Evaluation the Effects of the Irrigation Water Salinity and Water Stress on Yield Components of Cherry Tomato

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Javad ramezani moghadam
• yaser hosseini
• Mohammad Reza Nikpour
• atieh abdoli

University of Mohaghegh Ardabili

10.22067/jsw.v32i3.70395

Abstract

Introduction: The largest share of water consumption in Iran is related to the agricultural sector. Therefore, in order to save water resources, priority is given to reducing irrigation water consumption. On the other hand, reducing of water quality and salinization are the main problems which are commonly found in the areas with limited water resources. One of the most important effects of salinity is the reduction of yield and its inhibitory effects on plant growth and metabolism. Also, increasing salinity can reduce potassium, calcium and magnesium ions. One of the significant points regarding the effects of salinity stress is a significant decrease in the hydraulic conductivity of the roots, which leads to a decrease in the water use efficiency index. According to the food and agriculture organization (FAO), more than 40 percent of Iran's irrigated lands are affected by salinity stress, which is generally found in dry and semi-arid areas. Therefore, studying the combined effect of stress caused by salinity and water stress can be used to provide management solutions for irrigation and crop production.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in greenhouse laboratory at University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran during August to November 2016. In this research, the effects of saline water on cherry tomato yield under water stress conditions were investigated. The applied treatments included irrigation with saline water (in two levels: S1=4ds/m and S2=7ds/m) and water stress (in three levels, irrigation at 40, 50 and 65% field capacity, respectively, I1, I2,I3). The experimental design used in this research was a completely randomized block design with four replications. On the other hand, in order to compare the plant yield under water stress and salinity conditions with non-stress conditions, control treatment with salinity characteristics less than 1ds/m and irrigation without water stress were used in three replications. In this experiment, cherry tomatoes were cultivated in the pots with diameter and height of 26 and 27 centimeters, respectively. The moisture meter (Model: PMS-714) was also used to measure soil moisture and determine the irrigation time. The most important parameters included cherry tomato yield, total evapotranspiration and water use efficiency index. It should be mentioned that analyses of the results were done by MSTATC software (Version: 2.10).
Results and Discussion: The results of this study showed that the interaction between two factors of water and salinity stress on the parameters was not significant, but the effects of salinity stress on yield, total evapotranspiration and water use efficiency (in two levels: 2% and 5%) are significant. Also, the greatest effect of salinity stress on cherry tomato yield was observed, so that by increasing the amount of irrigation water salinity from 4 to 7 ds/m, the yield was decreased by 27%. Also, the performance in salinity treatments of S1 and S2 decreased by 27.2% and 46.7%, respectively, compared to the controled treatment. Probably the reason for the yield reduction caused by decreasing in plant evapotranspiration and plant growth and metabolism. In addition, water use efficiency index in treatments of S1 and S2 decreased by 3.4% and 22.3%, respectively, compared to the controlled treatment. As it can be seen, the differences in water use efficiency between the control and S1 treatments were not significant. In this study, the average values of Ky (plant response coefficient to salinity and water stresses) were achieved 1.39, which was higher than the value that was reported by FAO for tomato plant under water stress conditions (equal to 1.05). This can be due to the significant effect of saline irrigation water on the yield of the tomato plants. Finally, based on the results of this research, it can be said that although salinity decreased yield significantly at 1% confidence level, in the coming years, with severe water resource constraints and increased costs for its preparation, this yield loss can be economical and feasible.
Conclusions: In this research, the effect of saline water on cherry tomato yield under water stress conditions was investigated. According to the results of this study, with increasing salinity of irrigation water from 4 to 7 ds /m, total evapotranspiration decreased by 10%. On the other hand, due to salinity stress, tomato yield was decreased to 27% in the most salinity levels of irrigation water compared to control treatment; one of the main reasons of which could be the reduction of total evapotranspiration in the growing season. In the end, the important point to note is that although, based on the results of this study, utilization of irrigation saline water decreased the yield, total evapotranspiration and water use efficiency by 27%, 8.9% and 19.2%, respectively compared to the control treatment, but in the near future, by increasing the water production costs and the quantitative reduction of water resources, even use of saline water is economically feasible and justifiable.

Keywords

• Irrigation water salinity
• Water stress
• Water use efficiency
• Yield of cherry tomato cluster

20.1001.1.20084757.1397.32.3.4.2

---

References

- Amer K.H. 2010. Corn crop response under managing different irrigation and salinity levels. Agricultural Water Management, 97:1553– 1563.

2- Cantore V., Lechkar O., Karabulut E., Sellami M.H., Albrizio R., Boari F., Stellacci A.M., and Todorovic M. 2016. Combined effect of deficit irrigation and strobilurin application onyield, fruit quality and water use efficiency of “cherry” tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Agricultural Water Management, 167:53–61.

3- Courtney A.J., Xu J., and Xu Y. 2016. Responses of growth, antioxidants and gene expression in smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) to various levels of salinity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 99: 162- 170.

4- Daneshvar Vousoughi F., Dinpashoh Y., and Aalami M. 2011. Effect of drought on groundwater level in the past two decades (case study: Ardebil Plain). Water and Soil Sience, 21(4): 165- 179. (In Persian with English abstract)

5- Doorenbos J., and Kassam A.H. 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper no. 33.

6- Faalian A., Ansari H., Kafi M., Alizadeh A., and Moghaddasi M. 2015. Effect of combined salinity and drought stress on economy of soilless culture of greenhouse tomato. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 29(3):317-330. (In Persian with English abstract)

7- Faalian A., Ansari H., Kafi M., Alizadeh A., and Moghaddasi M. 2015. Effect of combined salinity and water stress on tomato yield in soilless culture. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 29(4):447-463. (In Persian with English abstract)

8- Ghaedi S., Afrasiab P., and Liaghat A.M. 2016. Comparison of conjunction methods of sorghum grown in saline and non-saline water and salt adjustment- physiological properties in the soil profile. Journal of Irrigation Science and Engineering, 39(1):167-179. (In Persian with English abstract)

9- Heydarnejad S., and Ranjbar Fordoii A. 2014. Assessment of salinity stress on some growth characteristics and ion accumulation in Seidlitzia rosmarinus. Journal of Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 4:1-10. (In Persian(

10- Heydarynia M., Naseri A.A., and Broomandnasb S. 2016. Effect of wheat residues management and irrigation with saline water on spring maize yield and soil profile salinity changes. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 30(3):285-298. (In Persian with English abstract)

11- Karandish F., and Torajzadeh A.A. 2015. Effect of irrigation method with saline water on yield of sorghum and improving water and nutrient use efficiency. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 29(1):49-61. (In Persian with English abstract)

12- Karimi Gh. H. 2012. Groundwater contribution with different salinities on providing maize water requirements and maize yields. Ph.D. Thesis. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran. (In Persian with English abstract)

13- Kesari Sh., Mandal R., Bhunia G.S., Kumar K., and Das P. 2014. Spatial distribution of P. argentipes in association with agricultural surrounding environment in North Bihar, India. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 8(3):358-364.

14- Kheirabi J., Tavakkoli A.R., Entesari M.R., and Salamat A.R. 1996. Deficit irrigation manual. Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, Tehran. (In Persian)

15- Mehdi Tounsi H., Chelli Chaabouni A., Mahjoubb Boujnah D., and Boukhris M. 2017. Long-term field response of pistachio to irrigation water salinity .Agricultural Water Management, 185:1– 12.

16- Michele Moles T., Pompeiano A., Huarancca Reyes T., Scartazza A., and Guglielminetti L. 2016. The efficient physiological strategy of a tomato landrace in response to short-term salinity stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 109: 262- 272.

17- Mohammadi M., Liaghat A.M., and Molavi H. 2010. Optimization of water use and determination of tomato sensitivity coefficients under combined salinity and drought stress in Karaj. Journal of Water and Soil, 24(3):583-592. (In Persian with English abstract)

18- Mohammadi M., Liaghat A.M., Parsinejad M., and Hasanoghli A.R. 2011. Evaluation of effect of surface and groundwater irrigation with saline water on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of Tomato. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 25(1):47-55. (In Persian with English abstract)

19- Nasrolahi A.H., Houshmand A.R., and Broomandnasab S. 2015. Evaluation of Maize response to salinity under drip irrigation and irrigation management. Journal of Irrigation Science and Engineering, 38(4):25-32. (In Persian with English abstract)

20- Norouzi H., roshanfekr H.A., hasibi P., and mesgarbashi M. 2014. Effect of irrigation water salinity on yield and quality of two forage millet cultivars. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 28(3):551-560. (In Persian with English abstract)

21- Ors S., and Suarez D.L. 2017. Spinach biomass yield and physiological response to interactive salinity and water stress. Agricultural Water Management, 190: 31– 41.

22- Reis M., Coelho L., Santos G., Kienle U., and Beltrao J. 2015. Yield response of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) to the salinity of irrigation water .Agricultural Water Management, 152: 217– 221.

23- Yazdani V., Davari K., Ghahreman B., and Kafi M. 2015. Modeling the effects of salinity and water deficit stress on growth and yield parameters of two cultivars of Canola. Journal of Irrigation Science and Engineering, 38(4):137-154. (In Persian with English abstract)