ارزیابی همبستگی ویژگی‌های خاک با پارامترهای منحنی Q/I پتاسیم در خاک‌های آهکی استان لرستان

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• مریم موسی پور
• اکبر فرقانی
• عاطفه صبوری

دانشگاه گیلان

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v34i2.79749

چکیده

پتاسیم عنصری ضروری برای تولید محصولات کشاورزی است. برای ارزیابی وضعیت پتاسیم تبادلی و محلول در خاک از روش کمیت- شدت (Q/I) استفاده می­کنند. این تحقیق جهت به­دست آوردن شکل­های پتاسیم و منحنی­های Q/I در 16 خاک سطحی (30-0 سانتی­متری)، از خاک­های آهکی لرستان انجام شد. برای این کار از محلول کلرید کلسیم 01/0 مولار و کلرید پتاسیم با غلظت­های 33/0، 66/0، 1، 33/1، 2 و 5/2 میلی­مولار استفاده گردید. از هر نمونه، 6 سوسپانسیون تهیه و با استات آمونیوم 1 مولار خنثی عصاره­گیری ­گردید و میزان پتاسیم بوسیله دستگاه فلیم­فتومتر اندازه‌گیری شد. منحنی (Q/I) برای هر نمونه رسم گردید. نسبت فعالیت پتاسیم در حال تعادل (AR0k) بین(mmolL-1)0.5 872/0 تا 047/0، پتاسیم آسان قابل‌تبادل K0)Δ( بین (mmolkg-1) 269/1 تا 243/23، پتاسیم سخت قابل‌تبادل (KX) بین (mmolkg-1) 163/0 تا 328/16، پتاسیم قابل دسترس (KL) بین(mmolkg-1) 219/6 تا 593/38 می­باشد. بیش­ترین مقدار PBCK در خاک 11 (834/45) با درصد رس (38) و کم­ترین مقدار برای خاک 13 با مقدار (mmolkg-1)/(mmolL-1)0.5 329/23 و درصد رس (8) مشاهده گردید. بین ΔK0 و  (AR0k)همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌دار (01/0 p<،90/0=r) مشاهده گردید. PBCK با درصد رس (01/0 p<،74/0=r) و ظرفیت تبادل کاتیونی خاک (01/0 p<،73/0=r) همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌داری نشان داد. با استفاده از روش رگرسیون چند متغیره گام به گام مشخص شد از بین تمام خصوصیات خاک، تنها مقدار رس طبق مدل آماری (631/0Clay (R2=482/0+875/17 PBCK=می­تواند بعنوان ویژگی مناسب به­منظور برآورد ظرفیت بالقوه پتاسیم خاک استفاده شود. هم­چنین طبق مدل آماری ) 318/0(R2= O.C017/9+468/14KL= مقدار کربن آلی (O.C)، بعنوان خصوصیت مناسب برای برآورد مقدار KL تعیین گردید. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

• پتاسیم
• منحنی کمیت-شدت
• PBCK
• Δk

20.1001.1.20084757.1399.34.2.10.0

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Correlation of Soil Characteristics with Potassium Q/I Curve Parameters in Some Calcareous Soils of Lorestan Province

نویسندگان [English]

• M. Mosapour
• A. Forghani
• A. Sabouri

Guilan University

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Potassium is the second essential nutrient for plants. Potassium has a high abundance in the soil, but only a small part of it can be used. The principal forms of potassium in the soil are solution potassium, exchangeable potassium, non-exchangeable potassium, and structural potassium. To evaluate the state of potassium in the soil, three forms of soluble, exchangeable, and non-exchangeable are used. The Q/I curve is used to describe the availability of potassium, due to the competition between calcium, potassium, and magnesium ions by soil exchange sites. This curve represents the supply power of soil potassium. The objective of this study was to investigate soil potassium Q/I curve and relationships between its parameters and soil characteristics in some calcareous soils of Lorestan province.
Materials and Methods: In this study, 16 topsoil samples (0-30 cm) were obtained from the calcareous soils of Lorestan province. The experiment was carried out by a completely randomized design with three replications. To prepare the Q/I curve, six suspensions were prepared from each soil sample containing 1 g of soil and 10 ml of calcium chloride 0.01 M and 10 milliliters of potassium chloride with concentrations of 0.33, 0.66, 1, 1.33, 2 and 2.5 mmol. The solutions were shaken for one hour. They were then left for 20 hours to reach the balance. The samples were centrifuged and the soluble and solid phase were separated and then the soluble potassium solution was read using a potassium flame photometry. Calcium and magnesium concentrations were measured by titration with EDTA. Then, 20 ml of 1 M ammonium acetate (NH4OAC) was added to the solid phase of each sample. Then, the concentration of exchangeable potassium was measured using a flame photometer. Then the Q/I curve was plotted for each sample. In addition, the association analysis was performed using a stepwise multivariable regression method.
Results and Discussion: According to the Q/I curve, ARK0 (potassium activity ratio at equilibrium) ranged from 0.087-0.047 (mmol.L-1). The maximum amount of PBCK (potential buffering capacity) was observed in soil No.11 with value of 45.834 (mmol.kg-1)/(mmol.L-1)0.5 and the lowest value obtained for soil No.13 with value of 23.329 (mmol.kg-1)/(mmol.L-1)0.5. In fact, in soils with PBCK, the soluble potassium activity has a lower oscillation and is better buffered. The low amount of PBCK in soil No.13 indicates low soil power to supply potassium and the necessity of using potassium fertilizers. The lowest and most easily converted easy potassium (ΔK0) were observed for soil No.12 and 4 with a value of 1.269 and 23.243 (mmol.kg-1) respectively. There was a negative correlation between PBCK and ARK, suggesting those high-PBCK soils, lower ARK, are more stable than those with lower PBCK. The KL (available Potassium) with ΔK0 and Kx (Hardly exchangeable K) showed a significant and positive relationship (r=0.70, p<0.01). Therefore, it can be concluded that by increasing each of the two parameters ΔK0 and KX, the amount of potassium (KL) is increased. Also, a positive and significant correlation was found between potassium potential buffering capacity with clay content (r=0.79, p<0/01) and the cation exchange capacity (r=0.73, p<0.01). Therefore, the cation exchange capacity of soils can be used to estimate the buffering capacity of soils and therefore recommend potassium fertilizers. Available potassium (KL) showed a positive and significant correlation with soil organic matter because its organic material is a part of potassium. Also, organic matter can alter the amount of potassium by changing the pH value. Other Q/I curve parameters, such as ARK0, Kx, and ΔK0 did not show any significant correlation with any soil properties. According to regression analysis, it was determined among all soil characteristics the only amount of clay can be used as a proper attribute in order to estimate the potential of potassium in soil according to the following equation: PBCK=17.857+0.482 Clay R2 = 0.631. Also, the amount of organic carbon (O.C) was determined as the proper variable for estimating the KL value according to the following model: KL=14.468+9.017 O.C (R2 = 0.318).
 Conclusion: Due to potential buffering capacity (PBCK) in these soils, it seems that soils can be able to provide the absorbable potassium relatively. Therefore, fertilizer recommendation can be performed by considering the amount of determined variables by the Q/I curve.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Potassium
• PBCK
• Δk
• Quantity-Intensity curve

مراجع

1- Abdi S., Tajabadiopur A., and Hamidpour M. 2019. Chemical Forms and Quantity-Intensity Relationships of Potassium in Rafsanjan and Anar Lands under Pistachio Trees. Journal of Pistachio Science and Technology 3(5): 22-38. (In Persian with English abstract)

2- Abtahi A.S., and Abbaslu H. 2008. Quantitative-intensity (Q/I) parameters of potassium and evaluation of correlation of its parameters with soil properties in a number of Estahban-Fars province soils. 10th Iranian soil science congress, Tehran University (Karaj), pp. 1132-1143. (In Persian with English abstract)

3- Beckett P.H.T. 1964a. Studies on soil potassium II. The immediate Q/I relations of labile potassium in the soil. Journal of Soil Science. 15: 9-23.

4- Datta D.K., and Joshi D.C. 1990. Quantity-intensity parameters of potassium and their parameter with available forms and soil properties in dune and interdune soils. Soil Science Society Indian Journal. 38: 404-409.

5- Fatemi A., Malakouti M., Bazargan K., and Honorary R. 2011. Correlation between mineral composition and quantitative-intensity parameters and available potassium in Calcareous Soils. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Research 18(2): 23-44. (In Persian with English abstract)

6- Gawander J.S., Gangaiya P., and Morrison R.J. 2002. Potassium studies on some sugarcane growing soils in Fiji. Soil Science Society American Journal. 20: 15-21.

7- Hawkesford M., Horst W., Kichey T.M.R., Schjørring J.K., Møller I.S., and White P. 2012. Functions of macronutrients. Marschers's Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants: Elsevier Science.

8- Hajizad Sh., Samadi S., Mowhaydi Nayeni S., and Charming F. 2010. Quantity-intensity parameters and forms of potassium in relation to clay mineralogy in some vineyard growing growcalcareous soils in Western Azarbaijan Province. Journal of Soil and Water Protection Research 17(3): 65-83. (In Persian with English abstract)

9- Hashemimofrad S.M., Hossinpour A., and Motaghian H.R. 2018. Determination of K quantity-intensity parameters in a topography. Journal of Soil and Water Research 24(3): 267-282. (In Persian with English abstract)

10- Helmeke P.A., and Sparks D.L. 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis, part 3. Chemical methods. 2nd Ed, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin USA.

11- Hosseinpour A.R., and Kalbasi M. 2000. Potassium quantity-intensity ratio and the correlation of its parameters with soil properties in some Iranian soils. J. Sci. Techno. Agric. Nat. Res. 4: 43-55.

12- Islam A., Karim A.J.M.S., Solaiman., A.R.M., Islam Md., and Saleque Md. A. 2017. Eigh-year long potassium fertilization effects on quantity/intensity relationships of soil potassium under double rice cropping. Soil Tillage Research 169: 99-117.

13- Jimenez C., and Parra M.A. 1991. Potassium Quantity-Intensity Parameters in Calcareous Vertisols and Inceptisols of Southwestern Spain. Soil Science Society American Journal .55( 4): 985-989.

14- Knudsen D., Peterson G.A., and Pratt P.F. 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. P225-246, In: Page, A.L., et al., (eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison. WI. USA.

15- Krishna K.R. 2002. Soil fertility and crop production. Science publisher. Inc. Endified. New Hampshire., PP. 465.

16- LeRouxe J., and Sumner M.E. 1968. Labile potassium in soils: I. Factors affecting the quantity-intensity (Q/I) parameters. Soil Science. 106: 35-41.

17- LeRoux J. 1966. Studies on ionic equilibria in Natal soils. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Natural, Republic of South Africa.

18- Lotfi Parsa H., Khademi H.Sh., Ayyubi A., and Hadiynezhad A. 2013. Time variation of potassium release from phlogopite in alfalfa root. Soil Researches (Soil and Water Sciences) 26(1): 111-112. (In Persian with English abstract)

19- Matthews B.C., and Becket P.H.T. 1962. A new procedure for studing the release and fixation of potassium ions in soil. Journal of Agriculture Science. 58: 59-64.

20- Mahmoudi Shenas M. 1395. Quantitative relationships-Severity of potassium in some calcareous soils of the Malayer vineyards. Department of Soil Science, Malayer University. (In Persian with English abstract)

21- Page A.L., 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

22- Poonia S.R., and Niederbudde E.A. 1990. Exchange equilibria of potassium in soil, V. Effect of natural organic matter on K-Ca exchange. Geoderma 47(3-4): 233-242.

23- Reynolds M., D. Bonnett S.C., Chapman R.T., Furbank Y., Manes D.E., and Parry M.A. 2011. Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies. Journal of Experimental Botany 62: 439-452.

24- Richards J.E., and Bates T.D. 1988. Studies on the potassium supplying capacities of southern Ontario: II. Nitric acid extraction of non-exchangeable K and its availability to crops. Canadian Journal soil Science. 68:199-208.

25- Samadi A. 2006. Potassium exchange isotherms as a plant availability index in selected calcareous soils of Western Azarbaijan Province, Iran. Turkish Journal Agriculture and Forest. 30(3): 213-222.

26- Samavati M., and Eskandari B. 2013. Correlation between Quantitative-Soil Potassium Soil (Q/I) parameters with some soil properties in some soils of spring city. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Water and Soil Science 17(63): 203-213. (In Persian with English abstract)

27- Salardini A.A. 2003. Soil fertility. Tehran University Press, 410p.

28- Schouwenburg J., Van Ch., and Schuffelen A.C. 1963. Potassium-exchange behavior of an illite. Neth. Journal Agriculture Science. 11: 13-2.

29- Shaviv A., Mohsin M., Partt P F., and Mattigod S.V. 1985. Potassium fixation characteristic of five southern California soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 49: 1105-1109.

30- Sharma A., Jalali V.K., and Arora S. 2010. Non-exchangeable potassium release and its removal in foot-hill soils of North-west Himalayas. CATENA 82: 112-117.

31- Simonsson M., Andersson S., Andrist-Rangel Y., Hillier S., Mattsson L., and Öborn I. 2007. Potassium release and fixation as a function of fertilizer application rate and soil parent material. Geoderma 140: 188-198.

32- Sindhu S.S., Parmar P., and Phour M. 2014. Nutrient cycling: potassium solubilization by microorganisms and improvement of crop growth. In Geomicrobiology and Biogeochemistry (pp. 175-198). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

33- Sparks D.L., and Libhardt W.C. 1981. Effect of long-term lim and potassium application on quantity-intensity (Q/I) relationships in sandy soil. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 66: 786-986.

34- Sparks D.L., and Liebhardt W.C. 1982. Temperature effect on potassium applications on quantity-intensity (Q/I) exchenge and selectivity relationships in sandy soil. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 45: 786-790.

35- Strawn D.G., Bohn H.L., and OConnor G.A. 2015. Soil Chemistry. Wiley-Blackwell, 392p.

36- Stumm W., and Morgan J.J. 1996. Aquatik chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural waters. 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.

37- Surapaneni A., Palmer A.S., Tillman R.W., Kirkman J.H., and Gregg P.E.H. 2002. The mineralogy and potassium supplying power of some loessial and related soils of New Zealand. Geoderma 110: 191-204.

38- Towfighi H. 1995. Kinetics potassium release from paddy soils of north of Iran. I. Comparison and evaluation of first-order, zero order and parabolic diffusion rate equations. Iranian Journal of Agriculture Science 26(4): 27-41.

39- Vahdati H. 2010. Correlation of some soil characteristics with Q / I curve parameters of potassium in some soils of Guilan province. Department of Soil Science, Guilan University. 100 pp. (In Persian with English abstract)

40- Wang J.J., Harrel D.L., and Bell P.F. 2004. Potassium buffering characteristcs of three soils exchangeable potassium. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 68: 654-661.

41- Wang J.J., and Scott A.D. 2001. Effect of experimental relevance on potassium Q/I relationships and its implications for surface and subsurface soils. Communication in Soil Science and plant Analysis. 32: 2561-2575.

42- Woodruff C.M. 1955. The energies of replacement of Calcium by potassium in soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 19: 36-40.

43- Zörb C., Senbayram M., and Peiter E. 2013. Potassium in agriculture– Status and perspectives. Journal of Plant Physiology 171: 656-669.