تعیین مدل پیش بینی عملکرد کلزا براساس شاخص های هواشناسی کشاورزی و پارامترهای اقلیمی در شهرستان مشهد

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

پیش بینی صحیح عملکرد گیاه زراعی جهت مدیریت مناسب سیستم های اقتصادی و زراعی از اهمیت ویژه ای برخوردار است. این تحقیق، به منظور مدل‌سازی آماری و پیش‌بینی عملکرد کلزا در شهرستان مشهد، بر مبنای 5 شاخص هواشناسی کشاورزی و 12 پارامتر اقلیمی در طی دوره سال زراعی 79-78 الی 93-92 انجام شد. تاریخ کاشت بر اساس دمای مطلوب زمان کاشت بر اساس احتمال وقوع 75% به کمک فرمول ویبول تعیین شد. شروع و خاتمه مراحل فنولوژی کلزا (جوانه زدن، سبز شدن، یک برگی، رزت، ساقه رفتن، گل دادن، غلاف بندی و رسیدن) با درجه روز رشد (GDD) معینی برای هر مرحله محاسبه شد. با استفاده از روش همبستگی و تحلیل مدل های آماری، مدل های چند متغیره بین عملکرد سالانه کلزا و متغیرهای مستقل (پارامترهای اقلیمی و شاخص‌های هواشناسی کشاورزی) در طی سال های زراعی 79-78 الی 89-88 برای هر مرحله فنولوژیکی (8 مرحله) و کل فصل رشد کلزا تعیین شد. مدل برتر با توجه به مقادیر ضریب تعیین R2 و جذر میانگین مربعات خطا (RMSE) انتخاب شد. آزمون مدل انتخابی با تخمین عملکرد کلزا برای سال های زراعی 90-89 الی 93-92 که در تعیین مدل شرکت نداشتند انجام شد. سپس ضریب تصحیح محاسبه و در نهایت مدل پیش بینی عملکرد انتخاب شد. این مدل بر اساس میانگین دمای حداکثر روزانه (Tmax) و مجموع بارش (R) در طی کل دوره رشد، عملکرد کلزا را پیش‌بینی کرد. این متغیرها 8/86 درصد تغییرات عملکرد در فصل رشد را توصیف کرده و در سطح احتمال 05/0 معنی‌دار بودند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Determining Prediction Model of the Canola) Brassica napus L.( Yields Based on Agrometeorological and Climatic Parameters in Mashhad Region of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyed javad rasooli
  • Mohammad Taghi Naseri Yazdi
  • reza ghorbani
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Environmental factors whichaffect crop yield areone of the most important factors in increasing yield.Accurate prediction of crop yield for economic management and farming systems is of particular importance.
Materials and Methods: This research was done in order to statistically model and predict the canola growth and yield in Mashhad region based on 5 agricultural meteorology indicesand 12 climatic parameters during 1999 - 2014period. The date of planting determined with regard to the optimum temperature at planting with probability of 75% based on Weibull formula. Beginning and the end of the phenological stages of canola (germination, emergence, Single leaf, rosette, stemming, flower, poddingand ripening) were calculated on the basis of growing degree days (GDD) for each set. Calculation and statistical equations was done usingMinitab Ver. 13.0, 16.Ver SPSS and Excelsoftwares. Correlation analysis,statistical models andmultivariate models were used to determine the relationship between the annual yield of canolaand independent variables, includingclimaticparameters and agricultural meteorologyindices during the growing season between 1999- 2000 and2009-2010for each phenological stage (8stages).The bestmodel was selected with respect to the values of the coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE).If the predictive power is estimated of the model RMSE values of less than 10% excellent, between 10 and 20% good, 20 to 30% average, and higher than 30% weak. The model tested by estimating the yield of canola for the 2010 to2014 years and the correction factor was calculated and the effect.
Results and Discussion: Canola planting date wascalculated for 23 September in Mashhad region. The phenology of canola was calculated based on growing degree days (GDD) above 5 ° C.Germination calculatedfor25 September, emergence in 3 October, appearance single leaf in 7 October, rosette in 6 March, stemming in 4 April, floweringin 21 April, podding in 15 May and ripening in 4 Jun. The time of the phenological stages of cereals is virtually the same time. Therefore, due to the water scarcity in the studied region -canola can be used in crop rotation. Average, the highest and the lowest yield of canola were1329.5, 2159 and 835.5 kg per hectare,respectively.Canola crop yield showed a rising trend during 1999 – 2014period due toimprovingfarming techniques and mechanization. All models are significant regression coefficients were tested normal, alignment and line.Each model in the absence of proof of any of these hypotheses was removed and the 9remaining models were compared.Model 1 predicted canola crop yield in the single leaf stagewith an average yield of canola evapotranspiration ((Mpet, absolute maximum wind speed (FFabsmax) and the sum of the vapor pressure deficit (VPD).Model 5 predicted canola yield in the floweringstage based on the absolute lowest temperature (Tabsmin), average daily wind speed (FF) and total sunshine hours (SH). Model 3 predicted canola yield in the rosette stage based on the average of daily minimum temperature (Tmin), the number of days with precipitation greater than 1 mm R (day) and total pressure loss water vapor (VPD). Model 7 predicted canola yield during the whole growing season based on the average of daily maximum temperature (Tmax) and total precipitation (R).After R2 models with higher coefficient of 1, 5, 7 and 3, respectively, with coefficients of determination 0.902, 0.902, 0.868 and 0.866 respectively.Then F and RMSE were evaluated forecasting models 1 and 7 excellent, 5 good model and version 3 was average. Model 7due to lower RMSE and the number of parameters during growing season was the most appropriate model. Model validatedby means ofrecordedcrop yieldsduring 2011 and2014 years. The simulated yieldswere 1470, 1639 and 1226 with average of 1445 kg per hectare. Error percent was 45.1, 9.3 and -7.1for the following years with an average of 15.7. RMSE was 9.4, 2.6 and 2.3 with average of 7.4. The predictive value of the model was excellent for all these years.
Conclusion: Model predicted the yield of canola based on the average maximum temperature (Tmax) and total precipitation (R)with error correction to reduce15.7. These variables described 86.8percent yield in the growing season and were significant at 5 percent. Canola planting date wascalculated for 23 September. Time phenology was germinated 25 September until ripening 4 Jun.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Agriculture climate indices
  • Canola yields
  • Mashhad
  • Multivariate models
  • Modelling
1- Alizadeh A. 1995. Applied Hydrology Perinciples. Astan Qodse Razavi Publications.
2- Allen R. G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., and Smith M. 2000. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper,No. 56,Crop Evapotranspiration (Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements), p. 215.
3- Arvaneh h., and Abbasi F. 2014. Validation and calibration of the model Aqua Crop for Brassica napus in field conditions. Journal of Iran Water Research. 14: 9-17. (in Persian with English abstract).
4- Azizi Gh., and Yarahmadi D. 2003. Evaluate the relationship between climatic parameters and yield of wheat using a regression model ( case study Silakhoor plain). Geographical Research. 29: 23-44. (in Persian with English abstract)
5- Azizi M., and Soltani A. 2008. Physiology, agronomy, breeding biology of rape. SID Mashhad. (Translation)
6- Bazgeer S., Kamali GH., and Mortazavi A. 2007. Wheat Yield Prediction throughAgrometeorological Indices for Hamedan, Iran, Biaban Journal, 12: 33-38. (in Persian with English abstract)
7- Bazgeer S. 2005. Land use Change Analysis in the Sub mountainous Region of PunjabUsing Remote Sensing, GIS, and Agro Meteorological Parameters, PHD Thesis inAgricultural Meteorology.
8- Bazgeer S., Kamali GH. A., Sedaghatkerdar A., and Moradi A. 2008. Pre-harvest wheat yield prediction using agrometeorological indices for different regions of Kordestan Province, Iran. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2: 275-280. (in Persian with English abstract)
9- Cheraghi R. 2014. The importance of cumulative growing degree days to determine the different phenological stages of canola in Khuzestan plain. Available at http://www.civilica.com/Paper-HBHEAITH01-HBHEAITH01_119.html (in Persian with English abstract)
10- Fanaei h. M., Akbari Moghaddam H., Keikha Gh. A., Narouie Rad M.R., and Modarese Najafaadi. 2007. Effect of harvest time on the yield of Brassica napus in Sistan. 22: 55-74. (in Persian with English abstract)
11- FAO. 2006. Available at http:faostat.fao.org,site,336,default.aspx. (10 Septamber 2006)
12- FAO. 2010. Food outlook, Global Market Analysis. Available at http://www.fao.Food outlook.com. 2 May 2011.
13- Faraji A. 2010. Seed Yield in Three Species of Brassica (Brassica napus L., B. rapa L., B. junceae L.): Effect of Rainfall and Photothermal Quotient in Rainfed Conditions of Gonbad. Seed and Seedling Journal of Agriculture. 2-26(4): 109-121. (in Persian with English abstract)
14- Farajzadeh M. 2002. Modeling of wheat yield according to criteria of agricultural climatology in West Azerbaijan province. MA thesis agriculture. Tehran University. (in Persian with English abstract)
15- Gilmore E.C., and Rogers J.S. 1958. Heat units as a method of measuring maturity in corn, Agtonomy Journal, 50, pp. 611-615.
16- Hodges T., and Kanemasu E. T. 1977. Modeling daily dry matter production of winter wheat, Agron, 69,pp. 974-78.
17- Honar T., Sarverestani A., Kamgarhaghighy A. A., and Shams Sh. 2012. CropSyst calibration model to predict performance and simulation of plant growth. Journal of Soil and Water (Agricultural Science and Technology). 25(3): 593-605. (in Persian with English abstract)
18- Jafari N., Esfahani M., and Sabouri A. 2011. Evaluation of nonlinear regression models to describe the rate of appearance of the three varieties of canola to temperature. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 42(4): 857- 868. (in Persian with English abstract)
19- Kafy M. 2009. Climate and crop yield. SID Mashhad. (Translation).
20- Kamali G., and Bazghir S. 2008. Prediction of meteorological parameters of wheat farming in some areas of the West. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 2: 113-121 (in Persian with English abstract)
21- Khakian D. Gh., Kamali Gh., Hajjam S., and Abrahimi A. 2011. Canola planting date with the degree of development to cope with the cold winter days in the provinceChahar Mahal and Bakhtiari. (Tehran University, Department of Irrigation Engineering. (in Persian with English abstract). Available at http://www.civilica.com/Paper-NCAGM01-NCAGM01_114.html.
22- Kramer P.J. 1997. Plant and Soil Water Relationship: A Modern Synthesis, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New Delhi, p. 296-345.
23- Labus M. P., Nielsen G., Alawrence R.L., Engeld R., and Long S. 2002. Wheat yield estimates using multi-temporal NDVI satellite imagery Int, Journal of RemoteSensing, 2002, vol 23, No 20, pp. 4169-4180.
24- Marletto V., Ventura F., Fontana G., and Tomei F. 2007. Wheat growth simulation and yield prediction withseasonal forecasts and numerical model. Agricultural and forest meteorology. 146: 85-99.
25- Meena R. P., and Dahama A. K. 2004. Crop Weather Relationship of Groundnut During Different Phenophases under Irrigated Condition of Western Rajasthan, Journal ofAgromet, 6, pp. 25-32.
26- Mirhashemi M., and Banayan Aval M. 2012. Simulation of leaf area and yield of oilseed rape under conditions of water stress in the semi-arid climate. 22-2: 392-403.(in Persian with English abstract)
27- Omidvar K., and Dstmorady S. 2013. Relationship with the elements of rape in Kermanshah province. (Industrial and Technology Graduate University for Advanced. (in Persian with English abstract). Available at http://www.civilica.com/Paper-COLIMACONF01-COLIMACONF01_031.html
28- Park S. J., and Hwang C. S. 2005. Comparison of adaptive techniques to predict crop yield response under varyingsoil and land management condition. Agricultural systems. 85: 59-81.
29- Qian B., Jong R.D., Warren R., Chipanshi A., and Hill H. 2009. Statistical Spring Wheat Yield Forecasting for the Canadian Prairie Provinces, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,149: 1022-1031.
30- Rasooli S. j., Rasool A. S., and Habibi Nowkhandan M. 2012. Canola yield prediction based on the desired temperature and phenology limiting in Khorasan provinces. Second National Conference on Advances in oil production plant origin. Islamic Azad University Bojnoord. (in Persian with English abstract)
31- Rasooli S. J., and Ghaemi A. 2010. Canola cultivation temperature on climate zoning requirements with the use of GIS in Khorasan. Electronic Journal of Crop Production. 3(1): 121-138. (in Persian with English abstract)
32- Raymer P.L. 2002. Canola: An emerging oilseed crop. p. 122–126. In: J. Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.), ASHSPress. Alexandria, VA.
33- Razavi Agriculture Organization of Khorasan. 2013. In a statistically. Agriculture Organization of Khorasan Razavi.
34- Reddy T.Y., and Reddi G.H.S. 2003. Principles of Agronomy. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, pp.48–77.
35- Rinaldy M., Losavio N., and Flagella Z. 2003. Evaluation of OILCROP-SUN model for sunflower in southern Italy. Agricultural systems. 78: 17-30
36- Sedaghatkerdar A., and Fatahi A. 2008. Early warning indicators of drought. Geography and Development, University of Sistan and Baluchestan. 11: 59-76 (in Persian with English abstract)
37- Shabani A., Kamgarhqyqy A., Sepaskhah A. R., Imam Y., and Honar T. 2009. Effects of water stress on the phenological characteristics of the plant. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences. 41: 31- 42. (in Persian with English abstract)
38- Shariati Sh., and Ghazi Shahni zade. 2009. Canola. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture, 79/16.
39- Zavare M., and Imam Y. 2000. Identification Guide to life in Canola. Journal of Crop Science. 2 (1): 1-14. (in Persian with English abstract)
40- Zomorodian A., Kavoosi Z., and Momenzadeh L. 2010. Determination of EMC isotherms and appropriate Mathematical models for canola. Food and Bioproducts Processing. In Press.
CAPTCHA Image