دوماه نامه

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

2 دانشگاه شیراز

3 دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

فهم انتقال و نگهداشت نانوذرات آهن صفر ظرفیتی (nZVI) در محیط زیرسطحی برای طراحی سیستم‌های تصفیه و احیای در محل آب‌های زیرزمینی ضروری است. در این مطالعه از آزمایش‌های اشباع ستون ماسه برای بررسی اثرات همزمان غلظت نانوذره و اندازه ذرات ماسه بر میزان انتقال و نگهداشت نانوذرات آهن صفر ظرفیتی پوشش داده شده با کربوکسی متیل سلولز (CMC-nZVI) استفاده شد. بدین منظور، 12 آزمایش با ترکیبی از 4 غلظت متفاوت نانوذره (mg/l 10000، 3000، 200، 10C0= ) و سه اندازه ماسه (mm 2-1، 1-5/0، 5/0-35/0 d=) صورت گرفت. غلظت نانوذره آهن در محلول خروجی از ستون و همچنین بر روی ماسه‌ها اندازه‌گیری شد. سپس، منحنی‌های رخنه (BTCs) و پروفیل‌های نگهداشت رسم شدند. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که پدیده رایپنینگ و استرینینگ نقش مهمی را در کاهش انتقال نانوذرات با کاهش اندازه ماسه‌ها و افزایش غلظت، در مرحله تزریق نانوذره دارند. اما در مرحله فلاشینگ، (تزریق آب دیونیزه) نقش چاله حداقل انرژی ثانویه و نیروهای هیدرودینامیکی در انتقال موثرتر می‌شود و این عوامل سبب افزایش انتقال نانوذرات با کاهش اندازه ماسه در غلظت‌های بالای نانوذره (mg/l 10000 و 3000) می‌گردد. برخلاف نتایج بدست آمده از سوسپانسیون‌های با غلظت بالا، نتایج پروفیل‌های نگهداشت در غلظت‌های پایین (mg/l 200 و 10)، از تئوری فیلتراسیون کلوئید تبعیت می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Particle Concentration and Sand Grain Size on Transport Breakthrough Curves and Retention Profiles of CMC-nZVI Particles in Saturated Media

نویسندگان [English]

  • A. Saberinasr 1
  • M. Nakhaei 1
  • M. Rezaei 2
  • Seyed Mousa Hosseini 3

1 Kharazmi University of Tehran, Tehran

2 Shiraz University

3 University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: nZVI particles are strong reducing agents, capable of degradation and detoxification of a wide range of organic and inorganic pollutants in contaminated aquifers. Understanding the transport and retention of these nanoparticles in subsurface environments is required for treatment systems and in situ groundwater remediation. During the last decade, several studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of different physicochemical conditions on the transport and retention of nZVI in saturated porous media. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sand grain size and nanoparticle concentration on fundamental processes governing CMC-nZVI nanoparticle transport and retention in saturated porous media.
Materials and Methods: nZVI (NANOFER STAR, NANOIRON, s.r.o. Czech Republic was employed in this study. To prepare CMC-nZVI, nanoparticle, suspension and polymer solution was added by the relative dose of CMC to nZVI mass 1:2, in a 250-ml flask reactor. pH was fixed at 9.5 by NaOH and the solution was mixed for 144 h under ambient temperature condition at the absence of oxygen. Quartz sands with ∼ 99.38% SiO2 and 0.27 Fe2O3 based on XRF analysis, was used as the porous medium. The experiments were conducted using a cylindrical Plexiglas column 30 cm in length and 2.5 cm in inner diameter. In order to capture the effect of particle concentration and grain size, 12 tests were conducted with four different concentrations (C = 10, 200, 3000, 10000 mg/l) and three sizes of grain (dc = 0.297–0.5 mm, 0.5–1 mm, 1–2 mm). In each test, ∼4 PVs of nZVI suspension were introduced into the columns and to complete the test, ∼6 PVs of deionized water were flushed. The column effluent was collected every 2 min and analyzed for total Fe using UV-Vis. The normalized effluent iron concentration (C/C0) for each transport test was plotted as a function of pore volumes. The spatial distributions of retained CMC-nZVI in the sand columns were determined to right after the breakthrough experiment. The quartz sand in each column was carefully excavated in ~3 cm increments, transferred into 50 mL vials and analyzed for total Fe. The concentration of retained CMC-nZVI in all the sand columns was also plotted as a function of travel distance.
Results and Discussion: The breakthrough curves indicate that both grain size and nanoparticle concentration had a relevant impact on CMC-nZVI mobility, even if the influence of nanoparticle concentration was more evident. In all experimental conditions, the BTCs were not symmetrical, which indicates that attachment and detachment phenomena occurred in different modes. The breakthrough curves can be interpreted in two steps: injection and flushing times. The maximum relative concentration (C/C0) decreased, during injection time, for three different grain sizes while influent concentration increased from 10 to 10,000 mg/L, which can be attributed to the increase in particle-particle interaction (aggregation) and particle-sand interaction (attachment). The breakthrough curves, after the initial increase, showed a strong decline, which is a clear indication of the ripening phenomenon. This phenomenon affected the porous medium properties such as porosity and hydraulic conductivity. Moreover, At higher influent CMC-nZVI concentration, Na+ ion and subsequently ionic strength increases because of higher doses of Na-CMC. As a result, aggregation and deposition will occur under a shallower secondary energy minimum well, that they are reversible. At the same nZVI concentrations, the breakthrough curve decreased by a decrease in grain size. Decreases in grain size can lead to an increase in surface area, decrease in pore throat size; and consequently, retention of nanoparticles by straining phenomena. However, another behavior was governed during the flushing time. During the flushing time, a narrow sharp increase in C/C0 was observed called flushing peak. In this study, CMC-nZVI aggregates deposited onto surfaces of sands due to secondary energy minimum were eventually released during the flushing period of the column with DI water. The results suggest that the grain size and particle concentration can have a positive effect on this peak. The results of retention profiles demonstrate that the CMC-nZVI retention in low concentration (10 mg/L) is consistent with filtration theory; whiles the highly concentrated polymer-modified nZVI dispersions (especially 3000 and 10000 mg/l) contradicts filtration theory. Based on filtration theory (Elimelech et al. 1995; Tufenkji et al. 2004), if all factors affecting the transport of colloids are kept constant, grain size increase can lead to a decrease in surface area and attachment efficiency (α). The contradiction at high concentration can be explained by considering the effect of hydrodynamic forces (especially fluid shear) on agglomeration and disagglomeration and deposition and detachment. The size of stable aggregates formed in the pores of finer sands is smaller than when they are formed in the pores of larger sands because the magnitude of local shear is higher for narrower pores. This led to decreased retention in finer sand.
Conclusion: The results of this research show that during the injection time, ripening and straining phenomena are key retention mechanisms of nanoparticles by decreasing the sand size and increasing particle concentration. While during the flushing time, secondary energy minima and hydrodynamic forces play critical roles in the deposition and transport mechanisms of CMC-nZVI. At high particle concentration (3000 and 10000 mg/l), these factors can lead to an increase in nanoparticle mobility by decreasing sand size. However, the results of retention profiles were consistent with colloid filtration theory at low particle concentration (10 and 200 mg/l).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • transport
  • Sand Grain Size
  • Particle Concentration
  • CMC-nZVI Particles
  • Retention
1- U.S. EPA. 2008. FY 2007 Superfund Annual Report. Building on Success: Protecting Human Health and the Environment.EPA 540-R-08-003. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: www.epa.gov/superfund/accomp/pdfs/sf_annual_report_2007.pdf [accessed 20 October 2009].
2- Jiemvarangkul P. 2012. Nanoparticles for Nonaqueous-phase liquids (NAPLs) Remediation. A Dissertation presented to the graduate and research committee of Lehigh University in candidacy for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Engineering.
3- Comba S., Di Molfetta A., and Sethi R. 2011. A Comparison Between Field Applications of Nano-, Micro-, and Millimetric Zero-Valent Iron for the Remediation of Contaminated Aquifers. Water Air and Soil Pollution 215: 595–607.
4- Mueller N.C., Braun J., Bruns J., Černik M., Rissing P., and Rickerby Nowack B. 2012. Application of nanoscale zero valent iron (NZVI) for groundwater remediation in Europe. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19: 550–558.
5- He F., Zhao D., and Paul C. 2010. Field assessment of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilized iron nanoparticles for in situ destruction of chlorinated solvents in source zones. Water Research 44: 2360–2370.
6- Wei Y.T., Wu S.C., Chou C.M., Che C.H., Tsai S.M., and Lien H.L. 2010. Influence of nanoscale zero-valent iron on geochemical properties of groundwater and vinyl chloride degradation: A field case study. Water Research 44: 131–140.
7- Karn B., Kuiken T., and Otto M. 2009. Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks. Environmental Health Perspectives 117(12): 1823-1831.
8- Seymour M. 2012. Transport of Engineered Nanomaterials in Porous Media: Groundwater Remediation Application and Effects of Particle Shape. A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate College at the University of Nebraska in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Environmental Engineering.
9- He F., Zhang M., Qian T., and Zhao D. 2009. Transport of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilized iron nanoparticles in porous media: Column experiments and modeling. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 334: 96–102.
9- Shi J., Wang J., Wang W., Teng W., and Zhang W. 2019. Stabilization of nanoscale zero-valent iron in water with mesoporous carbon (nZVI-MC). Journal of Environmental Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.jes.2019.02.010.
10- Yu Z., Hu L., Lo I.M.C., 2018. Transport of the arsenic (As)-loaded nano zero-valent iron in groundwater-saturated sand columns: Roles of surface modification and As loading. Chemosphere. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.125.
11- Dong H., and Lo I.M.C. 2014. Transport of Surface-Modified Nano Zero-Valent Iron (SM-NZVI) in Saturated Porous Media: Effects of Surface Stabilizer Type, Subsurface Geochemistry, and Contaminant Loading. Water Air Soil Pollut 225: 2107.
12- Saleh N., Kim H.J., Phenrat T., Matyjaszewski K., Tilton R.D., and Lowry G.V. 2008. Ionic strength and composition affect the mobility of surface-modified Fe0 nanoparticles in water-saturated sand columns. Environmental Science & Technology 42: 3349–3355.
13- Phenrat T., Kim H.J, Fagerlund F., Illangasekare T., and Lowry G.V. 2010. Empirical correlations to estimate agglomerate size and deposition during injection of a polyelectrolyte-modified Fe0 nanoparticle at high particle concentration in saturated sand. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 118: 152-164.
14- Raychoudhury T., Tufenkji N., and Ghoshal S. 2014. Straining of polyelectrolytestabilized nanoscale zero valent iron particles during transport through granular porous media. Water Research 50: 80-89.
15- Soares A., Ramos S., Albergaria T., and Delerue-Matos C. 2018. Green zero valent iron nanoparticles dispersion through a sandy column using different injection sequences. Science of the Total Environment 637–638: 935–942.
16- Zhu K., and Chen C. 2019. Application of nZVI and its composites into the treatment of toxic/radioactive metal ions. Emerging Natural and Tailored Nanomaterials for Radioactive Waste Treatment and Environmental Remediation- Principles and Methodologies, 281–330. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-102727-1.00006-6.
17- Laumann S., Micic V., Lowry G.V, and Hofmann T. 2013. Carbonate minerals in porous media decrease mobility of polyacrylic acid modified zero-valent iron nanoparticles used for groundwater remediation. Environmental Pollution 179: 53-60.
18- Johnson R.L., Nurmi J.T., Johnson G.S.O., Fan D.M., Johnson R.L.O., Shi Z.Q., Salter-Blanc A.J., Tratnyek P.G., and Lowry G.V. 2013. Field-Scale transport and transformation of carboxymethylcellulose-stabilized nano zero-valent iron. Environ. Sci. Technology 47(3): 1573-1580.
19- Su C.M., Puls R.W., Krug T.A., Watling M.T., O’Hara S.K., Quinn J.W., and Ruiz N.E. 2013. Travel distance and transformation of injected emulsified zerovalent iron nanoparticles in the subsurface during two and half years. Water Research 47(12): 4095-4106.
20- Elimelech M., Gregory J., Jia X., and Williams R. 1995. Particle Deposition and Aggregation: Measurement, Modeling, and Simulation, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston.
21- Tufenkji N., Miller G.F., Ryan J.N., Harvey R.W., and Elimelech M. 2004. Transport of cryptosporidium oocysts in porous media: role of straining and physicochemical filtration. Environmental Science & Technology 38: 5932-5938.
22- Litton G.M., and Olson T.M. 1996. Particle size effects on colloid deposition kinetics: evidence of secondary minimum deposition. Colloids and Surfaces, A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 107: 273-283.
23- Wang Y., Dave R.N., and Pfeffer R. 2004. Polymer coating/encapsulation of nanoparticles using a supercritical anti-solvent process. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids 28: 85-99.
24- Elimelech M., and O’Melia C.R. 1990. Kinetics of deposition of colloidal particles in porous media. Environmental Science & Technology 24: 1528-1536.
25- Tufenkji N., and Elimelech M. 2004. Deviation from the Classical Colloid Filtration Theory in the Presence of Repulsive DLVO Interactions. Langmuir 20(25): 10818-10828.
26- Torkzaban S., Bradford S. A., Wan J., Tokunaga T., and Masoudih A. 2013. Release of Quantum Dot Nanoparticles in Porous Media: Role of Cation Exchange and Aging Time. Environmental Science & Technology 47: 11528−11536.
27- Lin D., Tian X., Wu F., and Xing B. 2010. Fate and Transport of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment. Journal of Environmental Quality 39: 1896-1908.
28- Franchi A., and O’Melia C.R. 2003. Effects of natural organic matter and solution chemistry on the deposition and reentrainment of colloids in porous media. Environmental Science & Technology 37(6): 1122-1129.
29- Hahn M.W., and O’Melia C.R. 2004. Deposition and reentrainment of Brownian particles in porous media under unfavorable chemical conditions: some concepts and applications. Environmental Science & Technology 38(1): 210-220.
29- Street A., Sustich R., Duncan J., Savage N., (Edts). 2014. Nanotechnology Applications for Clean Water: Solutions for Improving Water Quality (Micro and Nano Technologies). Burlington: William Andrew (Elsevier Science).
30- Hosseini S.M., and Tosco T. 2013. Transport and retention of high concentrated nano-Fe/Cu particles through highly flow-rated packed sand column. Water Research 47: 326-338.
31- Tosco T., Papini M.P., Viggi C.C., and Sethi R. 2014. Nanoscale zerovalent iron particles for groundwater remediation: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 77: 10-21.
32- Godinez I.G., and Darnault C.J.G. 2011. Aggregation and transport of nano-TiO2 in saturated porous media: Effects of pH, surfactants and flow velocity. Water Research 45: 839-851.
33- Li Z., Sahle-Demessie E., Hassan A.A., Sorial G.A., 2011. Transport and deposition of CeO2 nanoparticles in water-saturated porous media. Water Research 45: 4409-4418.
34- Saleh N. 2007. An Assessment of Novel Polymeric Coatings to Enhance Transport and In situ Targeting of Nanoiron for Remediation of Nonaqueous. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
35- Phenrat T., Kim H., Fagerlund F., Illangasekare T., Tilton R.D., and Lowry G.V. 2009. Particle size distribution, concentration, and magnetic attraction affect transport of polymer-modified Fe0 nanoparticles in sand columns. Environmental Science and Technology 43: 5079-5085.
CAPTCHA Image