Analysis of Effect of the Climate Parameters Change on Runoff and Evapotranspiration of Mehrgerd Watershed

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Z. Nouri ¹
• A. Talebi ¹
• B. Ebrahimi ²

¹ Yazd University

² Isfahan

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v34i1.82329

Abstract

Introduction: In the past century, the climate has been changing on both regional and global scales over the earth. It is also expected that such changes will continue in the near future. Climate change is due to increased greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere. The concentration of these gases is directly related to the temperature increase. Climate change affects the hydrological cycle through changes in time, amount, the shape of precipitation, evaporation rates and transfer, soil moisture, runoff, etc. Today, the use of hydrological models have been developed to have the factors affecting the hydrological cycle in the watershed. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is an example of these models. The common method of assessing the effects of climate change on flow is using hydrological models along with general circulation models (GCMS) or regional weather models (RCMS). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of climate change on runoff and evapotranspiration (real and potential) of Mehrgerd Watershed using the SWAT hydrologic model and the CanESM2 climatic model.
Materials and Methods: For modeling the change rate of regional climate parameters in the future period (2017-2030) and the effect of these changes on hydrological parameters, the daily data of minimum and maximum temperature of the Borujen station and precipitation of the Tange Zardaloo station for the base period (1984-2005) were used as inputs of the CanESM2 model. Accordingly, using the model of SDSM5.2 under the scenario of RCP8.5 was performed the downscaling operation. To evaluate the efficiency of the SDSM model were used statistical criteria R2, RMSE, and NS. In the next step, the SWAT 2012 model was used to simulate the hydrologic conditions. After introducing the DEM map with a precision of 20 meters, the region was divided into 18 sub-basins. From the combination of land use maps, soil, and slope, 54 units of hydrological response (HRU) were obtained. Then, climatic data including precipitation, minimum and maximum temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation were introduced to the model. Due to the presence of the dam and the two water transfer lines in the area, physical data and discharge were calculated and introduced into the model. The calibration and validation of the model were done by Sufi-2 algorithm. The calibration process was conducted for the period 2004 to 2012 while the validation process was from 2013 to 2016. In order to evaluate the performance of the model, coefficients NS, R2, P-Factor and R-Factor were used. For this purpose, the model was restarted to obtain the appropriate range for each parameter. After calibrating the hydrological model was introduced the simulated climate to the SWAT model. Finally, the effect of climate change was investigated on runoff and evapotranspiration (real and potential) of Mehrgerd Watershed.
Results and Discussion: The results of the downscaling of the climatic model in this region indicate a decrease of 53.48% of precipitation and increase minimum and maximum temperatures for a future period (2017-2030), 0.84 and 3.99%, respectively. Based on the results of the sensitivity analysis of the SWAT model, 10 parameters were identified as the most sensitive parameters. In the hydrological section, the statistical criteria of R2, NS, P-Factor and R-Factor were obtained for the calibration period 0.73, 0.69, 0.52 and 0.24, respectively and for the validation period, 0.71, 0.58, 0.45 and 0.29, respectively. Comparing runoff simulation in the future period under the influence of climate change and comparison of its values with the base period showed a decrease of 23.82% in an annual average of runoff. Climate change will also reduce actual evapotranspiration by 26.03% and increase potential evapotranspiration by 10.20%.
Conclusion: Based on the results of the SDSM model, it was determined that the precipitation is strongly reduced in comparison with the observation period, and the minimum and maximum temperatures increase with a slight difference compared to the observation period. According to statistical criteria, the SDMS model has succeeded in simulating the parameters for the future period. Accordingly, the values of R2, RMSE, and NS for precipitation, were equal to 0.92, 5.81 and 0.39, respectively, and for the minimum and maximum temperatures were obtained 0.99, 0.16, 0.99 and 0.99, 0.21, 0.99, respectively. In the hydrological section, the statistical criteria were acceptable values for the calibration period and the validation. Finally, it was found that under the influence of climate change, runoff decreases. Real evapotranspiration is also declining due to a lack of available water, but potential evapotranspiration is increasing due to the close relationship with temperature.

Keywords

• Climate change
• , Climate scenarios
• Downscaling
• SWAT Model
• water balance

References

1- Abbaspour K.C. 2011. SWAT-CUP2: SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs Version 2: A User Manual. Department of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling (SIAM), Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland, 100 pp.

2- Abraham T., Abate B., Woldemicheeal A., and Muluneh A. 2018. Impacts of Climate under CMIP5 RCP Scenario’s on the Hydrology of Lake Ziway Cathment, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science 8)7): 10.

3- Abtahi M. 2016. Investigation of vegetation dynamics of semi-stepi rangelands of Isfahan province (Case Study: Dolat Gharin Semirom). Iranian Journal of Natural Resources 69(2): 311-322. (In Persian)

4- Akbari F., Taheri Borujeni G., Moridi A., and Khazaee Pool A. 2018. The Effect of climate change on runoff in the Aras river basin using SWAT model 15-16 May 2018. The first national conference on water and soil assessment (SWAT) in water resources management in the country. Isfahan University of Technology,11pp. (In Persian)

5- Asakoreh H., and Akbarzadeh Y. 2017. Simulation of temperature and precipitation variations in the synoptic station of Tabriz during (2010-2100) using statistical Downscaling (SDSM) and output model (CanESM2). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards 21: 174-153. (In Persian)

6- Charron I.A. 2014. Guidebook on climate scenarios: Using climate information to guide adaptation research and decisions. 94pp.

7- Chu T.W., and Shirmohammadi A. 2004. Evaluation of the SWAT model’s hydrology component in the piedmont physiographic region of Maryland 47(4): 1057−1073.

8- Dlamini N.S., Kamal R., Amin M., Mohd B., Syazwan M., and Fikri A. 2017. Modeling potential impacts of climate change on streamflow using projections of the 5th assessment report for the Bernam River Basin, Malaysia. Water, 9: 22pp.

9- Emile Soro G., Berthe Yao A., Morton Kouame Y., and Goula B. 2017. Climate Change and Its Impacts on Water Resources in the Bandama Basin, Côte D’ivoire. Journal Hydrology 4(18): 13.

10- Ghermezcheshmeh B., Hajimohammadi M., and Ahmadi M. 2017. Validation of SWAT model accuracy in minimal flow simulation (case study: Can basin) .31 May- 1 Jun.2017. Second National Conference on Soil and Water Conservation. Iran,12pp. (In Persian)

11- Goodarzi M., Salahi B., and Hoseini S.A. 2015. Estimation of evapotranspiration in relation to climate change in the watershed of Lake Urmia. Eco Hydrology 2(2): 175-189. (In Persian)

12- Goodarzi M., Hoseini M., and Parekar M. 2017. The application of quasi-quantitative statistical method to estimate the change of Karkheh basin to the dam, Iran-Watershed Management Sience and Engineering 10(35): 51-64. (In Persian with English abstract)

13- Goodarzi M.R., Faraji A.R., and Komasi M. 2018. Uncertainty of downscaling methods in future catchment flow under climate change effect. Journal of Water and Soil 31(6):1586-1575. (In Persian with English abstract)

14- Hewitson B.C., and Crane R.G. 1996. Climate downscaling: techniques and application. Journal Climat Research. Published November 7(29): 85-95.

15- IPCC. 2001. Climate Change.The Scientific Based. Contribution of Working Group 1 To The Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, Houghton, J.T.Etc. (Eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge And New York; Chap.8:881 pp.

16- IPCC-TGCIA. 2007. General guidelines on the use of scenario data for climate impact and adaptation assessment. Ads. Mass. task group on data and scenarios support for impact and climate assessment.

17- IPCC. Climate Change .2013.The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.222pp.

18- Jabbari S., Khajadini J., Jafari R., Soltani S. 2014. Investigating the changes of vegetation cover percentages using satellite images in the Semirom area. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology 3(10): 27-38. (In Persian)

19- Koohi V., and Sanai Nejad H. 2013 Assessment of climate change scenario based on microscopic methods for calculating evapotranspiration of Urmia region. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Research 559-574. )In Persian)

20- Liang L., and LijuanL Qiang L. 2010. Emporal variation of reference evapotranspiration during 1961-2005 in the Taoer river basin of Northeast China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150: 298-306.

21- Mansuri B., Ahmadzadeh H., Masah Bavani A., Morid S., Delavar M., and Lotfi S. 2015. Investigating the effects of climate change on water resources of Zarrinehroud area using SWAT model Water and Soil Journal Agricultural Science and Technology 28(6): 1191-1230.

22- Melke A., and Abegaz F. 2017. Impact of climate change on hydrological responses of Gumara catchment, in the Lake Tana Basin Upper Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, 9(1): 8-21.

23- Merritt W.S., Alila Y., Barton M., Taylor B., Cohen S., and Neilsen D. 2006. Hydrologic response to scenarios of climate change in sub watersheds of the Okanagan basin, British Columbia. Journal of Hydrology 326: 79–108.

24- Ministry of Power. 2017. Report of water resources balance of study areas Great Karun Basin. Volume 5: Water Resources Assessment Report. Appendix 24: Water balance of the Mehrgerd Study Area (2324). Code: SR-105-39.

25- Molina-Navarro E., Hallack-Alegria M., Martinez-Perez S., Ramirez-Hernandez J., Mungaray-Moctezuma A., and Sastre-Merlin A. 2015. Hydrological modeling and climate change impacts in an agricultural semiarid region. Case study: Guadalupe River basin, Mexico. Agric. Water Manage 175: 29-42.

26- Moriasi D., Wilson B., Douglas-Mankin K., Arnold J., and Gowda P. 2012. Hydrologic and water quality models: Use, calibration, and validation. Trans. ASABE 55(4): 1241-1247.

27- Naderi S., Goodarzi M., and Ghadami Dehno M. 2018. Effects of climate change on climate parameters in Seymare Basin. Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering 11(39): 69-76. (In Persian with English abstract)

28- Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., and Williams J.R. 2005. Soil and water assessment tool documentation, (user’s manual). 494 pp.

29- Neitsch S., and Arnold J., Kiniry J., and Williams J. 2011. Soil and water assessment tool: theoretical documentation, version 2009, Texas Water Resource Institute, USA.647pp.

30- Saboohi R., Barani H., Khodagholi M., Abedi Sarvestani A., and Tahmasebi A. 2019. Nomads’ indigenous knowledge and their adaptation to climate changes in Semirom city in Central Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 137: 1377–1384.

31- Sathian K.K., and Shyamala P. 2009. Application of GIS integrated SWAT model for basin level water balance. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 37: 100-105.

32- Seifi A., Mirlotfi SM., and Riahi H. 2011. Developing a combined model of linear regression and factor analysis (mlr-pca) for evaluating reference evapotranspiration (Case Study: Kerman Station). Journal of Water and Soil Science 1186-1196. (In Persian with English abstract)

33- Tolson B.A., and Shoemaker C.A. 2004. Watershed modeling of the canyonville basin using SWAT2000: model development, calibration and validation for the prediction of flow, sediment and phosphorus transport to the cannons ville reservoir. school of civil and environmental engineering. 159 pp.

34- Uniyal B., Jha M.K., and Verma A.K. 2015. Parameter identification and uncertainty analysis for simulating streamflow in a river basin of Eastern India, Hydrological Processes 29(17): 3744-3766.

35- Wilby R.L., Dowson C.W., and Barrow E.M. 2002. SDSM-A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts, environmental modeling & software 17: 147-159.

36- Wilby R.L., and Dawson W.C. 2007. SDSM 4.2- A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts, SDSM manual version 4.2, Environment Agency of England and Wales, 94 pp.

37- Zhang Y., You Q., Chen C., and Ge J. 2016. Impacts of climate change on stream flows under RCP scenarios: a case study in Xin River Basin, China. To appear in: Atmospheric Research, 46pp.

38- Zuo D., Xu Z., Zhao J., Abbaspour K., and Yang H. 2015. Response of runoff to climate change in the Wei River basin, China. Hydrological Sciences Journal 37-41.