برآورد کمی ترسیب کربن خاک در سه نوع کاربری (باغ مرکبات، شالیزار و جنگل) در قسمتی از اراضی رامسر، شمال ایران

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• زکیه پهلوان یلی ¹
• منوچهر زرین کفش ¹
• ابوالفضل معینی ²

¹ دانشگاه آزاد واحد کرج

² دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v30i3.32736

چکیده

افزایش غلظت دی اکسیدکربن در جو زمین عامل اصلی تغییرات اقلیمی است که تغییر در اکوسیستم ها از خسارت ناشی از آن هستند. این در حالی است که اکوسیستم ها با پوشش های گیاهی مختلف تأثیر چشمگیری بر ترسیب کربن خاک دارند. این تحقیق به منظور برآورد ترسیب کربن خاک، در سه نوع کاربری شامل باغ مرکبات، شالیزار و جنگل، در شهرستان رامسر انجام گردید. پس از تعیین نقاط مطالعاتی بر روی نقشه، نمونه‌برداری خاک از عمق 0-100 سانتیمتری صورت گرفت. مهم‌ترین خصوصیات خاک؛ بافت، pH، کربن آلی، نیتروژن کل، وزن مخصوص ظاهری در آزمایشگاه اندازه گیری شد. در پایان میزان معنی داری کربن ترسیب شده در خاک، با استفاده از تجزیه واریانس و مقایسه میانگین ها به روش دانکن در نرم افزار SPSSتعیین شد. نتایج نشان دادکه در بین کاربری‌های مختلف از نظر مقدار ترسیب کربن خاک تفاوت معنی داری وجود ندارد. مقدار کل ترسیب کربن خاک در واحد سطح جنگل (35/4532تن در هکتار) بیشتر از باغ مرکبات (66/2997تن در هکتار) و شالیزار (55/2682تن در هکتار) می باشد و بیشترین مقدارنیتروژن،کربن آلی و کربن ترسیب شده در لایه سطحی خاک، عمق 10-0 سانتی‌متری به میزان (968/866 تن در هکتار) مربوط به جنگل و کمترین به میزان (4/393 تن در هکتار) در کاربری شالیزار می‌باشد. نقشه ترسیب کربن در منطقه مورد مطالعه با روش GIS ترسیم گردیده است. به طور کلی، کشاورزی و عملیات زراعی سبب پراکنده شدن خاکدانه ها،کاهش ماده آلی و ترسیب کربن نسبت به خاک های دست نخورده (جنگل) می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• تغییرات اقلیمی
• زمین زراعی
• نیتروژن کل
• وزن مخصوص ظاهری

20.1001.1.20084757.1395.30.3.4.8

عنوان مقاله [English]

Quantitative Estimation of Soil Carbon Sequestration in Three Land Use Types (Orchard, Paddy Rice and Forest) in a Part of Ramsar Lands, Northern Iran

نویسندگان [English]

• zakieh pahlavan yali ¹
• M. Zarrinkafsh ¹
• A. Moeini ²

¹ Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch

² Science and Research, Islamic Azad University (IAU),Tehran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The increasing Greenhouse Gases in atmosphere is the main cause of climate and ecosystems changes. The most important greenhouse gas is CO2 that causes global warming or the greenhouse effect. One of the known solutions that reduces atmospheric carbon and helps to improve the situation, is carbon sequestration in vegetation cover and soil. Carbon sequestration refers to the change in atmospheric CO2 into organic carbon compounds by plants and capture it for a certain time . However, the ecosystems with different vegetation have Impressive Influence on soil carbon sequestration (SCS). Soil as the main component of these ecosystems is a world-wide indicator which has been known to play an important role in global balance of carbon sequestration. Furthermore, carbon sequestration can be a standard world trade and becomes guaranteed. Costs of transfer of CO2 (carbon transfer From the atmosphere into the soil) based on the negative effects of increased CO2 on Weather is always increasing, This issue can be faced by developing countries to create a new industry, especially when conservation and restoration of rangeland to follow. This research was regarded due to estimation of SCS in three land use types (orchard, paddy rice and forest) in a Part of Ramsar Lands, Northern Iran.
Materials and Methods: Ramsar city with an area of about 729/7 km2 is located in the western part of Mazandaran province. Its height above sea level is 20 meters. Ramsar city is situated in a temperate and humid climate. Land area covered by forest, orchard and paddy rice. After field inspection of the area, detailed topographic maps of the specified zone on the study were also tested. In each of the three land types, 500 hectares in the every growing and totally 1,500 hectares as study area were selected .For evaluation the sequestration of carbon in different vegetation systems,15 soil profile selected and sampling from depth of 0 to 100 centimetres of each profile was done by collecting 15 samples with the total number of 45 samples. Soil sampling (at the 0-100 cm depth) was carried out following determination of points on map. Some of soil features (i.e., Soil structure, Bulk density ,Texture, Acidity, CEC, total Nitrogen and Organic Carbon) were measured in the laboratory. Then, the ANOVA and Duncan tests were employed due to statistical analysis using of SPSS software package. Also The map of carbon sequestration was prepared using of GIS approach.
Results and Discussion :According to obtained results, the amounts of SCS were imposed by different land uses as non-significant. The amounts of SCS were found in forest (4532.35 ton/ha), orchard (2997.66 ton/ha) and paddy rice (2682.55 ton/ha) land use, respectively. The differences may be resulted from the variation among the ecosystem types and plant species. Forests are located in wetlands in the high forest and agricultural land more organic carbon levels (0 to 20 cm), but non-significant difference was observed in the soil depth in these areas. The Increased amount of carbon sequestration in the Orchard of the Paddy Rice can be interpreted due to long-term use of fertilizer in the orchards. In Paddy Rice of study due to deep plowing, results showed more decline of organic matter and the loss of carbon from soils.In addition, the maximumtotal nitrogen, organic and sequestrated carbon in top soil (0-10cm depth) were detected in forest (866.968 ton/ha),whereas the least amount dedicated in paddy rice (393.4 ton/ha) land uses. Four classes of detected soil in the study area were included AlfiSols, Inceptisols, Entisols and Mollisols
Conclusions: We found no significant differences in terms of carbon sequestration in land use due to the impact of climate, annually high rainfall and washing clay seems logical. The plant communities in forest ecosystems can become more capable to absorb and retain carbon than other vegetation cover. Agriculture and farming operations are due to dispersion aggregates, reduce of organic matter and carbon sequestration compared to forest intact soils. Considering the vital role of soil carbon sequestration as one of the known values in terms of natural ecosystems and the importance of soil conservation programs, further research works are recommended on the effects of biotic factors such as grazing and land-use changes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Bulk density
• Climate change
• Field
• Total Nitrogen

مراجع

1- Allard V.J., Soussana R., Falcimagne P., Berbigier J.M., Bonnefond E., Ceschia P., D’hou C., Henault P., Laville C., and Pinare`s Patino C. 2007. The role the net biome productivity and Greenhouse gas Budget (CO2, N2O and CH4) of semi-natural of grazing management for grassland , Agriculture , Ecosystems and Environment, 121: 47-58.

2- Allison L.E. 1975. Organic carbon. In: Black, C.A., Evans, D.D., White, J.L., Ensminger L.E., Clark F.E. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp. 1367.

3- Bauer A. C., Cole v., and Black A.L. 1987. Soil Property Comparisons in Virgin Grasslands Between Grazed and Nongrazed Management Systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51: 176–182.

4- Bremner J.M., and Mulvaney C.S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: page, AL, Miller, RH, Keeney, RR, (Eds), Methods of soil analysis, and Part 2. Second ed. American society of agronomy, Madison, WI, Pp: 595-624.

5- Burke I.C., Lauenroth W.K., and Coffin D.P. 1995. Soil organic matter recovery in semiarid grasslands: implications for the conservation reserve program. Ecol. Appl. Vol 5. Pp: 793-801.

6- Burke I.C., Laurenroth W.K., and Milchunas D.G. 1997. Biogeochemistry of Managed Grasslands in Central North America. In: Paul, E.A., K. Paustian, E.T. Elliott and C.V. Cole (Eds.), Soil Organic Matter in Temperate Agroecosystems: Long-term Experiments in North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton,FL, pp. 85–102.

7- Congressional Bodget Office (CBO). 2007. The potential for carbon sequestration in the United States, congress of the U.S Washington DC, 1-22.

8- De Neergaard A., Porter J.R., and Gorissen A. 2002. Distribution of assimilated carbon in plants and rhizosphere soil of basket willow (Sailx viminalis L.), Plant soil, 245: 307-314.

9- Dinakaran J., and Krishnayya N.S.R. 2008. Variations in type of vegetal cover and heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in affecting sink capacity of tropical soils, 94:1144-1150.

10- Gee G.w.,and Bauder J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis, in A, Klute, ed. Method of soil analysis, soil science society of America, Madison, Wiscon, 383–411.

11- Jandl R., Lindner M., Vesterdal L., Bauwens B., Barit R., Hagedorn F., Johnson D.W., Minkkinen K.,and Byrne K.A. 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137, 253–268.

12- JavadiTabalundany M.R.,Zehtabian GH.R.,Ahmadi H.,Ayubi SH.,Jafary M., and Alizadeh M.2010. Role different land uses in soil carbon sequestration (Case study: catchment bosin nome stream, Noor). Journal Natural Ecosystems Iran.2:156-166.

13- Jenio K., Toms P.S., Sayago J.M., and Derbyshire E. 2006. Impact of soil movement on carbon sequestration in agricultural ecosystems, Advances in Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory, Measurments, and Monitoring, Conference in Raleigh North Carolina, October 3-5, 2006.

14- Johnson J. M. F., Allmaras R.R., and Reicosky C. 2006. Estimating source carbon from Crop Residues, Roots and Rhizodeposits Using The Nation Grain - Yield Database, Agron, j, 98: 622- 636.

15- Johnsen K.H., Wear D.,Oren R.,Teskey R.O., Sanchez F., Will R., Butnor J., Markewicz D., Richter D., Rials T., Allen H.L., Seiler J., Ellsworth D., Maier C., Samuelson L., Katul D.,and Philougherty G. 2001. Meeting globalpolicy commitments : Carbon sequestration and southern pine forests. Journal of Forestry 99(4).

16- Lorenz K., and Lal R. 2006. Subsoil organic carbon pool, Encyclopedia of soil science DOI:10.108/E-ESS-12004I45I.

17- Maddah Arefi H., Abdi N., and Zahedi Amiri G.A. 2009. The amount of carbon sequestration in the Golestan district diverse fileds Khansar Mountain, Watershed research journal, 83: 68-58.

18- Marschner B., Brodowski S., Dreves A., Gleixner G., Gude A., Grootes P.M., Hamer U., Heim A., Jandi G., Kaiser R.K., Kalbitz K., Kramer C., Leinweber P., Rethemeyer J., Schaffer A., Schmidt M., Schwark L., and Wiesenberg G.B. 2008. How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organig matter in soils?J.plant Nut, Soil Sci,171,91-110.

19- McLauchlan K. 2006. The nature and longevity of agricultural impacts on soil carbon and nutrients: A review, Ecosystems, Vol 9. Pp: 1364-1382.

20- Mohammadi J.2006. pedology.pelk.press,307p.

21- Mortenson M. ,and Schuman G.E. 2002. Carbon sequestration in rangeland interseeded with yellowflowering Alfalfa (Medicago sativa spp. Falcata). USDA Symposium on Natural Resource Management to Offset Greenhouse Gas Emission in, University of Wyoming.

22- Nobakht A., Pourmajidian M.R.,Hojjati S.M., and Fallah A.2011. A comparison of soil carbon sequestration in hardwood and softwood monocultures(Case study: Dehmian forest management plan, Mazindaran). Iranian Journal of Forest, Vol.3, No.1, Pp:13-23.

23- Nowak D.J., and Crane D.E. 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environment Pollution. 116: 381-389.

24- Rice C.W. 2000. Soil Organic C andN in Rangeland Soils under Elevation CO2 and Land management. Advances in Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory, Measurements and Monitoring Conference in Raleigh,North Carolina, October 3-5, 2000, 15-24.

25- Schuman G.E., Janzen H., and Herrick J.E. 2002. Soil Carbon Information and Potential Carbon Sequestration by Rangelands, Environmental Pollution,116:391-396.

26- Singh G., Bala N., Chaudhuri K.K., and Meena R.L. 2003. Carbon sequestration potential of common access resources in arid and semi-arid regions of northwestern India. Indian Forester 129: 7, 859-864.

27- Tatian M.R.,Tamartash R.,and Yousefian M.2011.Influence vegetative species in carbon sequestration in valley pasture Miankaleh.Iran, Journal Ecology.62:45-54.

28- Varamesh S., Hosseini S.M. and Abdi N. 2009. Comparison of broad-leaved and needle-leaf species of carbon sequestration in urban forests (case study Cheetgar park Tehran), M.Sc. Thesis, Department of natural resources and marine sciences, University of Moddaress 86p.

29- Varamesh S., Hosseini S.M., Abdi N. and Akbari-nia M. 2010. Afforest effects in the carbon sequestration and improve some features of the soil, the forests of Iran, Iran forestry association, the second year, 1: 25-35.

30- William E. 2002. Carbon dioxide fluxes in a semiarid environment with high carbonate soils, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol 116. Pp: 91-102.

31- Zalaghi, R., and landi, A.2009. Evaluating carbonic greenhouse gases emission and organic carbon balance from soil under current agricultural land use. J. Appl. Sci. 9 (12): 2307-2312.