Hydrological Effects of Chashm Dam on the Downstream of Talar River Watershed

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Mohammad Reza Khaleghi ¹
• Vahid Gholami ²
• Ghorbanali Khodabakhshi ³

¹ Taybad Branch, Islamic Azad University

² University of Guilan

³ Mazandaran Regional Water Company

10.22067/jsw.v30i4.46053

Abstract

Introduction: In the last century, dams have constructed with the objective of water supplies for agriculture, drinking water and industry. However, the results from the performance review of dams show adverse effects on the downstream environment and the availability of water resources. The purpose of the Chashm dam construction on the TalarRiver's tributaries is the water supply for Semnan city.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in TalarRiver watershed. TalarRiveroriginatesfrom AlborzMountains in Mazandaran province, in the southern Caspian Sea basin, in north of Iran and flows parallel with the Firouzkooh-Ghaemshahr road and it arrives to the Caspian beach area in the Malek Kala village. In order to supply the water requirements of Semnan city, the construction of Chashm dam on the TalarRiver's tributaries placed on the agenda of the Ministry of Energy. However, because of the uncontrolled exploitation of agricultural streams and invasion of privacy riverbed, the TalarRiver has acute and critical conditions from the point of hydrologic and environmental. To study the hydrological impacts of Chashm dam, Talar watershed was considered with an area of approximately 1057 square kilometers of the Pole Sefid gauging station using a rainfall-runoff model.
Results and Discussion: Simulation of the study area hydrological behavior shows that the Chashm Dam average water discharge is near to 8.6 million m3. This figure will be significant changes during wet and droughtperiods. The minimum and maximum monthly discharge of the Chashm Dam watershed in August and February is equal to 0.31 and 0.55 m3/s respectively. The minimum and maximum monthly water demand in turn in October and August is equal to 0.015 and 0.4 m3/s respectively and this shows that the river discharge in June is lower than the downstream water demand. Based on confirmed studies of the Kamandab Consulting Engineers, drinking water requirement of Semnan province, water rights users' requirement and downstream environmental requirements are 4.54, 2.164 and 2.448 million m3, respectively. This is despite the fact that the volume of annual input water is slightly lower than this figure in normal.
Conclusion: Simulation of the study area hydrological behavior shows that the Chashm Dam average water discharge is near to 8.6 million m3. This figure will be significant changes during wet and drought periods. The minimum and maximum monthly discharge of the Chashm Dam watershed in August and February is equal to 0.31 and 0.55 m3/s respectively. The minimum and maximum monthly water demand in turn in October and August is equal to 0.015 and 0.4 m3/s respectively, and this shows that the river discharge in June is lower than the downstream water demand. Based on confirmed studies of the Kamandab Consulting Engineers, drinking water requirement of Semnan province, water rights users' requirement and downstream environmental requirements are 4.54, 2.164 and 2.448 million m3, respectively. This is despite the fact that the volume of annual input water is slightly lower than this figure in normal. In addition, the Chashm Dam area is about 110 hectares and given the minimum annual actual evaporation equal to 700 mm, about seven hundred thousand cubic meters of water stored in the reservoir will be lost. Due to the simultaneous occurrence of the maximum water requirement, maximum evaporation and a minimum of water inlet to the Chashm Dam reservoir in warm seasons, it seemsthat, it is not possible to provide needs based on these studies and no doubt, in the case of water supply in Semnan province, we have to stop the flow of the river in downstream of the dam. The results of this study suggest that on many rivers large headwater dams have reduced the frequency and duration of floodplain inundation downstream and these changes lead to changes in downstream ecosystems. The results from the simulation and analysis of the Chashm Dam in downstream are as follows: a) stop of the river flow in downstream of the dam site, b) the sharp decline in river discharge in minimum (varied) flows, c) reduce in the rate and volume of maximum flows, d) changes in the hydrological regime of the river such as base flow, flow stop, the frequency of the river full section and competency which will make dramatic changes in the morphology of the river and downstream ecosystems. Note that is not verified by modeling and forecasting studies, is how to manage the reservoir. The amount of water stored in the reservoir and discharge to downstream is directly a function of the reservoir management.

Keywords

• Dam reservoir
• HEC-HMS model
• Hydrologic effects
• Water need

20.1001.1.20084757.1395.30.4.18.4

---

References

1- Agllligan F., and Nislow K.H. 2005. Changes in hydrologic regime by dams. Journal of Geomorphology, 71: 61-78.

2- Burns D., Vitvarb T., McDonnellc J., Hassettb J., Duncanb J., and Kendalld C. 2005. Effects of suburban development on runoff generation in the Croton River basin. New York, USA, Journal of Hydrology, 311: 266-281.

3- Camorani G., Castellarin A., and Brath A. 2005. Effects of land-use changes on the hydrologic response of reclamation systems. Journal of Physics and chemistry of earth, 3: 561-574.

4- Casado A., Hannah D.M., Peiry J.L., and Campo A.M. 2013. Influence of dam-induced hydrological regulation on summer water temperature: Sauce Grande River, Argentina. Journal of Ecohydrology, 6(4): 523–535.

5- Choi S.U.K., Yoon B., and Hyoseop W. 2005. Effects of dam-induced flow regime change on downstream river morphology and vegetation cover in the Hwang River. Korea. Journal of Earth and Environmental Science, 21(2-3): 315– 325.

6- Esmaeeli Gholzom H., and Gholami V. 2012. A comparison between natural forests and reforested lands in terms of runoff generation potential and hydrologic response (Case study: Kasilian Watershed). Journal of Soil & Water Research, 7(4): 166–173.

7- Fleming M., ASCE M., and Vincent N. 2004. Continuous Hydrologic Modeling Study with the Hydrologic Modeling System. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 9(3): 175-183.

8- Hirsch R.M., Walker J.F., Day J.C., and Kallio R. 1990. The influence of man on hydrologic systems. In: Wolman, M.G., Riggs, H.C. (Eds.), Surface Water Hydrology, vol.1. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 329–359.

9- Gholami V., Mohseni Saravi M., and Ahmadi H. 2010. Effects of impervious surfaces and urban development on runoff generation and flood hazard in the Hajighoshan watershed. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences (CJES), 8(1): 1-12.

10- Gholami V., 2010. Simulation of watershed management activities to verify its effects on downstream flood and flow regime in the Hajighoshan watershed, Ph.D Dissertation, Tehran Sciences and research branch, Islamic Azad University, PP: 201.

11- Gholami V. 2010. Modeling of watershed management practices to investigate their effects on flood and flow regime in Hajighoshan Watershed, Golestan. PhD. Thesis of Natural Resources Engineering-Watershed Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Supervisor: Dr Mohseni Saravi M, 200P.

12- Katz B., and Bradley J. 1999. Divided we sprawl, Atlantic Monthly, 284: 26–42.

13- Maglligan F., and Keith N. 2005. Changes in hydrologic regime by dams. Journal of Geomorphology, 71: 61-78.

14- Nathan R., and Lowe L. 2012. The hydrologic impacts of farm dams. Australian Journal of Water Resources, 16(1): 75-83.

15- Page K., Read A., Frazier P., and Mount N. 2005. The effect of altered flow regime on the frequency and duration of bank full discharge: Murrumbidgee River, Australia. Earth and Environmental Science, 21(5): 567– 578.

16- Regional Water Company of Semnan 2011. The first stage studies of Chashm Dam construction. Kamandab consulting Engineering, P386.

17- Xiang L., Shenglian G., Pan L., and Guiya CH. 2010. Dynamic control of flood limited water level for reservoir operation by considering inflow uncertainty. Journal of Hydrology, 391: 124-132.

18- Yuksel I., and Sandalci M. 2007. An investigation on flood control structures in the Sakarya Basin. International Congress on river basin management, 516-526.