Document Type : Research Article

Authors

University of Kurdistan

Abstract

Introduction: Soil organic carbon (SOC) has great impacts on soil properties, soil productivity, food security, land degradation and global warming. Similar to other soil properties, SOC has a strong spatial heterogeneity as a result of dynamic interactions between parent material, climate and geological history, at both regional and continental scales. However, landscape attributes including slope, aspect, altitude, and land use types are dominant factors influencing on SOC in areas with the same parent materials and climate regime. Understanding and identifying the spatial and temporal distribution of SOC is essential to evaluate soil quality, agricultural management, watershed modeling and soil carbon sequestration budgets. Therefore, the objectives of this study was to estimate soil organic carbon content in the Aligodarz watershed, and to investigate the effects of altitude, slope, and land use type on SOC.
Materials and Methods: The research was carried out in the Aligodraz watershed in Lorestan province of Iran. The study area is located between latitudes N 33° 10' 51.72"to N 33° 34' 28.22" and longitudes E 49° 27' 17.99"to E 49° 58' 40.84" 14 that covers an area of 1078.9 km2. It has an altitude between 1866.3 and 3200 m above sea-level. The primary land uses within the watershed include pasture, dryland and irrigated farming. In this study, soil samples were randomly collected from 206 sites at depth of 0– 15 cm during June and August 2003. The mean distance between samples was about 5 km. Soil samples were air-dried in the shade for about 7 days and then passed through a 0.25 mm prior to determination of SOC. Soil organic carbon content was determined in triplicate for each sample using the Walkey-Black method. Basic statistical analyses for frequency distribution, normality tests, Pearson's correlation and analysis of variance were conducted using SPSS (version 18.0). Calculation of experimental variograms and modeling of spatial distribution of SOC were carried out with the geostatistical software GS+ (version 5. 1). Maps were generated by using ILWIS (version 3.3) GIS software.
Results and Discussion: The results revealed that the raw SOC data have a long tail towards higher concentrations, whereas that squareroot transformed data can be satisfactorily modelled by a normal distribution. The probability distribution of SOC appeared to be positively skewed and have a positive kurtosis. The square root transformed data showed small skewness and kurtosis, and passed the K–S normality test at a significance level of higher than 0.05. Therefore, the square root transformed data of SOC was used for analyses. The SOC concentration varied from 0.08 to 2.39%, with an arithmetic mean of 0.81% and geometric mean of 0.73%. The coefficient of variation (CV), as an index of overall variability of SOC, was 44.49%. According to the classification system presented by Nielson and Bouma (1985), a variable is moderately varying if the CV is between 10% and 100%. Therefore, the content of SOC in the Aligodarz watershed can be considered to be in moderate variability. The experimental variogram of SOC was fitted by an exponential model. The values of the range, nugget, sill, and nugget/sill ratio of the best-fitted model were 6.80 km, 0.058, 0.133, and 43.6%, respectively. The positive nugget value can be explained by sampling error, short range variability, and unexplained and inherent variability. The nugget/sill ratio of 43.6% showed a moderate spatial dependence of SOC in the study area. The parameters of the exponential smivariogram model were used for kriging method to produce a spatial distribution map of SOC in the study area. The interpolated values ranged between 0.30 and 1.40%. Southern and central parts of this study area have the highest SOC concentrations, while the northern parts have the lowest concentrations of SOC. Kriging results also showed that the major parts of the Aligodarz watershed (about 87%) have statistically SOC content less than 1%. Lower SOC concentrations were associated with high altitude (r = −0.265**). The results of Pearson correlation analysis showed that soil organic carbon content has a significantly negative correlatiton with slope gradient (r = −0.217**). The results also indicated that the SOC content was variable for the different land use types. The irrigated lands had the highest SOC concentrations, while the pasture lands had the lowest SOC values.
Conclusion: The square-root transformed data of SOC in Aligodarz watershed of Lorestan province, Iran, followed a normal distribution, with an arithmetic mean of 0.81%, and geometric mean of 0.73%. The coefficient of variation and nugget/sill ratio revealed a moderate spatial dependence of SOC in the study area. The results indicated that the major parts of the Aligodarz watershed have SOC content less than 1%. The land use type had a significant effect on the spatial variability of SOC and that lower SOC concentrations were associated with higher altitude and slope gradients. The irrigated and pasture lands had the highest and lowest SOC concentrations, respectively.

Keywords

1- Abdollahi L., Schjonning P., Elmholt S., and Munkholm L.J. 2013. The effects of organic matter application and intensive tillage and traffic on soil structure formation and stability. Soil & Tillage Research, 136: 28–37.
2- Agha Mohseni Fashami M., Zahedi Gh., Farahpour M., and Khorassani N. 2009. Influence of exclosure and grazing on the soil organic carbon and soil bulk density Case study in the central Alborze south slopes range lands. Dynamic Agriculture, 5(4): 375-381. (in Persian with English abstract)
3- Batjes N.H. 1996. The total C and N in soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 47: 151–163.
4- Cambardella C.A., Moorman T.B., Novak J.M., Parkin T.B., Karlen D.L., Turco R.F., and Konopka A.E. 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 1501–1511.
5- Don A., Schumacher J., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Scholten T., and Schulze E-D. 2007. Spatial and vertical variation of soil carbon at two grassland sites - Implications for measuring soil carbon stocks. Geoderma, 141: 272–282.
6- Ghorbani vaghei H., and Bahrami, H. A. 2006. The study of influence of Wischmeier nomograph parameters in determination of soil erodibility factor based on Fuzzy Logic system. Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1-2): 32-38. (in Persian)
7- Han F., Hu W., Zheng J., Du F., and Zhang X. 2010. Estimating soil organic carbon storage and distribution in a catchment of Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma, 154: 261–266
8- Heenan D.P., Chan K.Y., and Knight P.G. 2004. Long-term impact of rotation, tillage and stubble management on the loss of soil organic carbon and nitrogen from a Chromic Luvisol. Soil Tillage Research, 76: 59–68.
9- Hosseini E., Gallichand J., and Marcotte D. 1994. Theoretical and experimental performance of spatial interpolation methods for soil salinity analysis. Transaction of the ASAE, 37(6): 1799-1807.
10- Lal, R. 2002. Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environmental Pollution, 116: 353–362.
11- Lal, R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304: 1623–1627.
12- Liu D., Wang Z., Zhang B., Song K., Li X., Li J., Li F., and Duan H. 2006. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and analysis of related factors in croplands of the black soil region, Northeast China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 113: 73–81.
13- Marchetti A., Piccini C., Francaviglia R., and Mabit L. 2012. Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Matter Using Geostatistics: A Key Indicator to Assess Soil Degradation Status in Central Italy. Pedosphere, 22(2): 230–242.
14- Mohammadi J. 2006. Pedometer: 2, spatial statistics (Geo statistics). Pelk Publication, Tehran, 453 p. (In Persian)
15- Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 539–579. In A.L. Page et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
16- Nielsen, D.R., and Bouma, J. (eds.). 1985. Soil Spatial Variability. Proceedings of a Workshop of the ISSS and the SSSA, Las Vegas, USA. 30th November to 1st December, 1984. Pudoc, Wageningen.
17- Parvizi Y., and Gorji M. 2013. Study the effect of dry management on quantity and distribution of soil organic matter in Mereg watershed in Kermanshah province. Land Management, 1(1): 81-89. (in Persian with English abstract)
18- Sun B., Zhou Sh., and Zhao Q. 2003. Evaluation of spatial and temporal changes of soil quality based on geostatistical analysis in the hill region of subtropical china. Geoderma, 115: 85-99.
19- Turner J., and Lambert M. 2000. Change in organic carbon in forest plantation soils in eastern Australia. Forest and Ecology Management, 133: 231–247.
20- Van Meirvenne, M., Pannier, J., Hofman, G., and Louwagie, G. 1996. Regional characterization of the long-term change in soil organic carbon under intensive agriculture. Soil Use Management, 12: 86–94.
21- Wang Z.M., Zhang B., Song K.S., Liu D.W., Li F., Guo Z.X., and Zhang S.M. 2009. Soil organic carbon under different landscape attributes in croplands of Northeast China. Plant, Soil and Environment, 54(10): 420–427
22- Webster R., and Oliver M. 2001. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
23- Yun-Qiang W., Xing-Chang Z., Jing-Li Z., and Shun-Ji L. 2009. Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Carbon in a Watershed on the Loess Plateau. Pedosphere, 19(4): 486-495.
24- Zhang C.S., and McGrath D. 2004. Geostatistical and GIS analyses on soil organic carbon concentrations in grassland of southeastern Ireland from two different periods. Geoderma, 119: 261–275.
25- Zong-Ming W., Bai ZH., Kai-Shan S., Dian-Wei L., and Chun-Ying R. 2010. Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Carbon Under Maize Monoculture in the Song-Nen Plain, Northeast China. Pedosphere, 20(1): 80-89.
CAPTCHA Image