یک روش ساده فیزیکی خالص‌سازی سپیولیت

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

2 فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

سپیولیت یک کانی رسی فیبری است که معمولا در رسوبات دوران سوم یافت می‌شود. این کانی در صنایع مورد استفاده قرار می‌گیرد، اما وجود برخی ناخالصی‌های رسی و غیررسی که عمده آن پالیگورسکیت، کوارتز و دولومیت است، باعث کاهش کیفیت سپیولیت می‌شود. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی قابلیت کارایی خالص‌سازی فیزیکی مبتنی بر تفکیک اندازه ذرات بر اساس ته‌نشینی در سوسپانسیون، بدون استفاده از روش‌های شیمیایی بر میزان خالص‌سازی سپیولیت استخراجی از معدن الیاتو فریمان بود. سه گروه ذرات 20 تا 50، صفر تا 20 و کمتر از 2 میکرون جدا شدند. کارایی خالص-سازی با این روش با استفاده از آنالیز پراش پرتو ایکس مشخص شد. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که استفاده از روش جداسازی اندازه ذرات، می‌تواند تأثیر زیادی در کاهش مقدار کوارتز در ذرات جدا شده و نیز حذف کامل دولومیت در ذرات کمتر از 2 میکرون و حذف پالیگورسکیت به طور کامل در ذرات 50-20 میکرون داشته باشد. نتیجه این پژوهش نشان داد که بدون استفاده از روش‌های شیمیایی و با استفاده از روش فیزیکی ساده و کم هزینه، می-توان فرآیند خالص‌سازی سپیولیت را تا حد مناسبی انجام داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Simple Physical Method for Purification of Sepiolite

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdiyeh Momen 1
  • Ali reza Karimi 2
  • Akram Halajnia 1
  • Parisa Mirhoseini Moosavi 1
1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 ferdowsi university of mashhad
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Sepiolite is a fibrous clay mineral which is usually found in Tertiary sediments in arid environments. The most abundance of sepiolite is between 30⁰ to 40⁰ latitudes of both northern and southern hemispheres. Sepiolite is an Mg-rich clay minerals which is very sensitive to weathering. Sepiolite is an industrial mineral with a variety of applications due to its structural and chemical properties. However, the clay (e.g. palygorskite and smectite) and no-clay (e.g. dolomite and quartz) impurities reduce the quality of sepiolite. Therefore, removing the impurities enhances the quality of the main clay mineral. Mineral purification consists of a series of chemical (e.g. acid treatment) and physical (e.g. particle size fractionation, sieving, ultrasonic treatment) procedures. There is a sepiolite mine in the northeastern Iran, near the city of Fariman. The sepiolite is a sensitive clay to weathering, especially in acidic solution. Therefore, the objective of this study was to propose a simple physical method based on particle size fractionation to purify the sepiolite.
Material and Methods: Sepiolite mine is located around Elyator, a village near the city of Fariman. The relatively hard sepiolite samples were grinded and passed through a 2 mm sieve. To determine the mineralogical composition, the powdered samples were analyzed by X-ray diffractometer (model: Explorer). XRF spectroscopy (model: PHILIPS-PW148) was used to identify the elemental composition. Pipette method was used to separate the particle size fractions. Firstly, the samples were passed through a 270 mesh (50 µm) sieve. The 0-50 µm fraction was then transferred to the cylinder containing dispersion solution (0.1% sodium carbonate and sodium hexametaphosphate solution). Based on the settling time of the particles in the suspension, three classes of particle size of 20-50, 0-20 and 50 µm size (sand size) were about 20 % and those with less than 2 µm size (clay size) consisted 37 % of the sample. Silt size particles (2-50 µm) were about 43 % of the sample. The XRD diffractograms indicated that particle size fractionation considerably decreased the amount of quartz. Dolomite peaks were completely absent in the diffractogram of the < 2 µm fraction. Furthermore, the peaks of palygorskite were not present in diffractogram of 20-50 µm. The intensity of sepiolite peaks considerably increased and the intensities of the other minerals decreased in relation to bulk samples. This confirmed that the most impurities were in the fraction > 50 µm. The ratios of the sepiolite indicator peak to the dolomite, palygorskite and quartz indicator peaks in bulk sample were 5.11, 7.28 and 2.82. This ratio was very high for dolomite in < 2 µm fraction and for palygorskite in 20-50 µm fraction. A purification procedure should be both efficient and economic. The 0-20 µm fraction composed about 70 % the particles. The separation time for this fraction is also pretty fast. Therefore, 0-20 µm particles seem to be economically purified. Based on the conventional measurement method for carbonates (HCl digestion and NaOH titration method), the calcium carbonate equivalent in < 2 µm fraction was calculated to be about 10 % despite removal of dolomite in this fraction. This illustrates that HCl dissolved the sepiolite. However, if removal of dolomite from coarser fraction by HCl is needed, it should be applied in the solution with high amount of Mg to prevent sepiolite dissolution.
Conclusion: Dolomite, palygorskite and quartz were the impurities in Fariman sepiolite. There is no chemical treatment to remove the quartz and palygorskite. Dolomite can be easily removed using HCl, but it dissociates the sepiolite, too. The result indicated that particle size fractionation as a simple physical method purifies sepiolite effectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Fariman sepiolite
  • dolomite
  • Particle size fractionation
  • purification
1- Akbulut A., and Kadir S. 2003. The geology and origin of sepiolite, palygorskite and saponite in Neogene lacustrine sediments of the Serinhisar- Acipayam Basin, Denizli, SW Turkey, Clays and Clay Minerals, 51: 279-292.
2- Cetisli H., and Gedikbey T. 1990. Dissolution kinetics of sepiolite from Eskisehir (Turkey) in hydrochloric and nitric acids, Clay Minerals, 25: 207-215.
3- Corma A., Mifsud A., and Perez J. 1986. Etude cinetique de l’attaque deide de la sepiolite: Modifications des proprieties texturales, Clay Minerals, 31: 69-84.
4- Galan E. 1996. Properties and applications of palygorskite-sepiolite clays, Clays and Clay Minerals, 31: 443-453.
5- Gonzalez-Hernandez L., Ibarra-Ruoda L., Rodriguez-Dias A., and Chamorro-Anton C. 1986. Preparation of amorphous silica by acid dissolution of sepiolite kinetics and textural study, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 109: 150-160.
6- Ha Thuc Grillet A.C., Reinert L., Ohashi F., Ha Thuc H., and Duclaux L. 2010. Separation and purification of montmorillonite and polyethylene oxide modified montmorillonite from Vietnamese bentonites, Applied Clay Science, 220- 238.
7- Hojati S., and Khademi H. 2011. Genesis and distribution of palygorskite in Iranian soils and sediments. In: Galan E. and Singer A. (Eds.). Developments in Palygorskite-Sepiolite Research: A New Look at These Nanomaterials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, PP. 201-218.
8- Hojati S. 2011. Distribution patterns, genesis and stability of fibrous clay minerals in selected soils associated Tertiary sediments in Central Iran and Zagros regions. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Soil Science, Isfahan University of Technology. (In Persian with English abstract)
9- Hojati S., and Khademi H. 2012. Physicochemical and mineralogical characteristics of sepiolite deposits of Northeastern Iran, Scientific Quarterly Journal Geosciences, 165- 174: 23. (In Persian with English abstract)
10- Inukai K., Miyawaki R., Tomura S., Shimosaka K., and Irkec T. 1994. Purification of Turkish sepiolite through hydrochloric acid treatment, Applied Clay Science, 9: 11-29.
11- Jacqueline Arroyo L., Teppen B.J., and Boyd S. 2005. A simple method for partial purification of references clays, Clays and Clay Mineral, 53: 512- 520.
12- James O.O., Adediran Mesubi M., Adekola A., Odebunmi O., and Adekeye J.I.D. 2008. Beneficiation and characterization of a bentonite from north-eastern Nigeria, Journal of the North Carolina Academy of Science, 124: 154-158.
13- Khademi H., and Mermut A.R. 1998. Source of palygorskite in gypsiferous Aridisols and associated sediments from central Iran, Clay Minerals, 33: 561-578.
14- Klute A. 1986. Methodes of soils Analysis. Part 1, Physical and mineralogical methods, Soil Science Society of America Book Series Number 5, Madison, WI.
15- Liu X., Lu X., Qiu J., Wang Zh., and Wu P. 2012. Purification of low grade Ca-bentonite for Iron ore pellets, Advanced Material Research, 454: 237-241.
16- Marroquin-Cardona A., Deng Y., Garcia-Mazcorro J.F., Johnson N.M., Mitchell N.J., Tang L., Robinson A., Taylor J.F., Wang J.S., and Philips T.D. 2011. Characterization and safety of uniform particle size NovaSil clay as a potential aflatoxin entersorbent, Applied Clay Science, 54: 248-257.
17- Mirhosseini Moosavi P., Astaraei A., Karimi A., and Karimi Gh. 2014. Identification and purification of montmorillonite mineral of Ghaen mine bentonite, Journal of Water and Soil, 987-997. (In Persian with English abstract)
18- Murray H.H. 2007. Applied Clay Mineralogy: Occurrence, processing and application of kaolins, bentonites, palygorskite-sepiolite, and common clays, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 180 p.
19- Singer A. 1989. Palygorskite and sepiolite group minerals. In: Dixon J.B. and Weed S.B. (Eds.), Minerals in Soil Environments, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, PP. 829-872.
20- Singer A., Kristen W., and Bühmann C. 1995. Fibrous clay minerals in the soils of Namaqualand, South Africa: characteristics and formation,Geoderma, 66: 43-70.
21- Singer A., Stahr K., and Zarei M. 1998. Characteristics and origin of sepiolite (Meerschaum) from Central Somalia, Clay Minerals, 33: 349-362.
22- Singer A. 2002. Palygorskite and sepiolite. In: Dixon J.B. and Schulze D.G. (Eds.), Soil mineralogy with environmental applications, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, PP. 555-583.
23- Viseras C., and Lopez- Galindo A. 1998. Pharmaceutical applications of some Spanish clays (Sepiolite, palygorskite, bentonite): some reformulation studies, Applied Clay Science, 14: 69- 82.
24- Yalcin H., and Bozkaya O. 1995. Sepiolite-palygorskite from the Hekimhan region (Turkey), Clays and Clay Minerals, 43: 705-717.
25- Zhou F., Yan Ch., Yan Zh., Tan J., Wang H., Zhou S., and Pu S. 2016. Applied Clay Science: Purification and defibering of a Chinese sepiolite, Elsevier, 124- 125: 119- 126.
CAPTCHA Image