ارزیابی اثربخشی سناریوهای احیای آبخوان توسط شاخص‌های پایداری و بهره‌برداری منابع آب، مطالعه موردی: آبخوان شهرکرد

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• بنفشه شیخی پور ¹
• سامان جوادی ²
• محمد ابراهیم بنی حبیب ¹

¹ دانشگاه تهران

² پردیس ابوریحان دانشگاه تهران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v32i1.68794

چکیده

افزایش بی‌رویه‌ی جمعیت در کشور، محدودیت منابع آب سطحی و بهره‌برداری بیش از اندازه از آبخوان‌ها باعث افت شدید سطح آب زیرزمینی در بسیاری از دشت‌های کشور همچون دشت شهرکرد شده است. در پژوهش حاضر جهت مدیریت بهینه دشت مذکور، مدل کمی این آبخوان تهیه سناریوهای کاهش برداشت 5، 10 درصد، ساخت سد زیرزمینی و تغذیه مصنوعی برای 3 سال آینده پیش‌بینی و تأثیر آن‌ها مدل‌سازی شده است. در نهایت دو شاخص فنی پایداری (Iu) و بهره‌برداری اصلاح شده (WEI+) جهت تعیین میزان اثربخشی سناریوها محاسبه می‌شود. شاخص پایداری نشان دهنده‌ی میزان مصرف از منابع طبیعی موجود با توجه به مقدار تقاضا است که مقدار بهینه آن عدد 1 بوده و می‌تواند مقادیر منفی نیز داشته باشد. شاخص بهره‌برداری نیز بیان کننده‌ی مقدار فشار به منابع آب با توجه به مقدار برداشت بوده و دارای مقادیر مثبت و مقدار بهینه‌ی آن، اعداد نزدیک به صفر می‌باشد. نتایج به دست آمده نشان می‌دهد وضعیت اولیه‌ی آبخوان بسیار نامناسب و برداشت از آبخوان بیش از ظرفیت آن می‌باشد. مقدار شاخص بهره‌برداری برای حالتی‌که سناریویی وجود ندارد، برابر با 068/1 و برای سناریوهای سد زیرزمینی، اجرای طرح تغذیه مصنوعی، کاهش برداشت 5 و 10 درصد به ترتیب برابر با 068/1، 061/1، 045/1 و 969/0 می‌باشد. همچنین مقادیر شاخص پایداری به ترتیب برابر با 070/0، 070/0، 071/0، 078/0 و 114/0 می‌باشد. نتایج نشان داد، سناریو کاهش 10 درصد برداشت، بهترین سناریو بوده و پس از آن، سناریوهای کاهش 5 درصدی برداشت از چاه‌ها در طرح تغذیه مصنوعی و سد زیرزمینی در جایگاه‌های بعدی قرار گرفته‌اند. با استفاده از دو شاخص بازتعریف شده در این مقاله می‌توان به بررسی عملکرد آبخوان‌های دیگر و روش‌های مدیریتی مختلف پرداخت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• آب زیرزمینی
• تغذیه مصنوعی
• شاخص پایداری
• سد زیرزمین
• مدل‌سازی

20.1001.1.20084757.1397.32.2.4.0

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessing the Effectiveness of Aquifer Regeneration Scenarios by Sustainability Index and Water Exploitation Indicators of Water Resources, Case Study: Shahrekord Aquifer

نویسندگان [English]

• Banafsheh Sheikhipour ¹
• Saman Javadi ²
• Mohammad ebrahim Banihabib ¹

¹ university of Tehran

² University of Tehran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Most part of Iran is located in an arid and semi-arid region, thus in most parts of a region; groundwater is the only water resource also Population growth, limitation of surface water resources and excessive water withdrawal from the aquifers, caused a sharp drop in groundwater level in many plains of Iran such as Shahrekord plain, So it is necessary to have suitable management plans to improve the aquifer and evaluate some indicators to see the effects of the methods. In this research, many management plans were assessed for the case study.
Materials and Methods: A groundwater numerical flow model (GMS 10.2) was established by using the monthly data including hydraulic heads, depletion volume of the wells, springs and qanats, precipitation values in Shahrekord aquifer. The model was prepared and calibrated for both status of steady (October 2010) and unsteady flow (November 2010-October 2012), and verified for the following year (November 2012- October 2013). The final values of hydraulic conductivity and specific discharge were obtained by trial and error and PEST method. The water level fluctuation was predicted for three years later (until October 2016) by applying management scenarios of 5% and 10% reduction in water withdrawal, underground dam and artificial recharge. After that, two indicators of Sustainability Index and modified Water Exploitation Index (WEI+) were calculated to determine the effect of the scenarios. The Sustainability Index indicates the consumption ratio of natural resources to water demand. The optimal value of this Index is 1 and it may also have negative values. Low values of this index mean high usage of natural resources. The Water Exploitation Index shows to which extent the total water demand puts pressure on water resources. This index has positive values and its optimal value is close to zero. These two indicators were used for surface water resources in the past studies so in this article they were redefined for underground water resources.
Results and Discussion: The result of groundwater modeling shows that the hydraulic conductivity from 1 to 25 m/day and specific yield from 0.01 to 0.08 are varied also the result of prediction shows that the underground water level would be decreased about 1.34 meter per year in the next 3 years when it hadn’t any management plans in this area but after 5% and 10% reduction water withdrawal scenarios Decreasing of water level were, respectively, 1.33 and 0.71 meter for each year also, considering that there were more wells in the center of the aquifer, water level in this area increased more than other areas, after 5% and 10% Reduction scenarios. According to the results of the artificial recharge and underground dam storage prediction, groundwater head increased in upstream of underground dam and the area near the artificial recharge. Considering the results it was found that the current condition of the aquifer is inappropriate and the amount of withdrawal from the aquifer is more than its capacity. The amount of Water Exploitation Index for business as usual scenario equal to 1.068 and for underground dam, artificial recharge, 5% and 10% reduction water withdrawal, were, respectively, equal to 1.068, 1.061, 1.045 and 0.969. Also the amount of Sustainability Index for business as usual scenario equal to 0.071 and for the other scenario were 0.068, 0.071 and 0.114. , respectively.
Conclusion: Considering the values of the indicators, 10% reduction water withdrawal scenario improved both indicators and selected as the best scenario. After that, 5% reduction water withdrawal was in the second place, then the artificial recharge scenario and underground dam scenarios, respectively, were in the third and fourth place. The scenario of underground dam had any positive effect on these two indicate. Regarding the calculated values of the indicators, it can be seen that although management scenarios have improved these two indicators, the amounts obtained are also significantly different from their optimal values. Several management scenarios can be used simultaneously to bring the calculated index values closer to their optimal values. Used two indicators of sustainability and modified water exploitation can be used exploitation for other management scenarios and assess the performance of them for the other aquifers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Artificial recharge
• Groundwater
• Modeling
• Sustainability index
• Underground dam

مراجع

1- Anonymous. 2012. Second Phase Studies of Artifical Recharge in shahrekord Plain, Chaharmahal Provincial Water Authority- Shahrekord (In Persian).

2- European Environment Agency EEA. 2013. Results and lessons from implementing the Water Assets Accounts in the EEA area, From concept to production. EEA Technical report No 7/2013 European Environment Agency.

3- Ghobadian R., Bahrami Z., and Dabagh Bagheri S. 2016. Applied management scenario to predict fluctuations in groundwater levels with MODFLOW conceptual and mathematical models (Case Study: Khazal-Nahavand plain), Journal of Ecohydrology, 3(3):303-319 (In Persian).

4- Ishida S., Tsuchihara T., Yoshimoto S., and Imaizumi M. 2011. Sustainable use of groundwater with underground dams, Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly (JARQ), 45(1):51–61.

5- Lalehzari R., and Tabatabaei S.H. 2015. Simulating the impact of subsurface dam construction on the change of nitrate distribution. Environmental Earth Sciences, DOI:10.1007/s12665-015-4362-2.

6- Martin-Carrasco F., Garrote L., Iglesias A., and Mediero L. 2013. Diagnosing causes of water scarcity in complex water resources systems and identifying risk management actions, Water resources management, 27:1693-1705.

7- Milano M., Ruelland D., Dezetter A., Fabre J., Ardoin-Bardin S., and Servat E. 2013. Modeling the current and future capacity of water resources to meet water demands in the Ebro basin, J Hydrol, 500, 114–126.

8- Mirahmadpour S., and Taleb-bidokhti N. 2016. Investigating the Artificial Nutrition Project of Groundwater Resources in Tehran's Shahriar Plain as a Way to Prevent the Transition of Earth. 15th National Hydraulics of Iran, COI:IHC15_195 (In Persian).

9- Pedro-Monzonis M., Solera A., Ferrer J., Estrela T., and Paredes-Arquiola J. 2015. A review of water scarcity and drought indexes in water resources planning and management, Journal of Hydrology, 527:482-493.

10- Porhaghi A., Akhondali A., Radmanesh F., and Mirzaee Y. 2016. Manage the Groundwater Sources Exploration of the Nourabad Plain in the Drought Conditions with MODFLOW Modeling, Eco Hydrology, 3:319-303 (In Persian with English abstract).

11- Ouerdachi L., Boutaghane H., Hafsi R., Tayeb T B., and Bouzahar F. 2012. Modeling of underground dams application to planning in the semi-arid areas (Biskra, Algeria), Energy Procedia, 18:426-437.

12- Salimpour Sh., Azhdari-moghadam M., and Hashemi-mofrad A. 2015. Estimation of Farsan aquifer volume for reducing the negative effect of Beheshtakad water transfer tunnel on groundwater level, 14th National Hydraulics of Iran, COI:IHC14_195 (In Persian).

13- Shahraki J., and Mohseni S. 2013. Compromise multi-criteria decision making Application in water resources optimal allocation, Case study Yazd city, Journal of Iranian of Irrigation and Water Engineering.

14- Stevanović Z. 2015. Subsurface dams as a solution for supplementary recharge and groundwater storage in Karst aquifers in Arid areas, Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-09048-1_90.

15- Vanrompay L. 2003. Report on The Technical Evaluation & Impact Assessment of Subsurface Dams (SSDs) TLDP Technical Report Pp.