رابطه بین توپوگرافی و برخی ویژگی های خاک

پژند, محمدجواد; امامی, حجت; آستارایی, علیرضا

doi:10.22067/jsw.v29i6.44736

رابطه بین توپوگرافی و برخی ویژگی های خاک

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

10.22067/jsw.v29i6.44736

چکیده

توپوگرافی یکی از ویژگی های مهم و تأثیرگذار بر کیفیت خاک در هر منطقه است. در این پژوهش رابطه درجه و جهت شیب با برخی از ویژگی-های فیزیکی و شیمیایی خاک مانند بعد فرکتال ذرات، درصد شن، رس و سیلت، درصد کربنات کلسیم معادل، درصد کربن آلی، میانگین وزنی قطر خاکدانه و شاخص پایداری ساختمان خاکبررسی شد. برای انجام تجزیه های آزمایشگاهی یک ردیف پستی و بلندی4با طول شیب، مواد مادری یکسان انتخاب و30 نمونه از خاک در شیب های کمتر از 5، 15-5، 30-15، 50-30 و بیشتر از 50 درصد، با سه تکرار و در دو جهت شمالی و جنوبی در قالب طرح آشیانه ای نمونه برداری شد. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده، مقادیر کربنات کلسیم و کربن آلی در شیب های مختلف دارای اختلاف معنی داری در سطح پنج درصد بود. مقدار کمینه کربنات کلسیم در شیب کمتر از 5 درصد جنوبی و مقدار بیشینه آن در شیب بیشتر از 50 درصد جنوبی مشاهده شد، درحالی که مقدار کمینه کربن آلی در شیب بیشتر از 50 درصد جنوبی و بیشینه آن در شیب کمتر از 5 درصد جنوبی وجود داشت. بین میانگین درصد کربنات کلسیم و کربن آلی در دو جهت شیب اختلاف معنی داری وجود داشت. همچنین مقدار شاخص پایداری ساختمان خاک و میانگین وزنی قطر خاکدانه ها در جهت شمالی به طور معنی داری بیشتر از جنوبی بود. با وجود اینکه کلاس بافت خاک تقریبا در همه درجه-های شیب یکسان بود، درصد شن، رس و سیلت در طول شیب تغییرات زیادی داشت. به طوری که با افزایش شیب درصد ذرات درشت تر افزایش و درصد ذرات ریزتر کاهش یافت. بعد فرکتال ذرات نیز با کاهش درصد شیب، افزایش یافت. با توجه به این که در هنگام گزارش کلاس بافتی خاک درصد شن، رس و سیلت آن بیان نمی شود، می توان گفت که بعد فرکتال ذرات نسبت به بافت خاک، تعریف بهتر و روشن تری از چگونگی توزیع اندازه ذرات خاک ارایه می دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.20084757.1394.29.6.26.9

عنوان مقاله [English]

Relationship between Topography and Some Soil Properties

نویسندگان [English]

M. J. Pajand
H. Emami
Alireza Astaraei

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Topography is an important and effective property affecting the soil quality. Some researchers demonstrated that degree and aspect of land slope may influence the particle size distribution and gravel. Slope degree affects the surface and subsurface run-off, drainage, soil temperature, stability of soil aggregates and soil erosion. This research was carried out to determine the spatial variation of soil properties in different slope degrees of northern and southern slopes in Khorasan Razavei province, Iran.
Material and Methods: This study was performed in Sanganeh research station (longitude 60o 15ʹ60ʺ and latitude 36o 41ʹ 36ʺ), of north-eastern, Khorasan Razavi province of Iran. In order to study the effects of topography on some soil physical and chemical properties, a topo-sequence with the same slope length, parent materials and cover crops was selected. 30 soil samples (0-30 cm depth) were collected from different slopes of less than 5, 5-15, 15-30, 30-50 and more than 50 percent of both southern and northern aspects. In this study, the soil particle size distribution (texture) was measured by hydrometer method, organic carbon and calcium carbonate were determined by wet oxidation and titration with HCl 6 M, respectively and soil structural stability index, aggregates mean weight diameter and particles fractal dimension were calculated by related equations. Finally, the studied soil properties of 5 slopes (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30, 30-50, and more than 50%) and 2 aspects (north and south) with 3 replicates were compared by nested experimental design and Tuky test in JMP statistical software.
Results and Discussion: The maximum and minimum clay contents as well as fractal dimension and organic carbon contents were found in less than 5% and more than 50% of south slopes, respectively. Clay content and fractal dimension in north aspect were also significantly (P

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Fractal Dimension of Solid Particles
Particle size distribution
Slope

مراجع

1- Arya L., and Paris J. 1981. A physico-empirical model to predict soil moisture characteristic from particle-size distribution and bulk density data. Soil Science Society of America Journal,45:1023-1030.

2- Bird N.R.A., Perrier E., and Rieu M. 2000. The water retention function for a model of soil structure with pore and solid fractal distributions. European Journal of Soil Science, 51: 55-63.

3- Bittelli M., Campbell G.S., and Flury M. 1999. Characterization of particlesizedistribution in soil with a fragmentation model. Soil Science Society ofAmerica Journal, 63:782-788.

4- Bouyoucos G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal, 54:464-465.

5- Caravaca F., Masciandaro G., and Ceccanti B. 2002. Land use in relation to soil chemical and biochemical properties in a semiarid Mediterranean environment. Soil and Tillage Research, 68:23-30.

6- Ceddia M.B., Vieira S.R., Villela L.O., Mota L.S., Anjos H.C., and Carvalho F.D. 2009. Topography and spatial variability of soil physicalproperties. Scientia Agricola, 66:338-352.

7- Dahlgren A.R., Bottinger L.T., Huntington L.G., and Amundson A.R. 1997.Soil development along an elevation transect in the western Sierra Nevada,California. Geoderma, 78:207–236.

8- Ersahin S., Gunal H., Kutlu T., Yetgin B., and Coban S. 2006. Estimating specific surface area and cation exchange capacity in soils using fractal dimension of particlesize distribution. Geoderma, 136:588-597.

9- Filgueira R.R., Fournier L.L., Cerisola C.I., Gelati P., and Garcia M.G. 2006. Particle-size distribution in soils: A critical study of the fractal model validation. Geoderma 134:327-334.

10- Hanna A.Y., Harlan P.W., and Lewis D.T. 1982. Soil available water asinfluenced by landscape position and aspect. Agronomy Journal, 74:999-1004.

11- Hoyos N. and Comerford N.B. 2005. Land use and landscape effects on aggregate stability and total carbon of andisols from the Colombian Andes. Geoderma, 129:268-278.

12- Huang G., and Zhang R. 2005. Evaluation of soil water retention curve with the pore-solid fractal model. Geoderma, 127:52-61.

13- Jazini F. 2007. The role of topography on soil almond vegetative, quantitativeand qualitative Characteristics in Saman region, Shahrekord. MSc thesis,Shahrekord University, Iran.(in Persian with English abstract).

14- Jiang P., and Thelen K.D. 2004. Effect of soil and topographic properties oncrop yield in a north-central corn-soybean cropping system. Agronomy Journal, 96:252-258.

15- Kemper W.D. and Rosenau R.C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute, A. (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monogroph No. 9. 2nd Edition. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 5:425–442.

16- Kohler J., Caravaca F., and Rolan A. 2010. An AM fungus and a PGPRintensify the adverse effects of salinity on the stability of rhizospheresoilaggregates of Lactuca sativa. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42:429-434.

17- Lynch J.M., and Bragg E. 1985. Microorganisms and soil aggregate stability. Advance Soil Science, 2: 133-171.

18- Mena M., Deeks L.K., and Williams A.G. 1999. An evaluation of a fragmentation dimension technique to determine soil erodobility. Geoderma, 90:87-98.

19- Millan H., Gonzales-Posada M., Aguliar M., Dominguez J., and Cespedes L. 2003. On the fractal scaling of soil data, particle-size distributions. Geoderma, 117:117-128.

20- Page, A.L., Miller R.H., and Keeney D.R. 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp: 643-698.

21- Perrier E., Bird N., and Rieu M. 1999. Generalizing the fractal model of soil structure: The pore–solid fractal approach. Geoderma, 88:137-164.

22- Pieri C.J.M.G. 1992. Fertility of Soils: A Future for Farming in theWest African Savannah. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

23- Pirmoradian N., Sepaskhah A.R., and Hajabbasi M.A. 2005. Application of fractal theory to quantify soil aggregate stability as influenced by tillage treatments. Biosystems Engineering. 90:227-234.

24- Rasiah V., and Kay B.D. 1994. Characterizing changes in aggregate stability subsequent to introduction of forages. Soil Science Society of America Journal.58: 935-942.

25- Rezaei S., and Gilkes R. 2005. The effects of landscape attributes and plantcommunity on soil physical properties in rangelands. Geoderma, 125:167-176.

26- Rezaei S.A., Arzani H. and Tongway D.J. 2006. Assessing rangeland capability in Iran using landscape function indices based on soil surface attributes. Journal of Arid Environments, 65:460-473.

27- Rieu M., and Sposito G. 1991. Fractal fragmentation, soil porosity, and soil water properties: II.Applications. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55:1239-1244.

28- Sadeghi H.R., Bashari-Seghaleh M., and Rangavar A. S. 2010. Comparing the sediment variation with hillside direction and plot length in storm wise soil erosion. Journal of Water and Soil, 22(2):230-239.(in Persian with English abstract)

29- Su Y.Z., Zhao H.L., Zhao W.Z., and Zhang T.H. 2004. Fractal features of soil particle size distribution and the implication for indicating desertification. Geoderma, 122:43–49.

30- Ternan J.L., Williams A.G., Elmes A., and Hartley R. 1996. Aggregate stability of soils in central Spain and the role of land management. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 21: 181-193.

31- Thompson J.A., and Kolka R.K. 2005. Soil Carbon storage estimation in aforested watershed using quantitative soil- landscape modeling, Soil Sci. Soc.Am. J. 69: 1086-1093.

32- Tyler S.W., and Wheatcraft S.W. 1992. Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56:362–369.

33- Walkley A., and Black I.A. 1934. An examination method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37:29–38.

34- Wang Y., Zhang X.C., Zhang J.L., and Li S.J. 2009. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in a watershed on the loess plateau. Pedosphere. 19: 486-495.

35- Yimer F., Ledin S., and Abdelkadir A. 2006. Soil property variations in relation to topographic aspect and vegetation community in the south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management, 232:90-99.

36- YuanJun Z., and Mingan S. 2008. Spatial distribution of surface rock fragmenton hill slopes in a small catchment in wind-water erosion crisscross region ofthe loess Plateau. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 51: 862-870.