@article { author = {Sarcheshmeh, B. and Behmanesh, J. and Rezaverdinejad, vahid}, title = {Evaluation of Water Scarcity by Determining Quantity and Quality and Environmental Flow Requirement of Zarrinehrood}, journal = {Water and Soil}, volume = {34}, number = {3}, pages = {565-577}, year = {2020}, publisher = {Ferdowsi University of Mashhad}, issn = {2008-4757}, eissn = {2423-396X}, doi = {10.22067/jsw.v34i3.82187}, abstract = {Introduction: Drying Urmia Lake, located in northwest of Iran, is mainly related to the reduction in rivers flowing into the lake and hydrological parameters changes. Considering the importance and critical ecological conditions of Urmia Lake, the purpose of this research is to accommodate the environmental water requirement in managing rivers leading to the lake, including Zarrinehrood as the largest river to the lake. Moreover, water scarcity was assessed by QQE approach in this basin. Materials and Methods: Tennant method is easy, rapid, inexpensive, and is based on empirical relationships between the recommended percent of the MAF. The ecological conditions of the river have been determined for use in this method. In this study, different levels of EFR were calculated to protect the relevant levels of habitat quality defined in the Tennant method. Also the fraction of Blue Water Resources (BWR) required to protect a “good” level of habitat quality was considered as the suitable EFR. If it is less than the lower limit, the habitat quality will be in degraded status.      ,           SQQE is a complete index to demonstrate water scarcity by considering water quantity and quality and EFR indicator.       ,               ,       The Smakhtin method provided an indicator for assessing the water scarcity. WSI = Where WSI is the index of water scarcity, MAR is the mean annual flow and EWR is the environmental water requirement of river. If the water scarcity index is more than one, the river would suffer from water shortage and not be able to meet the environmental water requirement. When the water scarcity index is between 0.6 and 1, the river would be under stress, and if it is between 0.3 and 0.6 Harvesting conditions from the river is moderate, and if it is less than 0.3 the river is ecologically safe and has no shortage. Results and Discussion: According to the Smakhtin method, can be noticed that the calculations of this method are the same quantitative index of the other method used in this research. Only the quantitative conditions are evaluated in the Smakhtin method. However, in addition to the quantity (blue water footprint), environmental requirement and water quality are also included in the other method used in this research. Figure 1 shows the mean annual flow (MAF) and environmental flow requirement (EFR). As shown in figure 1, the majority river flow has been conducted from January to June and the rest from July to December. The annual BWR in the Nezamabad station was equal to 1208 × 106 (m3/year). To protect the habitat health of Zarrinehrood river at a good level, 400×106 (m3) of water must be left in the river per year. Therefore EFR was equivalent to 33.11% of the annual BWR. It is about one-third of total BWR. In this station, EFR ranged from 60×106 (m3/year) as severely degraded to 2400×106 (m3/year) as maximum habitat health situation by using the Tennant table (Fig 2).   Figure 1- Environmental flow requirement (EFR) and mean annual flow (MAF) for the (Nezamabad station) Zarrinehrood river basin   Figure 2- Different levels of total environmental flow requirement (EFR) in the (Nezamabad station) Zarrinehrood river. Habitat quality levels with the flows shown in table 3 (Tennant) have be matched   The BWF and the BWA for the studied station were calculated 830×106 and 808×106 (m3/year), respectively. The BWF is 1.02 times the BWA. Therefore, the WSI Smakhtin and S Quantity will be 1.02.  The total GWF in this station was 1.08 times the BWR. Thus, the S Quality will be 1.08. P is a demonstrator that shows the percentage of EFR in total BWR. It is related with the EFR to protect the habitat quality in a “good” level. As you know, the number in the bracket shows that 33.11% of the total BWR of the basin is required as EFR, for maintaining the ecological habitat condition at the ‘good’ level. Other percentages of EFR are used to represent other ecological levels of habitat condition. The S Quantity and S Quality for the Nezamabad station in Zarrinehrood river basin were obtained 1.02 and 1.08, respectively. Both indices are above the threshold (1.0), and the basin suffer from both qualitative and quantitative deficiencies. Thus, the final water scarcity indicator, SQQE, is 1.02 (33.11%) |1.08. Conclusion: The EFR for protecting the good ecological level is not enough in some months during a year. Water scarcity was evaluated by simultaneously considering water quantity, water quality and EFR in the Zarrinehrood river basin in Iran. Compared with the Smakhtin method as another method of water scarcity assessment, the Smakhtin Index is only quantitatively, but the SQQE Index provides a comprehensive assessment of the water scarcity. The results imply that the studied region is suffering from both water quantity, water quality problems. The water pollution has a big role in causing the water scarcity in the river basin. This shows that only aiming on reducing water consumption cannot help impressive reduce the water scarcity. It is necessary to pay attention to reduce water pollution and water conservation. Even in the areas that the hydrological and ecological data are rare, the QQE approach as a holistic method could be used.}, keywords = {Environmental Flow Requirement,water quantity,water quality,Water scarcity,Zarrinehrood}, title_fa = {بررسی کمبود آب با درنظرگرفتن همزمان کمیت و کیفیت آب و جریان زیست‌محیطی زرینه‌رود}, abstract_fa = {آب نقشی مهم برای رفاه انسانها و محیط­زیست دارد. مردم برای مصارف کشاورزی، صنعتی و خانگی از آب رودخانه استفاده می­کنند. علاوه بر این، برآورده شدن نیاز زیست­محیطی اکوسیستم رودخانه بسیار مهم خواهد بود. کمبود آب یک محدودیت اصلی و جدی برای توسعه اقتصادی-اجتماعی در کشورهای در حال توسعه و یک خطر برای معیشت مردم در نقاط مختلفی از جهان شده است. در سال­های اخیر دریاچه ارومیه که در شمال غرب ایران واقع شده است با کمبود جدی آب مواجه شده­است. زرینه­رود یکی از مهم­ترین رودخانه­هایی است که آب دریاچه را تامین می­کند. در این مطالعه براساس داده­های ماهانه کمیت آب از سال 1365تا 1395 ایستگاه نظام­آباد رودخانه زرینه­رود، نیاز ­جریان زیست­محیطی با روش تنانت محاسبه شد. همچنین داده­های کیفی و کمی آب و نیاز­ جریان زیست­محیطی برای ارزیابی کمبود آب به وسیله شاخص SQQE مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که متوسط نیاز جریان زیست­محیطی برابر 106× 400 مترمکعب­درسال و برابر با % 11/33 متوسط جریان سالانه جهت مدیریت اکولوژیکی و حفظ اکوسیستم رودخانه در سطح خوب می­باشد. شاخص‌های کمی و کیفی به ترتیب 02/1 و 08/1 محاسبه شدند. محاسبات نشان می­دهند، شاخص کمی، همان شاخص اسمختین، می­باشد. این مقادیر نشان می­دهند که هر دو شاخص کمی و کیفی بالای حد 1 هستند و در نتیجه این ایستگاه در حال تحمل کمبود آب مربوط به کمیت و کیفیت برای مقدار معین نیاز جریان زیست­محیطی می­باشد. بنابراین چاره­اندیشی مدیریتی مناسب، ضروری به نظر می­رسد.}, keywords_fa = {ردپای آب,زرینه رود,کمبود آب,کیفیت آب,نیاز جریان زیست‌محیطی}, url = {https://jsw.um.ac.ir/article_38819.html}, eprint = {https://jsw.um.ac.ir/article_38819_0cf042572a7ef9fe89e4cc04b2de8616.pdf} }