اثر جایگذاری کود نیتروژنه بر محتوای نیتروژن برگ و عملکرد ذرت دانه‌ای

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی همدان

چکیده

در این تحقیق، مناسب ترین روش کوددهی از منبع کود اوره (پخش سطحی کود، ریزش کود در وسط جویچه، کودکاری نواری یک طرف گیاهچه و کودکاری نواری دو طرف گیاهچه) و مقادیر آن (30، 60 و 90 کیلوگرم نیتروژن خالص از منبع کود اوره در هکتار)، بر عملکرد ذرت دانه‌ای که بصورت سرک در زمان در زمان 7 تا 9 برگه‌ شدن ذرت، به گیاه داده شد، مقایسه شدند و علاوه بر آن مقدار 90 کیلوگرم نیتروژن خالص در هکتار نیز در زمان کاشت بطور یکسان در تمام تیمارها مصرف گردید. این پژوهش به صورت طرح آزمایشی بلوک های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار و به مدت دو سال اجرا گردید. نتایج حاصل از اجرای دو سال طرح، نشان داد که روش کوددهی هیچ اختلاف معنی‌داری در سطح احتمال 1% بر روی ارتفاع بوته، ارتفاع بلال و درصد چوب بلال نداشت، اما در سطح احتمال 1% بر عملکرد خالص (عملکرد دانه با رطوبت 14%) و در سطح احتمال 5% بر وزن 1000 دانه اثر معنی‌داری داشت. همچنین اثر مقدار کود نیتروژنه نیز در سطح احتمال 1% بر صفات: ارتفاع بوته، ارتفاع بلال و درصد چوب بلال معنی‌دار نبود اما بر عملکرد خالص و وزن 1000 دانه در سطح احتمال 1% معنی‌دار بود. اثر متقابل روش– مقدار نیز در سطح احتمال 1% بر صفات ذرت و وزن 1000 دانه معنی‌دار نبود اما در سطح احتمال 5% بر عملکرد خالص ذرت دارای اختلاف معنی‌دار بود. مقایسه میانگین ها نیز نشان داد که اگر چه تیمار کودکاری در طرفین گیاهچه به میزان 90 کیلوگرم نیتروژن خالص در هکتار عملکرد ذرت را به 92/10 تن در هکتار رسانید ولی با تیمار کودکاری یک طرف گیاهچه به میزان 60 کیلوگرم که عملکرد آن 463/9 تن در هکتار بود در سطح احتمال 1% اختلاف معنی‌داری نداشت. نتایج تجزیه مقدار نیتروژن موجود در برگ گیاهان در دو سال اجرای آزمایش نشان داد که اثرروش کوددهی بر مقدار نیتروژن در برگ گیاهان معنی‌دار بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Placement on the Yield and Nitrogen Content of the Leaf in Corn

نویسندگان [English]

  • alireza yazdanpanah
  • mohammad reza bakhtiyari
Hamedan Agricultural and Natural Research and Education Center
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Corn is one of the most important agricultural products withhigh consumption different forms of usage asfood and fodder. Corn yield and its cultivation needs improvement especially in developing countries. In conventional fertilizing methods with centrifuge machines or hand fertilization, parts of the fertilizer lost through volatilization, leaching and weeds absorption. Leaf burning is also reported in this method. Fertilizer placement in bands is a method that does not show these disadvantages and improves fertilizer use efficiency for the crop. Therefore using new machines and new methods for fertilizing the crop,the cultivation area and mean of yield productioncan improved, for example the yield of corn in this research.
Material and Methods: This research was conducted in Lak Lak research farm in Asadabad district. Moldboard plowing plus disking was used for bed preparing the seeds anda 4 rows crop planter was used for planting the seeds.
For treatments conducting Combination machine that had designed in thisresearch station workshop was used. This machine was able to place Urea fertilizer with different methods (fertilizer drilling in the rills, fertilizer placement in one side and two sides of plants). The variety of corn that used for this experiment was SC704 with65000 plants in one hectareas plant density. After soil sampling nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium fertilizers and other fertilizers demands by means of soil testwere determined. Half of the nitrogen was used at planting time from source of urea and the other half was used as top dressing duringgrowth season due to treatments as follow:
90 kgha-1 nitrogen as broad costing
60 kgha-1 nitrogen as broad costing
30 kgha-1 nitrogen as broad costing
90 kgha-1 nitrogen as drilling in the rills
60 kgha-1 nitrogen as drilling in the rills
30 kgha-1 nitrogen as drilling in the rills
90 kgha-1 nitrogen as band placement in one side of the plants
60 kgha-1 nitrogen as band placement in one side of the plants
30 kgha-1 nitrogen as band placement in one side of the plants
90 kgha-1 nitrogen as band placement in two sides of the plants
60 kgha-1 nitrogen as band placement in two sides of the plants
30 kgha-1 nitrogen as band placement in two sides of the plants
The treatments were conducted through 7-9 leaf bearing stage of corn growth. After harvesting, the mean yield of each plot and other data of plant attributes were collected through growth season and leaf samples were collected for nitrogen analysis. All data were analyzed usingmeans of Duncan's test.
Result and Discussion: The results of experiment showed that, fertilizing method had no significant effect on plant height, maize height and percentage of corn cob at 1% level, but had a significant effect on corn yield at 1% level and on the weight of thousand kernels at 5% level. Also the effect of fertilizer amount on plant height, maize height and percentage of corn cob was not significant at 1% level. The interactional effect of method-amount was not significant on the corn attributes and weight of thousand kernels but was significant on the net yield of corn at 5% level. Comparison of means showed that although the treatment of fertilizer placement in two sides of plants with the amount of 90 kgha-1net nitrogen produced 10.98 tha-1corn yield but its difference with one side fertilizer placement, with the amount of 60 kgha-1 net nitrogen that produced 9.463 tha-1 corn yield, was not significant in 1% level. According to mean comparison table (table 3 and 4) it was clear that using 90 kgha-1 net nitrogen as band placement in two sides of plant row, produced the maximum yield of corn that was in the same group with 60 kgha-1 as band placement in one side of plant row. Therefore the treatment of 60 kgha-1as band placement waspreferred to othertreatments that reduces fertilizer usage and produces good amount of yield. The results of leaf analysis of corn in two years of experiment showed that the treatments effect on nitrogen concentration in corn leaf was significant.
Conclusion: Band placement of urea fertilizer from distance of 10 cm of plants and 5 cm in soil depth with amount of 60 kgha-1 as band placement in one side of plant row is recommended for corn through growth season. Band placement of urea is preferred to broadcasting method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Band placement
  • corn
  • Fertilizing method
  • Nitrogen fertilizer amount
1- Azari K. 1992. Study of nutritional needs of corn. Report of soil and water department of agricultural research center of Hamedan, Unpublished, (in Persian)
2- Benjamin J.G., Porter L.K., Duke H.R., and Ahuja L.R. 1997. Corn growth and nitrogen uptake with furrow irrigation and fertilizer bands. Agronomy Journal, 89: 609-612.
3- Cai G. X., Chen D.L., Ding H., Pacholski A., Fan X.H., and Zhu Z.L. 2002. Nitrogen Losses from Fertilizers Applied to Maize, Wheat and Rice in the North China Plain. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 63: 187–195.
4- Choudhury A.T.M.A., and Kennedy I.R. 2005. Nitrogen fertilizer losses from rice soils and control of environmental pollution problems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 36: 1625–1639.
5- Gee G.W., and Bauder J.W.C. 1986. Particle size analysis. Pp. 383-412. In Klute A., (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis: Part1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd Ed.). Soil Science Society of American Book Service, 5. Madison, WI, USA.
6- Johnston A.M., Lafond G.P., Hultgreen G.E., and Hnatowich G.L. 2001. Spring wheat and canola response to nitrogen placement with no-till band openers. Canadian journal of plant science, 81(1): 191-198.
7- Jones J. 2001. Laboratory Guide for Conducting Soil Tests and Plant Analysis. CRC Press, LLC, USA.
8- Lehrsch G.A., Sojka R.E., and Westermann D.T. 2000. Nitrogen placement, row spacing, and furrow irrigation water positioning effects on corn yield. Agronomy Journal, 92: 1266–1275.
9- Lindsay W.L., and Norvell W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 42: 421-428.
10- Mclean E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page A.L., Miller R.H., and Keeney D.R. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Soil Science Society of America Book Service, 5. Madison, WI, USA.
11- Nelson D.W.L.E., and Sommers L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. Pp. 967-1010. In: Sparks D.L., Page AL, Helmke P.A., Loeppert R.H., Soltanpour P.N., Tabatabaei M.A., Johnson C.T., and Sumner M.E. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. Soil Society of American Book Service, 5. Madison, WI, USA.
12- Rees R.M., Roelke M., Li S.X., Wang X.Q., Li S.Q., Stockdale E.A., Mc Taggart I.P., Smith K.A., and Richter J. 1997. The effect of fertilizer placement on nitrogen uptake and yield of wheat and maize in Chinese loess soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 47: 81-91.
13- Richards L.A. 1969. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. US Salinity Laboratory Staff. Agricultural Handbook, No.60, USDA, USA.
14- Vetsch J.A., and Randall G.W. 2000. Enhancing no-tillage systems for corn with starter fertilizers, row cleaners, and nitrogen placement methods. Agronomy journal, 92: 309-314.
15- Zhu Z.L., and Chen D.L. 2002. Nitrogen fertilizer use in China– contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 63:117–127.
CAPTCHA Image