بررسی و تفکیک جزیره حرارتی و گرمایش جهانی در دشت مشهد

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• حسین بندار ¹
• محمد موسوی بایگی ²
• بیژن قهرمان ¹

¹ گروه علوم و مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

² استاد هواشناسی کشاورزی، گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.2020.14683.0

چکیده

جهان امروزه جریان بی‌سابقه‌ای از شهری ‌شدن را تجربه می‌نماید. با توسعه شهرنشینی، وسعت بیشتری از پوشش طبیعی مناطق کشاورزی و جنگل جای خود را به شهرها داده و معضلات اکولوژیستی شهری، منجمله ایجاد جزایر حرارتی، برای زیست‌گاه موجودات زنده فراهم آورده است. از طرفی گرم شدن زمین در سالیان اخیر بر اثر پدیده گرمایش جهانی نیز، که بر اثر فعالیت‌های انسانی ایجاد می‌شود، بر این مشکلات می‌افزاید. اما این دو منشاء یکسانی نداشته و تفکیک آن از طریق تفاضل مقادیر بدست آمده در شهر و نقاط مجاور، در مدیریت شهری لازم و ضروری است. پژوهش حاضر بر روی دشت مشهد، با استفاده از تصاویر ماهواره لندست 5، لندست 7 و لندست 8 بین سال‌های 1996 تا 2016 میلادی انجام گردید. در این مطالعه به کمک روش‌های مختلف تعیین دمای سطح (LST)، دمای پوشش گیاهی محاسبه شد. نتایج نشان داد که میانگین دمای سطح زمین (LST) منطقه مطالعاتی در روزهای تحت بررسی، به­طور میانگین بین 9/17 تا 0/49 درجه سانتی‌گراد در مناطق مختلف آن دارای تغییرات زمانی و مکانی است. بیشترین و کمترین مقادیر میانگین دمای سطح زمین به ترتیب در کاربری‌های شهری و کوهستانی مشاهده شد. هم­چنین، مناطق شهری دارای تفاوت محسوس دمای سطح زمین (LST) نسبت به سایر کاربری‌ها می­باشد. نتایج استفاده از الگوریتم‌های مختلف محاسبه LST در دشت مشهد نشان داد که روش پنجره مجزا (SW) نسبت به سایر روش‌ها مقادیر بالاتری از LST را ارائه می‌دهد، این روند تقریباً در تمامی کلاس‌های کاربری اراضی در منطقه مطالعاتی دیده شد. در مناطق شهری، از بین روش‌های مختلف تعیین LST، بیشترین همبستگی‌ها بین دمای هوا در ایستگاه سینوپتیک مشهد و LST محاسباتی به روش تک کاناله یا SC دیده شد (R²=0.964). در مناطق کوهستانی و کشاورزی، نیز بیشترین همبستگی‌ها بین دمای هوا و LST محاسباتی به روش تک پنجره اصلاحی یا IMW دیده شد (R²=0.951) و (R²=0.943).

کلیدواژه‌ها

• جزیره حرارتی
• شهرستان مشهد
• گرمایش جهانی

20.1001.1.20084757.1400.35.1.10.5

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation and Separation between Urban Heat Island and Global Warming in Mashhad Region

نویسندگان [English]

• H. Bondar ¹
• Mohammad Mousavi baygi ²
• B. Ghahraman ¹

¹ Department of Water Science and Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² Professor Agro meteorology, Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

چکیده [English]

Introduction: In arid and semi-arid regions such as Iran, water is the most important limiting factor in economic development, and its management is of high importance. In recent years, due to irrigation expansion, low productivity in agricultural sector, and the rainfall shortage, water resources have been adversely affected in Iran. Undoubtedly, global warming in arid and semi-arid countries has increased the need for aquatic plants and the severity of drinking water shortages, making it more difficult to plan for limited resources. Studying the spatial and temporal changes of evapotranspiration is essential for the comprehensive planning of water management in Mashhad and providing an appropriate solution for optimal use of available water resources. However, spatiotemporal analysis of evapotranspiration regardless of the phenomenon of global warming and thermal island leads to unrealistic results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to address these shortcomings in previous studies in Mashhad. The specific objectives were: temporal analysis of evapotranspiration in the existing statistical period and estimation of annual evapotranspiration volume with respect to global warming, investigating the effect of global warming factors and thermal island on evapotranspiration and eventually water resources management in Mashhad.
Materials and Methods: This study was carried out in Mashhad, city of Khorasan Razavi province with an area of 204 square kilometers, in northeastern Iran. Satellite imagery used for this research was a time series from Landsat 5 (TM sensor), Landsat 7 (ETM +) and Landsat 8  (OLI and TIRS sensors) from 1996 to 2016. The selected images for 2016 consisted of a time series of 13 images and a 16-day interval. After receiving satellite imagery, the performance of atmospheric corrections was evaluated based on FLAASH and TAC methods for reflective and thermal bands, respectively. The radiometric correction of images and reflection calculation of reflection was also conducted for bands 4 and 5 (values of ρ) and radiations of thermal bands10 and 11 (Lsen values) in the ILWIS software environment. Then, the temperature of the vegetation was calculated using different methods of determining the surface temperature (LST).
Result and Discussion: The results showed that, on average, NDVI values in urban, mountainous and agricultural classes were 0.39, 0.37, and 0.4, respectively. However, the lowest and largest absolute value of NDVI were, respectively, 0.29 and 0.82, both of which are obtained in agricultural lands. The mean land surface temperature (LST) was 34.2 °C during days, which had a time and spatial variation between 17.9 to 49.4 °C in different regions. The highest and lowest mean LST was observed in urban and mountainous applications, respectively. Urban areas also had a significant difference in LST compared to other land uses due to the type of land cover in urban areas (mainly asphalt, stone, brick, cement, iron, etc.) and activities such as vehicle traffic, smoke and heat from factories and industries. The Split-Window (SW) method gave higher LST values compared with other methods. Then, the single-channel (SC), Improved Mono-Window (IMW) and single-window (MW) methods provided lower amounts of LST. The same trend was observed in almost all land use classes in the study area. It was also found that in urban areas, the strongest correlation between air temperature and LST was calculated by applying SC (R² = 0.937). In mountainous regions, the highest correlation between air temperature and computed LST was found for the IMW (R² = 0.951). Similarly, in the agro-rangeland areas, the highest correlation between air temperature and computed LST was obtained by IMW (R² = 0.953).
Conclusion: In the study area, the general trend of NDVI index was declining between 1996 and 2016. Reducing the percentage of vegetation cover in different sectors such as agriculture and rangeland, changing the type of vegetation (crop pattern) in agricultural sector and urban green spaces are the reasons for decreasing NDVI index in Mashhad region. The average LST was 34.2 °C in the days, which had a time and spatial variation between 17.9 to 49 °C in different regions. The maximum and minimum average LST was observed in urban and mountainous regions, respectively. The SW provided higher LST values compared to other methods. The SC, IMW and MW methods, however, provided lower LST values. The same trend was observed in almost all land use classes in the study area. It was also found that in urban areas, the highest correlation between air temperature and LST was found by using SC (R²=0.937). In mountainous regions, the strongest correlations between air temperature and LST was observed by using the Split Window Algorithm (SW) Improved Mono-Window (IMW) (R²=0.951). Similarly, in the agricultural and rangeland areas, the highest correlation between air temperature and LST was observed using the Split Window (SW) Improved Mono-Window (IMW) (R² =0.953).
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Evaporation؛ Heating؛ Heat
• Transpiration؛ Water

مراجع

1.  

   1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. Climate change indicators in the United States, Third edition. EPA 430-R-14-004.
   2. Parry M., Parry ML., Canziani O., Palutikof J., Van der Linden P., and Hanson C. 2007. Climate change 2007-impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working group II contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press.
   3. Han JY., Baik JJ., and Lee H. 2014. Urban impacts on precipitation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 50(1):17-30.
   4. AghaKouchak A., Cheng L., Mazdiyasni O., and Farahmand A. 2014. Global warming and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: Insights from the 2014 California drought. Geophysical Research Letters. 41(24): 8847-52.
   5. Sanderson M.G., Hemming D.L., and Betts R.A. 2011. Regional temperature and precipitation changes under high-end (≥ 4 C) global warming. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369(1934): 85-98.
   6. Delpla I., Jung A.V., Baures E., Clement M., and Thomas O. 2009. Impacts of climate change on surface water quality in relation to drinking water production. Environment International 35(8): 1225-33.
   7. Wilby R.L., Whitehead P.G., Wade A.J., Butterfield D., Davis R.J., and Watts G. 2006. Integrated modelling of climate change impacts on water resources and quality in a lowland catchment: River Kennet, UK. Journal of Hydrology 330(1-2): 204-20.
   8. Dabbaghian Amiri M. 2012. Island Thermal Challenges for the Urban Environment and Solutions to Reduce its Impacts. Saqez University of Applied Sciences. First Regional Conference on Architecture and Urban Development. (In Persian)
   9. Mousavi Baighi M., Ashraf B., Farid Hosseini A., and Meyanabadi A. 2012. Checking the Thermal Island of Mashhad using satellite imagery and fractal theory. Geography Magazine and Environmental Hazards 1: 35-49. (In Persian)
   10. Grimm N.B., Faeth S.H., Golubiewski N.E., Redman C.L., Wu J., Bai X., and Briggs J.M. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319(5864): 756-60.
   11. Song X., Zhang J., AghaKouchak A., Roy SS., Xuan Y., Wang G., He R., Wang X., and Liu C. 2014. Rapid urbanization and changes in spatiotemporal characteristics of precipitation in Beijing metropolitan area. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 119(19): 11-250.
   12. Creamean J.M., Suski K.J., Rosenfeld D., Cazorla A., DeMott P.J., Sullivan R.C., White A.B., Ralph F.M., Minnis P., Comstock J.M., and Tomlinson J.M. 2013. Dust and biological aerosols from the Sahara and Asia influence precipitation in the western US. Science 339(6127):1572-8.
   13. Kustas W., and Anderson M. 2009. Advances in thermal infrared remote sensing for land surface modeling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149(12): 2071-81.
   14. Leuning R., Kelliher FM., De Pury D.G., and Schulze E.D. 1995. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration: scaling from leaves to canopies. Plant, Cell & Environment 18(10): 1183-200.
   15. Jiménez-Muñoz J.C., Cristóbal J., Sobrino J.A., Sòria G., Ninyerola M., and Pons X. 2008. Revision of the single-channel algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat thermal-infrared data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 47(1): 339-49.
   16. Barsi J.A., Barker J.L., and Schott J.R. 2003. An atmospheric correction parameter calculator for a single thermal band earth-sensing instrument. InIGARSS 2003. 2003IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37477) (5: 3014-3016). IEEE.
   17. Wang F., Qin Z., Song C., Tu L., Karnieli A., and Zhao S. 2015. An improved mono-window algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat 8 thermal infrared sensor data. Remote Sensing 7(4): 4268-89.
   18. Yu X., Guo X., and Wu Z. 2014. Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat 8 TIRS—Comparison between radiative transfer equation-based method, split window algorithm and single channel method. Remote Sensing 6(10):9829-52.
   19. Sobrino J.A., Li Z.L., Stoll M.P., and Becker F. 1996. Multi-channel and multi-angle algorithms for estimating sea and land surface temperature with ATSR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17(11): 2089-114.
   20. Michael Casey. NASA: Alarming Water Loss in Midle East [Internet]. New York: Associated Press; 2013[2013 February 13^th]. Available from: http://www.weather.com/news/climate/news/middle-east-vanishing-water-20130213
   21. Cristóbal J., Jiménez‐Muñoz J.C., Sobrino J.A., Ninyerola M., and Pons X. 2009. Improvements in land surface temperature retrieval from the Landsat series thermal band using water vapor and air temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 114(D8).
   22. Jiménez-Muñoz J.C., Sobrino J.A., Skoković D., Mattar C., and Cristóbal J. 2014. Land surface temperature retrieval methods from Landsat-8 thermal infrared sensor data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 11(10): 1840-3.