe separation, Critical depth, Fluent
