ارزیابی وضعیت حاصلخیزی خاک در دیمزارهای شمال‌غرب ایران با استفاده از ارزش شاخص عناصر غذایی (NIV)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسنده

موسسه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم

چکیده

حاصلخیزی خاک و مدیریت عناصر غذایی یکی از مهمترین عواملی است که به­صورت مستقیم عملکرد و کیفیت محصول را تحت تاثیر قرار می­دهد. درک صحیح از وضعیت حاصلخیزی خاک و مصرف بهینه عناصر غذایی به­عنوان کلید موفقیت تولید محصولات کشاورزی محسوب می­شود. به­منظور ارزیابی وضعیت حاصلخیزی خاک در دیمزارهای شمال­غرب کشور تعداد 674 نمونه خاک از استان­های آذربایجان­شرقی، آذربایجان­غربی، کردستان و کرمانشاه از عمق 25-0 سانتی­متری تهیه شد. در این نمونه­ها بافت خاک، کربنات کلسیم معادل، کربن ­آلی، نیتروژن کل، pH، EC، فسفر، پتاسیم، آهن، منگنز، روی و مس قابل جذب اندازه­گیری شد. تفسیر داده­ها با استفاده از شاخص عناصر غذایی (NIV) بر مبنای دو روش کلاس­بندی گومز (19) و مرسوم انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد، روش گومز (19) نمی­تواند وضعیت عمومی ویژگی­های خاک را در یک جامعه به دلیل میل به مرکزیت داده­ها (وضعیت بهینه) ارزیابی نماید. در محاسبه شاخص NIV، روش مرسوم در اغلب موارد به دلیل انطباق بیشتر با واقعیات موجود در دیمزارها بهتر از روش گومز (19) بود. بر خلاف تصور شوری و آهک به عنوان مشکل جدی در دیمزارها محسوب نمی­شود، اما با افزایش میزان آهک، میزان فسفر، پتاسیم، آهن، منگنز، روی و مس به طور معنی­داری کاهش یافت. وضعیت ماده­آلی در آذربایجان­غربی و شرقی، نیتروژن کل در آذربایجا­شرقی، فسفر آذربایجان­غربی و کردستان، آهن آذربایجان­غربی و کردستان، منگنز آذربایجان­غربی، روی آذربایجان­شرقی و مس آذربایجان­غربی و شرقی کم ارزیابی شد. بنابراین به­منظور بهبود کمی و کیفی تولید در شرایط دیم علاوه بر عناصر نیتروژن و فسفر باید به وضعیت عناصر کم مصرف نیز توجه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Soil Fertility Status in Northwest of Iran drylands by Nutrient Index Value (NIV)

نویسنده [English]

  • Vali Feiziasl
چکیده [English]

Introduction Dryland farming is a major agricultural practice in northwest of Iran. Knowledge of soil fertility status in this areas is one of the basic needs of dryland agricultural system. Soil chemical properties play important role for the soil fertility and determined after soil testing. The measurement of the fertility of soils is usually done by chemical analysis for plant nutrients. Assessing soil fertility is essential to help identify strategies with less environmental impact in order to achieve more sustainable agricultural systems. Unfortunately, many dry farming areas in Iran do not have adequate levels of all the necessary plant nutrients, or conditions in the soil are unfavorable for plant uptake of certain nutrients. Soil scientists focus on using commercial fertilizers and manures (rotation system and conservation tillage) to add nutrients and organic matter to the soil. Soil fertility can be further improved by incorporating cover crops that add organic matter to the soil, which leads to improved soil macro-nutrients and micronutrients, structure and promotes a healthy. Therefore, soil fertility evaluation of Iran dryland regions is most basic decision making tool for the sustainable soil nutrient management in this areas and estimation of capacity of soil to maintain a continuous supply of plant nutrients for a crop production. Evaluation of soil fertility in drylands of the northwest Iran have two objectives 1) Assess nutrient status of soil-crop system 2) Diagnose suspected nutrient imbalances.
Materials and Methods This study was carried out in northwest of Iran drylands included: west Azarbayjan, east Azarbayjan, Kordistan and Kermanshah provinces. A total of 674 soil samples were collected from farmer’s fields in east Azarbayjan, weast Azarbayjan, Kurdistan and Kermanshah 414, 97, 90 and 73 samples respectively. The surface soil samples were taken from 0-25 cm depth in each field before the sowing of the rainfed plants in autumn by composite sampling method. Immediately after collection soil samples were dried, grounded, screened through 2 mm sieve, labelled and stored in plastic container. The samples were analyzed for 12 chemical and physical parameters include: soil texture (hydrometer method), pH (saturation paste) and EC (saturated extract), organic carbon (Walkley and Black, 1934), Total N (Kejeltak), calcium carbonate equivalence (acid-neutralizing value), phosphorus (Olsen), potassium (sodium bicarbonate extracted) and iron, zinc, Mn and copper (DTPA extracted). Soil samples were categorized as low, medium and high on the basis of their availability in soils by two Gomes (1985) (equation 1) and common (nutrient classification by critical level method for dryland wheat) methods.



 

Low


 



 

Medium


Equation (1)  



 

High


 




Where, ,  and SD are soil property, average of soil property in all area and standard deviation of soil property, respectively. In order to compare the levels of soil fertility of one province with those of another it is necessary to obtain a single value for each nutrient. Nutrient index value (NIV) was calculated by Parker et al., (1951) method (equation 2) for soil samples of each province or district from the proportion of soils under low, medium and high categories using following equation:



 

Equation (2)




Where, ,  and  are number of samples testing low, medium and high category in each province, respectively. If the NIV is less than 1.67, the soil fertility status is low (nutrients or other property) and the value is 1.67-2.33 the fertility status is optimum (sufficiency) nutrients. The value greater than 2.33, the fertility status is high nutrients.
Results and Discussion The results showed that, the Gomes (1985) method could not classify the soil properties in all region (population) correctly, due to the tends towards central limit theorem (optimal condition). In the calculation of NIV, the conventional method (critical levels) for classification of soil properties was better than Gomes (1985) method because it was more compatible with the field conditions. Soil salinity and calcium carbonate are not problems in dryland areas seriously. But with increasing amount of calcium carbonate, soil phosphorus, potassium, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu decreased significantly. But soil phosphorus and Zn deficiencies were more sensitive to increase soil calcium carbonate. Assessment of soil fertility status by NIV showed that, soil organic matter were low (deficient) in west and east Azerbaijan with 92 and 69 percent of those areas. But total nitrogen were optimum (sufficient) in all areas with 98 percent averagely (except east Azarbayjan). This is mainly due to the application of nitrogen fertilizers for dryland wheat production and apply conservation tillage in some areas. Soil phosphorus were evaluated low in two west Azerbaijan (81%) and Kermanshah (67%) provinces, but in east Azerbaijan (68 %) and Kurdistan (85%) were sufficiency or high for wheat production. Potassium was more than sufficiency (high) in 90 percent of all areas averagely. Micronutrients deficiency were observed in some provinces. Deficiency of Fe with 100 and 69 percent in west Azarbayjan and Kurdistan respectively, Mn with 89 percent of west Azarbayjan, Zn 84 percent in east Azarbayjan and Cu with 100 and 87 percent in west and east Azarbayjan respectively. These results suggest that, in addition, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer applications should also be important for micronutrient management in dryland areas.
Conclusions It can be concluded that, the capability of critical level method is better than Gomes (1985) method in the classification of soil properties. Nutrient index value (NIV) method can be evaluated soil fertility status in Iran dryland conditions. According to this, there is deficiency of Fe, Zn and Cu elements in addition to the P and N nutrients in Iran dryland areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dryland
  • Northwest of Iran
  • Nutrient index value
  • Soil fertility
1- Ahmadi Golidaraga S., Abbasi Kalob A., and Esmali Ouri A. 2017. Preparation and mapping of soil fertility map based on some chemical properties using GIS in the Ardabil plain.1st International and 5st National Conference on Organic vs. Conventional Agriculture.16-17 Agust 2017. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, IRAN.
2- Ahmadi M., Mohebalipour N., Feizi-Asl V., and Eskandari I. 2013. Effect of manganese, zinc and boron micronutrients foliar application at different growth stages on quantitative characteristics of rainfed wheat cultivars. Agroecology Journal, 9(2): 1-6. (in Persian with English abstract)
3- Ali Ehyaei M., and Behbahanizadeh A.A. 1993. Description of soil method analysis. Soil Water Reserch Institute, Bulltein No. 893. (Persian)
4- Arjumend T., and Abbasi M.K. 2016. Spatial variability in soil properties and diagnostic leaf characteristics of apple (Malus domestica) in apple growing region of Dheerkot Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 48(2): 503-510.
5- Ashraf M., Ahmad Tahir F., Nasir M., Bilal Khan M., and Umer F. 2015. Distribution and Indexation of Plant Available Nutrients of District Layyah, Punjab Pakistan. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 3(2): 16-20.
6- Beg K., and Chaurey R. 2018. Assessment of soil fertility and nutrients status of Simrawal and part of Asrawal watershed, Tons sub-Basin, Ganga Basin. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, 3(6): 78-85.
7- Denis M.K.A., Patil L.P., Kamara A.M., and Saidu D.H. 2017. Assessment of soil fertility status using nutrient index approach. Academia Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(2): 28-38.
8- Dhamak A.L., Meshram N.A., and Waikar S.L. 2014. Identification of Major Soil Nutritional Constraints in Vertisol, Inceptisol and Entisol from Ambajogai Tahsil of Beed District. Journal of Research in Agriculture and Animal Science, 2(10): 35-39.
9- Eskandari I., and Feiziasl V. 2016. Influence of Conservation tillage on some soil physical properties and crop yield in vetch-wheat rotation in dryland cold region. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 7(2): 451-467. (in Persian with English abstract)
10- Fatahinejad E., Siadat A., Esfandeyari M., Moghadesi R., and Moezi A. 2013. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on yield, oil and canola protein in dry farming in different groups of soil phosphorus fertility. Crop Physiology Journal, 5(18): 83-100. (in Persian with English abstract)
11- Feiziasl V., Fotovat A., Astarae A.R., Lakzian A., Mousavi S.B. 2014. Effect of optimized nitrogen application in reducing drought stress effect on grain yield of some rainfed bread wheat genotypes. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 30(2): 169-198. (in Persian with English abstract)
12- Feiziasl, V. 2002. Determining the optimum rate of fertilizer for rainfed sunflower in Maragheh region. Journal of Agricultural Science. 1(12); 59-70. (in Persian with English abstract)
13- Feiziasl V. 2016. Evaluation of dryland barley (Hordum vulgare) genotypes response to the nitrogen rates and application times. Journal of Water and Soil, 31(2): 490-508. (in Persian with English abstract)
14- Feiziasl V., and Valizadeh G. 2004. Effects of phosphorus and zinc fertilizer applications on nutrient concentrations in plant and grain yield in cv. Sardari «Triticum aestivum» under dryland conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 6(3): 223-238. (in Persian with English abstract)
15- Feiziasl V. and Valizadeh G.R. 2003. The effects of nitrogen rates and application times on wheat yield under dryland farming conditions. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Science, 17(1): 29-38. (in Persian with English abstract)
16- Feiziasl V., Fotovat A., Astaraei A., Lakzian A., and Jafarzadeh J. 2019. Determination of chlorophyll content and nitrogen status using SPAD in dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 17(2): 221-240. (in Persian with English abstract)
17- Feiziasl V., Valizadeh G., Toshieh V., Taliee A.A., and Belson V. 2003. Determination of critical levels of soil micronutrients for Dryland wheat in the North West of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 5: 236-249. (in Persian with English abstract)
18- Feiziasl, V., R. Kasraei, M. Moghaddam and Gh.R. Valizadeh, 2004. Investigation on uptake limitation and nutrient deficiency diagnosis at applied phosphorus and zinc fertilizers by different methods in Sardari wheat. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 11: 23-33. (in Persian with English abstract)
19- Gomes F.P. 1985. Curso de estatistica experimental. São Paulo: Nobel, 467p.
20- Hakimi, A., 1986. The briefly study of soil science in Hashtrood. Soil and Water Research Institute, Agriculture Ministry, Bulltein No. 767, (in Persian).
21- Jafari S., and Pishgir M. 2016. Study of factors influencing potassium and ammonium fixation in the soil, clay minerals and its roles in potassium fertilizer consumption. Land Management Journal, 3.2(2): 121-139. (in Persian with English abstract)
22- Kumar R., Chand Hazra G., Das R., Majumder S.P., and Chandra Das A. 2019. Nutrient index of available S in Soils of Howrah and South Dinajpur Districts of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(4): 1024-1032.
23- Kumar D., Yadav S.R., Kaur R., Choudhary A., and Singh M.B. 2017. Soil fertility status and nutrient recommendations based on soil analysis of Jaisalmer district of western Rajasthan. Asian J. Soil Sci, 12 (1): 103-107.
24- Mandavgade R.R., Waikar S.L., Dhamak A.L., and Patil V.D. 2015. Evaluation of micronutrient status of soils and their relation with some chemical properties of soils of Northern Tahsils (Jintur, Selu and Pathri) of Parbhani district. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 8(2): 38-41.
25- Maralian H. 2009. Effect of foliar application of Zn and Fe on wheat yield and quality. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(24): 6795-6798.
26- Marschner H. 1995 Functions of mineral nutrients: micronutrients. In: mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd Edition, Academic Press, London, 313-404.
27- Mirtalebi S., Karimi A., Soleymani A., and Hoodaji M. 2015. Effects of manganese on yield, yield components, and grain quality of wheat cultivars. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(4), 649-657. (in Persian with English abstract)
28- Mondal K. and Ramkala. 2016. Fertility map and horizontal soil potassium status of north-eastern region of Haryana. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 8 (4): 2077-2080.
29- Oreei T., Dehghanipour M., and Amjadi H. 2018. Production and growing of fruits and ornamental trees. Iran's Textbooks Printing and Publishing Company. (in Persian)
30- Parker F.W., Nelson W.L., winters E., and Miles I.E. 1951. The broad interpretation and application of soil test Information. Agronomy Journal, 43: 105-112.
31- Parvizi Y., Gorji M., Husaini Joodaki R., and Parvizi K. 2016. Effects of land use change from low yield drylands to agro-forestry on soil physical properties and organic carbon stock. Iranian Journal of Forest 7: 523-538. (in Persian with English abstract)
32- Pathak H. 2010. Trends of fertility status of Indian soil. Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences 2(1): 10-12.
33- Ragheb H.M.A., Hala H., Youssef G.M.A., and Ali A.M.A. 2017. Fertility status and indices of micronutrients in Nile Valley soils, east of the Nile River, Assiut Governorate, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 57(2): 189-199.
34- Raheb A., Heidari A., and Mahmoodi S. 2016. Geochemical properties of some soils developed on basalt rocks of North-West Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 47(4): 807-818. (in Persian with English abstract)
35- Ravikumar P., and Somashekar R.K. 2013. Evaluation of nutrient index using organic carbon, available P and available K concentrations as a measure of soil fertility in Varahi River basin, India. Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 3(4): 330-343.
36- Roy R.N., Finck A., Blair G.J., and Tandon H.L.S. 2006. Plant nutrition for food security: A guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.
37- Seyed Ghiasi, M.F 1991. Detailed soil surveys and land calsification for Maragheh Dryland Agricultural Research Station. Agricultural Research Center of East Azarbaijan, Tabriz, Iran. Bulltein No. 495. (in Persian)
38- Shahbazi K., and Besharati H. 2013. Overview of agricultural soil fertility status of Iran. Land Management Journal, 1(1): 1-15. (in Persian with English abstract)
39- Shahid S.A., Zaman M., and Heng L. 2018. Soil salinity: historical perspectives and a world overview of the problem. p. 43-53. In M. Zaman, S.A. Shahid and L. Heng (ed.) Guideline for salinity assessment, mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques. Springer, Cham.
40- Singh B., and Singh Y. 2015. Soil fertility: Evaluation and management. p. 649-669. In: Rattan RK, Dwivedi B.S., Sarkar A.K., Bhattachryya T., Tarafdar J.C., and Kukal S.S. (eds). Soil science: an introduction. Is ted. Indian Society of Soil Science.
41- Soofi L., Heidari Gh., Siosemardeh A., and Hosseinpanahi F. 2017. The effect of zinc Sulfate foliar spray on yield and yield components of sardari wheat ecotypes. Plant Production Technology, 8(2): 69-86. (in Persian with English abstract)
42- Thejaswini C., Alur A.S., Shivanna M., Kumar S.A., Prashanth S.J., Dhannanjaya B.N., and Naikodi P.K.B. 2019. Land resource inventory and soil mapping for fertility status of uumnabad sub-watershed. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(2): 3264-3273.