ارزیابی تأثیر جایگزینی استروویت با کود سوپر فسفات تریپل بر برخی شاخص‌های فیزیولوژیکی و فراهمی فسفر در گیاه گندم

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• طالب نظری ¹
• مجتبی بارانی مطلق ¹
• سید امید رستگار ²
• محمد حسین سدری ³

¹ گروه علوم خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

² گروه مهندسی شیمی، دانشکده مهندسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

³ بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کردستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، سنندج، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.2024.85725.1362

چکیده

استروویت (فسفات آمونیوم منیزیم) یک ماده معدنی با حلالیت کم در آب است که به‌طور افزاینده­ی از تصفیه خانه­های فاضلاب بازیابی می­شود. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی اثر استروویت جایگزین شده با کود سوپر فسفات تریپل بر شاخص­های فیزیولوژیکی و فراهمی فسفر در گیاه گندم بود. بدین منظور آزمایشی فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در 3 تکرار به‌صورت گلدانی به مدت 10 هفته به اجرا درآمد. فاکتورها شامل کاربرد نسبت­های مختلف کود استروویت جایگزین شده با سوپر فسفات تریپل (S0:P100، S25:P75، S50:P50، S75:P25 و S100:P0) و 4 سطح فسفر (صفر، 50، 100 و 150 کیلوگرم سوپر فسفات در هکتار) بود. میزان کاربرد استروویت بر اساس مقدار فسفر کل (P₂O₅) سوپر فسفات تریپل محاسبه شد. بر پایه نتایج بدست آمده نوع تیمار کودی و سطوح مصرف و اثر متقابل آنها بر تمامی تیمارهای مورد بررسی بجز وزن تر و ارتفاع، در سطح احتمال یک درصد (p < 0.01) معنی­دار شد. مقایسه میانگین داده­ها نشان داد بیشترین مقدار وزن تر اندام­هوایی 79/7 گرم در گلدان، وزن خشک اندام هوایی 130/1 گرم در گلدان ، ارتفاع 66/29 سانتی­متر و غلظت فسفر اندام هوایی 174/0 درصد از کاربرد تیمار S75:P25 150 کیلوگرم سوپر فسفات در هکتار بدست آمد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که کاربرد  S100:P0 150 کیلوگرم سوپر فسفات در هکتار در مقایسه با S0:P100 می­تواند مقادیر کلروفیلa، b، کل و کارتنوئید را به‌ترتیب به­میزان 78/7، 82/3، 44/6 و 84/6 درصد افزایش دهد. با وجود حلالیت کم استروویت (3 تا 5 درصد) به اندازه کود فسفر رایج، برای گیاهان زراعی مؤثر است. بنابراین توصیه می­شود زمان‌بندی و نرخ کاربرد استروویت در رابطه با تقاضای محصولات زراعی و باغی مختلف بهینه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• استروویت
• سوپر فسفات تریپل
• فسفر
• کلروفیل
• گندم

موضوعات

• علوم خاک

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the Effects of Replacing Struvite with Triple Superphosphate Fertilizer on Some Physiological Indices and Phosphorus Availability in Wheat

نویسندگان [English]

• T. Nazari ¹
• M. Barani Motlagh ¹
• S.O. Rastegar ²
• M.H. Sedri ³

¹ Department of Soil Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

² Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

³ Soil and Water Research Department, Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sanandaj, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Phosphorus is an essential element for all living organisms, and it cannot be replaced by any other element. Phosphorus has however a limited resource, and it is estimated that the extracted phosphorus resources (Apatite) will last for another 50 to 100 years. One of the most widely used technologies for recycling phosphorus is the precipitation of phosphorus from sewage sludge and leachate. Phosphorus Recovery as struvite (NH₄MgPO₄.6H₂O) from sewage sludge has attracted special attention due to its potential for use as an ecological and slow release fertilizer. Struvite is a white, grain-like solid, odor-free and sludge–free ingredient, composed of magnesium, ammonium and phosphate at equal molar concentrations. Therefore, this study is designed to examine the effect of struvite replacement with triple superphosphate fertilizer on some physiological parameters and phosphorus availability in wheat plants in calcareous soils deficient in phosphorus.
 
Methods and Materials
Soil with phosphorus deficiency was collected from 0-30 cm depth under arable lands of Hajjiabad-e Seyyedeh located in Ghorveh township, Kurdistan Province, Iran. The soil was air-dried and ground to pass through a 2-mm sieve, followed by laboratory analysis to determine its physico-chemical properties. The struvite used in the research was obtained by optimizing the three main factors of sulfuric acid concentration, solid-to-liquid ratio, and time for the leaching process, and the three key factors of Mg:P ratio, N:P ratio and pH for the precipitation process by Response Surface Methodology. To achieve the aim of this study a factorial experiment was carried based on completely randomized design with 4 replications. The factors included the application of different proportions of struvite replaced with triple superphosphate (S0:P100, S25:P75, S50:P50, S75:P25 and S100:P0) and 4 levels of phosphorus (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg TSP ha^-1) and a total of 54 pots. The application rate for struvite was calculated based on total phosphorus (P₂O₅). Then 10 wheat seeds were planted in each pot at 2-cm depth which after plant emerging and greening, declined to 4 plants in each pot. The pots were randomly moved twice a week during the growth period to eliminate environmental effects. Irrigation and weeding operations were applied by hand. Plants were harvested 60 days after planting (beginning of flowering), washed with distilled water and dried with tissue paper. The samples were air-dried and then oven dried at 70˚C to a constant weight in a forced air-driven oven. Phosphorus concentrations in plant extracts were measured by the molybdenum vanadate or yellow method and chlorophyll content (a, b and ab) and carotenoids using the Arnon method. The statistical results of the data were analyzed using SAS software and LSD test (at 5% level) was used for comparing the mean values.
 
Results and Discussion
Based on the obtained results, all the investigated treatments and their interactions were significant at p<0.01. However, the interaction effect of fresh weight shoots and height was significant at p<0.05. The comparison of the average data showed that the highest amount of fresh weight shoots (7.79 g pot^-1), dry weight shoots (1.130 g pot^-1) and height (29.66 cm) was obtained from the application of S75:P25 150 kgTSP ha^-1. By use of struvite instead of triple superphosphate fertilizer, the phosphorus concentration and uptake of wheat increased at all three fertilizer levels, so that the highest phosphorus concentration (0.174%) was obtained from S75:P25 150 kg TSP ha^-1. However, there was no statistically significant difference for S100:P0 (0.169%) treatment. The highest amount of phosphorus uptake in wheat with an average of 0.197 g pot^-1 was obtained from the S75:P25 treatment (150 kg TSP ha^-1), compared to the treatment of 100% struvite (S100:P0) and 100% triple superphosphate fertilizer (S0:P100) with the averages of 0.158 and 0.109 g pot^-1, respectively, showing 19.79 and 44.67 percent increase. Also, the results showed that the treatment of 150 kg TSP ha^-1 100% struvite (S100:P0) compared to 100% triple superphosphate fertilizer (S0:P100) increased the amounts of chlorophyll a, b, ab and carotenoids by 7.78, 3.82, 6.44 and 6.84 percent, respectively.
 
Conclusion
Despite struvite's low solubility, it is a highly soluble phosphorus fertilizer for plants . However, the reasons for this apparent contradiction and also the specific mechanisms of struvite dissolution are still unclear. Hence, further accurate measurements at different pH and EC conditions with different physical and chemical properties of soil studying phosphorus fractionation in soil will help to better understand the use of struvite. Therefore, it is recommended to optimize the timing and application rate of struvite in relation to the demand for different agricultural and garden crops.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Chlorophyll
• Phosphorus
• Struvite
• Wheat

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

مراجع

1. Achat, D.L., Daumer, M.L., Sperandio, M., Santellani, A.C., & Morel, C. (2014a). Solubility and mobility of phosphorus recycled from dairy effluents and pig manures in incubated soils with different characteristics. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 99, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9614-0
2. Achat, D.L., Sperandio, M., Daumer, M.L., Santellani, A.C., Prud'Homme, L., Akhtar, M., & Morel, C. (2014b). Plant-availability of phosphorus recycled from pig manures and dairy effluents as assessed by isotopic labeling techniques. Geoderma, 232, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.028
3. Ackerman, J.N., Zvomuya, F., Cicek, N., & Flaten, D. (2013). Evaluation of manure-derived struvite as a phosphorus source for canola. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 93(3), 419-424.
4. Arzani, A., & Ashraf, M. (2017). Cultivated ancient wheats (Triticum spp.): A potential source of health‐beneficial food products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 16(3), 477-488. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1541-4337.12262
5. Barbosa, S.G., Peixoto, L., Meulman, B., Alves, M.M., & Pereira, M.A. (2016). A design of experiments to assess phosphorous removal and crystal properties in struvite precipitation of source separated urine using different Mg sources. Chemical Engineering Journal, 298, 146-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.148
6. Bastida, F., Jehmlich, N., Martínez-Navarro, J., Bayona, V., García, C., & Moreno, J.L. (2019). The effects of struvite and sewage sludge on plant yield and the microbial community of a semiarid Mediterranean soil. Geoderma, 337, 1051-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.046
7. Bonvin, C., Etter, B., Udert, K.M., Frossard, E., Nanzer, S., Tamburini, F., & Oberson, A. (2015). Plant uptake of phosphorus and nitrogen recycled from synthetic source-separated urine. Ambio, 44, 217-227. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13280-014-0616-6
8. Day, P.R. (1965). Particle fractionation and particle size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling, 9, 545-567.
9. Degryse, F., Baird, R., Da Silva, R.C., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2017). Dissolution rate and agronomic effectiveness of struvite fertilizers–effect of soil pH, granulation and base excess. Plant and Soil, 410, 139-152.
10. Ehmann, A., Bach, I.M., Laopeamthong, S., Bilbao, J., & Lewandowski, I. (2017). Can phosphate salts recovered from manure replace conventional phosphate fertilizer? Agriculture, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture 7010001
11. Eisenhauer, N., Lanoue, A., Strecker, T., Scheu, S., Steinauer, K., Thakur, M.P., & Mommer, L. (2017). Root biomass and exudates link plant diversity with soil bacterial and fungal biomass. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 44641. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44641
12. El-Rafie, S., Hawash, S., & Shalaby, M.S. (2013). Evaluation of struvite precipitated from chemical fertilizer industrial effluents. Advances in Applied Science Research, 4(1), 113-123.
13. Erdal, İ., Mejri, R., Yaylaci, C., & Turkan, Ş.A. (2023). Comparison of the effectiveness of struvite and some commercial fertilizers on the growth of lettuce. Bahçe, 52(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.53471/bahce.1316809
14. Fageria, N.K. (2014). Nitrogen management in crop production. New York: CRC Press. ISBN:978-1-4822-2283-8.
15. Franz, M. (2008). Phosphate fertilizer from sewage sludge ash (SSA). Waste Management, 28(10), 1809–1818.
16. Gell, K., De Ruijter, F.J., Kuntke, P., De Graaff, M., & Smit, A.L. (2011). Safety and effectiveness of struvite from black water and urine as a phosphorus fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3(3), 67.
17. González-Ponce, R., López-de-Sá, E.G., & Plaza, C. (2009). Lettuce response to phosphorus fertilization with struvite recovered from municipal wastewater. HortScience, 44(2), 426-430.
18. Guo, W., Nazim, H., Liang, Z., & Yang, D. (2016). Magnesium deficiency in plants: An urgent problem. The Crop Journal, 4(2), 83-91.
19. Guyonnet, J.P., Cantarel, A.A., Simon, L., & Haichar, F.E.Z. (2018). Root exudation rate as functional trait involved in plant nutrient‐use strategy classification. Ecology and Evolution, 8(16), 8573-8581. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ece3.4383
20. Hakim, A., Jaganath, S., Honnabyraiah, M.K., Kumar, S.M., Kumar, S.A., & Dayamani, K.J. (2018). Effect of biofertilizers and Auxin on total chlorophyll content of leaf and leaf area in pomegranate (Punica granatum) cuttings. International Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience, 6(1), 987-991.
21. Hall, R.L., Staal, L.B., Macintosh, K.A., McGrath, J.W., Bailey, J., Black, L., & Williams, P.N. (2020). Phosphorus speciation and fertiliser performance characteristics: A comparison of waste recovered struvites from global sources. Geoderma, 362, 114096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114096
22. Hertzberger, A.J., Cusick, R.D., & Margenot, A.J. (2020). A review and meta‐analysis of the agricultural potential of struvite as a phosphorus fertilizer. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 84(3), 653-671. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114096
23. Hertzberger, A.J., Cusick, R.D., & Margenot, A.J. (2021). Maize and soybean response to phosphorus fertilization with blends of struvite and monoammonium phosphate. Plant and Soil, 461, 547-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11104-021-04830-2
24. Hopkins, B.G., & Hansen, N.C. (2019). Phosphorus management in high‐yield systems. Journal of Environmental Quality, 48(5), 1265-1280. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2019.03.0130
25. Hopkins, B., & Ellsworth, J. (2003, January). Phosphorus nutrition in potato production. In Idaho Potato Conference (pp. 22-23).
26. Huygens, D., Saveyn, H., Tonini, D., Eder, P., & Delgado Sancho, L. (2019). Technical proposals for selected new fertilising materials under the Fertilising Products Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/1009). FeHPO CaHPO, 4.
27. Jama-Rodzeńska, A., Chohura, P., Gałka, B., Szuba-Trznadel, A., Falkiewicz, A., & Białkowska, M. (2022). Effect of different doses of phosgreen fertilization on chlorophyll, K, and Ca content in Butterhead lettuce (Lactuca sativa ) grown in peat substrate. Agriculture, 12(6), 788.
28. Jones Jr, J.B., & Case, V.W. (1990). Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, 3, 389-427.
29. Kuo, S., Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., & Loeppert, R.H. (1996). Phosphorus. Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Madison. Soil Sci Soc Am. Inc Am Soc Agron Inc, 4-9.
30. Li, B., Huang, H.M., Boiarkina, I., Yu, W., Huang, Y.F., Wang, G.Q., & Young, B.R. (2019). Phosphorus recovery through struvite crystallisation: Recent developments in the understanding of operational factors. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.025
31. Liang, S., Chen, H., Zeng, X., Li, Z., Yu, W., Xiao, K., & Yang, J. (2019). A comparison between sulfuric acid and oxalic acid leaching with subsequent purification and precipitation for phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge incineration ash. Water Research, 159, 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.022
32. Lindsay, W.L., & Norvell, W. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42(3), 421-428.
33. Liu, Y., Chen, J., Mol, A.P., & Ayres, R.U. (2007). Comparative analysis of phosphorus use within national and local economies in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 51(2), 454-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.resconrec.2006.10.012
34. Ma, J., Zhao, D., Tang, X., Yuan, M., Zhang, D., Xu, M., & Jiang, L. (2022). Genome-wide association study on root system architecture and identification of candidate genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum ). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(3), 1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031843
35. Mancho, C., Diez-Pascual, S., Alonso, J., Gil-Díaz, M., & Lobo, M.C. (2023). Assessment of recovered struvite as a safe and sustainable phosphorous fertilizer. Environments, 10(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments 10020022
36. Meng, X., Liu, X., Huang, Q., Gao, H., Tay, K., & Yan, J. (2019). Recovery of phosphate as struvite from low-temperature combustion sewage sludge ash (LTCA) by cation exchange. Waste Management, 90, 84-93. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.045
37. Militaru, B.A., Lupa, L., & Pode, R. (2019). Phosphorus recovery as struvite from sewage sludge ash. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 19(4.1), 749-755. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/4.1/ S18.095
38. Nongqwenga, N., Muchaonyerwa, P., Hughes, J., Odindo, A., & Bame, I. (2017). Possible use of struvite as an alternative phosphate fertilizer. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17(3), 581-593. https://doi.org/ 10.4067/S0718-95162017000300003
39. Olsen, S.R. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate (No. 939). US Department of Agriculture.
40. Page, A.L. (1982). Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties (Vol. 9). American Society of Agronomy.
41. Ryu, H.D., Lim, C.S., Kang, M.K., & Lee, S.I. (2012). Evaluation of struvite obtained from semiconductor wastewater as a fertilizer in cultivating Chinese cabbage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 221, 248-255. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.038
42. Seyhan, D. (2009). Country-scale phosphorus balancing as a base for resources conservation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(12), 698-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.05.001
43. Talboys, P.J., Heppell, J., Roose, T., Healey, J.R., Jones, D.L., & Withers, P.J. (2016). Struvite: a slow-release fertiliser for sustainable phosphorus management? Plant and Soil, 401, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2747-3
44. Vysotskaya, L., Akhiyarova, G., Feoktistova, A., Akhtyamova, Z., Korobova, A., Ivanov, I., & Kudoyarova, G. (2020). Effects of phosphate shortage on root growth and hormone content of barley depend on capacity of the roots to accumulate ABA. Plants, 9(12), 1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121722
45. Walkley, A., & Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29-38.
46. Wen, G., Huang, L., Zhang, X., & Hu, Z. (2019). Uptake of nutrients and heavy metals in struvite recovered from a mixed wastewater of human urine and municipal sewage by two vegetables in calcareous soil. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 15, 100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019.100384
47. Xu, H., He, P., Gu, W., Wang, G., & Shao, L. (2012). Recovery of phosphorus as struvite from sewage sludge ash. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 24(8), 1533-1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60969-8
48. Yuan, Z., Pratt, S., & Batstone, D.J. (2012). Phosphorus recovery from wastewater through microbial processes. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 23(6), 878-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.08.001.
49. Zin, M.M.T., & Kim, D.J. (2019). Struvite production from food processing wastewater and incinerated sewage sludge ash as an alternative N and P source: Optimization of multiple resources recovery by response surface methodology. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 126, 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep. 2019.04.018