Saeid Boroomand Nasab; Mohammad javad khangani
Abstract
Deficit irrigation is an optimization strategy for water use efficiency in irrigation. This research was conducted to evaluation effect of deficit irrigation (DI) and partial root zone drying (PRD) on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of corn. Research was conducted on Shahid Bahonar University ...
Read More
Deficit irrigation is an optimization strategy for water use efficiency in irrigation. This research was conducted to evaluation effect of deficit irrigation (DI) and partial root zone drying (PRD) on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of corn. Research was conducted on Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman in the spring of 2010 using a completely randomized block design with one control, 18 deficit irrigation treatment and three blocks. Deficit irrigation treatments were included: mild water stress (irrigation with درصد75 ETP), high water stress (irrigation with %50 ETP), fixed every other furrow irrigation and three partial root zone drying (Change the wet furrows in every irrigation, Change the wet furrows in every other irrigation and change the wet furrows in every second irrigations). Every treatment was applied at three growth stages of corn (all periods of growth, vegetative growth stage and reproductive growth stage). The highest biological yield obtained 32431 and the lowest was 17654 kg per hectare. The highest grain yield was 12115 kg per hectare and the lowest was 7163. Water use efficiency (km grain yield per cubic meter of water) for the control treatment was equal to 1.16 and for partial root zone drying with change the wet furrows in every irrigation (14 days) in all periods of growth treatment was equal to 2.13. Results showed that partial root zone drying with one interval irrigation (14-day) was the best choice to apply deficit irrigation on corn.
A. Mohseni; H. Mirseyed Hosseini; F. Abbasi
Abstract
Fertilizing method plays an important role in fertilizer and water use efficiency and plant yield and losses fertilizer. A field experiment was carried out at 16 treatments with factorial a complete randomized block design during 2010 for free drainage furrows. First factor was four levels of water (60, ...
Read More
Fertilizing method plays an important role in fertilizer and water use efficiency and plant yield and losses fertilizer. A field experiment was carried out at 16 treatments with factorial a complete randomized block design during 2010 for free drainage furrows. First factor was four levels of water (60, 80, 100 and 120% of full irrigation) and second factor was four levels of fertilizer (0, 60, 80 and 100% of required fertilizer) for fertigation method. The 16 treatments mentioned above, were compared with common fertilizing method. Nitrogen requirement was applied in four stages of the growth: before cultivation, in seven leaves, shooting and earring stages, the first portion (before cultivation) was applied by manual distribution and others by fertigation. In conventional treatment, the whole of required fertilizer was used in two split applications (before planting and in seven leaves). Results showed, the highest yield, yield component and use efficiency of corn was obtained on 100% irrigation and 100% fertilizer treatments. While the highest amount percolation of nitrate into soil was related to conventional treatment.
A. Shahnazari; Mirkhaleg Ziatabar Ahmadi; ghassem aghajani mazandarani
Abstract
Rice is the most important agricultural product in the world after wheat, and Iran has a special place in producing almost two million tones of rice per year. Considering the drought crisis and high consumption of water in paddy fields, it is useful to present strategies in order to increase irrigation ...
Read More
Rice is the most important agricultural product in the world after wheat, and Iran has a special place in producing almost two million tones of rice per year. Considering the drought crisis and high consumption of water in paddy fields, it is useful to present strategies in order to increase irrigation efficiencies. In this respect, many paddy fields in Northern Province of Iran are Land Leveled. The effect of these fields on the Water Balance Parameters, water use efficiency and water productivity has been used in this study. This research has been carried out in Qaemshahr City, Mazandaran Province, comparing two traditional and leveled paddy fields measuring 1.9 and 5.67 hectares, respectively for early-ripening local Tarom species. The water discharge rates of input and output, with 3-inch Parshall Flumes were measured. Three lysimeters were tried in order to determine evapotranspiration and deep percolation. The results demonstrate that in traditional and leveled paddy fields, water use efficiencies turned to be 62.9 and 73%, water productivity of 0.476 and 0.575 kilogram per square meter, evapotranspiration of 468.2 and 477.5 mm, and deep percolation of 196.3 and 147.8 mm, respectively. Also, 25% reduction of deep percolation parameter was observed in land leveled condition which was due to hard pan creation and can be known as the most important factor of 10% increase in irrigation efficiency.
N. Sedaghati; S.J. Hosseinifard; A. Mohammadi Mohammadabadi
Abstract
Unsustainable harvesting of agricultural water resources in the province of Kerman, has caused an annual average of one-meter drop in ground water levels. Surface irrigation methods in pistachio trees have low efficiency because of inherent characteristics and its incorrect application, as well as low ...
Read More
Unsustainable harvesting of agricultural water resources in the province of Kerman, has caused an annual average of one-meter drop in ground water levels. Surface irrigation methods in pistachio trees have low efficiency because of inherent characteristics and its incorrect application, as well as low access to water resource in pistachio regions. Therefore under the current critical condition, basic development of pressurized irrigation systems is an effective step to raise water use efficiency in the pistachio orchards. In this research, two irrigation systems including conventional surface drip irrigation and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) with two drip line depths (30cm and 50cm) with three levels of water irrigation in each treatment, including 40%, 60% and 80% of irrigation requirement of pistachio in surface irrigation system (2932, 4398 and 5864 m3/ha.year respectively) for four years, was studied. Growth and yield factors, water use efficiency (WUE) and water and salinity distribution in root zone were measured. The results indicated that 30cm installation depth was the best treatment. Between irrigation systems, amounts of 60% and 80% irrigation requirement don't have significant difference, but 40% irrigation requirement treatment, affected negatively on most of evaluated factors significantly. Therefore with regard to all evaluated factors in this research, subsurface drip irrigation with buried drip line at 30cm and 60% of irrigation requirement of pistachio in surface irrigation system, with water use efficiency of 0.290kg/m3 and 25% water saving in comparison with surface drip irrigation system, was the best treatment and recommended.
M. Jolaini; H.R. Mehrabadi
Abstract
Given the scarcity of water resources using modern methods of irrigation in agriculture will be inevitable. Today, process improvement, development and use of drip irrigation practices as one of the most advanced methods of irrigation in agriculture is increasing. So this study was conducted to determine ...
Read More
Given the scarcity of water resources using modern methods of irrigation in agriculture will be inevitable. Today, process improvement, development and use of drip irrigation practices as one of the most advanced methods of irrigation in agriculture is increasing. So this study was conducted to determine the impacts of irrigation interval and drip irrigation method and their interactions on yield, water use efficiency and quality characteristic of cotton in Kashmar Agricultural Research Station, Khorasan Razavi Province. The study was carried out during 2006-2008. Experimental design was a completely randomized design with four replications. Treatments were included irrigation intervals (2, 4 and 6 day) and drip irrigation methods (surface and subsurface drip irrigation). The results showed that the irrigation methods had significant effect on Yield and Water Use efficiency (P≤ 0.01). There was significant difference between yield in surface and subsurface drip irrigation that was 3074 and 3988 kg/ha, respectively. Water use efficiency was 0.349 kg/m3 in subsurface drip irrigation that was greater than surface drip irrigation. The highest yield and water use efficiency in drip irrigation and subsurface irrigation 4 days, 4315 kg/ha and 0.375 kg/m3 respectively and the lowest with 2 days 3107 kg/ha and 0.265 kg/m3, respectively. Yields in irrigation intervals of 2, 4 and 6 days were 3491, 3725 and 3364 kg/ha, respectively, with no significance difference. The highest water use efficiency and yield were obtained in subsurface irrigation method with 4 days interval as 4315 kg/ha and 0.375 kg/m3 respectively, while the least water use efficiency and yield was obtained in surface irrigation method with 2 days interval as 3107 kg/ha and 0.265 kg/m3, respectively. Finally, using subsurface drip irrigation with irrigation every 4 days was chosen as the best treatment.
