دوماه نامه

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهرکرد

چکیده

برنامه‌ریزی آبیاری یکی از اقدامات مهم در راستای افزایش تولید کمی و کیفی محصول است. در واقع هدف از برنامه‌ریزی آبیاری کنترل وضعیت آب در گیاه برای رسیدن به سطح مطلوب از عملکرد گیاه می‌باشد. عامل مهمی که تنش آبی گیاه و در نهایت میزان عملکرد به آن بستگی داشته و در برنامه‌ریزی آبیاری نیز مورد استفاده قرار می‌گیرد، زمان آبیاری است. پژوهش حاضر به منظور بررسی اثر زمان و میزان آب آبیاری بر کارآیی مصرف آب، عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد لوبیا در سال 1391 در دانشگاه شهرکرد اجرا گردید. آزمایش در قالب طرح کامل تصادفی و به صورت فاکتوریل شامل چهار سطح زمان آبیاری (ساعت‌های 6، 8، 14 و 18) و دو سطح میزان آب آبیاری (آبیاری کامل و کم‌آبیاری) در چهار تکرار انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد آبیاری در ساعت‌های مختلف روز کارآیی مصرف آب، میزان آب مصرفی، تعداد غلاف در بوته، وزن 100 دانه و عملکرد دانه را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد، به گونه‌ای‌که کارآیی مصرف آب تیمار آبیاری 6 صبح، 5/18 درصد نسبت به تیمار آبیاری ساعت 14 افزایش نشان داد. در حالی‌که زمان آبیاری اثر معنی‌داری بر ارتفاع بوته، تعداد شاخه‌های فرعی و طول غلاف نداشت. همچنین میزان آبیاری بر ارتفاع بوته، تعداد شاخه‌های فرعی، تعداد غلاف در بوته، طول غلاف و وزن صد دانه معنی‌دار بود. در مجموع بررسی‌ها نشان داد که حداکثر میزان صفات اندازه‌گیری شده در تیمارآبیاری 6 صبح حاصل گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Timing and Amount of Irrigation Water on Bean Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Arid and Semi-arid Conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • S.S. Nurbakhsh
  • M. Ghobadinia
  • A. Danesh-Shahraki
  • mohammad reza Nori Emamzadeie
  • R. Fatahi

Shahrekord University

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Nowadays, due to lack of water resources and increasing demand for water, agricultural water planning issues need further consideration. With proper planning and determination of irrigation depth and time, the effects of stress and yield loss on the plants are reduced. Irrigation scheduling is one of the most important factors in crop’s quality and quantity. The main objective of irrigation scheduling is to control crop’s water conditions in order to achieve its optimum yield level. So irrigation timing is the vital factor on which crop water stress and eventually yield's level are dependent upon. Moreover, irrigation timing is used in irrigation scheduling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of irrigation time on water consumption, water use efficiency and yield of beans.
Materials and Methods: In order to observe the effect of the amount and the time of the irrigation on water consumption, yields rate and water use efficiency, the current research was carried out at the University of Shahrekord during the summer of 2012. The experiment was done as a completely randomized design with 4 repetitions consisting of irrigation time and the amount of irrigation in 4 and 2 levels (at 6, 8, 14 and 18) and (deficit irrigation, full irrigation), respectively. Beans seeds were planted in 32 similar vases with a diameter of 45 cm and height of 60 cm, in each experiment. Treatments were begun after 37 days from planting. Treatments were irrigated when the average moisture in the root zone was equal to the lower border of readily available water of full irrigation. At the end of the experiments, plants were completely harvested. Then the plant’s height, number of branches, numbers of pods per plant, pod and seed weight were measured.
Results and Discussion: Results showed that irrigating at different times during the day influenced water use efficiency, water consumption, seeds yield and number of pods in the bush. The water consumption was affected by irrigation time. Among full irrigation treatments, irrigation at 2 p.m. and 6 a.m. had the highest and lowest water consumption, respectively. The total amount of water used in irrigation at 8 a.m., 2:00 p.m. and 6 p.m. compared to 6:00 a.m. was increased by1.6, 9.5 and 4.1 percent, respectively. The results showed that irrigation at 2:00 p.m., caused a significant reduction in yield. Moreover, water use efficiency in 6 a.m. treatments had increased 18.5 percent more than that of the 2:00 p.m. irrigation treatment. The time of irrigation did not have a meaningful effect on bush height, the number of minor branches, the pod's length. The effect of the amount of irrigation water was meaningful on bush height, number of minor branches, seeds yield, the number of pods in the bush, pods length and seed weight. Seed yield at 8:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. treatments has shown 0.29, 17.1 and 7.6 percent decrease in comparison with 6:00 a.m. irrigation treatment, respectively. Moreover, 100-seed weights were significantly affected by the irrigation time. The maximum and minimum weights of 100-seed weights were obtained at 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. irrigation, respectively. Analysis of variance showed that the number of pods per plant was affected by irrigation time. The maximum number of pods per plant was 101 which belong to the 6:00 a.m. treatment. In this experiment in the case of irrigation at 2:00 p.m., the number of pods per plant was significantly decreased in full and deficit irrigation. The results showed that although the irrigation frequency was the same, irrigation at maximum evapo-transpiration caused the plant to be under stress and the yield was reduced. In other word, it can be said that time of irrigation had no meaningful effect on the appearance and shape of the plant while it was effective in terms of the yield. Overall assessments showed that maximum of the measured features were obtained in the case of 6:00 a.m. treatment.
Conclusion: The results showed that irrigation at different times of the day and the applied water stress, reduced water use efficiency. These caused traits such as plant height; number of branches; number of pods per plant; pod and seed weight to be affected by the irrigation depth. Based on the results of this experiment it can be stated that, when there is no limit of water supply, it is recommended to irrigate in the early morning, before the steep slope of the temperature rise. However, in the situations with water shortage problems, is better to manage the water and the product.

Keywords: Bean, Deficit irrigation, Irrigation time, Water use efficiency

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bean
  • Deficit irrigation
  • Irrigation time
  • Water use efficiency
1- Acosta D.K., Shibata J., and Acosta-Gallegos J.A. 1997. Yield and its components in bean under drought conditions, Journal of Agricultura-Tecnica en Mexico, 23(2): 139-150 (CAB Abstract).
2- Aliyari H. 2010. Effects of water stress on root distribution of bean in soil and plant water uptake. MSc Thesis. Shahrekord University. Iran. (in Persian with English abstract)
3- Bayat A.A., Sepehri A., Ahmadvand G., and Dorri H.R. 2010. Effect of water deficit stress on yield and yield components of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 12 (1):42- 54. (in Persian with English abstract)
4- Beeson R.C. 1992. Restricting overhead irrigation to dawn limits growth in container grown woody ornamentals. HortScience, 27:996–999.
5- Boutraa T., and Sanders F.E. 2001. Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Agronomy and Crop Science, 187:251-257.
6- Della Costa L., and Gianquinto. G. 2002. Water stress and water table depth influence yield, water use efficiency, and nitrogen recovery in bell pepper: lysimeter studies. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53:201-210.
7- Ferrara A., Lovelli S., Tommaso Tdi., and Perniola M. 2011. Flowering, growth and fruit setting in greenhouse bell pepper under water stress. Agronomy, 10(1):12-19.
8- German C., and Teran H. 2006. Selection for Drought Resistance in Dry BeanLandraces and Cultivars. Crop Science, 46:2111-2120.
9- Ghassemi-Golezani K., and Mardfar R.A. 2008. Effects of limited irrigation on growth and grain yield of common bean. Plant Science, 3: 230-235.
10- Golkar F., Farahmand A., and Fardad H. 2008. Response of Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Early Urbana. Journal of Water Engineering, 1. 13-20. (in Persian)
11- Habibi G.R., and Bihamta M.R. 2007. Study of seed yield and some associate characteristics in pinto bean under reduced irrigation. Journal of Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 74. 34-46. (in Persian with English abstract)
12- Hill R.W., and Allen R.G. 1996. Simple irrigation scheduling calendars. Irrigation Drainage Engineering, 122:107-111.
13- Keever G.J., and Cobb. G.S. 1985. Irrigation scheduling effects on container media and canopy temperature and growth of ‘Hershey’s Red’ azalea. HortScience, 20:921–923.
14- Khaghani Sh., Bihamta M., Changizi M., Dorri H., Khaghani Sh., Bakhtiari A., and Safaapour M. 2009. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative traits full irrigation and drought stress in red and white beans. Journal of Environmental Stresses on Plant Science, 1(2). 169-182. (in Persian)
15- Moayeri M., and Barzegari M. 2005.Irrigation scheduling of spring corn in Khuzestan. Research Report. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. Pp 38. . (in Persian)
16- Nakagami K., Okawa T.O., and Hirasawa T. 2004. Effect of reduction in soil moisture from onemonth before flowering though ripening on dry matter production and ecophysiological characteristics of wheat plants. Plant Production Science 7, 143-154.
17- Ricardo J.H., Dardanelli J.I., Maria E., and Collino D.J. 2008. Seed yield determination of peanutcrops under water deficit: Soil strength effects on pod set, the source-sink ratio and radiationuse efficiency. Field Crops Research, 109: 24-33.
18- Robinson R.G. 1983. Yield and composition of field bean and adzuki bean in response to irrigation, compost, and nitrogen. Agronomy, 75: 31-35.
19- Santos M.G., Ribeiro R.V., Oliverira R.F., Machado E.C., and Pimetel C. 2006. The role of in organic phosphate on photosynthesis recovery of common bean after a mild water deficit. Plant Science, 170: 659-664.
20- Singh S.H. 2007. Drought Resistance in the Race Durango Dry Bean Land races and Cultivars. Agronomy, 99:1919-1225.
21- Stuart L.W., and Ted E.B. 2002. Timing of Low Pressure Irrigation Affects Plant Growth and Water Utilization Efficiency. Environmental Horticultural, 20(3):184–188.
22- Urbano C.C. 1989. The environmental debate: An industry issue. Amer. Nurs, 169:69- 73, 83, 85.
23- Yeager T.H., Gilliam C.H., Bilderback T.E., Fare D.C., Niemiera A.X., and Tilt K.M. 1997. Best Management Practices Guide for Producing Container-Grown Plants. Southern Nurserymen’s Association Publication., Marietta, GA.
CAPTCHA Image