اثر اسید هیومیک بر فراهمی کود فسفر و برخی صفات فیزیولوژیکی گیاه کلزا

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• آمنه جهاندیده ¹
• مجتبی بارانی مطلق ²
• اسماعیل دردی پور ¹
• رضا قربانی نصرآبادی ¹

¹ علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

² گرگان

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v33i6.77449

چکیده

فسفر در مقایسه با دیگر مواد مغذی ضروری، دارای تحرک و قابلیت دسترسی کمتر برای گیاهان است. اگر چه فسفر به اشکال آلی و غیر آلی در خاک‌ها فراوان است، اما اغلب عامل مهم یا حتی محدود کننده اصلی برای رشد گیاه است. در این پژوهش اثرات مصرف هم­زمان اسید هیومیک و کود فسفر و روش­های کاربرد آن بر صفات فیزیولوژیک و فراهمی فسفر در گیاه کلزا (رقم هایولا 50) مورد بررسی قرار گرفت، بدین منظور آزمایشی به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در 3 تکرار به­صورت گلدانی به اجرا درآمد. تیمارهای شامل فسفر در سه سطح (0، 50 و 100 میلی‌گرم کود سوپرفسفات تریپل بر کیلوگرم خاک)، اسید هیومیک در سه سطح (0، 5/0 و 1 گرم بر کیلوگرم خاک) و روش­های کاربرد همزمان اسید هیومیک و فسفر بود. اثرات متقابل اسید هیومیک و فسفر و روش­های کاربرد آن بر تمام صفات اندازه­گیری شده در سطح یک درصد معنی­دار شد. نتایج اثرات متقابل سه­جانبه سطوح اسید هیومیک، سطوح فسفر و روش‌های کاربرد نشان داد که بیشترین مقادیر در انواع کلروفیل (a، b و ab) و کارتنوئید در تیمار کودی 100 میلی­گرم بر کیلوگرم فسفر و سطح 1 گرم بر کیلوگرم مصرف همراه با آب آبیاری اسید هیومیک به­دست آمد. بیشترین مقدار غلظت فسفر اندام هوایی با میانگین 30/0 درصد در تیمار یک گرم بر کیلوگرم اسید هیومیک همراه با آب آبیاری با سطح 100 میلی­گرم بر کیلوگرم فسفر مشاهده شد هر چند با تیمار 5/0 گرم بر کیلوگرم اسید هیومیک همراه با آب آبیاری از لحاظ آماری اختلاف نداشت. بیشترین مقدار فسفر عصاره­گیری شده به روش اولسن با میانگین 16/41 میلی­گرم بر کیلوگرم و روش سلطان­پور و شواب با میانگین 24/5 میلی­گرم بر کیلوگرم مربوط به تیمار 100 میلی­گرم برکیلوگرم فسفر و مصرف خاکی یک گرم بر کیلوگرم اسید هیومیک بود. همچنین همبستگی بالا و معنی­داری بین فسفر عصاره­گیری شده به روش اولسن و سلطان­پور و شواب با صفات مورد مطالعه مشاهده شد. به­نظر می­رسد که استفاده از فسفر همراه با اسید هیومیک، بیشتر از کاربرد فسفر به‌تنهایی، می­تواند باعث افزایش فسفر قابل­دسترس در خاک و نیز غلظت فسفر در گیاه کلزا (هایولا 50) شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• اندام هوایی
• کلروفیل
• کارتنوئید
• وزن تر و خشک

20.1001.1.20084757.1398.33.6.7.8

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Humic Acid on the Availability of Phosphorus Fertilizer and some Physiological Traits of Rapeseed (Canola)

نویسندگان [English]

• A. Jahandideh ¹
• M. Barani ²
• E. Dordipour ¹
• R. Ghorbani Nasrabadi ¹

¹ Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

²

چکیده [English]

Introduction: One of the most important needs in the farm planning is the evaluation of different systems of plant nutrition. By supplying the correct way of plant nutrition, one can preserve the environment and increase the efficiency of agricultural inputs. Humic acid contains many nutrients that increase soil fertility, soil organic matter content, and access to macro- and micro-nutrients by preventing the formation of insoluble salts and chelating properties. Phosphorus and humic acid stimulate vegetative growth, improve reproductive growth, and increase the quantitative and qualitative yield of plants. In this regard, the positive effects depend on the amount and how they are applied. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effects of different levels of humic acid and phosphorus fertilizer on phosphorus availability and photosynthetic pigments (a, b and carotenoids) in canola (cv. Hyola 50).
Methods and Materials: The soil used in this study was collected from 0-30 cm layer of a soil profile passed through a 2-mm sieve after air-drying. The soil chemical and physical properties were then determined. The pot experiment was conducted as factorial based on completely randomized design with three replications. Treatments include phosphorous fertilizer as super phosphate in three levels (0, 50 and 100 mg/kg) and humic acid in three levels (0. 0.5 and 1 gr/kg soil), phosphorous and humic acid application ways. Humic acid and phosphorous treatments were mixed in various forms including simultaneous mixing of humic acid and phosphorous fertilizer in the soil matrix, application of humic acid and phosphorous via irrigation water and coting of phosphorous fertilizer via solid humic acid before soil application. Then 10 canola seeds were planted in each pot at 2-cm depth which were declined to 4 plants in each pot after emerging and greening phases. At the end of the growth period (158 days), the plants were harvested. Determination of phosphorus concentrations of plant extracts by molybdenum vanadate or yellow method and chlorophyll content (a, b and ab) and carotenoids were measured precisely before harvesting using Barnes method. After harvesting the plants, the soil was immediately air-dried and passed through a 2mm sieve. Then, the amount of phosphorus was determined by sodium-DTPA and sodium bicarbonate. The statistical results of the data were analyzed using SAS software and LSD test (at 5% level) was used for comparing the mean values.
Results and Discussion: The interactions of humic acid and phosphorus and its application methods were significant for all measured traits at the 5% level. The results of the triple effects of humic acid levels and its application at the presence of phosphorus treatments showed that the highest chlorophyll (a, b and ab) and carotenoid content was obtained at 100 mg/kg phosphorus and 1 g/kg humic acid along with irrigation water. The highest concentration of plant shoot phosphorus with an average of 0.30% was observed in 1 g/kg humic acid with irrigation water at the level of 100 mg/kg phosphorus, although had no significant difference with 0.5 g/kg of humic acid with irrigation water. Maximum amount of P was extracted by Olsen method with the mean of 16.14 mg/kg and Soltanpour and Schwab method with the mean of 5.24 mg/kg obtained in 100 mg/kg phosphorus and 1 g/kg soil humic acid application. There was a significant correlation between the phosphorus extracted by Olsen method and Soltanpour and Schwab method (r = 0.95), which was significantly correlated with concentration of phosphorus (r = 0.84) and (r = 0.85) (P<0.05). There was also a significant correlation between fresh and dry above-ground biomass, types of chlorophyll (a, b and ab) and carotenoids with phosphorus extracted by Olsen and Soltanpour and Schwab methods at 5% significance level.
Conclusion: P adsorption capacity is a function of many factors. Application of phosphorous fertilizers in calcareous soils, due to the presence of calcium with high activity, results in the formation of calcium phosphates, which becomes insoluble, over time. Humic material in interaction with phosphorus in the soil can reduce phosphorus stabilization and increase plant available phosphorus. The results of this study showed that the use of phosphorus with humic acid, rather than the use of phosphorus alone, could increase the available phosphorus in the soil and also the phosphorus concentration within the plant.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Carotenoid
• Chlorophyll
• Fresh and dry weight
• Shoots

مراجع

1- Abou-Aly H.E., and Mady M.A. 2009. Complemented effect of humic acid and biofertilizers on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity. Annals of Agricultur Science Moshtohor 47(1): 1-12.

2- Antelo J., Arce F., Avena M., Fiol S., Lopez R., and Macias F. 2007. Adsorption of a soil humic acid at the surface of goethite and its competitive interaction with phosphate. Geoderma 138(1-2): 12-19.

3- Asenjo M.C.G., Gonzalez J.L., and Maldonado J.M. 2000. Influence of humic extracts on germination and growth of ryegrass. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 31(1-2): 101-114.

4- Barahimi N., Afyuni M., Karami M., and Rezaee Nejad Y. 2009. Cumulative and residual effects of organic amendments on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentrations in soil and wheat. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology 12(46): 803-812.

5- Barber S.A. 1995. Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: a Mechanistic Approach. 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York, USA, 414 p.

6- Barnes J.D., Balaguer L., Manrique E., Elvira S., and Davison A.W. 1992. A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophyll a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 32(2): 85-90.

7- Berg M.G., and Gardner E.H. 1978. Methods of soil analysis used in the soil testing laboratory at Oregon State University.

8- Boehme M., Schevtschenko J., and Pinker I. 2005. Iron supply of cucumbers in substrate culture with humate. Acta Horticulturae 697, 329.

9- Bremner J.M., and Mulvaney C.S. 1982. Nitrogen—Total 1. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, (methodsofsoilan 2), 595-624.

10- Chapman H.D. 1965. Cation-exchange capacity 1. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, (methodsofsoilanb), 891-901.

11- Classen N., and jones D.L. 2004. Phosphorus solubilization by citrate in soil of low p availibilaty effect and mechanisms. Rhizospher International on Gress Abstract 145:12-17.

12- Delgado A., Madrid A., Kassem S., Andreu L., and del Carmen del Campillo, M. 2002. Phosphorus fertilizer recovery from calcareous soils amended with humic and fulvic acids. Plant Soil 245: 277–286.

13- El-Bassiony A.M., Fawzy Z.F., El-Baky M.A., and Mahmoud A. R. 2010. Response of snap bean plants to mineral fertilizers and humic acid application. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 6(2): 169-175.

14- El-Sayed S.A.A., Hellal F.A., and KAS M. 2014. Effect of Humic acid and phosphate sources on nutrient composition and yield of Radish grown in calcareous soil. European Inter. J. Sci. and Tech. ISSN, 2304-9693.

15- Emami M. 1996. Legs analysis methods Technical Journal number 982. Soil and Water Research Institute, Tehran. Iran. Caver 2.

16- Fargami A.A., and Nabavi Kalat S.M. 2013. The role of humic acid and phosphorus on the quality and quantity of spring wheat (Calendula officinalis L.). Ecophysiology of Crop Plants (Agriculture Sciences) 28(4): 443-452. (In Persian)

17- Fatemi H., Ameri A., and Aminifard M.H. 2011. In Investigation of Effect of humic acid Fertilizer on growth and Yield of Ocimum basilicum under Field Conditions. 1st National Conference on New Concepts in Agriculture. Faculty of Agriculture, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University (IAU), November, 678-683.

18- Fu Z., Wu F., Song K., Lin Y., Bai Y., Zhu Y., and Giesy J.P. 2013. Competitive interaction between soil-derived humic acid and phosphate on goethite. Applied Geochemistry 36: 125-131.

19- Hallajnia A., Fotovat A., and Khorasani R. 2006. Availability of soil phosphorus resulting from different amounts of phosphorus fertilizer in soils of Hamedan province. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 4(10): 121-132. (In Persian)

20- Harper S.M., Kerven G.L., Edwards D.G., and Ostatek-Boczynski Z. 2000. Characterisation of fulvic and humic acids from leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and from decomposed hay. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32(10): 1331-1336.

21- Hartwigson J.A., and Evans M.R. 2000. Humicacid seed and substrate treatments promote seedling root development. Horticultur Science 35(7): 1231-1233.

22- Havlin J.L., Beaton J.D., Tisdale S.L., and Nelson W.L. 2005. Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management (Vol. 515, pp. 97-141). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

23- Hu H.Q., He J.Z., Li X.Y., and Liu F. 2001. Effect of several organic acids on phosphate adsorption by variable charge soils of central China. Environment International 26(5-6): 353-358.

24- Inskeep W.P., and Silvertooth J.C. 1998. Inhibition of hydroxy apatite precipitation in the presence of fulvic, humic and tannic acids. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52: 941-946.

25- Jones Jr J.B., and Case V.W. 1990. Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue samples. Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue samples, (Ed. 3), 389-427.

26- Kamprath E.J. and Watson M.E. 1980. Conventional soil and tissue tests for assessing the phosphorus status soils. pp. 433-469. In: Khasawneh et al. (eds). The Role of Phosphorus in Agriculture. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

27- Karimi Amir Kia Sar M., Ardalan M., Kavusi M., and Shokri Vahed H. 2001. Field and laboratory evaluation of some extraction methods for determining the available phosphorous in some rice paddies in Guilan province. Water and Soil Journal (Agricultural Sciences and Technology) 25(4): 814-822. (In Persian with English Abstract)

28- Khoram Ghahfarokhi A., Rahimi A., and Torabi B. 2016. Effect of humic acid fertilizer application and foliar spraying of compost tea and vermiwash on growth indices of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Oil Plants Production 2(1): 71-84. (In Persian)

29- Labhsetwar V.K., and Soltanpour P.N. 1985. A comparison of NH4HCO3-DTPA, NaHCO3, CaCl2, and Na2-EDTA soil tests for phosphorus. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49:1437-1440.

30- Leytem A.B., and Westermann D.T. 2003. Phosphate sorption by pacific northwest calcareous soils Journal of Soil Science 168: 368-375.

31- Maghsudi M.R., Reihanitabar A., and Najafi N. 2014. Evaluation of some extraction methods for determining the available phosphorus of Zea mays in some calcareous soils of East Azarbaijan Province. Water and soil knowledge 24(2): 199-214. (In Persian with English Abstract)

32- Malekooti M.J., and Homaee M. 2004. Fertility of arid and semi-arid soils (Problems and solutions). Tarbiat Modares University. Office of Scientific Works 195-241. (In Persian)

33- Molina M., Ortega R., and Escudey M. 2012. Evaluation of the AB-DTPA multiextractant in Chilean soils of different origin with special regard to available phosphorus. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 58: 789-803.

34- Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Muscolo A., and Vianello A. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34: 1527-1536.

35- Nasooti Miandoab R., Samavat S., and Tehrani M.M. 2010. Humic acid fertilizer on plants and soil properties. Agric. Food, 101: 53-55. (In Persian with English Abbstract)

36- Olsen S. R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department Of Agriculture, Washington.

37- Page A.L., Miller R.H., and Keeney D.R. 1982. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy, No. 9. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, p.1159.

38- Pagliari, P., Rosen C., Strock J., and Russelle M. 2010. Phosphorus availability and early corn growth response in soil amended with Turkey manure ash. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 41: 1369-1382.

39- Perassi I., and Borgnino L. 2014. Adsorption and surface precipitation of phosphate onto CaCO3–montmorillonite: effect of pH, ionic strength and competition with humic acid. Geoderma 232: 600-608.

40- Richardson A.E., Barea J.M., McNeill A.M., and Combaret C.P. 2009. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil 321: 305-339.

41- Roozbehani A., Ghorbani S., Mirzaee M.M., and Orujnia S. 2013. Study of the Effect of Humic Acid and Folic Acid on Yield and Yield Components of Hordeum vulgare. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding 9(2): 25-33. (In Persian)

42- Rostami M., and Shokouyan A.A. 2018. Evaluation of Humic Acid Techniques and Nitrogen Ratios on Morphological Characteristics and Strawberry Function (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) Parus. journal of horticulture, 32(2): 251-261. (In Persian)

43- Salman S.R., Abou-Hussein S.D., Abdel-Mawgoud A.M.R., and El-Nemr M.A. 2005. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon as affected by hybrids and humic acid application. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 1: 51-58.

44- Sepehr I., and zebardast V.R. 2013. Effect of Humic Acid on Phosphorus Absorption Behavior in a Calcareous Soil. Journal water and soil (Agriculture Sciences and Technology) 27:4. 720-731( In Persian with English abstract)

45- Soltanpour P.N., and Schawb A.P. 1977. A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro and micro nutrients in alkaline soils. Commn. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 8:195-207.

46- Ström L., Owen A.G., Godbold D.L., and Jones D.L. 2002. Organic acid mediated P mobilization in the rhizosphere and uptake by maize roots. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34(5): 703-710.

47- Syers J.K., Johnston A.E., and Curtin D. 2008. Efficiency of soil and fertilizer phosphorus use. FAO Fertilizers and Plant Nutrition Bulletin no 18. Rome, Italy. FAO.

48- Taghadosi M., Hasani N., and sinky J. 2012. Disruption of irrigation and spraying stress with humic acid and algae extract on antioxidant enzymes and propylene in forage sorghum. Journal of Crop Production in Environmental Conditions 4(4):1-12. (In Persian)

49- Talebi P., Jabarzade M., and sedighani R. 2017. Effect of application and different concentrations of humic acid on performance and mineral absorbption of minor roses seven colors. To Agricultural Crop 4(18): 789-804. (In Persian)

50- Türkmen Ö., Dursun A., Turan M., and Erdinç Ç. 2004. Calcium and humic acid affect seed germination, growth, and nutrient content of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings under saline soil conditions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science 54(3): 168-174.

51- Varinderpal S., Dhillon N.S., and Brar B.S. 2006. Influence of long-term use of fertilizers and farmyard manure on the adsorption–desorption behaviour and bio-availability of phosphorus in soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 75: 67-78.

52- Walkley A., and Black I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1): 29-38.

53- Whalen J.K., and Chang C. 2002. Phosphorus sorption capacities of calcareous soils receiving cattle manure applications for 25 years. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 33(7-8): 1011-1026.

54- Zhou D. 2011. An in-vitro model of calcium phosphate mineralization in bone: transformation from amorphous calcium phosphate to apaptite. (Thesis (M.S.) Central Michigan University.