Efficiency of Nitrilo Triacetic Acid (NTA) on Leaching and Refining of Cadmium from Soil by Maize

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• N. Mehrab
• M. Chorom
• M. Norouzi Masir

Ahwaz

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v34i3.78046

Abstract

Introduction: Decontamination of heavy metals (HMs), especially cadmium (Cd) which has high mobility in the soil, is very important due to the effects of HMs pollution on the soil, environment, and human. Numerous efforts have been made to develop technologies for the remediation of contaminated soils, including ex-situ washing with physical-chemical methods, and the in-situ immobilization of metal pollutants. These methods of clean up are generally very costly, and often harmful to properties of the soil (i.e., texture, organic matter, microorganisms). Recently, the phytoremediation of HMs from contaminated soils has attracted attention for its low cost of implementation and many environmental benefits. Several chelating agents, such as DTPA, EDTA, and NTA, have been studied for their ability to dissolve metals, leach heavy metals, and enhance the uptake of metals by plants. Although many researchers have reported that EDTA is excellent solubilizing agents for HMs from contaminated soils, it is quite persistent in the environment due to the low biodegradability. Hence recently the easily biodegradable chelating agent NTA has been proposed to enhance the uptake of HMs in phytoremediation as well as the leaching of HMs from the soil. Therefore, in the present study attempts are made to investigate the effect of applicability NTA in Cd leaching and the refining of Cd from contaminated-soil by maize.
Materials and Methods: In this research, the effect of NTA on Cd leaching and its absorption by maize in contaminated-soil in a greenhouse experiment were investigated. The experiment was a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized design. The treatments consisted of three levels of Cd contamination (0, 25 and 50 mg kg-1soil) and three levels of NTA (0, 15 and 30 mmol per pot) in loamy soil and in the cultured and non-cultured conditions under three irrigation conditions. The soil was contaminated with cadmium chloride (CdCl2.2.5H2O). Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (in the form of urea, triple superphosphate and potassium phosphate, respectively) were added to the pots. NTA was added in three steps to the pots. The first step of adding NTA was beginning 4 weeks after cultivation, occurring approximately once in 14 days. Also, 7 days after adding NTA, the pots were irrigated with an amount corresponding to 20% more water than the moisture of soil saturation condition. The drainage water collected from each irrigation event was kept in a refrigerator at 5°C prior to Cd analysis. The plants were cut about 5 mm above the soil surface after 10 weeks of maize growth and were dried for analyzing Cd in the plant. Analysis of variance was used to study the effects of different treatments of Cd and NTA on Cd contents in drainage water, plant, and soil. Statistical analysis were performed using SPSS. Means of treatments were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) and the graphs were plotted in Excel.
Results and Discussion: The contrasting impact between irrigation rounds and Cd treatments, as well as NTA treatments on Cdtotal leached was significant (P<0.05). The highest Cd leached was in 50 mgCd kg-1soil (Cd50) and 30 mmol NTA (NTA30) in the first irrigation round. In the next two rounds, the Cd leached from the soil was inconsiderable. Different levels of Cd and NTA showed a significant difference in Cd concentration in the first round of leaching.  In non-cultivated pots, the amount of Cd leaching in Cd50NTA15 and Cd50NTA30 treatments increased by 8 and 15 times, respectively than that in Cd50NTA0 treatment. In the case of similar treatments in the presence of maize, the Cd leaching rate increased by 5.8 and 6 times, respectively, than that in (NTA0). Cd absorbed by maize in (Cd50, NTA30) was maximum and that measured 58% more than that in (Cd50, NTA0), while dry weight decreased significantly (30% in the shoot and 40% in the root). After the cultivation and leaching process, the maximum amount of DTPA-extractable Cd was observed in (Cd50, NTA0). While using (NTA15, NTA30) at the same level of Cd-contamination (Cd50), there was a significant decrease in DTPA-extractable Cd (due to the increase in Cd dissolved, Cd leached and Cd absorbed by plants). Due to pH between 2-3 and EC about 2.5-3.5 in NTA solutions, the application of NTA in soil decreased pH and increase EC in the soil. On the other hand, the decrease in pH of soil increased solubility of calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE), thereby reduced CCE in the soil. The results of this study showed that the soil pH was effective on HMs absorption by plants, therefore the availability of Cd after the use of NTA may be due to the decrease of alkalinity in the soil. The presence of organic-metal bonds in chelate-metal compounds causes metals to be less exposed to colloids, hydroxides, and oxides thus will prevent their stabilization in the soil. So it can be said that one of the effective methods for increasing the absorption of HMs from the soil by the plant is to reduce the pH of the soil. Some of the soil properties, such as pH and total heavy metal concentration, improves the efficiency of the chelator agent.
Conclusion: The results showed that an increase in the amount of Cd contamination and NTA applied increased Cd content in drainage water and Cd which was uptake by maize. Also, results showed well, the combined of maize planting and the use of NTA is successful in refining Cd from contaminated-soil. It seems that Adding NTA as a natural chelator in Iranian calcareous soils can increase the dissolution of Cd and extract it from the soil during a leaching period without contamination of the environment, as well as increase the efficiency of removing Cd by maize.

Keywords

• Leaching
• NTA
• phytoremediation
• Cadmium

References

1- Akhtar S., and Iram S. 2014. Effect of chelating agents on heavy metal extraction from contaminated soils. Research Journal Chemical Sciences 4(9): 70-87.

2- Allen S.E., Grimshaw H.M., and Rowland A.P. 1986. Chemical analysis. p. 285-344. In: Moore, P.D., Chapman, S.B. (ed.) Methods in Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford, London.

3- Anderson R.L., Bishop W.E., and Campbell R.L. 1985. A review of the environmental and mammalian toxicology of nitrilotriacetic acid. Critical Reviews Toxicology 15(1): 1-102.

4- Babula P., Ryant P., and Adam V. 2009. The role of sulphur in cadmium ions detoxification demonstrated in invitro model: Dionaea muscipula. Environment Chemistry 7(4): 353-361.

5- Bai W. 2018. Effects of Application of NTA and EDTA on Accumulation of Soil Heavy Metals in Chrysanthemum. p. 1-7. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

6- Brennan R.F., Armour J.D., and Reuter D.J. 1993. Diagnosis of zinc deficiency. p. 167-181. In A.D. Robson (ed.) Zinc in Soils and Plants, P206. Springer, Netherlands.

7- Clemens S., Palmgren M.G., and Kramer U. 2002. A long way ahead: understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation. Journal of Trends in Plant Science 7(7): 309-315.

8- Day P.R. 1982. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. p: 935-951. In Methods of soil analysis. Page, A.L., R.H. Miller, D.R. Keeney (ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.

9- Evangelou M., Ebel W.H.M., and Schaeffer A. 2007. Chelate assisted phytoextraction of heavy metals from soils. Effect, mechanism, toxicity, and fate of chelating agents. Chemosphere 68(6): 989-1003.

10- Hentrich D., Tauer K., Espanol M., Ginebra M.P., and Taubert A. 2017. EDTA and NTA effectively tune the mineralization of calcium phosphate from bulk aqueous solution. Biomimetics 2(24): 1-21.

11- Holleman A.F., and Wiberg E. 2001. Inorganic Chemistry. San Diego, Academic Press. Berlin, New York.

12- Huang B., Li Z., Huang J., Chen G., Nie X., Ma W., Yao H., Zhen J., and Zeng G. 2015. Aging effect on the leaching behavior of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, and Cd) in red paddy soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22(15): 11467-11477.

13- International Joint Commission. 1977. A report to the Great Lakes Research Advisory Board of the International Joint Commission on the health implications of NTA. Windsor, Canada.

14- Jalali M., and Rostaii L. 2011. Cadmium distribution in plant residues amended calcareous soils as a function of incubation time. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 57(2): 137-148.

15- Karimi R., Chorom M., Solhi S., Solhi M., and Safe A. 2012. Potential of Vicia faba and Brassica arvensis for phytoextraction of soil contaminated with cadmium, lead and nickel. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(22): 3293-3301.

16- Kayser A., Wenger K., Keller A., Attinger W., Felix H.R., Gupta S.K., and Schulin R. 2000. Enhancement of phytoextraction of Zn, Cd, and Cu from calcareous soil: the use of NTA and sulfur amendments. Environmental Science and Technology 34(9): 1778-1783.

17- Khalkhaliani Z.N., Mesdaghinia A., and Mahvi A. 2006. An experimental study of heavy metal extraction, using various concentration of EDTA in a sandy loam soils. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 9(5): 837-842.

18- Konate A., He X., Zhang Z., Ma Y., Zhang P., Alugongo G.M., and Rui Y. 2017. Magnetic (Fe3O4) nanoparticles reduce heavy metals uptake and mitigate their toxicity in wheat seedling. Sustainability 9(5): 790-806.

19- Lan J., Zhang S., Lin H., Li T., Xu X., Li Y., Jia Y., and Gong G. 2013. Efficiency of biodegradable EDDS, NTA and APAM on enhancing the phytoextraction of cadmium by Siegesbeckia orientalis L. grown in Cd-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 91(9): 1362-1367.

20- Lim T.T., Tay J.H., and Wang J.Y. 2004. Chelating-agent enhanced heavy metal extraction from a contaminated acidic soil. Journal of Environmental Engineering 130(1): 59-66.

21- Liu L., Li W., Song W., and Guo M. 2018. Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Science of the Total Environment 633:206-219.

22- Loppert R.H., and Suarez D.L. 1996. Carbonate and gypsum. p. 437- 474. In D.L. Sparks et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.

23- Mahvi A., Mesdaghinia A., and Naghipoor D. 2005. Comparison of heavy metals extraction in contaminated soils by various concentrations of EDTA. Journal of Biological Sciences 8(8): 1081-1085.

24- Majer B.J., Tscherko D., and Paschke A. 2002. Effects of heavy metal contamination of soils on micronucleus induction in Tradescantia and on microbial enzyme activities: a comparative investigation. Mutation Research 515(1-2): 111-124.

25- Martell A.E., and Smith R.M. 1974. Critical Stability Constants. Vol. 1, Amino Acids, New York, Plenum.

26- Mauskar J.M. 2007. Cadmium-an environment toxicant. Central Pollution Control Board. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt of India, Parivesh Bhawan, East Arjun Nagar, Delhi-110032.

27- Naghipour D., Jaafari J., Ashrafi S.D., and Mahvi A.H. 2017. Remediation of heavy metals contaminated silty clay loam soil by column extraction with Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid and Nitrilo Triacetic Acid. Journal of Environmental Engineering 143(8): 04017026.

28- Olsen S.R., Cole C.V., Watanabe F.S., and Dean L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA. Circ. 939. U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.

29- Ozkan A., Gunkaya Z., and Banar M. 2016. Pyrolysis of plants after phytoremediation of contaminated soil with lead, cadmium and zinc. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 96(3):415-419.

30- Quartacci M.F., Baker A.J.M., and Navari-Izzo F. 2005. Nitriloacetate and citric acid assisted phytoextraction of cadmium by Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj, Brassicaceae). Chemosphere 59(9): 1249-1255.

31- Sarwar N., Imran M., Shaheen M.R., Ishaq W., Kamran A., Matloob A., Rehim A., and Hussain S. 2017. Phytoremediation strategies for soils contaminated with heavy metals: modifications and future perspectives. Chemosphere 171: 710-721.

32- Shen Z.G., Li X.D., Wang C.C., Chen H.M., and Chua H. 2002. Lead phytoextraction from contaminated soils with high-biomass plant species. Journal of Environmental Quality 31(6): 1893-1900.

33- Soleimani M., Hajabbasi M.A., Afyuni M., Akbar S., Jensen J.K., Holm P.E., and Borggaard O.K. 2010. Comparison of natural humic substances and synthetic ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and nitrilotriacetic acid as washing agents of a heavy metal polluted soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 39(3): 855-862.

34- Sumner M.E., and Miller W.P. 1996. Cation exchange capacity, and exchange coefficients. p. 1201-1231. In D.L. Sparks (ed.), Methods of soil analysis. p1320. Part 2: Chemical properties, (3rd ed.) ASA, SSSA, CSSA, Madison, WI.

35- Thangavel P., and Subhuram C.V. 2004. Phytoextraction: role of hyper accumulators in metal contaminated soils. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy. Part B 70(1): 109-130.

36- Turan M., and Esringu A. 2007. Phytoremediation based on canola (Brassica napus L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) planted on spiked soil by aliquot amount of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn. Plant, Soil and Environment, 53(1): 7–15.

37- Walkley A., and Black I.A. 1934. Review examination of the degtjareff method determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Journal of Soil Science 34: 29-38.

38- Wang G., Zhang S., Xu X., Li T., Li Y., Deng O., and Gong G. 2014. Efficiency of nanoscale zero-valent iron on the enhanced low molecular weight organic acid removal Pb from contaminated soil. Chemosphere 117: 617-624.

39- Wei S., Teixeira Da Silva J.A., and Zhou Q. 2008. Agro-improving method of phytoextracting heavy metal contaminated soil. Journal of Hazard Materials 150(3): 662-668.

40- Wenzel W.W., Unterbrunner R., Sommer P., and Pasqualina S. 2003. Chelate-assisted phytoextraction using canola (Brassica napus L.) in outdoors pot and lysimeter experiments. Plant and Soil,249(1): 83-96.

41- Wilcox L.V. 1951. A method for calculating the saturation percentage from the weight of a known volume of saturated soil paste. Journal of Soil Science 73 (3): 233-238.

42- Wu J., Hsu F., and Cunningham S. 1999. Chelate–assisted Pb phytoextraction: Pb availability, uptake and translocation constrains. Environmental Science and Technology, 33(11): 1898-1904.

43- Yanai J., Zhao F.J., and McGrath S.P. 2006. Effect of soil characteristics on Cd uptake by the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Environmental Pollution 139(1): 167-175.

44- Zhang L., Zhang L., and Song F. 2008. Cadmium uptake and distribution by different maize genotypes in maturing stag. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 39(9-10): 1517-1531.

45- Zhao S., Jia L., and Duo L. 2016. Combining nitrilotriacetic acid and permeable barriers for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals from municipal solid waste compost by lolium perenne and reduced metal leaching. Journal of Environmental Quality 45(3): 933-939.

46- Zou Z., Qiu R., Zhang W., Dong H., Zhao Z., Zhang T., Wei X., and Cai X. 2009. The study of operating variables in soil washing with EDTA. Environmental Pollution 157(1): 229-236.