Assessing earthworm and sewage sludge impacts on microbiological and biochemical soil quality using multivariate analysis

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Hanye Jafari Vafa
• Fayez Raiesi

Shahrekord University

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v31i1.50082

Abstract

Introduction: Land application of organic wastes and biosolids such as municipal sewage sludge has been an important and attractive practice for improving different properties of agricultural soils with low organic matter content in semi-arid regions, due to an increase of soil organic matter level and fertility. However, application of this organic waste may directly or indirectly affect soil bio-indicators such as microbial and enzymatic activities through a change in the activity of other soil organisms such as earthworms. Earthworms are the most important soil saprophagous fauna and much of the faunal biomass is attributed to the presence of these organisms in the soil. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the effect of earthworm activity on soil microbial and biochemical attributes, in particularly when soils are amended with urban sewage sludge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the earthworm effects on biochemical and microbiological properties of a calcareous soil amended with municipal sewage sludge using Factor Analysis (FA).
Materials and Methods: In the present study, the experimental treatments were sewage sludge (without and with 1.5% sewage sludge) as the first factor and earthworm (no earthworm, Eiseniafoetida from epigeic group, Allolobophracaliginosa from endogeic group and a mixture of the two species) as the second factor. The study was setup as 2×4 full factorial experiment arranged in a completely randomized design with three replications for each treatment under greenhouse conditions over 90 days. A calcareous soil from the 0-30 cm layer with clay loam texture was obtained from a farmland field under fallow without cultivation history for ten years. The soil was air-dried and passed through a 2-mm sieve for the experiment. Sewage sludge as the soil organic amendment was collected from Wastewater Treatment Plant in Shahrekord. Sewage sludge was air-dried and grounded to pass through a 1-mm sieve for a uniform mixture with soil matrix.Heavy metals concentrations were found to be below the maximum permissible limits for municipal sewage sludge. After applying sewage sludge treatments, the pots were irrigated (70% soil field capacity) for three months to achieve a relative equilibrium condition in the soil. Eight adult earthworms with fully-developed clitellum were added to each pot. In the pots with both earthworm species, 4 specimen of each earthworm species was added. At the end of the experiment (90 days), soil samples were collected from treatments and were separately air-dried for chemical analysis or kept fresh and stored (4oC) for microbial analysis. Finally, data obtained from the study were analyzed using multivariate analysis.
Results and Discussion: Factor analysis led to the selection of three factors with eigen value greater than 1. The first, second and third factors were accounted for 62, 17.7 and 9.2% of the variability in soil data, respectively. The three factors together explained 89% of the original variability (i.e., variance) in the soil dataset. Consequently, three factors were retained to represent the original variability of the dataset. The first factor had 16 highly weighted variables with a negative loading for soil pH and positive loadings for other variables. The first factor, which included most soil indicators as input variables, clearly separated sewage sludge treatments. Most of the soil microbial characteristics were increased by sewage sludge application due to the high contents of organic matter and nutrients in sewage sludge, as well as low concentrations of heavy metals. Fungal respiration, bacterial respiration and microbial biomass carbon loaded heavily on the second factor with a negative loading for fungal respiration and positive loadings for bacterial respiration and microbial biomass carbon. The second factor, which included microbial biomass and community composition, noticeably discriminated earthworm treatments. In sewage sludge treatments, the dependence of E. foetidaspecies on soil microorganisms as a food source declined, because of the consumption of organic waste by this epigeic species. However, the activity and impact of A. caliginosa species from endogeic group was only related to soil microbial biomass probably due to selective feeding of soil microorganisms.
Conclusion: Factor analysis was used successfully in discriminating the effects of sewage sludge and earthworm either alone or in combination on soil microbial and biochemical parameters. A. caliginosa species in soils amended with sewage sludge had a positive effect on microbial community and biomass, while E. foetidaspecies had no such effect. A. caliginosa species indirectly benefited from sewage sludge application following the increase of soil microbial biomass. In summary, A. caliginosa species positively affected microbiological and biochemical properties in soils amended with sewage sludge due to its less dependence on this organic resource.

Keywords

• Earthworm
• Factor analysis
• Municipal sewage sludge
• Soil quality

References

1. Aira M., and Dominguez J. 2009. Microbial and nutrient stabilization of two animal manures after the transit through the gut of the earthworm Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161: 1234-1238.

2. Alef K., and Kleiner D. 1987. Applicability of arginine ammonification as an indicator of microbial activity in different soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 5: 148-151.

3. Alef K., and Nannipieri P. 1995. Enzyme activities. p. 311-373. In K. Alef and P. Nannipieri (ed.) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, New York.

4. Amlinger F., Pollak M., and Favoino E. 2004. Heavy metals and organic compounds from wastes used as organic fertilizers. European Union, ANNEX2-Compost quality definition, legislation and standards.

5. Ananyeva N.D., Susyan E.A., Chernova O.V., Chernove I.Y., and Makarova O.L. 2006. The ratio of fungi and bacteria in the biomass of different types of soil determined by selective inhibition. Microbiologiya, 6: 807-813.

6. Anderson J.P.E. 1982. Soil respiration. p. 831–871. In A.L. Page and Miller R.H. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. ASA, Madison, WI.

7. Andrews S.S., Karlen D.L., and Mitchell J.P., 2002. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in northern California. Agricultural, Ecosystem and Environment, 90: 25-45.

8. Bartholomew D.J., Steele F., Moustaki I., and Galbraith J. 2008. Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data. Chapman and hall, London, UK.

9. Bergkvist P., Jarvis N., Berggren D., and Carlgren K. 2003. Long-term effects of sewage sludge application availability and distribution in arable soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 97: 167-179.

10. Birkhofer K., Bezemer T.M., Bloem J., Bonkowski M., Christensen S., Dobius D., Ekelund F., Fliebach A., Gunst L., Hedlund K., Mader P., Mikola J., Robin C., Setala H., Tatin-Froex F., Van der Putten W.H., and Scheu S. 2008. Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: implications for soil quality, biological control and productivity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43: 2297-2308.

11. Blagodatskaya E., and Kuzyakov Y. 2013. Active microorganisms in soil: critical review of estimation criteria and approaches. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 67: 192-211.

12. Bremner J.M. 1996. Nitrogen total. p. 1085-1121. In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, WI.

13. Corre M.D., Schnabel R.R., and Shaffer J.A. 1999. Evaluation of soil organic carbon under forests, cool-season and warm-season grasses in the northeastern US. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31: 1531-1539.

14. Degens B.P., Schipper L.A., Sparling G.P., and Ducan L.C. 2001. Is the microbial community in a soil with reduced catabolic diversity less resistant to stress or disturbance? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33: 1143-1153.

15. Dindar E., Sagban F.O.T., Alkan U., and Baskaya H.S. 2013. Effects of canned food industry sludge amendment on enzyme activities in soil with earthworms. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 12: 2407-2416.

16. Du Y.L., He M.M., Xu M., Yan Z.G., Zhou Y.Y., Guo G.L., Nie J., Wang L.Q., Hou H., and Li F.S. 2014. Interactive effects between earthworms and maize plants on the accumulation and toxicity of soil cadmium. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 72: 193-202.

17. Edwards C.A., and Bohlen P.J. 1996. Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. Chapman and hall, London, UK.

18. Fernandez J.M., Plaza C., Garcia-Gil J.C., and Polo A. 2009. Biochemical properties and barley yield in a semiarid Mediterranean soil amended with two kinds of sewage sludge. Applied Soil Ecology, 42: 18-24.

19. Fernandez S.A.P., Bettiol W., and Cerri C.C. 2005. Effect of sewage sludge on microbial biomass, basal respiration, metabolic quotient and soil enzymatic activity. Applied Soil Ecology, 30: 65-77.

20. Garcia-Ruiz R., Ochoa V., Hinojosa M.B., and Carreira J.A. 2008. Suitability of enzyme activities for the monitoring of soil quality improvement in organic agricultural systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40: 2137-2145.

21. Hong H.N., Rumpel C., Tureaux T.H.D., Bardoux G., Billou D., Duc T.T., and jouquet P. 2011. How do earthworms influence organic matter quantity and quality in tropical soils? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43: 223-230.

22. Horwath W.R., and Paul E.A. 1994. Microbial biomass. pp. 753-775. In D.R. Buxton (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. ASA, Madison, WI.

23. Karami M., Afyuni M., Rezainejad Y., and Schulin R. 2009. Heavy metal uptake by wheat from a sewage sludge-amended calcareous soil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 83:51-61.

24. Landi L., Renella g., Moreno J.L., Falchini L., and Nannipieri P. 2000. Influence of cadmium on the metabolic quotient, L-:D- glutamic acid respiration ratio and enzyme activity: microbial biomass ratio under laboratory conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 32: 8-16.

25. Lindsay W.L., and Norvell W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42:421-428.

26. Liu J., Xie J., Chu Y., Sun C., Chen C., and Wang Q. 2008. Combined effect of cypermethrin and copper on catalase activity in soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 8: 327-332.

27. Mench M., Renella G., Gelsomino A., Landi L., and Nannipieri P. 2006. Biochemical parameters and by sludge-borne metals and remediated with inorganic soil amendments. Environmental Pollution, 144: 24-31.

28. Mohammadi J. 2006. Pedometry: Classical statistics. Pelk Publisher, Tehran. (in Persian)

29. Nannipieri P., Ascher J., Cecchrini M.J., Landi L., Pietramellara G., and Renella G. 2003. Microbial diversity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Science, 54: 655-670.

30. Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 961-1011 .In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. ASA, Madison, WI.

31. Olsen S.R., and Sommers L.E. 1982. Phosphorus. p. 403-430. In A.L. Page et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. ASA, Madison, WI.

32. Ovalles F.A., and Collins M.E. 1988. Variability of northwest Florida soils by principal component analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52: 1430-1435.

33. Pang J.Z., Qiao Y.H., Sun Z.J., Zhang S.X., Li Y.L., and Zhang R.Q. 2012. Effects of epigeic earthworms on decomposition of wheat straw and nutrient cycling in agricultural soils in a reclaimed salinity area: a microcosm study. Pedosphere, 22: 726-735.

34. Rhodes J.D. 1996. Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. p. 417-435. In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical properties. SSSA, Madison, WI.

35. Sharma S. 1996. Applied Multivariate Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

36. Shirani H., Hajabbasi M.A., Afyuni M., and Hemmat A. 2002. Effect of farmyard and tillage systems on soil physical properties and corn yield in central Iran. Soil and Tillage Research, 68: 101-108.

37. Sposito G., Lund J.L., and Chang A.C. 1982. Trace metal chemistry in arid-zone field soils amended with sewage sludge: I. fractionation of Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb in solid phases. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46: 260-264.

38. Tahmasebi P. 2011. Multivariate analysis in environmental science and natural resources. Shahrekord University publisher. (in Persian)

39. Tejada M. 2009. Application of different organic wastes in a soil polluted by cadmium: effects on soil biological properties. Geoderma, 153: 254-268.

40. Thomas. G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. p. 475-483. In D.L. Sparks (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical properties. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI.

41. Xing M., Yang j., Wang Y., Liu J., and Yu F. 2011. A comparative study of synchronous treatment of sewage and sludge by two vermifiltrations using an epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida. Journal of Hazardous Material, 185: 881-888.

42. Zarei V., and Sheklabadi M. 2015. Assessing soil quality in different land uses using multivariate analysis. Science and Technology of agriculture and natural resources, Water and Soil Science, 70: 101-110. (in Persian with English abstract)

43. Zhang B. Li G., Shen T., Wang J., and Sun Z. 2000. Changes in microbial biomass C, N and P and enzyme activities in soil incubated with the earthworms Metaphire guillelmi or Eisenia fetida. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32: 2055-2062.