Effect of Slope Positions on Physicochemical Properties of Soils Located on a Toposequence in Deilaman Area of Guilan Province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• P. Mohajeri
• P. Alamdari
• A. Golchin

University of Zanjan

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v30i1.37607

Abstract

Introduction: Topography is one of the most important factors of soil formation and evolution. Soil properties vary spatially and are influenced by some environmental factors such as landscape features, including topography, slope aspect and position, elevation, climate, parent material and vegetation. Variations in landscape features can influence many phenomena and ecological processes including soil nutrients and water interactions. This factor affects soil properties by changing the altitude, steepness and slope direction of lands. In spite of the importance of understanding the variability of soils for better management, few studies have been done to assess the quality of soils located on a toposequence and most of these studies include just pedological properties. The aim of this study was to investigate physical and chemical properties of soils located on different slope positions and different depths of a toposequence in Deilaman area of Gilan province, that located in north of Iran.
Materials and Methods: The lands on toposequence that were same in climate, parent material, vegetation and time factors but topographical factor was different, were divided into five sections including steep peak, shoulder slope, back slope, foot slope and toe slope. In order to topsoil sampling, transverse sections of this toposequence were divided into three parts lengthways, each forming one replicate or block. 10*10 square was selected and after removing a layer of undecomposed organic residues such as leaf litter, three depths of 0 to 20, 20 to 40 and 40 to60 cm soil samples were collected. physical and chemical characteristics such as soil texture, bulk density, aggregate stability, percent of organic matter, cation exchange capacity, available phosphorous and total nitrogen were measured.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that, because of high organic matter content and fine textured soils on the lower slope positions including foot slope and toe slope, aggregate stability, cation exchange capacity, available phosphorous and total nitrogen were maximum in these positions, whereas, bulk density had a reverse trend and was higher in the upper slope positions than the lower slope positions. The high content of organic carbon, phosphorus and total nitrogen in the soil of foot and toe slope positions, can be attributed to soil erosion and transferred from top of the slope and their accumulation in these situations. The results also revealed that, with increasing depth, aggregate stability, organic carbon content, cation exchange capacity, available phosphorous and total nitrogen content of soils decreased, whereas, clay content and bulk density had a reverse trend and increased with increasing the depth. Reducing the amount of organic carbon with increasing depth was because of the remains of plants and roots in the surface horizons and the presence of more organic carbon. Since phosphorus and nitrogen in the soils are highly dependent on organic matter, Thus, changes in these indicators are mainly obeys from this materials.
Conclusion: In general, it became appears from this study, that the topography factor had important effect on studied soil properties. The changes observed in the quality of soils located on different slope positions can be attributed to the differences of the soil in erosion rate and moisture content and different sediment receptions in different positions of toposequence as affected by the amount and distribution of rainfall. Considering the effect of the position of the landscape on the physical and chemical properties of soil, recommended analysis of the landscape is better to be done in the sustainable land management and also for soil and water conservation programs. Because of the different management practices in different parts of landscape is difficult and perhaps impossible, in order to maintain soil, conservation management must be done based on soil quality in areas with maximum damage and minimum quality.

Keywords

• Aggregate stability
• Organic carbon
• Soil Erosion
• Steep slope
• Topography

20.1001.1.20084757.1395.30.1.14.4

References

1- AminiJahromi H., Naseri M.Y., Khormali F., and MovahediNaeini S.A. 2009. Variations in properties of the loess derived soils as affected by geomorphic positions in two different climatic regions of Golestan Province. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 16(1): 1-17. (in Persian with English abstract).

2- Ariapak S., BayramZadeh V., and Moeini A. 2012. Estimation of carbon sequestered in biomass and soil in Taleghani and Chitgar forest parks with elder pine (Pinuseldarica) as main species. Journal of Conservation and Utilization of Natural Resources, 1(2): 15-28. (in Persian with English abstract).

3- Bersstrom D.W., Monereal C.M., and Jacques E. 2001. Spatial dependence of soil organic carbon mass and its relationship to soil series and topography. Canadian Soil Science Journal, 81(1): 53-62.

4- Beyene S. 2011. Toposequence in Gununo Area, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Science and Development, 1(1): 31-41.

5- Brubaker S.C., Jones A.J., Lewis D.T., and Frank K. 1993. Soil properties associated with landscape position. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57: 235-239.

6- Darvishzadeh A. 1991. Iran geology. Tehran University Inc. 908p. (in Persian).

7- Gee G.W., and Bauder J.W. 1986. Particle size analysis.p. 383-411. InA.Klute. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part1.2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.

8- Halajnia A., Haghnia G.H., Fotovat A., and Khorasani R. 2007. Effect of organic matter on phosphorus availability in calcareous soils. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Science, 10(4): 121-133. (in Persian with English abstract).

9- Hattar B.I., Taimeh A.Y., and Ziadat F.M. 2010. Variation in soil chemical properties along toposequences in an arid region of the Levant. Catena, 83(1): 34-45.

10- Hikmatullah H., Subagyo S., and Prasetyo B.H. 2003. Soil properties of the eastern toposequence of mount kelimutu, flores island, East Nusa Tenggara and their potential for agricultural use. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(1): 1-11.

11- Jenny H. 1941. Factors of Soils Formation. McGraw-HillBook Company. New York, NY, 281 pp.

12- Krike P.L. 1950. Kjeldahl method for total nitrogen. Analytical Chemistry, 22: 345-358.

13- Lax A., Diaz E., Costillo V., andAlbaladejo J. 1994. Reclamation of physical and chemical properties of a salinized soil by organic amendment. Arid Soil Research Rehabitation, 8: 9-17.

14- Maleki S., Khormali F., Kiani F., and Karimi A.R. 2013. Effect of slope position and aspect on some physical and chemical soil characteristics in a loess hill slope of Toshan area, Golestan province, Iran. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 20(3): 93-112. (in Persian with English abstract)

15- Malo D.D., Worcester B.K., Cassel T.K., and Matzdrot K.D. 1974. Soil landscape relationships in a closed drainage system. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 38(5): 813-818.

16- Nazari N. 2005. The effect of topography and soil formation with calcareous parent material under semi-arid region of the Rajein area. Journal of New Agricultural Science, 1(2): 31-46. (in Persian).

17- Nourbakhsh F., Moneral C.M., Emtiazy G., and Dinel H. 2002. L-Asparginase activity in some soils of central Iran. Arid Land Research. Manag, 16:377-384.

18- Olsen S.R., and Sommers L.E. 1982. Phosphorous. p. 403-430. In A.L. Page et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Chemical and biological methods. Vol 2. 2nd ed. Agron. SSSA, Madison, WI.

19- PolyakovV., and Lal R. 2004. Modeling soil organic matter dynamics as affected by soil water erosion. Environment International, 30(4): 547-556.

20- RezaeS., and Gilkes R. 2005. The effect of landscape attributes and plant community on soil physical properties in range lands. Journal of Geoderma, 125: 167-176.

21- RuheR.V., and Olsen C.G. 1980. Soil welding. Soil Science, 130: 132-139.

22- Safadoust A. 2013. Effect of crop management and soil texture on some structural features. Journal of Soil Research (Soil and Water Science), 27(3): 327-334. (in Persian).

23- Salehi M.H., Jazini F., and Mohammadkhani A. 2008. The effect of topography on soil properties with a Focus on Yield and Quality of Almond in the Saman Area, Shahrekord. Journal of Water, Soil and Plant in Agriculture, 8(2): 79-92. (in Persian with English abstract).

24- Soane B.D. 1990. The role of organic matter in soil compactibility: a review of some practical aspects. Soil and Tillage Research, 16(1): 179-201.

25- Soil and water research institute. 1998. Maps of soil moisture regimes.Agriculture Research Organization, Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture. (in Persian).

26- Sommer M., and Schlichting E. 1997. Archetypes of catenas in respect to matter a concept for structuring and grouping catenas. Geoderma, 76: 1-33.

27- Somner M.E., and Miller W.P. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. p. 1201-1229. In D.L. Spark. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. ASA, Madison, WI. USA.

28- Vahidi M.J., Jafarzadeh A.A., Oustan S., and Shahbazi F. 2010. Effect of Geomorphology on Physical, Chemical and Mineralogical Properties of Soils in Southern Ahar. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 21(2): 65-80. (in Persian with English abstract).

29- Walky A., and Block I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37: 29-38

30- Wang D., Shi X., Wang H., Weindorf D.C., Yu D., Sun W., Ren H., and Zhao Y. 2010. Scale effect of climate and soil texture on soil organic carbon in the uplands of northeast China. Pedosphere, 20:525-535.

31- Zarrinkafsh M. 1997. Principles of Plant and Soil Science in Relation to the Environment.Islamic Azad University. (in Persian with English abstract)