Evaluation of the Aqua‎Crop Model to Simulate Maize Yiled Response under Salinity Stress

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Aida Mehrazar
• Jaber Soltani
• omid Rahmati

Abouraihan Campus, University of Tehran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v0i0.43858

Abstract

Introduction: Limited water resources and its salinity uptrend has caused reducing water and soil quality and consequently reducing the crop production. Thus, use of saline water is the management strategies to decrease drought and water crisis. Furthermore, simulation models are valuable tools for improving on-farm water management and study about the effects of water quality and quantity on crop yield.. The AquaCrop model has recently been developed by the FAO which has the ability to check the production process under different propositions. The initial version of the model was introduced for simulation of crop yield and soil water movement in 2007, that the effect of salinity on crop yield was not considered. Version 4 of the model was released in 2012 in which also considered the effects of salinity on crop yield and simulation of solute Transmission in soil profile.
Material and methods: In this project, evaluation of the AquaCrop model and its accuracy was studied in the simulating yield of maize under salt stress. This experiment was conducted in Karaj, on maize hybrid (Zea ma ys L) in a sandy soil for investigation of salinity stress on maize yield in 2011-2012. This experiment was conducted in form of randomized complete block design in four replications and five levels of salinity treatments including 0, 4.53, 9.06, 13.59 and 18.13 dS/m at the two times sampling. To evaluate the effect of different levels of salinity on the yield of maize was used Version 4 AquaCrop model and SAS ver 9.1 software .The model calibration was performed by comparing the results of the field studies and the results of simulations in the model. In calculating the yield under different scenarios of salt stress by using AquaCrop, the model needs climate data, soil data, vegetation data and information related to farm management. The effects of salinity on yield and some agronomic and physiological traits of hybrid maize (Shoot length, root length, dry weight and crop yield) under different levels of NaCl solution osmotic potential were also investigated by SAS ver 9.1 software. Data's mean comparisons were performed by Duncan's multiple range test. To assess the accuracy of AquaCrop Model for Simulation of the Maize Performance under Salt Stress used from Indicators RMSE, MAE, CRM, NSE, d and Er.
Results Discussion: The results of RMSE and MAE indices showed that AquaCrop model can simulate maize yield under the salinity stress. Accuracy decreased and crop yield prediction underestimated with increasing salinity from treatment 0 to 18.13 ds/m in the first and second harvest. The highest yield related to salinity treatment of 0 dS/m and the lowest yield related to salinity treatment 18.13 dS/m. yeild simulation error increased by increasing salinity, the highest and lowest error of yield simulation in model respectively related to salinity treatments 18.13 and 0 dS/m. The highest and lowest error was in the first harvest respectively 0.56 and 13.1 percent and in the second harvest respectively 0.42 and 21.79 percent, that in the comparison with the results of studies conducted by Steduto and colleagues on maize is not much different. The results comparison in the first and second harvest showed that soil salinity was increased by increasing irrigation number in second harvest, so the error in second harvest is greater than first harvest and the maximum error is related to treatment 18.13 ds/m in the second harvest 21.79 percent.The coefficient of determination R2 for the first and second harvest is respectively 0.850 and 0.834, that indicates a high correlation between yeild values of measured and predicted by the AquaCrop model. CRM index was negative and near zero in both harvest under Salinity different scenarios. According to CRM value, AquaCrop model was overestimated and the model was simulated maize yield under the salinity stress a little more than measured yield. The d statistic index value is close to unity, indicates that yield values in model is compatible with actual values. NSE index was calculated for the first and second harvest respectively 0.81 and 0.84, that is close to one and showed that the model has suitable performance in the yield simulation. Comparison of means by Duncan's multiple range test and analysis of variance in the software SAS ver 9.1 indicated Salinity has a very significant effect on all traits including shoot length, root length, dry weight and crop yield that all traits were decreased significantly by increasing salinity.
Conclusion: Comparison of the results of AquaCrop model and statistical analysis in software SAS ver 9.1 showed that maize yield was reduced with increasing salinity. According to index CRM, AquaCrop model was simulated maize yield under the salinity stress more than measured yield in farm. The results showed that the AquaCrop model simulated well maize yield in moderate and low stress, but accurately simulation slightly decreased in high stress. The results of this study was compared with other research and indicated that the error values of AquaCrop model in Karaj is not much different with the error values of other research.

Keywords

• Crop Yield
• Modeling
• Saline water
• Statistical Analysis
• Water management

20.1001.1.20084757.1395.30.5.21.9

References

1. Alizade H.A., Nazari B., Parsinezhad M., Ramezani etedali H., and Janbaz H.2010. Evaluation of AquaCrop Model on Wheat Deficit Irrigation in karaj area. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and drainage, P:273-283.(in Persian with English abstract)

2. Allen R.G., Preira L.S., Raes D., and Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirement. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, NO.56, Rome, Italy.

3. Ashofteh Beiragi M., Ebrahimi M., Mostafavi K.h., Golbashy M., Khavari Khorasani S. 2011. A study of Morphological Basis of corn (Zea mays L.) yield under drought stress condition using Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds, 2(2):32-37.

4. Babazadeh H., and sarai Tabrizi M.2012. Assessment of AquaCrop Model under Soybean Deficit Irrigation Management Conditions. Journal of Water and Soil, 2(26):329-339.(in Persian with English abstract)

5. Blanco F.F., Folegatti M.V., Gheyi H.R., and Fernandes P.D. 2008. Growth and yield of corn irrigated with saline water. Science Agriculture, 65(6):574-580.

6. Cicek N., and Cakirlar H. 2002. The effect of salinity on some physiological parameters in two maize cultivars. BULG. Journal Plant Physiology, 28:66-74.

7. Demir Kaya M., Gamze Okc u., Atak M., and Yakup C.2006. Seed treatments toovercome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthusannuus L.). Europ. J. Agronomy, 24:291–295.

8. Doorenbos J., Kassam A.H. 1979. "Yield response to water". irrigation and drainage. Paper No. 33, FAO. Rome.

9. Droogers P., Torabi M., Akbari M., and Pazira E. 2001. Field-scale modeling toexplore salinity problems in irrigated agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage, 50:77-90.

10. Eker S., and Comertpay G. 2009. Effect of Salinity Stress on Dry Matter Production and IonAccumulation in Hybrid Maize Varieties. Turk J Agric, 365-373.

11. Emdad M.R., and Fardad H. 2000. Effect of salt and water stress on corn yield production. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science, 3(31): 641-654. (in Persian with English abstract)

12. FAO. 2008. FAOSTAT. Land and plant nutritionmanagement service. Available at http://www.fao.org/ ag/Agl/agll/spuch.

13. Heng L.K., Hsiao T.C., Evett S., Howell T., and Steduto P. 2009. Validating the FAO AquaCrop Model for Irrigated and Water Deficient Field Maize Agron. J. 101:488–498.

14. Heydariniya M., Naseri A.A., andBoromand Nasab S. 2012. Investigation of AquaCrop model application in irrigation planning of sunflower in ahvaz. Journal of Water Engineering, 5(12):37-50).in Persian(

15. Hoffman G.J., Mass E.V., Prichard T.L., and Meyer J.L. 1983. Salt tolerance of corn in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta of California. Irrigation, Science, 4:31–44.

16. Iqbal M., Shen Y., Stricevic R., Pei H., Sun H., Amiri E., Penas A., and del Rio S. 2014. Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation. Agricultural Water Management, 135:61-72.

17. Khorsand A., Verdinejad V.R., and Shahidi A.2014.Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model to predict yield production of wheat, soil water and solute transport under water and salinity stresses. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 4(1):89-104.) in Persian(

18. Kroes J.G., and Van Dam J.C. 2008. Reference manual SWAP version 3.2., Alterra Green World Research, Wagenningen, Report 1649.

19. Kuo Sh.F., Lin B.J., and Shieh H.J. 2006. Estimation irrigation water requirements with derived crop coefficients for upland and paddy crops in ChiaNan Irrigation Association, Taiwan. Agricultural Water Mmanagement Journal, 82:433-451.

20. Liu H.F., Genard M., Guichard S., and Bertin N. 2007. Model-assisted analysis of tomato fruit growth in relation to carbon and water fluxes, Journal of Experimental Botany, 13(58):3567-3580.

21. Manchanda G., and Garg N. 2008. Salinity and its effects on the functional biology of legumes. Acta Physiologia Plantarum, 30:595-618.

22. Mass E.V.1986. Crop tolerance to saline soil and water. Proe. US Pak Biosaline Res. Workshop, Karachi, Pakistan, pp:205-219.

23. Mohammadi M., Ghahraman B., Davary K., Ansari H., and Shahidi A. 2015. Validation of AquaCrop Model for Simulation of Winter Wheat Yield and Water Use Efficiency under Simultaneous Salinity and Water Stress. Journal of Water and Soil. 1(29): 67-84.(in Persian with English abstract)

24. Patel N, Kumar P., and Sign N. 2008. Performance evaluation of AquaCrop in simulating Potato yield under varying water availability condition. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012.

25. Raes D. 2002. Reference manual of Budget model. K. U. Leuven, Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological sciences, Institute for Land and Water Management, Leuven, Belgium.

26. Raes D., Steduto P., Hsiao T.C., and Fereres E. 2009. AquaCrop-The FAO crop model for predicting yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agronomy, 101:438–447.

27. Raes D., Steduto P., Hsiao T.C., and Fereres E. 2012. Reference manual AquaCrop, FAO, Land and Water Division, Rome, Italy.

28. Soltani Mohamadi A., kashkooli H.A., Naderi A., and Boromand nasab S.2012.Interaction of Water and Salinity Stresses on Yield and Yield Components of Maize during Different Stages in Ahvaz Climate Conditions.Journal of Iranian Water Research (IWRJ), 5(9):161-170.(in Persian(

29. Steduto P., Hsiao T.C., Raes D., and Fereres E. 2009. AquaCrop- The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: Consepts and underlying principles. Agron. J, 101:426-437.