Evaluation and Variability of Flood-Oriented Health of Shiraz Darwazeh Quran Watershed from Watershed Management Structures

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi ¹
• Mohammad Tavoosi ²
• Somayeh Zare ¹
• Vahid Beiranvandi ¹
• Hengameh Shekohideh ¹
• Fatemeh Akbari Emamzadeh ¹
• Marjan Bahlekeh ¹
• Faezeh Khorshid Sokhangoy ¹
• Reza Chamani ¹

¹ Department of Watershed Management Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Tarbiat Modares University

² Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Tarbiat Modares University, Tarbiat Modares University

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.2022.78150.1190

Abstract

Introduction
Currently, many disasters threaten the health of ecosystems. The pressures caused by extensive human interventions and the unprincipled exploitation of natural resources have led to the degradation of natural resources and the structure and functioning of ecosystems. Hence, evaluating the consequences of human intervention in nature and meeting the growing need of humans to receive diverse services has made it necessary to evaluate the performance of watershed ecosystems in providing different services. Healthy watersheds play an important role in providing a wide variety of ecosystem services. Therefore, watershed health monitoring and evaluation is vital for the conservation of ecosystems and achieving the optimal level of services. In such a way a suitable collaborative and executive approach is established between research and watershed management. In this connection, watershed health analysis can provide valuable help in achieving the goals of integrated management of watersheds and, of course, the balance between the needs of human societies and ecosystems. However, the assessment of the health and sustainability of the watershed affected by human activities has not been sufficiently documented yet.
Materials and Methods
The current pilot research has evaluated the health of the Shiraz Darwazeh Quran Watershed in Fars Province, Iran, and the effect of existing watershed management structures in the region on the health of the watershed with a focus on floods. For this purpose, 36 key criteria from a set of climatic, anthropogenic, and hydrologic factors were identified based on the conditions of the region and the analysis of the flood occurrence process in the watershed. The selected criteria were then categorized into the three indices of pressure (P), state (S), and response (R). After screening the selected criteria in exploring the conceptual approach of pressure, state, and response (PSR), the health status was evaluated in two cases with and without watershed management structures.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the health condition without considering the watershed management structures was at average conditions with health index of 0.55. In addition, the results of the watershed health assessment verified the non-significant effects of stone and mortar structures on improving watershed health. So that, the health conditions was remained at average status with health index of 0.53. Therefore, it can be acknowledged that the existing watershed management structures, due to the limited both number and spatial coverage, have not been able to noticeably affect the improvement of the general conditions of the watershed, despite the effect on the factors affecting the health of the sub-watersheds where the structures have been constructed. The spatial changes of the calculated variables showed that the abandoned lands, time of concentration, area under military activities, surface of sensitive formations to erosion, high density of the drainage network, density of the roads, areas of regions with high potential in producing runoff and sediment, and size of the residential areas were the most important factors affecting the health situation of the Darwazeh Quran Watershed.
Conclusion
According to the results of the analysis of the indicators and criteria considered in evaluation of the health of the Shiraz Darwazeh Quran Watershed based on the PSR approach, it was found that the watershed had an average health status. Therefore, it can be acknowledged that the existing watershed management structures have not been able to impose a noticeable effect on the prosperity and improvement of watershed health conditions. In general, it can be said that abandoned lands, short concentration time, military activities, the presence of formations sensitive to erosion, high density of drainage network and road, and the potential of high runoff and sediment production, and the size of residential areas are among the most important factors affecting the declining the health of Darwazeh Quran Watershed. Therefore, it is necessary to pay further attention to the aforesaid factors by conducting periodical monitoring with more comprehensive data, in time and also analyzing the trend of relative changes of the indicators in order to explain the adaptive and intelligent management of the watershed. The necessary measures should also be taken into account simultaneously. Therefore, it is suggested to turn the weak points of the region into strong points by applying bioengineering measures and use the opportunities in the region such as the potential of tourism and ecological features in order to improve the health status of the watershed.

Keywords

• Fars province
• Health degree
• Watershed adaptive management
• Watershed health criteria
• Watershed sustainability

20.1001.1.20084757.1401.36.5.3.3

Main Subjects

• Irrigation

References

1. Absar Fars Consulting Engineers. (2020). Additional watershed studies of flood control dams and backwaters in Darwazeh Quran watershed. General Department of Fars Natural Resources and Watershed Management.
2. Ahn, S.R., & Kim, S.J. (2017). Assessment of integrated watershed health based on the natural environment, hydrology, water quality, and aquatic ecology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21: 5583-5602. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5583-2017.
3. Ahn, S.R., & Kim, S.J. (2019). Assessment of watershed health, vulnerability and resilience for determining protection and restoration priorities. Environmental Modelling and Software 122: 103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.014.
4. Alaei, N., Mostafazadeh, R., Esmaliouri, A., Sharari, M., & Hazbavi, Z. (2020). Assessment and comparison of landscape connectivity in KoozehTopraghi watershed, Ardabil province. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology 8(4): 19-34. (In Persian with English abstract)
5. Bihamta, M.R., & Zare Chahouki, M.A. (2016). Principles of statistics for the natural resources science (Fourth ed.) (p. 300). Tehran: Tehran Univer-sity Publication. (In Persian)
6. Ebrahimi Gatkash, Z., & Sadeghi, S.H.R. (2022). Combined application of pressure-state-response and strategic planning approaches in integrated and problem-oriented management f the Makhsaz watershed in western Mazandaran, Iran. Journal of Water and Soil Resources Conservation 11(3): 89-109. (In Persian with English abstract)
7. Ebrahimi, P., Salajegheh, A., Mohseni Saravi, M., Malekian, A., & Sadoddin, A. (2018). Watershed health prediction based on surface water quality variables (case study: Taleghan watershed). Geography and Environmental Sustainability 8(1): 1-13. (In Persian)
8. Esty, D.C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & De Sherbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy 47-60.
9. Hazbavi, Z., & Sadeghi, S.H.R. (2016a). Watershed health (Part two): Pressure, state and response conceptual model, Extension and Development of Watershed Management 4(15): 25-30. (In Persian with English abstract)
10. Hazbavi, Z., & Sadeghi, S.H.R. (2016b). Watershed health characterization using reliability-resilience-vulnerability conceptual framework based on hydrological responses. Land Degradation and Development 28(5): 1528-1537.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2680.
11. Hazbavi, Z., Keesstra, S.D., Nunes, J.P., Baartman, J.E.M., Gholamalifard, M., & Sadeghi, S.H.R. (2018). Health comparative comprehensive assessment of watersheds with different climates. Ecology Indic 93: 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.078.
12. Hazbavi, Z., Parchami, N., Alaei, N., & Babaei, L. (2020). Assessment and analysis of the Koozeh Topraghi Watershed health status, Ardabil Province, Iran. Journal of Soil and Water Resources Conservation 9(3): 121-142. (In Persian with English abstract)
13. Hazbavi, Z., Sadeghi, S.H.R., & Gholamalifard, M. (2017). Comparative analysis of the variability of health assessment indicators of pressure, state and response in Shazand watershed. The 13^th National Conference of Iran Watershed Science and Engineering. (In Persian with English abstract)
14. Hazbavi, Z., Sadeghi, S.H.R., Gholamalifard, M., & Davudirad, A.A. (2020). Watershed health assessment using the pressure–state–response (PSR) framework. Land Degradation and Development 31: 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3420.
15. Jin, Y., Yang, W., Sun, T., Yang, Zh., & Li, M. (2015). Effects of seashore reclamation activities on wetlands ecosystem, A case study in Yellow River Delta, China, Ocean & Coastal Management 123: 44-52.
16. Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Li, M., Fu, Y., & Hui, Y. (2022). Ecological source identification based on the PSR model framework and structural features: a case study in Tianjin, China. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 15(9): 1-17.‏
17. Mallya, G., Hantush, M., & Govindaraju, R.S. (2018). Composite measures of watershed health from a water quality perspective. Journal of Environmental Management 214: 104-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.049.
18. (2013). Applied hydrology. Volume 2. Tehran University Publications, 8th edition.
19. Momenian, P., Nazarnejhad, H., Miryaghoubzadeh, M., & Mostafazadeh, R. (2018). Assessment and prioritizing of subwatersheds based on watershed health scores (case study: Ghotorchay, Khoy, West Azerbaijan). Journal of Watershed Management Research 9(17): 1-13. (In Persian with English abstract)
20. Mosaffaie, J., Salehpour Jam, A., Tabatabaei, M.R., & Kousari, M.R. (2021). Trend assessment of the watershed health based on DPSIR framework. Land Use Policy 100: 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104911.
21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2001). OECD Environmental Indicators: Towards Sustainable Development, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
22. Rani, G., Kaur, J., Kumar, A., & Yogalakshmi, K.N. 2019. Ecosystem health and dynamics: An indicator of global climate change. Contemporary Environmental Issues and Challenges in Era of Climate Change, Springer, Singapore 1-23 p.
23. Sadeghi, S.H.R., & Hazbavi, Z. (2016). Watershed health (Part one): reliability, resilience and vulnerability conceptual model. Journal of Extension and Development of Watershed Management 4(14):39-42. (In Persian with English abstract)
24. Sadeghi, S.H.R., Ebrahimi, Z., Jafari, F., & Farzi, P. (2017). Assessing the health of the Asiab Rood watershed with the conceptual model of pressure-state-response, the 13^th National Conference on Watershed Science and Engineering and the 3rd National Conference on Protection of Natural Resources and Environment with a focus on Watershed Management and Protection of Natural Resources and Environment, Ardabil, https://civilica .com/doc/827403. (In Persian with English abstract).
25. Sadeghi, S.H.R., Hazbavi, Z., & Gholamalifard, M. (2019). Interactive impacts of climatic, hydrologic and anthropogenic activities on watershed health. Science of the Total Environment 648, 880-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.004.
26. Sadeghi, S.H.R., Vafakhah, M., Moosavi, V., Pourfallah Asadabadi, S., Sadeghi, P.S., Khaledi Darvishan, A., Bagheri Fahraji, R., Mosavinia, S.H., Majidnia, A., Gharemahmudli, S., & Rekabdarkolaei, H.M. (2022). Assessing the health and ecological security of a human induced watershed in central Iran. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 8(1): p.2090447. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2022.2090447.
27. Sadeghi, S.H.R., Sadoddin, A., Asadi Neivan, O.A., Zarekarizi, A., & Moayeri, M.H. (2019). Watershed health and sustainability (fundamentals, approaches and assessment methods). Tarbiat Modares University Press. First edition, 218 pages. https://doi.org/10.22067/jwsd.v5i2.69177.
28. Sadoddin, A., Sadeghi, S.H.R. Zaregarizi, A., Hizbavi, Z., & Asdinalivan, A. (2017). Presenting an index-based framework for comprehensive assessment of the health and sustainability of watersheds with an emphasis on future research, the 13^th National Conference on Watershed Science and Engineering of Iran and the 3rd National Conference on Protection of Natural Resources and Environment, October 10 and 11, 2017, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, 1-7. (In Persian with English abstract)
29. Supplementary studies of flood and delay control dams in the watershed. (2019). Abar Fars Consulting Engineers Co.
30. Yang, W., Jin, Y., Sun, T., & Li, M. (2015). Effects of seashore reclamation activities on Wetlands ecosystem, a case study in yellow river Delta. E-proceedings of the 36^th IAHR World Congress, The Hague, the Netherlands. 28 June- 3 July, 2015: 1-3.
31. Zhang, Sh., Xiang, M., Xu, Z., Wang, L., & Zhang, Ch. (2020). Evaluation of water cycle health status based on a cloud model. Journal of Cleaner Production 245: 118850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118850.