Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Zabol

2 University of Zabol

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing the production rate became considerable for farmers in various ways. Modern technologies, such as biotechnology and nanotechnology could play an important role in increasing the production and improving the quality of agricultural products. Research into the direct application of nanotechnology into agriculture is set to increase in the future. One of the most remarkable plant growth factors is its nutrition. Titanium plays a beneficial role in increasing and stimulating plants growth. Titanium's usage in nutrition solution or spraying on the plant will increase the biomass and growth of different plant species. With respect to Nano technology enhancement in recent years the application of nano-particles is increasing. All the positive effects of titanium dioxide depend on its ability to absorb light and the main disadvantages of this combination are the low ability to absorb visible light from the sun and absorbing more UV light.  It is possible to improve its effectiveness due to the high proportion of sunlight in the visible range by absorbing the visible light of nano-particles. To achieve this goal a layer of color will be added on the surface of the nanoparticles, which is called the nanoparticle sensitization by color. Due to the absorption of light by titanium dioxide nano-particles, especially ultraviolet radiation, it is assumed that the creation of a color layer on these nano-particles increases the antibacterial and fungal properties of these nanoparticles. As a result, the goal of this experiment is to investigate the possible increase in light absorption and increase the yield of the sorghum plant by titanium dioxide nano-particles of Dye-Sensitized, which, some of the parameters were investigated by treating the seeds of the plant with both nanoparticles.
Materials and Methods: This research was performed in three replications in a completely randomized design with factorial arrangement and with 12 treatments containing 6 concentrations of titanium dioxide nano-particles (0, 1, 10, 50, 100 and 500 mg.L-1), 6 concentration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles of Dye-Sensitized (0, 1, 10, 50, 100 and 500 mg.L-1). Fresh and dry weight of plants, plant nutrients content (Phosphorus, Potassium, Manganese, and Zinc), activity of ascorbate peroxidase and guaiacol peroxidase and chlorophyll content parameters  have been measured.
Discussion and Results: The saffron compounds have significant peaks in the UV-Vis spectrum. The spectrum of titanium dioxide nanoparticles has a specific peak in the ultraviolet range (Area between wavelengths of 200-400 nm) however there is no trace of absorption in visible areas. The spectrum of the saffron solution has two identifiable peaks at 328 and 258 nm, and a double peak at 466 and 442 nm. The observed peak at 258 nm is related to the combination of Picrocrocin, which is the same colorless bitter substance found in saffron. The dual peaks range between 400-500 nm and the peak appearing at 328 nm are related to the carotenoids found in saffron. Crocin also has similar peaks which are likely to be overlapping with trans-isomeric peaks and not separable. The Spectrum of titanium dioxide nano-particles covered with saffron color also represents two peaks at 322 and 260 nm, and a peak at 430 nm with a specific shoulder at 458 nm. What comes from the comparison of two saffron peaks alone and saffron coated on titanium dioxide nano-particles is that the Crocin molecules contained in saffron are attached to nano-particles. According to the results, dry weight and enzymatic activity of Guaiacol peroxide and Ascorbate peroxide showed a significant increase compared to the control and had the highest performance respectively at concentrations of 10, 100 and 500 mg.L-1of titanium dioxide nano-particles of Dye-Sensitized, and showed 1.25, 2.7 and 3.28 fold. The amount of plant nutrients such as phosphorus, potassium, manganese, and zinc at concentrations of 10, 100, 500 and 50 mg.L-1titanium dioxide nanoparticles of Dye-Sensitized had a 72.34, 42.85, 73.95 and 28.17 percent increase, except fresh weight and chlorophyll a. Chlorophyll a at a concentration of 500 mg.L-1of both nano-particles showed the highest amount, but the fresh weight, unlike other parameters, showed the best performance with normal nanoparticles.
Conclusion: It seems that these nano-particles, by coloring, intensify light-related reactions compared to normal nano-particles, which results in better performance.

Keywords

1- Alcaraz C.F., Carvajal M., Frutos M.J., Gimrnez J.L., Martfnez-Sfinchez F., and Pastor J.J. 1994. The physiological role of titanium in Capsicum annuum L. plants. Proceedings of the 6th International Trace Element Symposium, Abstract. 2. Budapest.
2- Arnon A.N. 1967. Method of extraction of chlorophyll in the plants. Agronomy Journal 23: 112-121.
3- Baruah S., and Dutta J. 2009. Nanotechnology applications in Sensing and Pollution Degradation in Agriculture. Environmental Chemistry Letters 7: 191-204.
4- Carvajal M., and Alcaraz C.F. 1995. Effect of Ti (IV) on Fe activity in Capsicum annuum. Elsevier Science Ltd Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved 0031-9422/95 $9.50+0.00.
5- Carvajal M., and Alcaraz C.F. 1998. Why titanium is a beneficial element for plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 21(4): 655-664.
6- Carvajal M., Martfnez-Sfinchez F., and Alcaraz CF. 1994. Effect of Titanium (IV) application on some enzymatic activities in several developing stages of red pepper plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 17: 243-253.
7- Elghniji K., Sabrine S., Ben Mosbah M., Elimame E., and Moussaoui Y. 2014. Detoxification of 4-chlorophenol in TiO2 sunlight system: effect of raw and treated solution on seed germination and plants growth of various sensitive vegetables. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry 96: 869-879.
8- Feher M., Papp K., Fodor P., and Pais I. 1987. The effect of titanium on the uptake of other nutritive elements. p. 69-100. In I. Pals (ed.) New Results in the Research of Hardly Known Trace Elements and the Analytical Problem of Trace Element Research. University of Horticulture, Budapest.
9- Gao F., Hong F., Liu C., Zheng L., Su M., Wu X et al. 2006. Mechanism of nano-anatase TiO2 on promoting photosynthetic carbon reaction of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research 111: 239-253.
10- Gee G.W., and Bauder J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. p. 383-411. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part I. Agron. Monogr. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
11- Haghighi M., and Daneshmand B. 2013. Comparing the effects of titanium and nano-titanium on growth and photosynthetic changes of tomato in hydroponic culture. Journal of Greenhouse Culture Science and Technology 4(1): 73-80. (In Persian with English abstract)
12- Hashemi Dehkourdi E., Mousavi M., Moallemi N., and Ghafariyan Moghareb M.H. 2016. Effect of nanoparticles of titanium dioxide (anatase) on physiological characteristics of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa c.v.Queen Elisa) in hydroponic condition. Process and Plant Function 5(16): 1-8. (In Persian with English abstract)
13- Helmke P.A., and Sparks D.L. 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, cesium, and rubidium. P. 551-574. In D.L. Sparks (Ed.) Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. Chemical methods and processes. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
14- Hong F.S., Zhou J., Liu C et al. 2005. Effect of nano-TiO2 on photochemical reaction of chloroplasts of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research 105: 269–280.
15- Jaberzadeh A., Moaveni P., Moghadam H.R.T., and Zahedi H. 2013. Influence of bulk and nanoparticles titanium foliar application on some agronomic traits, seed gluten and starch contents of wheat subjected to water deficit stress. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici 41: 201–207.
16- Jakson M.L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice- Hall of India Private Limited. New Dehli.
17- Janmohammadi M., Amanzadeh T., Sabaghnia N., and Dashti Sh. 2016. Impact of foliar application of nano micronutrient fertilizers and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the growth and yield components of barley under supplemental irrigation. Acta agriculturae Slovenica 107: 265-276.
18- Jones J.R., Wolf J.B., and Mills H.A. 1991. Plant Analysis Handbook: A Practical Sampling Preparation Analysis and Interpretation Guide. Micro Macro Publishing Inc. Athens, Georgia, USA.
19- Kahila M.M.H., Najy A.M., Rahaie M., and Mir-Derikvand M. 2017. Effect of nanoparticle treatment on expression of a key gene involved in thymoquinone biosynthetic pathway in Nigella sativa L. Natural Product Research 1-5.
20- Kuzel S., Hruby M., Cigler P., Tlustos P., and Van P.N. 2003. Mechanism of physiological effects of titanium leaf sprays on plants grown on soil. Biological Trace Element Research 91(2): 179-190.
21- Lindsay W.L., and Norvell W.A. 1978. Development of DTPA Soil test for Zinc, Iron, Mangnese and Copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42: 421-428.
22- Lu C.M., Zhang C.Y., Wen J.Q., Wu G.R., and Tao M.X. 2002. Research on the effect of nanometer materials on germination and growth enhancement of Glycine max and its mechanism. Soybean Science 21: 68-172.
23- Mahmoodzadeh H., Nabavi M., and Kashefi H. 2013. Effect of nanoscale titanium dioxide particles on the germination and growth of canola (Brassica napus). Journal of Ornamental Horticultural Plants 3: 25-32.
24- Mano J.I., Endo T., and Miyake C. 2016. How do photosynthetic organisms manage light stress? A tribute to the late Professor Kozi Asada. Plant and Cell Physiology 57(7): 1351-1353.
25- Martfnez-S~chez E., Gim6nez J.L., Carvajal M., Moreno A., Fuentes J.L., and Alcaraz C.F. 1992. Efectos de tratamientos foliates con Ti(IV) sobre nutrici6n, producci6ny calidad de fruto en plantas de Capsicum annuum L. Sueloy Planta 2: 101-111.
26- Mclean E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. p. 199–224. In P. Al., M. Rh., and K. Dr. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
27- Mir H., Gholamalizade Ahangar A., and Mir N. 2016. Superior performance of dye-sensitized versus conventional TiO2 nanoparticles for promoting germination and early growth of Barley: From photovoltaic to biotechnological application. Journal of Nano Research 35: 77-91.
28- Morteza E., Moaveni P., Aliabadi Farahaniand H., and Kiyani M. 2013. Study of photosynthetic pigments changes of maize (Zea mays L.) under nano TiO2 spraying at various growth stages. Springer Plus 2: 247.
29- Movafeghi A., Khataee A.R., Abedi M., Tarrahi R., Dadpour M.R., and Vafaei F. 2018. Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on the aquatic plant Spirodela polyrrhiza: Evaluation of growth parameters, pigment contents and antioxidant enzyme activities. Journal of Environmental Sciences 64: 130-138.
30- Nair R., Varghese S.H., Nair B.G., Maekawa T., Yoshida Y., and Kumar D.S. 2010. Nanoparticulate material delivery to plants. Plant Science 179: 154-163.
31- Narula C., Kaur I., and Kaur N. 2015. Characterization and optoelectronics investigations of mixed donor ligand directed semiconductor ZnO nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 26(2): 791-800.
32- Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 961-1010. In A.L. Page et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, 2nd ed. American Society of Agronomy, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
33- Owolade O.F., Ogunleti D.O., and Adenekan M.O. 2008. Titanium dioxide affects diseases, development and yield of edible cowpea. Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry 7(5): 2942-2947.
34- Pais I. 1983. The biological important of titanium. Journal of Plant Nutrition 6: 3-131.
35- Pais I. 1991. Criteria of essentiality, beneficiality and toxicity. What is too little and too much? pp. 59-77. In I. Pais (ed.) Cycling of the Nutritive Elementin Geo-and Biosphere. University of Horticultural and Food Science, Budapest, Hungary.
36- Ram N., Verloo M., and Cottenie A. 1983. Response of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to foliar spray of titanium. Plant Soil 73: 285-290.
37- Rhoades J.D. 1982. Soluble salts. P. 167-178. In P. Al., M. Rh., and K. Dr. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph. 9. American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.
38- Sawhney A.P.S., and Condon B. 2008. Modern Applications of Nanotechnology in Textiles. Textile Research Journal 78: 731-739.
39- Simon L., Hajdu F., Balogh A., and Pais I. 1988. Effect of titanium on growth and photosynthetic pigment composition of Chlorella pyrenoidosa (green alga). II. Effect of titanium ascorbate on pigment content and chlorophyll metabolism of chlorella. p. 87-101. In I. Pais. (Ed.) New Results in the Research of Hardly Known Trace Elements and Their Role in the Food Chain. University of Horticultural and Food Science, Budapest, Hungary.
40- Syu Y.Y., Hung J.H., Chen J.C., and Chuang H.W. 2014. Impacts of size and shape of silver nanoparticles on Arabidopsis plant growth and gene expression. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 83: 57-64.
41- Tarantilis P.A., Tsoupras G., and Polissiou M. 1995. Determination of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) components in crude plant extract using high-performance liquid chromatography-UV-visible photodiode-array detection-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A 699: 107-118
42- Waling I., Van W., Vark V.J.G., and Vander Lee. 1989. Soil and Plant Analysis, a Series of Sylladi. Part 7. Plant Analysis Procedures. Wageningen Agriculture University.
43- Yang F., Hong F.S., and You W.J. 2006. Influences of nano-anatase TiO2 on the nitrogen metabolism of growing spinach. Biological Trace Element Research 110: 179-190.
44- Zheng L., Hong F.S., Lu S.P., and Liu C. 2005. Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research 104(1): 83-91.
CAPTCHA Image