Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz

2 Islamic Azad University, Ahwaz

Abstract

Introduction: Flow patterns within the river bend is three dimensional. Occurrence of secondary flow due to centrifugal force and formation of helicoidally vortex in river bend usually causes the outer bank of river erodes whilst the sediment are deposited in inner bend which appears in the form of point bars. To reduce the river bank scour, many techniques have been developed which may be classified as covering technique and modified flow patterns methods. The W-weir is among such structures. In the present paper, by measuring three components of flow velocity with and without presence of W-weir, variation of flow patterns and shear stress distribution in a 90-degree sharp bend have been investigated. The main purpose of this study is to see the installation of different locations of W-weir in the bend on reduction of outer bank scour. In the present paper, by measuring three components of flow velocity with and without presence of W-weir, variation of flow patterns and shear stress distribution in a 90-degree sharp bend have been investigated. The analyses of data showed more uniform flow upstream of the weir and also revealed that the effect of transverse and centrifugal forces are modified in such a way that the secondary flow is diminished. The results showed that for 30, 60 and 90-degree bends maximum erosion depth in the vicinity of the outer bank with Froude number of 0.206 in comparison with 0.137 has increased up to 84, 90 and 118 % respectively. In both Froude numbers, installation of W-Weir in 30 degree has the most reduction in bed in comparison with 60 and 90 degree.
Materials and Methods: To reach the goal of this study a physical model of 90 degree sharp bend was constructed in the hydraulic lab of Shahid Chamran university of Ahvaz. The ratio of R(radius)/b(flume width) was less than 2 which shows a sharp bend. The W-weir was built with 1mm galvanized steel. Flume bed was covered with sediment of D50=1.5mm. The W-weir was installed at three different locations of 30, 60 and 90 degrees from the bend entrance. Two sets of tests were carried out with and without weir. For each location two different flow discharges (Fr= 0.137 and Fr=0.206) were studied. The flow depth for all tests were kept constant equal to 15cm. At the end of each test the flume was drained and bed topography was recorded using laser meter. Measured bed topographic data were used in SURFER and TECPLOT software to compare the results of the W-weir location
Results and Discussion:


a)W-weir in 60 degree location
b)W-weir in 30 degree location

a)W-weir in 90 degree location


Fig.1 Bed topography after W-weir installed(Q=10l/s)

The results showed that W-weir concentrated the flow toward the flume center thus the bed only will scour at the downstream of W-weir whilst the bed at upstream is neither of weir nor eroded. This is because the flow patterns within the bend has been modified in such a way that diminishes the strength of helicoidally vortex upstream of the weir thus the scour or deposition will not occur. The results of tests with Q=15 l/s also was similar with the exception that in these tests the Froude number is higher and the scour depth downstream of weir is much larger. The results also showed that the scour depth is much higher when the weir is installed at 60 degrees. The scour depth for weir at 90 degree location showed reduction of about 33% and 39% compare to the weir in 30 and 60 degree location respectively.
Conclusion: In this research, by assessing the cross velocities and the scour depth downstream of weir in 90 degree sharp bends and studying the impacts of w-shape weir on those parameters, following results were obtained: The W-weir can modify the flow patterns within the flume bend in which no scour and deposition is observed upstream of the weir. The scour downstream of weir with higher depth closed to the outer bank is observed in all tests. The scour depth is much higher when the weir is installed at 30 degree location whilst is minimum when the weir is installed at 90 degree location.

Keywords

1- Atashi V., Shafai-Bajestan M., and Ahadian J. 2011. Flow patterns and shear stress distribution in a 90 degree sharp bend with W Weir. Journal of Water Resorces Engeeniring. Mrvdasht, 5:17-34
2- Bhuiyan F., Hey R D., and Wormleaton P.R. 2009. Effects of Vanes and W-weir on Sediment Transport in Meandering Channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. ASCE, 135: 339-349.
3- Bhuiyan F., Hey R. D., and Wormleaton P.R. 2007. Hydraulic evaluation of W-weir for restoration. Journal of Hydr. Enrg. ASCE. 133:596-609.
4- Blanckaert K., and Graf W.H. 2001. Mean flow and turbulence in open-channel bend, Journal of Hydrualic Engineering, ASCE. 127:883-874
5- Christopher I., Thornton Antony M., Meneghetti Kent Collins Steven R. A., and Michael Scurlock S. 2011. Stage-discharge relationships for U-, A-, and W-weirs in un-submerged flow conditions. Journal of American resources association.47:169-178.
6- Da Silva A.M.F., and Yalin M.S. 1997. Laboratory measurements in sine-generated meandering channels. International Journal of Sediment Research, International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation, IRTCES, 12: 92-104.
7- Golrokh A., and Shafaei-Bajestan M. 2011. The Lab Study of Impact of Placement of W-Weir on the Topography of the Bed in 90 Degree Bend. The 6th National Congress on Civil Engineering, 27-28 March. 2011. Semnan University, Semnan
8- Mashkurnia H., Jarrahzadeh F., Ramesh S., and Shafai-Bajestan M. 2010. Study the Impact of Length of the Sunk Water Break Structure on Amount of Water Wash of External Bank in 90 Degree Bend. The 9th Hydraulic Conference of Iran, November. 2010. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran
9- Pournassiri M., Pirestani M.R., and Majdzadeh Tabatabaei M.R. 2006. Study the Changes in Eddy Flow in U-shape Bend Channels. 7th Iranian Conference of Hydraulic, 11-13 December. 2008. Water and Electricity Industries University (Shahid Abbaspour), Tehran
10- Qadu E., Shafaei Bajestan M., and Souzehpou E. 2011. Lab Study of the Cross velocity Pattern of Flow in 90 Degree Sharp Bend. The 4th Conference of Water References of Iran, 3-4 June. 2011. Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran
11- Raudkivi A.J., and Ettema R. 1983. Clear-water scour at cylindrical piers. J Hydraul Eng, 109: 338- 350.
12- Rosgen D. L. 2001b. The cross vane, W-weir and J-hook structures: Their description, design and application for stream stabilization and river restoration. Proc. Wetland Engineering and River Restoration Conf. ASCE. Reston, Va.
13- Safarzade A. 2005. Numerical Study on Flow Pattern on Lateral Diversion in 180 Degree Bend. MSc. Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.
14- Salehi Neyshabouri E. 2008. Study and Presentation of a Solution to Lower Arriving Sediment to Lateral Water intakes in the River. The Applied Research Plan of Deputy of Plan and Development, Water Resources Management Co. of Iran.
15- Souzehpour E., Shafaei Bajestan M., and Qadu Y. 2011. Lab Study of the Flow Cross velocity Pattern in 90 Sharp Bend. The 4th Conference of Water References of Iran, 3-4 June. 2011. Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran.
16- Vaghefi M., and Ghodsian M. 2010. Lab Study of the Effect of Bend on the Secondary Flow in 90 Degree Bend in the Balanced Bed Conditions. The Scientific Research Journal of hydraulic, 5: 91-99. (in Persian with English abstract)
CAPTCHA Image