Adsorption Isotherms of Boron in Soil: the effects of Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), pH and Ionic strength

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Mojtaba Moqbeli ¹
• Mohsen Farahbakhsh ¹
• Naser Boroumand ²

¹ University of Tehran

² Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v30i6.39015

Abstract

Introduction: Boron (B) is an essential plant micronutrient whose soil availability is influenced by many soil factors.Understanding the processes controling activity of boron (B) in the soil solution is important for soil fertility management. The reaction of adsorption and desorption of boron in soil determines the amount of boron that is available to plants. Adsorption–desorption processes play a major role on boron equilibrium concentration and therefore on its bio-availability. Ionic strength, pH and ionic composition in exchangeable phase are among themajor factors affecting B adsorption reactions.Reducedadsorption of boron at high pH is because of a surface potential decrease onminerals with pH-dependent charge. Ionic strength has also a considerable effect on B adsorption.Several studies have been performed inthe adsorption of boron and the effect of factors such as ionicstrength and cations has been understudied, however, the effect of sodium adsorption ratio and itsinteraction with the ionic strength on boron adsorption behavior has not been reported. In thisstudy, the adsorption isotherms of boron in the soils affected by the combined effects of ionic strengthand sodium adsorption ratio were investigated.
Materials and Methods: In order to assess the effects of ionic strength (IS) and Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) on availability of B, the adsorption of B was investigated in a calcareous soil that hadlow levels of electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio and available P. For this purpose, 5 g soil wasequilibrated with 20 mL of B solution (0, 2, 5, 8, 10, 15, 20 mg L-1) in 0.02, 0.06 and 0.12 M background solutions (prepared by NaC1,CaC12.2H2O, MgCl2.6H2O), at two SAR levels (20 and 100).The reaction temperature was 25◦C. The suspension was centrifuged, filtered, and a sample was removed and B was determined by Azomethine-H spectrophotometric method (at a wavelength of 420 nm). B adsorption in Soil was obtained by subtracting B in solution after filtration, from added boron.
Results and Discussion: The Langmuir isotherm waswell fitted to the adsorbtiondata based on the R2 and SEE.At different IS and SAR levels, the soil exhibited different adsorption behaviors. The effect of SAR on the boron adsorption was greater at high concentrations.The results showed the increase in sodium adsorption ratio,increased soil pH and Boron adsorption.An increase in sodium adsorption ratio up to 100 resulted in a small increase in Boron adsorption compared to SAR=20. With sodium adsorption ratio of 100, soil pHincreased from 8.3 to 8.7. At about PH=9.5, maximum adsorption occurs because boron dissociation is greater when pka = pH. Increasing ionic strength increased the boron adsorption; the absorption rate wasmuch higher at higher ionic strength.Model-predicted and experimental parameters obtained using the Langmuir equation pointed to the large effect of salt concentration on the boron adsorption which wasan increase of around 10% and 75% in q max as a result of an increase in salt concentration from 0.02 to 0.06 and 0.12 M respectively. We can ignore the effect ofsalt at very low equilibrium concentration; however, it increases gradually with increasing the equilibrium concentration of boron.
Conclusions: The results of the present study showed that sodium adsorption ratio was low, in low equilibrium concentration related to low boron concentration, but the equilibrium concentration of boron increased with increasing the sodium adsorption ratio.In sodium adsorptionratio of 100, increasing pH increased the adsorption of boron. Boron adsorption was increased with increasing ionic strength; the adsorption rate was muchhigher than the rate of increase in ionic strength.Increasing the ionic strength suppresses the DDL on planar surface and therefore more negative borate ions are able to move close enough to interact with the adsorption sites located on the edge surfaces. Assuming that this phenomenon affects the adsorption of boron, the effect of ionic strength on boron adsorption can be partly dependent on it. Due to the high variability of soil minerals and the differences in their chemical properties, interpretation of the effect of ionic strength on adsorption of boron is not easy, but we can say that it is the sum of the effects of the above-mentioned factors. The positive effect of ionic strength on boron adsorption may suggest that the formation of inner sphere complex is the dominant mechanism for boron adsorption.

Keywords

• Boron
• Diffuse double layer
• Ions exchangeable
• Sodium adsorption ratio

20.1001.1.20084757.1395.30.6.13.3

References

1- Arora H., Bhardwaj S., and Sharma B. 2006. Boron adsorption on benchmark soils of Punjab. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 18:1313-1320.

2- Berger K., and Truog E. 1946. Boron availability in relation to soil reaction and organic matter content. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 10:113-116.

3- Bohn H. L., Myer R. A., and O'Connor G. A. 2002. Soil chemistry. Wiley

4- Couch E. L., and Grim R. E. 1968. Boron fixation by illites. Clays Clay Miner, 16(3).

5- Elrashidi M., and O'Connor G. 1982. Boron sorption and desorption in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46(1):27-31.

6- Fleet M. 1965. Preliminary investigations into the sorption of boron by clay minerals. Clay Miner, 6(3):3-16.

7- Frenkel H. 1984. Reassessment of water quality criteria for irrigation. Soil salinity under irrigation-Processes and management, Ecological Studies, 51:144-172.

8- Goldberg S. 1993. Chemistry and Mineralogy of Boron in Soils. U. C. Gupta (Ed.). Boron and its role in crop production. Boca Raton, USA, CRC Press.

9- Goldberg S. 1997. Reactions of boron with soils. Plant and Soil, 193:35-48.

10- Goldberg S. 2005. Inconsistency in the triple layer model description of ionic strength dependent boron adsorption. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 285: 509–517.

11- Goldberg S., and Forster H. 1991. Boron sorption on calcareous soils and reference calcites. Soil Science, 152:304-310.

12- Goldberg S., and Glaubig R. A. 1986. Boron adsorption and silicon release by the clay minerals kaolinite, montmorillonite and illite. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50:1442-1448.

13- Goldberg S., Lesch S. M., and Suarez D. L. 2000. Predicting boron adsorption by soils using soil chemical parameters in the constant capacitance model. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64:1356-1363.

14- Goli E., Rahnemaie R., Hiemstra T., and Malakouti M. J. 2011. The interaction of boron with goethite: Expriments and CD–MUSIC modeling. Chemosphere, 82:1475-1481.

15- Hassani A., Rahnemaie R., and Malakouti M. J. 2011. Effect of calcium carbonate and ionic strength on boron adsorption in calcareous soils. Iranian journal of soil Research, 24:117-126.

16- Keren R. 1996. Boron. p. 603-626. In D. L. Sparks et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI.

17- Keren R., and Sparks D. 1994. Effect of pH and ionic strength on boron adsorption by pyrophyllite. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58(4):1095-1100.

18- Keren R., and Gast R. 1981. Effects of wetting and drying, and of exchangeable cations, on boron adsorption and release by montmorillonite. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45:478-482.

19- Keren R., and O'Connor G. 1982. Effect of exchangeable ions and ionic strength on boron adsorption by montmorillonite and illite. Clays Clay Miner, 30:341-346.

20- Kosmulski M. 2001. Chemical properties of material surfaces. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

21- Majidi A., and Malakouti M. J. 2007.Study of boron toxicity in fruits gardens near Uremia Lake. Tehran, Iran, Department of soil science, Tarbiat Modares University, (in Persian with English abstract).

22- Majidi A., Rahnemaie R., Hassani A., and Malakouti M.J. 2010. Adsorption and desorption processes of boron in calcareous soils. Chemosphere, 80:733-739.

23- Mehrotra N.K., and Khan S.A. 1989. Agarwala. High SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) irrigation and boron phytotoxicity in sugar beet. Ann. Arid Zone, 28:69–78.

24- Page A.L., Miller R.H., and Keeney D.R. 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis, part2, chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science of America, Madison, WI.

25- Peak D., Luther III G.W., and Sparks D.L. 2003. ATR-FTIR spectroscopic studies of boric acid adsorption on hydrous ferric oxide. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 67, 2551-2560.

26- Rhoades J.D. 1982. Soluble salts. p. 167-179. In: A.L. Page (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd ed. Agronomy monograph no.9. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI.

27- Shainberg I., and Singer M. 1990. Soil response to saline and sodic conditions. Agricultural salinity assessment and management. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. ASCE New York: Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice.

28- Sparks D. L. 2003. Environmental soil chemistry, Access Online via Elsevier.

29- Xu D., and Peak D. 2007. Adsorption of boric acid on pure and humic acid coated am-Al (OH) 3: a boron K-edge XANES study. Environmental Science and Technology, 41:903-908.

30- Yadav H.D., Yadav O.P., Dhankar O.P., and Oswal M.C. 1989. Effect of chloride salinity and boron on germination, growth and mineral composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Ann. Arid Zone, 28:63–67.

31- Yermiyahu U., Keren R., and Chen Y. 1995. Boron sorption by soil in the presence of composted organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59: 405-409.