اثر نوسان ها و شوری آب زیرسطحی بر اشکال مختلف آهن در برخی از خاک‌های خوزستان

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• مصطفی پژوهان نیا ¹
• مصطفی چرم ¹
• سیروس جعفری ²

¹ دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

² دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v0i0.35151

چکیده

اشکال آهن و نسبت آن‌ها در خاک می‌تواند درجه تکاملی خاک‌ها را نشان دهد. هدف از این تحقیق، تعیین همبستگی بین شوری و سطح آب زیرسطحی بر تکامل خاک و اثرات زهکشی بر تشکیل این فرایندها در شرایط خاک‌های شور و غیرشور است. برای این منظور 12 خاک رخ و 6 مته در مناطق حاشیه جنوبی شوش و عبدالخان در استان خوزستان حفر گردید. خصوصیات فیزیکوشیمیایی خاک و اشکال آهن خاک به دو روش دیتیونایت سدیم (Fed) و اگزالات آمونیوم (Feo) عصاره گیری و اندازه گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که نسبت آهن اگزالات به آهن دیتیونایتی در این خاک‌ها تحت تأثیر شوری، بافت خاک، مواد آلی،کشت وکار، سطح آب زیرسطحی متفاوت است. شوری برخی از خاکرخ‌ها سبب شده که ریزجانداران مؤثر بر فرایند اکسایش و احیا امکان فعالیت نداشته باشند. بین مقدار شوری آب و Fec و مقدار شوری آب وFeo همبستگی مثبتی ملاحظه شد ((R2=0.85. در مناطق شور، تجمع آهن بیشتر به صورت بی شکل و در منطقه غیرشور به شکل بلوری بود. این امر نشان دهنده شرایط مناسب برای تشکیل آهن بلوری در منطقه غیرشور است. با افزایش مقدار رس و قدمت کشت و کار، مقدار آهن بلوری هم بیشتر شد. نتایج نشان داد افزایش یون هایSO42- و –Cl در خاک ها، باعث واکنش این یون ها به آهن شده و مانع از تشکیل آهن بلوری می شود و آهن بیشتر به ‌صورت بی شکل رسوب نموده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• آب زیرسطحی
• آهن بلوری
• شوری و رنگدانه

20.1001.1.20084757.1395.30.5.16.4

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Water Table Fluctuation and its Salinity on Fe Crystal and Noncrystal in some Khuzestan Soils

نویسندگان [English]

• mostafa Pajohannia ¹
• Mostafa Chorom ¹
• Siroos Jafari ²

¹ Shahid Chamran University of Ahwaz

² Ramin agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Iron is found in different forms in the soil. In the primary minerals, iron is found as Fe3+ or Fe2+ which converted to Fe2+ and released in unsuitable reduction conditions. Minerals such as sulfide or chlorine and bicarbonate can affect and change the different forms soil Fe. FeAs these elements are abundance in groundwater or soil, they are capable to react chemically with Fe and change different Fe forms and also may deposit or even leach them by increasing its solubility in the soil. Water table fluctuation is a regular phenomenon in Khuzestan that Fe forms change under these situations. The study of Fe oxide forms and its changes can be applied for evaluation of soil development. Therefore, the aim of this study is the water table fluctuation and its quality effects, and some physio-chemical properties on Fe oxides forms in non-saline and saline soils in Khuzestan.
Materials and Methods: Soil samples were collected from two regions: saline (Abdolkhan) and non-saline (South Susa) regions. soil samples were collected from all horizons of 12 soil field studied profiles . The samples were analyzed for soil texture, pH, EC (soil: water ratio 1:5), organic carbon and aggregate stability (Kemper and Rosenau method). Fe forms also were extracted by two methods in all samples: di-tyonite sodium and ammonium oxalate extraction. Fe oxalate extracted was related to Feo (non crystal Fe) and Fed-Feo was related to Fec (crystalline Fe). The Fe content were determined by atomic absorbtion spectrophotometer (AAS). Data were analysis in SAS and Excel software and results were presented.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that texture were loamy sand to silty clay loam, OM was very poor (0.1-0.7%). The soil salinity was also 2.8-16.8 dS/m. Calcium carbonate equivalent was 38-40%. All pedons were classified in Entisols and Inceptisols according to Keys to soil taxonomy (2010). The results showed that the proportion of Fe with oxalate to di-tionite treatments was different regarding the salinity, texture, organic matters, cultivation and the water table fluctuation. The total Fe content in the middle layers had permanently increased due to the groundwater fluctuation levels and this caused the creation of mottle in this layer. All saline soils had saline subsurface water. The salinity has caused that the effective microorganisms have not been actived on the reduction processes in some profiles and the Fe deposit more in the Fe3+forms. The Fe was found more in non-crystal form in saline regions, but it was in the crystal form in non-saline regions which indicated the suitable conditions for Fe’s nodule formation. For example, when soil salinity decreased from 14.9 to 8.1 dS/m, Fec increased from 460.1 to 497.8 mg/kg soil. With increasing the amount of clay, and cultivation periods, the Fed content has also been increased. The Feo/ Fec ratio in undevelopted soils was higher than developed soils. This ratio was low in non-saline soil and was high for saline soil. this indicates that non-saline soil had more development than saline soils. The maximum amount (1.6) was belonged to saline soil and minimum was for no saline soils. With increasing in soil age, tillage periods and clay content this ratio was decreased., statistical analysis Also showed that there was significant difference between Fec and Feo in saline and no saline soils. Also, with increasing in salinity, Fec content decreased and Feo increased. aggregate stability was also increased with increasing Fec content.
Conclusions: The Feo content was more in surface of saline soil than subsurface when pedon was ponded and saturated from surface. Feo was very higher in saline soils than no saline soils. Fec had not significant difference between saline and nonsaline soils. Salinity decreased Fec and increased Feo content in soils. Feo/Fec ratio of saline soils was 4 to 5 times fold of non-saline soils. Increasing Feo/Fec ratio in saline soils and decreasing in this ratio in nonsaline soil showed that nonsaline soils had more development than saline soils. Organic matter was more effective in Feo and Fec contents in nonsaline soil than saline soils. Also, Fec content increased with increasing clay content in all horizons that this shows that mottling and more Fe concentration in nonsaline soils.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Fe Crystal
• Mottle, Salinity
• Subsurface Water

مراجع

1- Akef M., Mahmoodi S., Eghbal K.M., and Sarmadian F. 2003. Studying the changes of physicochemical and micro morphological characteristics of soils in converted natural forests to paddy soils in Fouman at region in Guilan province. Iran Natural Resources, 56(4): 407-423.(in Persian with English abstract)

2- Barthes B., Kouakoua E., Larre-Larrouy M.C., Razafimbelo T., De Luca E., and Azontonde, A. 2008. Texture and sesquioxide effects on water-stable aggregates and organic matter in some tropical soils. Geoderma, 143: 14-25.

3- Bouyoucos G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54: 464-465.

4- Costantini E.A.C., Pellegrini S., Vignozzi N., and Barbetti R. 2006. Micromorphological characterization and monitoring of internal drainage in soils of vineyard and olive groves in central Italy. Geoderma, 131: 388-403.

5- Fanning D.S., and Fanning M.C.B. 1989. Soil morphology, genesis and classification. John Wiley and Sons, P: 110-125.

6- Cornell R. M., and Schwertmann U. 2003. The iron oxides: Structure, Properties, Reaction, Occurrence and uses. 2nd Ed. VCH, Weinheim, Germany.

7- Gotic M., and Music S. 2007. Mossbauer, FT-IR and Fe SEM investigation of iron oxides precipitated from FeSO4 solutions. Journal of Molecular Structure, 834–836.

8- He Y., Vepraskas M.J. Lindbo D.L., and Skaggs R.W. 2003. A method to predict soil saturation frequency and duration from soil color. Soil Science Society American Journal, 67: 961-969.

9- Hassannezhad H., Pashaee A., Khormali F., and Mohammadian, M. 2008.Morphology and micromorphology of paddy soils under different soil moisture regime and ground water table in Mazandaran Province, Northern Iran. International Journal Soil Science, 3(3): 149-156. (in Persian with English abstract)

10- Huang L., Hong J. Tan W., Hu H., Liu F., and Wang M. 2008. Characteristics of micromorphology and element distribution of iron-manganese cutan in typical soils of central china. Geoderma, 146:40-47.

11- Jackson M.L. 1975. Soil chemical analysis advanced course. University of Wisconsin, College of Agriculture. Dept. of Soils, Madison, Wisconsin.

12- Jien S.H., Hsue Z.Y., and Chen Z.S. 2004. Relations between morphological color index and soil wetness condition of anthrax aquic soils in Taiwan. Soil Science, 169:871-882.

13- Kemper W.D., and Rosenau K. 1986. Size distribution of aggregates. P. 425- 442.In Klute, A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. USA, Madison, Wisconsin.

14- Lair G.J., Hrachowitz M., Franz N., Maringer F.J., and Gerzabek M.H. 2009. Datingof soil layers in a young floodplain using iron oxide crystallinity. Quaternary Geochronology, 4: 260-266.

15- Mbagwu J. 2003. Aggregate stability and soil degradation in the tropics. Geoderma, 3-21.

16- Mirabella A., and Carnicelli S. 2003. Iron oxide mineralogy in red and brown soils developed on calcareous rocks in central Italy.Geoderma, 55: 95-109.

17- Munch J.C., and Ottow J.C.G. 1983. Reductive transformation mechanism of ferric oxides in hydromorphic soils. Environment Biogeochem Ecological Bulletins, 35:383-394.

18- Norvel W.A., and Lindsay W.L. 1982. Estimation of iron (III) solubility from EDTA chelate equilibria in soil. Soil Science Society American Journal, 46:710-715.

19- Ogunsola O.A., Omueti J.A., Olade O., and Udo E.J. 1989. Free oxide status and distribution in soils overlying limestone areas in Nigeria. Soil Science-Red Soils under Mediterranean Type of Climate: Their Properties Use and Productivity. Soil Science Society American Journal, 147: 245-251.

20- Page A.L., Miller R.H., and Keeney D.R. 1982. Methods of soil analysis. p. 1159. Part2. 2nd Ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA. Madison, WI.

21- Rezapour S., Jafarzadeh A.A., Samadi A. and Oustan S., 2010. Distribution of iron oxides forms on transect of calcareous soils, Northwest of Iran. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 56:165-182. (in Persian with English abstract)

22- Ritvo G., Avnimelich Y., ‌and Kochba M. 2003. Emperical relationship between conventionally determined pH and insitu values in waterlogged soils, Aquaculture engineering, Elsevier, 27:1-8.

23- Samandi A. M. 2011. Vegetation effect on pedogenetic forms of iron and aluminium and mineralogical properties of basaltic soil in the southern guinea savanna of Nigeria. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 5(1): 139 – 148.

24- Schwertmann U., and Taylor A.M. 1989. Iron oxides.p: 379 -438. In: Dixon J.B., and Weed S.B. (Eds). Minerals in soil environments. ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin.

25- Seta A., and Karathanasis A. 1996. Water dispersible colloids and factors influencing their dispersibility from soil aggregates. Geoderma, 74: 255-266.

26- Shao-Shan A., Yi-Mei H., Fen-Li Z., and Jian-Guo Y. 2008. Aggregate characteristics during natural revegetation on the Loess Plateau. Soil Science Society of China, 18(6): 809-816.

27- Sharma B.M., and Yadava J.S.P. 1986. Leaching losses of iron and manganese during reclamation of alkali Soil. Soil Science, 142(3).

28- Sherman G.D., Matsusaka Y., Ikawa H., and Uehara G. 1964. The role of amorphous fraction in the properties of tropical soils. Agrochemical. 7: 164-163.

29- Six J., Conant R., Paul E., and Paustian K. 2002. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant and Soil, 24 (155-176).

30- Stonehouse H. B., and Arnaud R. J. St. 1971. Distribution of iron, clay and extractable iron and aluminum in some Skatchewan soils. Canadian of Journal Soil Science, 51: 283-292.

31- Stoops G., and Eswaran H. 1985. Morphological characteristics of wet soils. P. 177-189 In: Wetland soils: Characterization, classification, and utilization. Los Banos, Philippines.

32- Torabi Golsefidi H., Eghbal K.M., and Givi J. 2000. Iron oxide coating characteristics on root surface in the East of Guilan Province, Northern Iran. Journal Soil and Water Science, 14: 121-129. (in Persian with English abstract)

33- Torabi Golsefidi H. 2001. Genesis, classification and suitability evaluation of wetland soils for rice cultivation on different landforms in Guilan Province, Northern Iran. Isfahan University of Technology, College of Agriculture. Ph.D. Thesis, 485p.

34- Torabi Golsefidi H., Eghbal K. M., and Givi J. 2003. Morphology and Micromorphology of Paddy Soils on different landforms in Guilan Province, Northern Iran. P. 119-121. Article collections of 8th Iranian Soil Science congress. Rasht, Iran

35- Verheye W., 1973. Formation, classification and land evaluation of soils in mediterrean areas. University of Gent, 122pp.

36- Zeng-Yei H., and Zeng-Sang C. 2001. Quantifying soil hydromorphology of a Rice-growingUltisoltoposequence in Taiwan. Soil Science Society American Journal, 65:270-278.