تأثیر تلقیح دو گانه باکتری تیوباسیلوس (Thiobacillus thiooxidans) و قارچ میکوریز (Glomus spp.) بر تغذیه ذرت در سطوح مختلف گوگرد

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• احمد غلامی ¹
• علی انصوری ¹
• حمید عباس دخت ¹
• علیرضا فلاح نصرت آباد ²

¹ دانشگاه شاهرود

² موسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v0i0.36023

چکیده

به منظور بررسی برهمکنش کود گوگرد و باکتری تیوباسیلوس بر کلونیزاسیون ریشه و تغذیه ذرت آزمایشی به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در سه تکرار انجام شد. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل پنچ سطح گوگرد (S0، S50، S100، S150 و S200 به‌ترتیب شامل مقادیر صفر، 50، 100، 150 و 200 میلی گرم گوگرد پودری بر کیلوگرم خاک گلدان)، تیوباسیلوس تیواکسیدانس در دو سطح (تلقیح T1 و عدم تلقیح T0) و قارچ میکوریز در سه سطح عدم تلقیح (M0)، تلقیح باGlomus intraradices (M1) و Glomus mosseae (M2) بودند. نتایج این بررسی نشان داد که کاربرد گوگرد، مقادیر نیتروژن، فسفر، گوگرد، آهن و روی، هم‌چنین بیوماس اندام هوایی و کلروفیل را در مقایسه با شاهد به طور معنی داری در گیاه ذرت افزایش داد. کاربرد تیوباسیلوس سبب افزایش معنی‌دار فسفر، آهن، روی و کاهش معنی‌دار درصد کلونیزاسیون ریشه گیاه به‌وسیله قارچ های میکوریز و pH خاک شد. هم‌چنین نتایج بررسی حاضر نشان داد که تلیقح قارچ میکوریز مقادیر نیتروژن، فسفر، گوگرد، آهن، روی و کلونیزاسیون ریشه را نسبت به شاهد به‌طور معنی داری افزایش داد. کاربرد مجزا و توأم گوگرد و تیوباسیلوس تأثیر منفی معنی داری بر درصد کلونیزاسیون ریشه داشت. اثرات منفی افزایش مصرف گوگرد بر درصد کلونیزاسیون ریشه در گونه G.mosseae بیشتر از گونه G.intraradices بود. نتایج تحقیق حاضر نشان داد کاربرد گوگرد و تیوباسیلوس و هم‌چنین اثر متقابل این دو عامل تأثیر معنی داری بر وزن خشک اندام هوایی داشت. برش دهی اثر متقابل گوگرد و تیوباسیلوس نشان داد که کاربرد باکتری تیوباسیلوس تنها در شرایط عدم کاربرد گوگرد و کاربرد 100 میلی گرم گوگرد تأثیر معنی داری بر وزن خشک اندام هوایی داشت. بر اساس این نتایج کاربرد گوگرد، تیوباسیلوس و میکوریز در خاک های قلیایی سبب بهبود تغذیه و افزایش رشد گیاه شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• اسیدیته
• تلقیح مضاعف
• عناصر غذایی
• کلونیزاسیو
• همزیستی

20.1001.1.20084757.1394.29.3.19.6

عنوان مقاله [English]

Co-Inoculation Effects of Thiobacillus thiooxidans Bacteria and Mycorrhiza (Glomus spp.) on Maize Nutrition at Different Levels of Sulfur

نویسندگان [English]

• A. Gholami ¹
• A. Ansouri ¹
• H. Abbas dokht ¹
• A. Fallah Nosrat Abad ²

¹ Shahrood University

² Soil and Water Research Institute

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Sulfur is the key element for higher crops and plays an important role in the formation of proteins, vitamins, and enzymes. It is a constituent of amino acids such as cysteine and methionine, which act for the synthesis of other compounds containing reduced sulfur, such as chlorophyll and utilization of phosphorus and otheressential nutrients.Deficiency of this nutrient in soil is usually compensated by using chemical fertilizers. However, these fertilizers have harmful effects on the environment and decrease the quality of the agriculture products. Therefore, biological fertilizers are more useful for using in agricultural ecosystems.Sulfurshould be addedto the soil, usually in a reduced form such as elemental sulfur. Use of S oxidizers enhances the rate of natural oxidation of S and speeds up the production of sulfates and makes them available to plants consequently resulting in an increased plant yield. The role of chemolithotrophic bacteria of the genus Thiobacillus through oxidation process in the soil is usually emphasized. Sulfur oxidation is the most important step of sulfur cycle, which improves soil fertility. The result is formation of sulfate, which can be used by the plants, while the acidity produced by oxidation helps to solubilize nutrients in alkaline soils. These bacteria can solubilise the soil minerals through the production of H2SO4 that reacts with these non-soluble minerals and oxidised them to be available nutrients to the cultivated plants. Arbuscular MycorrhizalFungi isan important component ofthe microbiota, mutualistic symbioticsoilfungithatcolonizesthe rootsofmost cropplants.The AM symbiosis involves an about 80% of land plant species and 92% of plant families. They have theability to enhance host uptake of relativelyimmobile nutrientsparticularly phosphorus (P) andzinc (Zn),Manganese (Mn) andiron(Fe).Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased plant uptake of phosphorus, nitrogen and water absorption. Inoculation withthesefungihas increased the yield of numerous field-grown crops.
This study was aimed to evaluate the effects of thiobacillus bacteria and sulfur application on soil pH, and also their interactions with mycorrhizal fungi in order to improve nutrients uptake and grain yield of maize under alkaline soil condition.
Materials and Methods: Treatments arranged as factorial experiment were based on RCBD with three replications. Treatments consisted of mycorrhizal inoculation: inoculated (m1) and non-inoculated (m0), thiobacillus in two levels of inoculated (t1) and non-inoculated (t0) and three levels of sulfur (S0: 0 kg.ha-1, S1: 250 kg.ha-1 and S2: 500 kg.ha-1). Four-row plots were prepared with row width and intra-row space of 60 and 20 cm, respectively. Seeds of maize (Zea Mays, Sc:647) were surface sterilized in a 10% (v/v) solution of hydrogen peroxide for 10 min, were rinsed with sterile distilled water. Before sowing, 300 kg of urea per hectare were applied according to the results of soil analysis. In order to facilitate oxidation of sulfur to sulfate form, , S was applied and thoroughly mixed into top 30 cm of soil 30 days before sowing. One week before sowing, thiobacillus (Thiobacillus thiooxidans) was inoculated. Inoculum of AM fungus Glomus intraradices, were added to soil just before planting at about 2 centimeters below seed sowing dept. To measure Arbuscular Mycorrhizal colonization, root plants collected one week before harvesting, cleared in 10% KOH at 80˚C for 2 h, and then acidified in 1% HCL for 60 min. Then the cleared roots were stained in a solution of Trypan blue. For nutrient analysis, the following procedure was applied. Zn, Fe, S, and P were determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma-atomic emission spectrometry apparatus. For this purpose, ash of seed samples was prepared at 500-550 degree of Celsius and then 5 ml of HCl 37% was added and with dionized water to reach to 50 ml. Kjeldahl method was used to determine nitrogen. Analysis of variance was performed on all experimental data and means were compared using the least Significant Differences (LSD) test with SAS software. The significance level was p>0.05 unless stated otherwise.
Results and Discussion: Results showed sulfur application increased significantly the amount of S, P, N, Fe, Zn, shoot dry weight and leaf chlorophyll of maize. With increasing Sulfur, sulfur concentration in plant shoot increased with linear trend. The highest S concentration was obtained with 200 mg.kg-1 S and the lowest amount was obtained from control plots. Applications of 50, 100, 150 and 200 mg.kg-1 S increased P content about 0.45, 3.91, 4.74 and 5.56 %, respectively. The highest N contentwas obtained with 100 mg.kg-1 S. The thiobacillus significantly increased P, Fe, Zn anddecreased root colonization and soil pH compared to control. Thiobacillus bacteria increased shoot P only with application of 100 mg.kg-1 S. Mycorrhizal inoculation increased the amount of N, P, S, Fe, Zn, shoot dry weight and root colonization. Inoculation with G.intra and G.mosseae increased shoot P content about 4.18 and 3.34% in comparison with the control plots. Single or combination of sulfur and thiobacillus had a negative impact on the root colonization. Based on the results it seems that sulfur, thiobacillus and mycorrhiza in alkaline soils improved crops nutrition and growth. S application and thiobacillus interaction on S concentration of maize shoot were significant. In condition of 0 or 50 mg.kg-1 S application, inoculation of thiobacillus is recommended. Also, the effects of mycorrhiza on P shoot was significant with no application of S.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Mycorrhiza
• Nutrient uptake
• Root colonization
• sulfur
• Thiobacillus

مراجع

Ansori A., Gholami A., Abbas dokht H., Gholipoor M. and Baradaran M. 2012. Evaluation of mycorrhizal symbiosis, thiobacillus bacteria and sulfur levels on growth and yield of maize. Msc. Thesis. Shahrood university, pp104. (in Persian) .

2-Attoe O.J. and Olson R.A. 1966. Factors affecting the rate of oxidation of elemental sulfur and that added in rock-phosphate-sulfur fusion. Soil Science, 101:317-324.

3-Bagayoko M., George E., Romheld V. and Buerkert A. 2000. Effects of mycorrhizae and phosphorus on growth and nutrient uptake of millet, cowpea and sorghum on a West African soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, 135: 399-407.

4-Brundrett M., Bougher N., Dell B., Grove T. and Malajczuk, N. (eds). 1996. Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research

5-Burke J.J., Holloway P. and Dalling M.J. 1986. The effect of sulphur deficiency on he organization and photosynthetic capability of wheat leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 125:371-375.

9-Clark R. B. 1997. Arbuscular mycorrhizal adaptation , spore germination , root colonization and host plant growth and mineral acquisition at low pH . plant and soil, 192: 15-22

10-Deluca T.H., Skogley E.O. and Engle R.E. 1989. Band–applied elemental sulfur to enhance the phyto-availability of phosphorus in alkaline calcareous soil. Biology and ertility of Soils, 7:346-350.

11-Gorbani Nasrabadi, R., Saleh Rastin N. and Alikhani H. 2003. Effects of bio-sulfur on some nutrient absorption in sybean- rhizobium symbiosis system. 8th congress of Iranian soil sci. Rasht. (in Persian).

12-Hanson W. C. 1950. The photometric determination of phosphorus in fertilizers using the phosphovanado-molybdate complex. J. of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1(6): 172–173.

13-Janzen H. and Bettani, H. 1987. The effect of temperature and water potential on sulfur oxidation in soils. Soil Science, 144:81–89.

14-Kacar B. and Katkat A.V. 2007. Plant Nutrition. Nobel Press; Ankara, Turkey. P365.

15-Kalbasi M., Filoof F. and Rezaiane Y.J. 1988. Effect of sulfur treatment on yield and uptake of Fe, Zn, and Mn by corn, sorghum and soybean. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 11: 1353 – 1360.

16-Khalil S., Loynachan T.E. and Tabatabai M.A.1994. mycorrhizal dependency and nutrient uptake by improved and unimproved corn and soybean cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 86:949-958.

17-Khavazi K., Nourgholipour F. and Malakouti M.J. 2001. Effect of Thiobacillus and phosphate solubilizing bacteria on increasing P availability from rock phosphate for corn. International Meeting on Direct Application of Rock Phosphate and Related Technology, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 231-234.

18-Kothari S.K., Marschner H. and Romheld V.. 1990. Direct and indirect effects of VA mycorrhiza fungi and rhizosphere microorganisms on acquisition of mineral nutrients by maize in a calcareous soil. New Phytology, 116: 637-645

19-Liu A., Hamel C., Hamilton R.I. and Smith D.L. 2000. Mycorrhizae formation and nutrient uptake of new corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids with extreme canopy and leaf architecture as influenced by soil N and P levels. Plant and Soil, 221:157-166.

20-Morvedt J.J., Giordano P.M. and Lindsay W.L. 1991.Micronutrient in agriculture. Soil Sci Soc. Am. Inc. Madison, Wisconsin. USA.p666.

21-Nasreen S., Haque M.M., Hossain M.A. and Frid, A.T.M. 2007. Nutrient uptake and yield of onion as influenced by nitrogen and sulphur fertilization. Bangladesh Agricultural Research, 32(3):413-420.

22-Rawat A. K., Khare A. K. and Thompson J.P. 1996. Effect of vesicular arbuscular ycorrhiza on phosphorus and zinc nutrition of maize grown in vertisols of Madhya radesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 66(1): 33-37.

23-Safir G .R. (editor): 1987. Echophysiology of va mycorrhizal plants. Chapter 9: 172- 192

24-Soltani A. 2007. Application of SAS software. Jihad daneshgahi mashhad. Pp182. . (in Persian)

25-Sylvia D. M., Hammond L.C., Bennet J.M., Hass J.H. and Linda S.B. 1993. Field esponse of maize to a VAM fungus and water management. Agron Journal, 85:193– 198.

26-Singh D. and Singh, V. 1995. Effect of potassium, zinc and sulphur on growth characters, yield attributes and yield of soybean. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 40(2):7-223.228.

27-Singh Y.P. 2004. Role of sulphur and phosphorus in black gram production. Fertility News, 49(2): 6-33.

28-Smith S.E. and Read D.J. 1997. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis (2nd ed). Academic Press: London, UK. p605.

29-Subramanian H. and Charest S. 1999. Acquistion if N by external hyphae of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and its impact on physiological responses in maize under drought stress and well watered conditions. Mycology, 9:69 –75.

30-Vinay S., Mehta V.S. and Singh V. 1995. Effect of sulfur sources and levels on yield and uptake of nutrients by garlic. Fertility News, 40(8):47- 49.

31-Wainwright M. 1984. Sulfur oxidation in soils. Advances in Agronomy, 37:349-396.

32-Zhi-Hui Y., Stoven K., Haneklaus S., Singh B.R. and Schnug, E. 2010. Elemental Sulfur Oxidation by Thiobacillus spp. And Aerobic Heterotrophic Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacteria. Pedosphere, 20(1):71-79.