J. Givi
Abstract
In addition to qualitative and quantitative land suitability evaluation, economical evaluation can be carried out as well, based on net or gross benefit per surface area unit. The present research was done to evaluate land suitability, qualitatively and economically,, by different methods for irrigated ...
Read More
In addition to qualitative and quantitative land suitability evaluation, economical evaluation can be carried out as well, based on net or gross benefit per surface area unit. The present research was done to evaluate land suitability, qualitatively and economically,, by different methods for irrigated maize, wheat, potato and barley in Shahrekord area. In this regards, qualitative land suitability class was determined by matching land characteristics with the studied crops growth requirements, using simple limitation method and ALES program. Economical land suitability evaluation was carried out, using "internal rate of return", "gross profit", "net present value" and "benefit/cost ratio" methods which are included in the ALES program. The results showed that qualitative suitability class in all of the studied land units for irrigated maize, wheat and barley is S2 and for irrigated potato in 73% of the units is S2 and in 27% of them is S3. As the "net present value" method is used, % 73 and % 27 of the land units are classified as S2 and S1, respectively for all of the studied crops. For wheat and maize, all of the land units are classified as S1, as gross profit, benefit/cost ratio and internal rate of return methods are used. For potato and barley, using gross profit and internal rate of return methods, % 73 and % 27 of the land units are classified as S2 and S1, respectively and as the benefit/cost ratio method is used, economical land suitability class in all of the land units is S1.
J. Givi; A. Abedi
Abstract
Economical profit is one of the important factors, persuading farmers to plant a specific crop. So, in addition to qualitative and quantitative land suitability evaluation, economical one can be carried out as well, based on net or gross profit per surface area unit. The present research was done to ...
Read More
Economical profit is one of the important factors, persuading farmers to plant a specific crop. So, in addition to qualitative and quantitative land suitability evaluation, economical one can be carried out as well, based on net or gross profit per surface area unit. The present research was done to evaluate land suitability, economically, by different methods for maize around Shahrekord city. In this regards, economical land suitability evaluation was carried out, using "internal rate of return", "gross profit", "net present value" and "benefit/cost ratio" methods. These methods are included in the ALES program. For model making in this program, a data base, including soil units, land characteristics, maize growth requirements, yield, discount rate, constant and variable costs and return of one weight unit of maize was established and then economical land suitability classes were determined. The results showed that as the "net present value" method is used, most of the land units are classified as S2. As the other three methods are used, all of the land units are classified as S1. Economical suitability class, determined based on "gross profit" method, without using ALES program, in 40% of the land units is S2 and in 60% of them is S1. The results of the economical land suitability classification, based on "net present value" method, using ALES program, is more in agreement with the results of qualitative land suitability classification of the study area that in a previous research, was done based on just physical land characteristics.
