ارزیابی پاسخ ژنوتیپ‌های جو (Hordum vulgare) دیم به مقادیر و زمان‌های مصرف نیتروژن

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسنده

موسسه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مراغه

چکیده

نیتروژن پس از آب دومین عامل محدودکننده رشد گیاهان در شرایط دیم بشمار می‌آید، لذا برای تولید اقتصادی جو در این مناطق، استفاده مناسب از آنبسیار ضروری است. به‌منظور ارزیابی پاسخ ژنوتیپ‌های جو دیم به مصرف نیتروژن، پژوهشی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی به صورت کرت‌های دوبار خردشده با زمان مصرف نیتروژن در کرت‌های اصلی (کل نیتروژن درپائیز، در پائیز + در بهار و در پائیز + در بهار)، مقادیر نیتروژن (صفر، 30، 60، 90 و 120 کیلوگرم در هکتار) در کرت‌های فرعی و ژنوتیپ‌های جو (سهند، آبیدر، Dayton/Ranny، Alpha/Gumhuriyet/Sonja و B-C-74-2) در کرت‌های فرعی در فرعی در 4 بلوک و به مدت 3 سال زراعی (89-86) در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم به اجرا درآمد. نتایج نشان داد، مصرف نیتروژن از طریق افزایش معنی‌دار (01/0P≤) تعداد سنبله در واحد سطح (243-112) و ارتفاع بوته (6/17-3/6 سانتی‌متر) به عنوان سطح اندام‌های فتوسنتزکننده گیاه، طول (2/0-1 سانتی‌متر بر بوته) و وزن (2/0-1/0 گرم بر بوته) ریشه در مرحله پنجه‌زنی گیاه و کارایی استفاده از آب (5/2-3/1 کیلوگرم در هکتار بر میلی‌متر) باعث افزایش معنی‌دار عملکرد دانه، بیولوژیک و کاه (01/0P≤) شد. نیاز نیتروژنی جو در شرایط خشکسالی حدود 40 کیلوگرم در هکتار و در سال‌های نرمال 43 کیلوگرم در هکتار در منطقه مورد مطالعه تعیین شد که این مقادیر به ترتیب برای دستیابی به عملکردهای دانه 1784 و 3100 کیلوگرم در هکتار می‌باشد. در سال‌های نرمال 30 کیلوگرم در هکتار آن در پائیز و 13 کیلوگرم در هکتار به صورت سرک همرا بارندگی‌های اوایل بهار مصرف می‌شود. در نهایت، اثر بارندگی در افزایش عملکرد دانه جو دیم 1/2 برابر بیشتر از مصرف نیتروژن بود و این موضوع اهمیت بیشتر آب را نسبت به نیتروژن در دیمزارهای ایران به اثبات می‌رساند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Dryland Barley (Hordum vulgare) Genotypes Response to the Nitrogen Rates and Application Times

نویسنده [English]

  • vali feiziasl
Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Maragheh
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Nitrogen is the main component of fertilizer programs necessary for production of high quantity dryland barley. This element is the second limiting factor, after water in dryland areas. So for economic production of barley, the proper nitrogen fertilizer application is essential to increase seed quantity and quality in Iran dryland areas. Many researchers have been confirmed that dryland barley yield increased by nitrogen application management. Nitrogen fertilization in dryland areas can increase the use of soil moisture, and improve barley yields to some extent. Different studies have been confirmed interactions between water stress and nitrogen fertilizers on barley, especially under field conditions. From the nitrogen management factors, timing and amount of nitrogen application is known as the most important aspect. This project established in order to study nitrogen rates and nitrogen application time's effects on nitrogen requirement, nitrogen agronomy use efficiency (NUE) and crop characteristics of various dryland barley genotypes in cold and semi cold drylands of Iran.
Materials and Methods: This study was carried out in split-split plot in a RCBD in Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI), Maragheh; where nitrogen application times (fall, 1/2 in fall and 1/2 in spring and 2/3 in fall and 1/3 in spring) were assigned to the main plots, nitrogen rates to sub plot (0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 kg/ha), and 5 dryland barley genotypes to sub-sub plots (Sahand, Abidar, Dayton/Ranny, Alpha/ Gumhuriyet/ Sonja and B-C-74-2)in 4 replications during 2007-2010 years. The Rainfall were 177-498 mm.yr-1 (long term mean is 365 mm.yr-1) in cropping years in DARI station. Soil samples were collected from 0-25 cm for determining total N, P-Olsen, K-Ammonium acetate, TNV, OC, Soil texture, pH, EC and Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu-DTPA before sowing and collected from 0-2, 20-40 and 40-60 cm depths in sub-sub plots in shooting stage (GS32) for determining NO3− andNH4+. Ammonium measurement in the soil KCl extracts were down by spectrophotometry method and colorimetric reaction at 655 nm. Also, Absorption spectrophotometry method was used for determination of nitrate in soil extract based on its UV absorbance at 210 nm. In this method two measurements were carried out; one before (by Zn coated by Cu) and second after reduction of nitrate). Using the difference between these two measurements, concentration of nitrate in the extracts was determined.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that nitrogen application rates significantly increased (p

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Nitrogen Requirement
  • Nitrogen use efficiency
  • rainfall
1- Abeledo L.G., Calderini D.F., and Slafer G.L. 2008. Nitrogen economy in old and modern malting barleys. Field Crops Research, 106:171–178.
2- Ahmed M., Aslam M.A., Ul-Hassan F., Asif M., and Hayat R. 2014. Use of APSIM to model nitrogen use efficiency of rain-fed wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 16(3): 461-470.
3- Ali Ehyaei M., and Behbahani Zadeh A.A. 1993. Study of soil chemical analysis. Technical Soil and Water Research Institute, 893. (in Persian).
4- Ali E.A. 2011. Impact of nitrogen application time on grain and protein yields as well as nitrogen use efficiency of some two-row barley cultivars in sandy soil. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 10: 425-433.
5- Angas P., Lampurlanes J., and Cantero-Martinez C. 2006. Tillage and N fertilization effects on N dynamics and barley yield under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Soil and Tillage Research, 87: 59–71.
6- Angus J.F., and Moncur M.W. 1985. Models of growth and development of wheat in relation to plant nitrogen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 36: 537-544.
7- Arregui L.M. and Quemada M. 2008. Strategies to improve nitrogen use efficiency in winter cereal crops under rain fed conditions. Agronomy Journal, 100: 277-284.
8- Asfary F., and Charanek A. 1997. Nitrogen fertilizer – use efficiency. Studies by Syrian atomic energy commission using N–labelled fertilizers. p. 64-70. In: J. Ryan (ed.). Accomplishments and future challenges in dryland soil fertility research in the Mediterranean area. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.
9- Austin R.B., Cantero-Martinez C., Arrúe Ugarte J.L., Playan Jubillar E., and Cano-Marcellan P. 1998. Yield–rainfall relationships in cereal cropping systems in the Ebro river valley of Spain. European Journal of Agronomy, 8(3-4): 239–248.
10- Ayadi S., Karmous C., Hammami Z., Trifa Y., and Rezgui S. 2014. Variation of durum wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency under Mediterranean rainfed environment. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 7 (10): 693-699.
11- Aynehband A., Asadi S., and RahnamaA. 2014. Nitrogen use efficiency assessment under Intra- and inter-specific competitions stress. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding, 4(2): 9-21.
12- Board NIIR. 2006. Wheat, rice, corn, oat, barley and sorghum processing handbook (Cereal Food Technology). Asia Pacific Business Press Inc, 464 pp.
13- Cantero-Martinez C., Angas P., and Lampurlanes J. 2003. Growth, yield and water productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare, L.) affected by tillage and N fertilization in Mediterranean semiarid, rainfed conditions of Spain. Field Crops Research, 84: 342-357.
14- Cossani C.M., Slaferand G.A.,and Savin R. 2012. Nitrogen and water use efficiencies of wheat and barley under a Mediterranean environment in Catalonia. Field Crops Research, 128: 109–118.
15- de Ruiter J.M., and Brooking I.R. 1994. Nitrogen and dry matter partitioning of barley grown in a dryland environment. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 22: 45-55.
16- de Ruiter J.M., Brooking I.R., Haslemore R.M., and Carran R.A. 1988. A survey of the variability in yield and quality of malting barley in the Rangitikei region. Proceedings of the AgronomySociety New Zealand, 18: 11-21.
17- Deniz B., Kavurmaci Z., and Topal M. 2009. Determination of ontogenetic selection criteria for grain yield in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) by path-coefficient analysis. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8: 2616-2622.
18- Ercoli L., LulliL., Mariotti M., Masoni A., and Arduini I. 2008. Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen dynamics in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen supply and soil water availability. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 138–147.
19- Eskandar I., and Mahmoodi H. 2001. Effect of fertilizer placement on wheat yield in dryland. Seed and Plant, 17(2):203-215.
20- Eyshi Rezaei E. and BabbayanM.. 2011. Rainfed cereals response to interseasonal rainfall variability in semiarid regions of Khorasan. Pro-Environment, 4: 238 – 244.
21- Fageria N.K., Baligar V.C., and Jones C.A. 2011. Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops. Marcel Dekker, Inc. 550 pp.
22- Fatima M. and Farihane H. 1991. Nitrogen of cereals: Soil-plant system nitrogen dynamics, fertilizer use efficiency under rain-fed agriculture in West Asia and North Africa: Proceedings of the Fourth Regional Workshop, 5-10 May 1991, Agadir, Morocco, pages 201-210.
23- Feiziasl V. 2007. Study on the effects of different sources and rates of soil nitrogen on quality and quantities of dryland wheat. Dryland Agriculture Research Institute (DARI). Issue No., 317. (in Persian).
24- Feiziasl V., and Pourmohammad A. 2014. Effects of nitrogen rates and application time on agronomic efficiency of nitrogen and seed yield of drylandʼs wheat genotypes. Soil and Water Science, 24(3):93-104. (in Persian).
25- Feiziasl V., Fotovat A., Astarae A.R., Lakzian A., and Mousavi S.B. 2014. Effect of optimized nitrogen application in reducing drought stress effect on grain yield of some rainfed bread wheat genotypes, 30(2):169-198. (in Persian).
26- Feiziasl V., Kasraei R., Moghaddam M., and Valizadeh G. 2004. Investigation on uptake limitation and nutrient deficiency diagnosis at applied phosphorus and zinc fertilizers by different methods in Sardari wheat, Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 11: 23-33. (in Persian).
27- Feiziasl V. 2014. Nitrogen optimum management for different dryland wheat genotypes using 15N. P.h.D. Thesis of Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian).
28- Fensholt R., RasmussenK., Kaspersen P., Huber S., Horion S., and Swinnen E. 2013. Assessing land degradation/recovery in the African Sahel from long-term earth observation based primary productivity and precipitation relationships. Remote Sensing, 5: 664–686.
29- Gregory P.J., Marshall B., and Biscoe P.V. 1981. Nutrient relations of winter wheat 3. Nitrogen uptake, photosynthesis of flag leaves and translocation of nitrogen to grain. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 96: 539-547.
30- Halvorson A.D., and Reule C.A. 1994. Nitrogen fertilizer requirement in an annual dryland cropping system. Agronomy Journal, 86(2): 315–318.
31- Halvorson A.D., and Reule C.A. 2007. Irrigated, no-till corn and barley response to nitrogen in northern Colorado. Agronmy Journal, 99:1521–1529.
32- HGCA. 2007. Recommended lists for cereals and oilseeds, 2007/08. HGCA, London.
33- Hu Z.M., Yu G.R., Fan J.W., Zhong H.P., Wang S.Q., and Li S.G. 2010. Precipitation-use efficiency along a 4500-km grassland transect. Global Ecol. Biogeogr, 19: 842–851.
34- Huxman T.E., Smith M.D., Fay P.A., Knapp A.K., Shaw M.R., Loik M.E., Smith S.D., Tissue D.T., Zak J.C., and Weltzin J.F. 2004. Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature, 429: 651–654.
35- Jackson G.D. 2000. Nitrogen Fertilization of dryland malt barley for yield and quality. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 5: 79-86.
36- Jones C.A., Koenig R.T., Ellsworth J.W., Brown B.D.,and Jackson G.D. 2007. Management of urea fertilizer to minimize volatilization. Extension Publication EB 173, Montana State University.
37- Jouyban A., Sadeghi Give H., Noryanand M. 2015. Relationship between agronomic and morphological traits in barley varieties under drought stress condition. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 9(9): 1507-1511.
38- Kara B., and Mujdeci M. 2010. Influence of late-season nitrogen application on chlorophyll content and leaf area index in wheat. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(16): 2299-2303.
39- Katerji N., Mastrorilli M., and Rana G. 2008. Water use efficiency of crops cultivated in the Mediterranean region: review and analysis. European Journal of Agronomy, 28: 493–507.
40- Kucey R.M.N. 1987. Nitrogen fertilizer application practices for barley production under Southwestern Canadian Prairie conditions. Communications in Soil Science and Plant, 26(17/18): 3023-3032.
41- Lauer J.G., and Partridge J.R. 1990. Planting date and nitrogen rate effects on spring malting barley. Agronomy Journal, 82: 1083- 1088.
42- McKenzie R.H., Middleton A.B., and Bremer E. 2005. Fertilization, seeding date, and seeding rate for malting barley yield and quality in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal ofPlant Science, 85: 603-614.
43- McKenzie R.M., and Jackson G. 2005. Barley production in semiarid regions—making the malting grade. Better Crops, 89(4): 10-12.
44- McVay K.A., Burrows M., Jones C., Wanner K., and Menalled F. 2009. Montana barley production guide. EB0186. Montana State University, 17 pages.
45- Mengistu D.K. and Abera F.A. 2014. Growth and yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as affected by nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization and water regimes in Tigray, Ethiopia. Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science (MEJS), 6(1):45-57.
46- Miranzadeh H., Emam Y., Pilesjö P., and Seyyedi H. 2011. Water use efficiency of four dryland wheat cultivars under different levels of nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 13: 843-854.
47- Mousavi Shalmani M. 2008. Use of 15N isotope in soil fertility and plant nutrition (1 ed.). Iran: Nuclear Science & Technology Research Institute P. 394.
48- Moshiri F., Shahabi A.A., Keshavarz P., Tehrani M.M., Khogar Z. Feiziasl V., Gheibi M.N. Asadi Rahmani H., and Saadat D. 2014. Guideline for integrated soil fertility and plant nutrition management of barley. Soil and Water Research Institute. (in Persian).
49- Muni A.T. 2002. Influence of varying seeding rates and nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Rum) in the semi-arid region of Jordan. Die Bodenkultur, 53 (1): 13-18.
50- Niazi-Fard A., Nouri F., Nouri A., Yoosefi B., Moradi A., and Zareei A. 2012. Investigation of the relationship between grain yield and yield components under normal and terminal drought stress conditions in advanced barley lines (Hordeum vulgar) using path analysis in Kermanshah province. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4(24): 1885-1887.
51- Paliwal A.K., Kandalkar V.S., Paraye P.M., and Thakur S.K. 1994. Effect of planting pattern and herbicide on weed growth, grain yield and yield attributes of transplanted bounded rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 64(6): 369-372.
52- Rasmussen P.E., Rickman R.W., and Klepper B.L. 1997. Residue and fertility effects on yield of no-till wheat. Agrononomy Journal, 89:563–67.
53- Ryan J., Abdel Monem M., and Amri A. 2009. Nitrogen fertilizer response of some barley varieties in semi-arid conditions in Morocco. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 11: 227-236.
54- Sadras V.O., and McDonald G. 2012. Water use efficiency of grain crops in Australia: principles, benchmarks and management. Grains Research and Development Corporation. 27 pp.
55- Sainju U.M., Lenssen A.W., and Barsotti J.L. 2013. Dryland malt barley yield and quality affected by tillage, cropping sequence, and nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy, Soils and Environmental Quality, 105(2): 329-340.
56- Segele Z.T., and Lamb P.J. 2005. Characterization and variability of Kiremt rainy season over Ethiopia. Meteorol. Atmospheric Physics, 89: 153–180.
57- Setotaw T.A., Belayneh S.G., Gwinner R., and Ferreira J.L. 2014. Developing selection criteria based on an ontogenetic path analysis approach to improve grain yield in barley. Genetics and Molecular Research, 13(2): 4635-4646.
58- Shangguan Z.P., Shao M.A., Ren S.J., Zhang L.M., and Xue Q. 2004. Effect of nitrogen on root and shoot relations and gas exchange in winter wheat. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 45: 49-54.
59- Sinebo W., Gretzmacher R., and Edelbauer A. 2003. Environment of selection for grain yield in low fertilizer input barley. Field Crops Research, 74(3-4): 151-162.
60- Svoboda P., and Haberle J. 2006. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on root distribution of winter wheat. Plant Soil Environ, 5(7): 308–313.
61- Taleei A.A. 2005. Evaluation of Sararood1dryland barley variety responses to supplemental irrigation and nitrogen. Dryland Agriculture Research Institute (DARI). Pages 1.
62- Turner N.C. 2004. Agronomic options for improving rainfall-use efficiency of crops in dryland farming systems. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(407): 2413–2425.
63- Van Harwaarden A.F., Farquhar G.D., Angus J.F., and Richards R.A. 2006. Physiological responses of six spring wheat varieties to nitrogen fertilizer (project report). Proceeding of the Australian Agronomy Conference, Australian Society of Agronomy.
64- Yesmin Sh., Akhtar M.,and Hossain B. 2014. Yield and seed quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as affected by variety, nitrogen level and harvesting time. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 7(3): 147-153.
65- Zahedi Ghare Aghaj M., and Ghavidel Rahimi Y. 2007. The determination of drought and computation of dependable rainfall rate for station of Urmia lake drainage basin. Geographical Research Quarterly, 39(59): 21-34. (in Persian).
CAPTCHA Image