تلقیح باکتری‎های محرک رشد بر عملکرد، هدایت روزنه‌ای و شاخص کلروفیل ذرت در شرایط کمبود پتاسیم

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• مهدیه لیلاسی مرند ¹
• محمدرضا ساریخانی ²

¹ دانشگاه تبریز

² تبریز

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v32i3.69251

چکیده

پتاسیم از عناصر ضروری گیاهان بوده که نقش مهمی در رشد و نمو گیاهان داشته و آزادسازی زیستی آن از طریق باکتری‏های آزادکننده پتاسیم مورد توجه است. این آزمایش با هدف بررسی تأثیر باکتری‎های مختلف بر تأمین پتاسیم و رشد رویشی گیاه ذرت انجام گرفت. در این تحقیق، 10 جدایه باکتری همراه با تیمارهای کودی (سولفات پتاسیم به میزان 50% و 100% توصیه کودی) و تیمار شاهد (بدون تلقیح باکتری و کود) در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با سه تکرار مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد به جز وزن خشک ریشه، وزن تر کل و قطر ساقه، بقیه پارامترها متأثر از تیمارهای آزمایش بودند. بیش‎ترین مقادیر به‎دست آمده از ارتفاع گیاه و وزن تر و خشک اندام هوایی، به ترتیب برابر با 8/100سانتی‏متر، 6/265 و 4/44 گرم، در تیمار کودی 50% مشاهده شد. بیش‎ترین وزن تر ریشه ( 2/187 گرم) در تیمار باکتری Pseudomonas sp. Az-8، بیش‎ترین وزن خشک کل (6/68 گرم) در تیمار باکتری Enterobacter sp. S16-3 و بالاترین میزان شاخص کلروفیل و هدایت روزنه‎ای (به ترتیب 6/9 و 097/0) در تیمار تلقیح شده با Azotobacter chroococcum 14SP2-1 مشاهده شد. آنالیز عناصر در بافت گیاهی نشان داد که بیش‌ترین مقدار پتاسیم اندام هوایی و ریشه را به ترتیب در تیمار 100% توصیه کودی (3/1077 میلی‎گرم بر وزن اندام هوایی) و Pseudomonas sp. Az-8 (4/421 میلی‎گرم بر وزن ریشه) به دست آمد. با در نظر گرفتن مقدار پتاسیم جذب شده و وزن خشک کل، باکتری‎های Pseudomonas sp. Az-8، A. chroococcum 14SP2-1 و Enterobacter sp. S16-3 مؤثرتر بوده و می‌توان برای سایر آزمایشات پیشنهاد نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• انتروباکتر
• باکتری آزادکننده پتاسیم
• پتابارور
• تلقیح باکتری
• کود زیستی

20.1001.1.20084757.1397.32.3.9.7

عنوان مقاله [English]

Inoculation of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria on Yield, Stomatal Conductance and Chlorophyll Index of Corn under Potassium Deficiency

نویسندگان [English]

• Mahdiyeh Leylasi Marand ¹
• Mohammad Reza Sarikhani ²

¹ University of Tabriz

² Tabriz

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Potassium is one of essential elements for plants and it is the most abundant nutrient on soil surface which is important factor on plant growth and development. Factors such as potassium fixation, erosion, run-off and leaching cause reduction in available potassium of soil. Microorganisms especially bacteria play important role in changing unavailable potassium to available form. Hence, such bacteria can be used for increasing available potassium in soil and consequently production and quality of crops. The K- releasing bacteria can be employed as a biofertilizer to provide plant nutrients in a sustainable approach.
Materials and Methods: In this study, 10 bacterial isolates including Enterobacter sp. S16-3, Azotobacter chroococcum 14SP2-1, Pseudomonas sp. 34A-2, Pseudomonas Az-48, Psudomonas Az-8, S11-2 and 36A-2L provided from soil biology laboratory, department of soil science, University of Tabriz, Bacillus sp. 44-1 provided from soil biology laboratory of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, and S19-1+ S14-3 isolated from Potabarvar biofertilizer produced by Green Biotech Company were used as a potassium biofertilizer. For this purpose, bacterial inoculant prepared in bagasse and perlite carrier was used to inoculate the disinfected seeds of corn (single cross 704). In this research, bacterial treatments were compared with chemical fertilizer treatments including K50 and K100, in these treatments based on soil test, 50% and 100% of fertilizer recommendation were used (equal to 0.115 g and 0.23 g potassium sulfate per pot, respectively). The experiment was conducted based on completely randomized design with three replications. Duration of this study was about 2 months. Parameters measured during growth were stem diameter, height, chlorophyll index and stomatal conductance and after harvesting, wet and dry weight of root, shoot wet and dry weight, total wet and dry weight.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that expect root dry weight, total wet weight and stem diameter, all parameters were significantly affected by the treatments. The highest plant height was observed for fertilizer treatment 50% (100.8 cm) with an increase of 3.5% compared to the negative control. As to bacterial isolates, highest height was measured in Bacillus sp. 44-1 (98.6 cm). Plant height and stem diameters are indicators of vegetative growth, these parameters can thus increase when plant can use soil nutrients more than others. Enterobacter sp. S16-3 had the maximum stem diameter and the lowest height. It can be due to decreased potassium nutrition and auxin and gibberellin transferred from root. The chlorophyll index and stomatal conductance were equal to 9.567 and 0.097, respectively, which were related to A. chroococcum 14SP2-1. These are the factors of photosynthesis parameters. Increase of these factors may be attributed to the hormone balance effects such as cytokinin which can expand root growth and absorbance of nutrients. A. chroococcum is one of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria which can provide more phytohormones and cause improved plant growth. Therefore, photosynthesis activities can be better. The highest wet weight (265.6 g) and shoot dry weight (44.4 g) were found at fertilizer treatments 50% and then 100% fertilizer recommendation, but in regards to bacterial isolates, A. chroococcum 14SP2-1 and Pseudomonas Az-8 had higher values as compared with the control. The maximum root dry weight was observed in Pseudomonas Az-48 (187.2 g). However, the lowest root weight was obtained at 50% fertilizer recommendation. Hence, this can be explained by the root developing types. The highest total dry weight was measured in Enterobacter sp. S16-3 (63.68 g) and Pseudomonas Az-8 and after these bacterial isolates, fertilizer treatments had better condition. Consequently, these bacteria had another effects on plants such phytohormones productions and enzymatic activities that chemical fertilizer did not have such influences. The highest average of shoot potassium content was observed at 100% fertilizer recommendation (1077.3 mg/plant).
Conclusions: The results showed that fertilizer treatments K50 and K100 had better conditions and pots with chemical fertilizer grew more than others in most plants. But some bacterial isolates showed comparable results relative to K50 and K100. These bacteria can affect plants with directly and indirectly mechanisms. Bacterial treatments such as A. chroococcum 14SP2-1 and Pseudomonas Az-8 improved growth parameters through solubilizing potassium and producing phytohormones. Hence, these isolates can be considered for further studies particularly under field condition.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Biofertilizer
• Bacterial inoculation
• Enterobacter
• K-releasing bacteria
• Potabarvar

مراجع

1- Arzanesh M.H., Alikhani H.A., Khavazi K., Rahimian H.A., and Miransari M. 2011.Wheat growth enhancement by Azospirillum sp. under drought stress. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 27: 197-205.

2- Aseri G.K., Jain N., Panwar J., Rao A.V., and Meghwal P.R. 2008. Biofertilizers improve plant growth, fruit yield, nutrition, metabolism and rhizosphere enzyme activities of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) in Indian Thar Desert. Scientia Horticulturae, 117: 130–135.

3- Badr M.A., Shafei A.M., and El-Deen S.H.S. 2006. The dissolution of K and P-bearing minerals by silicate dissolving bacteria and their effect on sorghum growth. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 2(1): 5-11.

4- Barker W.W., Welch S.A., Chu S., and Banfield J.F. 1998. Experimental observations of the effects of bacteria on aluminosilicate weathering. American Minerals, 83:1551–1563.

5- Basak B.B., and Biswas D.R. 2008. Influence of potassium solubilizing microorganism (Bacillus mucilaginous) and waste mica on potassium uptake dynamics by sudan grass (Sorghum vulgare Pers) grown under two Alfisols. Plant Soil, 317: 235-255.

6- Basak B.B., and Biswas D.R. 2010. Coinoculation of potassium solubilizing and nitrogen fixing bacteria on solubilization of waste mica and their effect on growth promotion and nutrient acquisition by a forage crop. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46: 641-648.

7- Broughton W.J., and Ouler S. 1986. Nitrogen fixation. volume 4: Mollecular Biology. Clarendon press, Oxford.

8- Deilamirad M., Sarikhani M.R., and Oustan Sh. 2016. Evaluating the nutrient uptake and tomato growth by Pseudomonads isolates and mineral potassium levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 26(4): 144-156. (In Persian with English abstract)

9- Dordipour E., Farshadirad A., and Arzanesh M.H. 2010. Effect of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum lipoferum on the release of soil potassium in pot culture of soybean (Glycine max var. Williams). Journal of Agroecology, 2(4): 593-599. (In Persian)

10- Ebrahmi M., Safari Sinegani A.A., Sarikhani M.R., Mohammadi S.A., and Aliasgharzad N. Isolation, identification, and determination of plant growth promoting properties of Azotobacteria isolated from soil samples North-west of Iran under different land usage. (In press)

11- Egamberberdiyeva D., and Hoflich G. 2003. Influence of growth-promoting bacteria on the growth of wheat indifferent soils and temperatures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35: 973-978.

12- Egilla N., Davies F.T., and Boutton T.W. 2005. Drought stress influence leaf water content, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency of Hibiscus rosasinensis at three potassium concentrations. Biomedical and Life Science, 43 (1): 135-140.

13- Gryndler M., Sudova R., and Rydlova J. 2008. Cultivation of high biomass crops on mine spoil banks: Can microbial inoculation compensate for high doses of organic matter?. Bioresource Technology, 99: 6391–6399.

14- Hajeeboland R., Asgharzadeh N., and Mehrfar Z. 2004. Ecological study of Azotobacter in two pasture lands of the North-west Iran and its Inoculation effect on Growth and mineral nutrition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.cv. omid) plants. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 8(2): 27-90. (In Persian with English abstract)

15- Han H.S., Supanjani D., and Lee K.D. 2006. Effect of co-inoculation with phosphate and potassium solubilizing bacteria on mineral uptake and growth of pepper and cucumber. Plant, Soil and Environment, 52: 130-136.

16- Jiang Q., Roche D., Monaco A., and Hole D. 2006. Stomatal conductance is a key parameter to assess limitations to photosynthesis and growth potential in barley genotypes. Plant Biology, 8(4): 515-521.

17- Kavino M., Harish S., Kumar N., Saravanakumar D., and Samiyappan R. 2010. Effect of chitinolytic PGPR on growth, yield and physiological attributes of banana (Musa spp.) under field conditions. Applied Soil Ecology, 45: 71–77.

18- Keshavarz Zarjani J., Aliasgharzad N., and Oustan S. 2012. Effects of six strains of potassium releasing bacteria on growth and potassium uptake of tomato plant. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 23: 245-255. (In Persian with English abstract)

19- Keshavarz Zarjani J., Aliasgharzad N., Oustan S., Emadi M., and Ahmadi A. 2013. Isolation and characterization of potassium solubilizing bacteria in some Iranian soils. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 59(12): 1713-1723.

20- Khormali F., Dordipour E., Amini A., Ghorbani R., and Ajami M. 2011. Analysis of the indigenous Glauconitic sandstone for its K supplying power and investigating its chemical and biological weathering by mineralogical and microscopic studies. Research Report. Gorgan University of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources, 46p. (In Persian)

21- Lin Q. M., Rao Z.H., Sun Y.X., Yao J., and Xing L.J. 2002. Identification and practical application of silicate – dissolving bacteria. Agricultural Science in China, 1: 81-85.

22- Liu W., Xu X., Wu X., Yang Q., Luo Y., and Christie P. 2006. Decomposition of silicate minerals by Bacillus mucilaginosus in liquid culture. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 28: 133-140.

23- Madani O., Sarikhani M.R., and Oustan S. 2015. Inoculation effects of potassium releasing bacteria on K nutrition of tomato in sand-muscovite medium and identification of efficient isolates, 26(1): 259-271. (In Persian with English abstract)

24- Malakouti M.J., and Gheibi M.N. 1988. Determine the Critical Nutrients Strategic and Proper Fertilizer Recommendations in the Country. Publication of Agricultural Education, Training and Equipping the Human Resources Department of Tat, The Ministry of Agriculture, Karaj, Iran.

25- Manske G.B., Luttger A., Behi R.K., Vlek P.G., and Cimmit M. 2000. Enhancement of mycorhiza (VAM) infection, nutrient efficiency and plant growth by Azotobacter chroocuccum in wheat. Plant Breeding, 13: 78-83.

26- Marchiol L., Letia L., Marti M., Pperssotti A., and Zerbi G. 1996. Physiological responses of two soybean cultivars to cadmium. Journal of Environmental Quality, 25: 562-566.

27- Meena V.S., Maurya B.R., and Verma J.P. 2014. Does a rhizospheric microorganism enhance K+ availability in agricultural soils. Microbiological Research, 169: 337–347.

28- Mirza M.S., Rasul G., Mehnazs Ladha J.K., Ali S., and Malik K.A. 2000. Beneficial effects of inoculated nitrogen-fixing bacteria on rice. Pp: 191–204. In: Ladha J.K., and Reddy P.M. (eds). The quest for nitrogen fixation in rice. International Rice Research Institute, India.

29- Moradi Sh., Sarikhani M.R., and Aliasgharzad N. 2016. The effect of some bacterial isolates on root growth and nutrient uptake in corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 26(4): 34-47. (In Persian with English abstract)

30- Moradi Sh., Sarikhani M.R., and Aliasgharzad N. 2017. Assessment of potassium releasing ability of some bacterial isolates in in-vitro condition and identification of efficient isolates. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. 48(2): 385-395. (In Persian)

31- Ostadi Jaafari A., Rezvani Moghaddam P., and Ghorbani R. 2012. Study of beneficial levels and effect of Azotobacter spp. And Azospirillum spp.. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 10(2): 277-283. (In Persian)

32- Park M., Singvilay D., Seok Y., Chung J., Ahn K., and Sa T. 2003. Effect of phosphate solubilizing fungi on 'P' uptake and growth of tobacco in rock phosphate. Soil Science and Fertilizer, 36: 233-238.

33- Prajapati K., Sharma M.C., and Modi H.A. 2013. Growth promoting effect of potassium solubilizing microorganisms on Abelmoscus esculantus. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 3(1): 181-188.

34- Rahmati khorshidi Y., and Ardakani M.R. 2011. Response of yield and yield components of rice (Oryza sativa) to Pseudomonas flouresence and Azospirillum lipoferum under different nitrogen levels. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, 10: 387-395. (In Persian)

35- Read J.J., Reddy K.R., and Jenkins H.N. 2006. Yield and quality of upland cotton as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus. European Journal of Agronomy, 24: 282-290.

36- Reddy G.S.N., Prakash J.S.S., Matsumoto G.I., Stackebrandt E., and Shivaji S. 2002. Arthrobacter roseus sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from an Antarctic cyanobacterial mat sample. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 52: 1017–1021.

37- Rokhzady A. 2008. Effects of inoculation Azotobacter and Mezorhizobioum on growth and yield of chickpea, Ph.D. thesis, Agronomy-Crop Physiology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research unit. (In Persian with English abstract)

38- Sadeghi S., Ostan S., Najafi N., Valizadeh M., and Monirifar H. 2017. Effects of Cadmium and Zinc interactions on growth and chemical composition of Corn (Zea mays cv. single cross). Journal of Water and Soil, 31(2): 460-477.

39- Sheikh Alipour P., Bolandnazar S.A., Sarikhani M.R., and Irani F. 2016. Effect of some isolates of Pseudomonas vaccination on growth and nutrient uptake of tomato under field condition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 26(1): 100-117. (In Persian with English abstract)

40- Sheng X.F., and Huang W.Y. 2002. Study on the conditions of potassium release by strain NBT of silicate bacteria scientia. Agricultural Sinica, 35: 673-677.

41- Sheng X.F. 2005. Growth promotion and increased potassium uptake of cotton and rape by a potassium releasing strain of Bacillus edaphicus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37: 1918-1922.

42- Sheng X.F., He L.Y., and Huang W.Y. 2002. The conditions of releasing potassium by a silicate-dissolving bacterial strain NBT. Agricultural Sciences in China, 1: 662–666.

43- Tabatabaei S.J. 2009. Principles of Mineral Nutrition of Plants. Tabriz, Iran.

44- Sindhu S.S., Dua S., Verma M.K., and Khandelwal A. 2010. Growth Promotion of Legumes by Inoculation of Rhizosphere Bacteria. Microbes for Legume Improvement. CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

45- Singh J.S., Pandey V.C., and Singh D.P. 2011. Efficient soil microorganisms: A new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 140: 339–353.

46- Singh G., Biswas D.R., and Marwah T.S. 2010. Mobilization of potassium from waste mica by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and its assimilation by maize (Zea mays) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition, 33: 1236-1251.

47- Sugumaran P., and Janarthanam B. 2007. Solubilization of potassium containing minerals by bacteria and their effect on plant growth. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3: 350-355.

48- Vikram A., Hamzehzarghani H., Al-Mughrabi K.I., Krishnaraj P.U., and Jagadeesh K.S. 2007. Interaction between Pseudomonas fluorescens FPD-15 and Bradyrhizobium spp. in peanut. Biotechnology, 6: 292–298.

49- Waling I., Vark W.V., Houba V.G.J., and Van der lee J.J. 1989. Soil and plant analysis, a series of syllabi. Part 7. Plant Analysis Procedures. Wageningen Agriculture University, The Netherland.

50- Zafar M., Abbasi M.K., Khan M.A., Khaliq A., Sultan T., and Aslam M. 2012. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nodulation and nutrient accumulation of lentil under controlled conditions. Pedosphere, 22: 848–859.