The Effect of Partial Root-Zone Drying and Zeolite on Water Use Efficiency and Physiological Characteristics of Sweet Pepper

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• P. Daneshpazhoh ¹
• A. R. Ghasemi ¹
• Mohamad reza Nori Emamzadeie ²
• R. Barzegar ¹

¹ Shahrekord University

² shahrekord

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v32i4.69640

Abstract

Introduction: Optimal water utilization is one of the most important challenges of the present century. Due to limited water resources and the existence of alternate droughts in the country, optimal use of it is necessary. The deficit irrigation technique is one of the most effective and practical ways in which it can determine and justify the minimum water consumption with acceptable economic performance. Its use in reducing water consumption for biomass production and for irrigation of annual and perennial crops. To effectively apply water deficit management, an understanding of the effects of irrigation at different stages of vine growth is required. Partial Root-zone Drying (PRD) is also one of the new irrigation techniques over the past years. The results of many studies indicate that water use efficiency has increased and there is no significant reduction in the yield in this irrigation method. In this technique, only half of the roots are irrigated at each turn and the remaining half remains dry. On the other hand, in recent years, the use of natural minerals has improved in order to improve the physical and chemical composition of the soil, which leads to an increase in water holding capacity in the soil. One of the methods for increasing the water use efficiency is the application of water absorbent materials in soil. Super absorbent polymer increases the water saving in soil and decreases the amount of water used for irrigation. Zeolite is one of these minerals that increases the soil water holding capacity. So far, many studies have been carried out on the use of PRD, as well as the use of zeolite, but none has examined the effect of these two simultaneously. Therefore, in the present study, the efficiency of both above method and deficit irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of sweet pepper were investigated.
Materials and Methods: This research was carried out in a completely randomized design with 9 treatments and 4 replications in a greenhouse in Shahrekord University. This study was carried out at three levels of irrigation of 100%, 75% and 50% of the water requirement of the plant by Partial Root-zone Drying and zeolite in two levels of 2 and 4% by weight in the soil, in one and two sides of the pots with a height of 30 and diameter 28 cm. After preparing the culture medium, the F1 type Lummus seedlings were transferred to the pots. During the transfer of transplants into the pot, careful attention was paid to the fact that the roots were developed on both sides. Physiological parameters such as leaf area, total fresh and dry weight of the whole organ, total fresh weight of fruit, diameter and number of fruits and chemical indices including vitamin C, pH, total soluble solids and chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll with water use efficiency were measured and evaluated. In order to analyze the results, SAS software (version 1/9) was used. Mean comparison was also performed by LSD test.
Results and Discussion: The results of this study showed that there was a significant difference in the 1% level for fresh and dry weight, fresh weight of fruit and chemical indices of vitamin C, pH and soluble solids, and a significant difference at 5% for diameter fruit and chlorophyll. The results of comparing the meanings showed that fresh weight and fruit diameter were significantly decreased in all treatments than control. The number of fruits in severe irrigation (50%) and in both levels of zeolite showed a significant decrease compared to control. Vitamin C value as an important indicator of fruit quality in all treatments was significantly higher than control, in other words water stress causes an increase in the amount of vitamin C in the fruit, and the amount of pH in the most treatments has decreased significantly compared to the control treatment.
Conclusion: Given that all important processes such as photosynthesis, nutrition, opening and closing of stomatal and plant growth and development are under the influence of water, most of the studied traits in this research (except chlorophyll) in zeolite-containing treatments, showed a significant advantage over non-consumption of zeolite. The results also showed that application of PRD method with zeolite in deficit irrigation resulted in significant increase in water use efficiency in all treatments.

Keywords

• Chemical indicators
• Deficit irrigation
• Greenhouse products
• Moisture
• PRD

20.1001.1.20084757.1397.32.4.3.3

References

1- Ahmad Azar F., Hasanlu T., Imani a., Feyzi Asl V. 2015. Drought stress and application of mineral zeolite on growth and some physiological parameters of cucumber plant. Journal of Plant Breeding. Iranian Journal of Biology, 28(3): 459-474 (In Persian).

2- Ayan S., Yahyaoglu Z., Gercek V. and Şahin A. 2005. Utilization of zeolite as a substrate for containerized oriental spruce (Picea orientalis L.) seedlings Concentration (mg/kg) 3 dS m-116 dS m-110 propagation. International Symposium on Growing Media.4-10.

3- Babazadeh H., Saraee Tabrizi M., and Modarrs Sanavi S. A. M. 2010. Improving the irrigation water use efficiency of soybean using partial root drying, jornal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4 (52), 99 – 110 (In Persian).

4- Bezkurt Colak Y., Yazar A., Colak I., Akca H. and Duraktekin G. 2015. Evaluation of crop water stress Index (CWSI) for Eggplant under Varying Irrigation Regimes Using Surface and Subsurface Drip Systems. Agriculture and Agriculture Science. 42: 372 – 382.

5- Blum A. 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. CRC Press, Inc., pp. 45-56.

6- Campos H. N., Trejo C., Pena-Valdivia C. B., Ayala C. R., and Garcia P. S, 2008. Effect of partial root zone drying on growth, gas exchange and yield of tomato. Scientical Horticulture, 4: 493-499.

7- Dehghan H., Alizadeh A., Esmaeli K., Nemati H. 2015. The effect of drought stress on root growth and yield components of tomato. Journal of water research in agriculture. 29(2): 169 -179 (In Persian).

8- EL-Sadek A. 2014. Water use Optimisation based on the concept of partial rootzone drying. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 5:55-62.

9- Favati F., Lovelli S,. Galgano F,. Miccolis V., Di Tommaso T. and Candido V. 2009. Processing tomato quality as affected by irrigation scheduling. Scientia Horticulturae. 122(4):562- 571.

10- Grilo F. S., Di Stefano V., Lo Bianco R. 2017. Water use efficiency and physiological characteristic of “Tommy Atkins” mango under partial root zone drying irrigation system. Journal of Water Resourceand Protection. v. 7. n. 13. pp. 1029-1037.

11- Jerie P., Zhang J., Kang S. and Hu. X. 2003. The effects of partial rootzone drying on root, trunk sap flow and waterbalance in an irrigation pear (Pyrus communis L.) Orchard. Journal of Hydrol. 280:192-206.

12- Karam F., Masaad R., Bachour R., Rhayem C. and Rouphael Y. 2009. Water and radiation use efficiencies in Drip- irrigated pepper (capsicum annuum L.): Response to full and deficit irrigation regimes. European Journal of Horticultural Science. pp. 79-85.

13- Karandesh F., Mirlatifi S.M., Shahnazari A., Abbasi F., Gheysari M. 2011. The effect of partial root drying and deficit irrigation on the water use efficiency on yield components in conditions plant corn. Iranian journal of soil and water research. 44: 33 34 (In Persian).

14- Khan M. A. I., Farooqne A. M., Haque, M. A., Rahim, M. A. 2008. Effects of water Stress at varios qrowth stages on the Physio-morphological characters and yield in chilli. Bangladesh Agricultural Research, 33(3): 353-362.

15- Khashei Sivaki a., Kochakzadeh m., Shahabifar M. 2008. The Effect of Application of Clinoptilolite Natural Zeolite and Soil Moisture on Corn Yield Components. Journal of Soil Research (Soil and Water Science) 22(2). 235-241 (In Persian).

16- Lee S. K. and Kader A. A. 2000. Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin c content of horticultural crops. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 20(3): 207-220.

17- Lutfor Rahman S. M., Nawata E. and Sakuratani T. 1998. Effects of water stress on yield and related morphological characters among tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars. Thai Journal of Agricultural Science, 31(1):10-18.

18- Mamy Y., Peyvast GH. A., Bakhshi D. and Sami Zadeh H. 2007. Determination of different substrate for tomato planting in soil-free cultivation system. Journal of Horticulture (Science and Technology of Agriculture), 22: 48–39 (In Persian).

19- Meydan Shahi M., Mousavi S. F., Mostafizadefard B., Lindy A. 2012. Effect of Deficit irrigation by PRD method and sodium salicylate on yield, yield components and tomato juice consumption efficiency. Journal of Greenhouse Crop Science and Technology, 4(13):1-13 (In Persian).

20- Mohammadi M., Leaghat A., Molavi H. 2011 .The effect of salinity and drought stress on yield components tomato in field conditions tom. Journal of irrigation Science and Engineering, 34:15-24 (In Persian).

21- Mohammadi M., Molavi H., Layghat A. and Parsinejad M. 2013. The Effect of Zeolite Application on the Performance and Water Consumption Efficiency of Maize. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 27(1):57-67 (In Persian).

22- Munns R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ, 25: 239–250.

23- Ramachandra Rao S. and Ravishankar G. A. 2002. Plant cell cultures: Chemical factories of secondary metabolites. Biotechnology Advances. 20(2): 101-153.

24- Rigling A., Briihlhart H., Braker O., Forster T. and Schweingruber F.H. 2003. Effect of irrigation on diameter growth and vertical resin production in Pinus sylvestris L. on dry sites in the central Alps, Switzerland. Forest Ecologyand Management. 175: 285- 296.

25- Rostami F., Sefidkohi M. A., Shahanzari A., Akbarpour V. 2016. Effect of A 200 superabsorbent under drought stress conditions on some phytochemical parameters of chili pepper plant and water productivity. Iranian Journal of Water Research. Volume 10 number 1. Successive 20th. 114–107 (In Persian).

26- Sarmadnia Gh. H. and Kochaki A. 1992. Physiological aspects of farming. Mashhad University Press, pp. 424 (In Persian).

27- Sharayei P., Sobhani A. R. and Rahimiyan M. H. 2006. The effect of different level of irrigation and potassium fertilizers on water use efficiency and the quality of tomato fruit of Erli Belanket. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 7(2): 75-86 (In Persian).

28- Stikic R., Popovic S., Srdic M., Savic D., Jovanovic Z. and Prokic L. J., 2003. Partial Root Drying (PRD): A New Technique for Growing Plants That Saves Water and Improves The Quality of Fruit. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, 164–171.

29- Yari S., Sigarodi f., Moradi p. 2013. Effect of different levels of zeolite on growth and production of gel in aloe vera plant under different irrigation conditions. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 4(48): 72-81 (In Persian).

30- Zarei M., Kazemaini S. A., Bohrani G. 2014. The effect of tillage and stress water systems on Wheet plant performance. Journal of Iranian Crop Research, 12(4): 793-804 (In Persian).