Influence of Plant Growth Regulators and Humic Substance on the Phytoremediation of Nickel in a Ni-Polluted Soil

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Mahshid Shafigh
• reza ghasemi
• abdolmajid ronaghi

Shiraz University

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v31i1.51798

Abstract

Introduction: Plants can uptake, bioaccumulate and immobilize different metals in their tissues. Phytoremediation technique has been used to remove hazardous substances including heavy metals from the environment. Assisted phytoremediation is usually the process of applying a chemical additive to heavy metal contaminated soils to enhance the metal uptake by plants. The main objective of present study was to investigate the effectiveness of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and a humic substance (HS) on Ni phytoremediation by maize in a Ni-pollutrd calcareous soil.
Materials and Methods: The experiment designed as a 5×3 factorial trial arranged in a completely randomized design with three replicates. Three kilograms of soil was placed in plastic pots and pots were watered with distilled water to field capacity and maintained at this moisture level throughout the experiment by watering the pots to a constant weight. The soils were polluted with 250 mg Ni Kg-1 as Ni-nitrate Ni (NO3)2. Six maize (Zea mays L.) seeds were planted 2 cm deep in soil and thinned to three uniform stands 1 week after emergence. Treatments consisted of three levels of soil application of commercially humic substance, HS, (0, 3, and 6 mg kg as Humax 95-WSG containing about 80% humic acid, and about 15% fulvic acid) and five levels of PGRs (0 or 10 µM GA3, IAA, BAP and SA). The HS was applied as split doses in three times at 15 day intervals along with irrigation water. The seedlings were exposed to aqueous solutions of HS 16 days after sowing for the first time. Prepared solutions of PGRs were sprayed three times at 15 day intervals from emergence. Seven weeks after planting, shoots were harvested and roots were separated from soil carefully, both parts were rinsed with distilled water and dried at 65°C for 72 h, weighed, ground, and dry meshed at 550°C. Root and shoot dry matter and Ni concentration and uptake and phytoremediation criteria were considered as plant responses. Data were statistically analyzed using SAS and SPSS software packages. Application of different PGRs had no considerable effect on phytoextraction or translocation efficiencies. Among the four PGRs studied application of SA and BA significantly increased mean uptake efficiency.
Results and Discussion: Among four PGRs evaluated, application of GA3 increased mean shoot dry matter yield and application of SA increased mean root dry matter yield. Application of the highest HS level (6 mg kg-1) decreased both mean root and shoot dry weight. Application of SA increased Ni concentration in both maize root and shoot. Application of BA only increased Ni concentration in maize root. Although application of the highest HS level (6 mg kg-1) caused an increase in Ni concentration in maize shoot, this effect was attributed to the influence of HS on the decrease in decreasing dry weight of maize shoot. Application of all PGRs except GA3 increased leaf greenness criterion. Addition of HS had no significant effect on leaf greenness. Application of PGRs enhanced root concentration factor (RCF) and decreased translocation factor (TF). Among PGRs evaluated, BA was the most effective on TF, and SA or BA was the most effective on RCF. However HS were not significantly influenced these phytoremediation criteria, as compared with control. The efficiency of PGRs in root Ni uptake was in the order of SA > BA > GA3 > IAA. Application of BA had a significant effect on Ni distribution among root and shoot, in comparison with other PGRs, and caused an increase and a decrease in root and shoot uptake of Ni, respectively. However HS had a negative effect on tolerance index and its application decreased root and shoot dry weights. Results showed that the values of Ni in maize root was considerably higher than that of maize shoot demonstrated that phytostabilization was the main mechanism involved in the phytoremediation of Ni by maize and application of PGRs was effective on this mechanism.
Conclusion: Results reported here indicated that although the addition of HS did not cause a significant effect on Ni phytoremediation, application of most studied PGRs had a positive effect on Ni phytoremediation by maize. Application of SA and BA increased uptake efficiency and RCF and application of GA3 increased shoot dry matter and tolerance index. The fact that Ni uptake by roots was significantly higher than that of shoots demonstrated that phytostabilization was the main mechanism involved in the phytoremediation of Ni by maize. According to results reported herein the addition of PGRs especially SA is likely to be promising in phytostabilization of Ni in calcareous soils polluted with this metal.

Keywords

• Benzyle adenine
• Gibberlic acid
• Indole-3-acetic acid
• salicylic acid
• phytostabilization

References

1- Alloway B.J. 1995. Heavy metal in soils. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK, pp 25–34.

2- Gimeno-Garcia E., Andreu V., and Boluda R. 1996. Heavy metals incidence in the application of inorganic fertilizers and pesticides to rice farming soil. Environmental Pollution, 92: 19-25.

3- Brown P.H., Welch R.M., and Cary E.E. 1987. Nickel: a micronutrient essential for higher plants. Plant Physiology, 85: 801–803.

4- Seregin I.V., and Kozhevnikova A.D. 2006. Physiological role of nickel and its toxic effects on higher plants. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 53: 257–277.

5- Swamy PM, and B. N. Smith. 1999. Role of abscisic acid in plant stress tolerance. Current Science, 9: 1220–1227.

6- Cabello-Conejo M., Centofanti T., Kidd P., Prieto-Fernandez Á., and Chaney R. 2013. Evaluation of plant growth regulators to increase nickel phytoextraction by Alyssum species. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 15: 365–75.

7- Cassina L., Tassi E., Morelli E., and Giorgetti L. 2011. Exogenous cytokinin treatments of a Ni hyperaccumulator, Alyssm murale, grown in a serpentine soil: Implications for phytoextraction. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 13: 90-101.

8- Fassler E., Evangelou M.W., Robinson B. H., and Schulin R. 2010. Effects of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) on sunflower growth and heavy metal uptake in combination with ethylene diamine disuccinic acid (EDDS). Chemosphere, 80: 901–907.

9- Lao C., Zeledon Z., Gamisans X., and Sole M. 2005. Sorption of Cd (II) and Pb(II) from aqueous solutions by a low-rank coal (leonardite). Separation Purification Technology, 45: 79-85.

10- Tan K.H. 2003. Humic matter in soil and the environment. Marcel Dekker, New York.

11- Khan S., Cao Q., Chen B.D., and Zhu Y.G. 2006. Humic acids increase the phytoavailability of Cd and Pb to wheat plants cultivated in freshly spiked, contaminated soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 6: 236-242.

12- Turan M., and Angin I. 2004. Organic chelate assisted phytoextraction of B, Cd, Mo and Pb from contaminated soils using two agricultural crop species. J. Acta Agric. Scandinavica Section b, Soil and Plant Science, 54: 221-231.

13-Wang Q., Li Z., Cheng S., and Wu Z. 2010. Effects of humic acids on phytoextraction of Cu and Cd from sediment by Elodea nuttallii. Chemosphere, 78: 604-608.

14- Bouyoucos G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Journal of Agronomy, 54: 464-465.

15- Sumner M.E., and Miller W.P. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. P. 1201-1229. In D. L. Sparks et al. (ed.). Methods of soil analysis, part 3, 3rd ed., Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

16- Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. P. 961-1010. In D. L. Sparks et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, part 3, 3rd ed., Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

17- Olsen S.R.C., Cole V., Watanabe F.S., and Dean L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA. Circ. 939. U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.

18- Bremner J.M. 1996. Nitrogen-total. P.1085-1121. Methods of soil analysis. In D. L. Sparks et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, part 3, 3rd ed., Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

19- Knudsen D., Peterson G.A., and Pratt P.F. 1982. Lithium, sodium, and potassium. P. 225-246. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney (eds.). Methods of soil analysis, part 3. Chemical and microbiological properties. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

20- Lindsay W.L., and Norvell W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42: 421-428.

21- Audet, P., and C. Charest. 2007.Dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in heavy metal phytoremediation: Meta-analytical and conceptual perspectives. Environmental Pollution, 147: 609-614.

22- Wang F.Y., Linb X.G., and Yinb R. 2007. Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Acaulospora mellea decreases Cu phytoextraction by maize from Cu-contaminated soil. Pedobiologia, 51: 99-109.

23- Yoon J., Cao X., Zhou Q., and Ma L.Q. 2006. Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Science of Total Environment, 368: 456-464.

24- Hadi F., Bano A., and Fuller M.P. 2010. The improved phytoextraction of lead (Pb) and the growth of maize (Zea mays L.): the role of plant growth regulators (GA3 and IAA) and EDTA alone and in combinations. Chemosphere, 80: 457–62.

25- Tanimoto E. 2005. Regulation of root growth by plant hormones—roles for auxin and gibberellin. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24:249–65.

26- JandaT., Horvath E., Szalai G., and Paldi E. 2007. Role of salicylic acid in the induction of abiotic stress tolerance. In S. Hayat and A. Ahmad (eds.), Salicylic Acid – a plant hormone. Springer.

27- Baker A.J.M., Megrath S.P., Sidholi C.M.D., and Reeves R.D. 1994. The possibility of in situ heavy metal decontamination of polluted soils using crops and metal-accumulating plants. Conservation and Recycling, 11: 41-49.

28- Sengar R., Gautam M., Sengar R., Sengar R., Garg S., Sengar K., and Chaudhary R. 2008. Lead Stress

Effects on Physiobiochemical Activities of Higher Plants. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Vol. 196. D. M. Whitacre, Springer US. 196: 73-93.

29- Prasad M.N.V., and Freitas H. 2003. Metal hyper accumulation in plants-Biodiversity prospecting for phytoremediation technology. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 6: 275-321

30- Maksymiec W., and Krupa Z. 2006. The effects of shortterm exposition to Cd, excess Cu ions and jasmonate on oxidative stress appearing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57: 187-194.

31- Khan, A. S., and N. Y.Chaudhry. 2006. GA3 improves flower yield in some cucurbits treated with lead and mercury. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5: 149-153.

32- Gunes A., Inal A., Alpaslan M., Cicek N., Guneri E., Eraslan F., and Guzelordu T. 2005. Effects of exogenously applied salicylic acid on the induction of multiple stress toler-ance and mineral nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.), Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 51: 687–695.

33- Aftab T., Khan M.M.A., Idrees M., Naeem M., and Moinuddin. 2010. Salicylic acid acts as potent enhancer of growth, photosynthesis and artemisinin production in Artemisia annua L. J. Crop Science and Biotechnology, 13: 183–188.

34- Mostofa M.. G., and Fujita M. 2013. Salicylic acid alleviates copper toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by up-regulating antioxidative and glyoxalase systems. Ecotoxicology, 22 : 959 - 973.

35- Raskin I., and Ensley B.D. 2000. Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals: Using plants to clean up the environment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

36- Aggarwal H., and Goyal D. 2007. Phytoremediation of some heavy metals by agronomic crops. Developments in Environmental Science, 5: 79–98.