اثر اصلاح کننده‌های خاک بر پاسخ‌های فیزیولوژیک درختچه مرتعی کام تیغ (Stocks Lycium depressum) به تنش خشکی

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مرتع‌داری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

2 دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان- گروه مرتع

3 دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد- گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف اثر اصلاح کننده­های خاک، بر پاسخ­های فیزیولوژیک (مقاومت روزنه‌ای، دمای برگ، کلروفیل، درصد کلونیزاسیون ریشه، کاروتنوئید، پرولین) درختچه مرتعی کام تیغ (Lycium depressum Stocks) به تنش خشکی بود. آزمایش­ها در شرایط نیمه کنترل شده گلخانه­ای انجام شد. آزمایش به صورت فاکتوریل بر پایه طرح کاملا تصادفی شامل تیمار اصلی آبیاری در 4 سطح (100، 75، 50 و 25 درصد ظرفیت زراعی) و تیمار فرعی اصلاح­کننده‌های خاک بررسی شد. تیمار­های فرعی اصلاح کننده­های خاک شامل هیدروژل و نیتروباکتر، میکوریزا و زئولیت در هر گلدان اضافه شد. در هر تیمار ترکیبی آبیاری و اصلاح کننده خاک 5 تکرار و در مجموع 160 گلدان برای انجام آزمایش مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. مقدار مقاومت روزنه‌ای از 48 متر مربع در ثانیه بر مول در سطح آبیاری 100 درصد به 44 متر مربع در ثانیه بر مول در آبیاری 25 درصد کاهش پیدا کرد. دمای برگ در اصلاح کننده هیدروژل بدون میکوریزا از 26 درجه سانتی‌گراد در آبیاری 100 درصد به 57/21 درجه سانتی‌گراد در سطح آبیاری 25 درصد کاهش یافت. در سطح آبیاری 100 درصد در اصلاح­کننده زئولیت بدون میکوریزا مقدار کلروفیل b+a از 6/0 میلی‌گرم بر گرم به 20/1 میلی‌گرم بر گرم در آبیاری 25 درصد افزایش پیدا کرد. مقدار کاروتنوئید در سطح آبیاری 100 درصد در اصلاح کننده زئولیت با میکوریزا از 1/0 میلی‌گرم بر گرم به 2/0 میلی‌گرم بر گرم در آبیاری 25 درصد افزایش یافته است در تیمار شاهد با میکوریزا در سطح آبیاری 100 درصد در مقایسه با سطح آبیاری 50 درصد، درصد کلونیزاسیون ریشه 5/1 درصد افزایش داشت. مقدار پرولین در تیمار هیدروژل بدون میکوریزا در آبیاری 100 درصد 77/2 میکرومول بر گرم و در سطح آبیاری 50 درصد 66/2 میکرومول بر گرم اندازه‌گیری شد. کاهش پرولین در سطح آبیاری 50 درصد نشان می­دهد اصلاح­کننده هیدروژل باعث افزایش مقاومت گونه  L. depressum به تنش خشکی شده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد افزایش خشکی باعث تغییرات در عملکرد فیزیولوژیک گیاه می­شود و کاربرد مواد اصلاح­کننده خاک در شرایط تنش خشکی به دلیل بهبود پارامترهای فیزیولوژیک، باعث افزایش 50 درصدی مقاومت گیاه خواهد شد. تیمارهای نیتروباکتر بدون میکوریزا، هیدروژل و زئولیت با میکوریزا و بدون میکوریزا به دلیل بهبود بیشتر پارامترهای فیزیولوژیک، برای کاشت گیاه در در طبیعت توصیه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Soil Properties Modifier on Physiological Responses of Lycium depressum Stocks to Drought Stress

نویسندگان [English]

  • S. Mohammadi 1
  • A. Sepehry 2
  • M. Farzam 3
  • H. Barani 2
1 Department of Rangeland Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural and Natural Resouces
2 Department of Rangeland Science, Gorgan University of Agricultural and Natural Resouces
3 Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of soil conditioners on physiological responses (stomatal resistance, leaf temperature, chlorophyll, percentage of root colonization, carotenoids, proline) of Lycium depressum Stocks to drought stress. The experiments were performed in semi-controlled greenhouse conditions.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted as a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized design including the main factor, irrigation at 4 levels (100, 75, 50 and 25% of field capacity) and the sub-factor of soil conditioners. In each combined treatment, 5 repetitions of irrigation and soil remediation and a total of 160 pots were used. Subsoil treatments including hydrogel and nitrobacter, mycorrhiza and zeolite were added to each pot. 500 cuttings of the target plant were planted in the greenhouse. The grown cuttings were transferred to the pots where the experiments were carried out. At each irrigation level, 40 pots containing 4 kg of vegetation soil of the target species were considered and the agricultural capacity (FC) of the target soil was determined in the soil laboratory. A total of 160 pots were placed in the greenhouse for testing. The main treatment of the experiment included irrigation levels (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the crop capacity) and sub-treatments of soil conditioners including Stacosorb hydrogel in the amount of 3 grams per kilogram of soil in each pot in the lower part of the plant roots. Zeolite with the industrial name of mineral zeolite (Mineral Zeolite) was added in the amount of 8 grams in each pot in the lower part of the root of the plant. Nitrobacter (a collection of strains of Azotobacter sp, Azospirillum sp and Bacillus sp with the brand name Nitrobacter Diane) was added to the amount of 3 cc in each pot in the upper region of the plant roots. Addition of mycorrhiza (the mycorrhiza used in this experiment was Glomus mosseae and was prepared as soil containing mosseae fungi) in the amount of 10 grams per pot in the lower part of the plant roots. After adding soil conditioners, irrigation was done according to the crop capacity in 4 irrigation levels, in the determined treatments.
Results and Discussion
Measurement of physiological characteristics showed different responses in each of the variables. Carotenoid changes in 50% irrigation showed the lowest value (p<0.05) and the control treatment without mycorrhiza showed the highest value in the measurement of chlorophyll and carotenoid at 100 and 75% irrigation levels. The results of measuring colonization percentage, stomatal resistance and leaf temperature showed the lowest value in 25% irrigation. In the control treatment, proline parameters and root colonization percentage increased under the influence of drought stress, and stomatal resistance parameters, leaf temperature and chlorophyll decreased under the influence of drought stress. With intensification of drought stress, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of the plant increased and the amount of proline decreased in Nitrobacter treatment with mycorrhiza, which was significantly different from the control treatment. In the control treatment with mycorrhiza, with increasing drought stress, the leaf temperature increased and the amount of proline decreased, which was different from the control treatment. Aperture resistance decreased from 48 m2 / mol.s 100% irrigation level to 44 m2 / mol.s 25% irrigation, leaf temperature at 100% irrigation level in mycorrhizal-free hydrogel modifier from 26 ° C Decreased to 21.57 ° C in 25% irrigation, at 100% irrigation level in non-mycorrhizal zeolite modifier the amount of chlorophyll b + a from 0.6 mg / g to 1.20 mg / g in 25% irrigation increased. The amount of carotenoids at 100% irrigation level in zeolite modifier with mycorrhiza increased from 0.1 mg / g to 0.2 mg / g in 25% irrigation in control treatment with mycorrhiza at 100% irrigation level compared to the level Irrigation increased by 50% and root colonization by 1.5%. The amount of proline in mycorrhiza-free hydrogel treatment was measured at 100% 2.77 μmol / g irrigation and at 50% irrigation level 2.66 μmol / g. Reduction of proline at 50% irrigation level indicates that the hydrogel modifier has increased the resistance of Lycium depressum Stocks to drought stress.
Conclusion
The results of this study showed that the increase in drought causes changes in the physiological performance of the plant and the use of soil conditioners under drought stress due to the improvement of the physiological parameters, will increase the resistance of the plant by 50%. Nitrobacter treatments without mycorrhiza, hydrogel and zeolite with mycorrhiza and without mycorrhiza, due to further improvement of physiological parameters, is recommended to plants in nature.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Chlorophyll
  • Colonization
  • Irrigation
  • Proline
  • Stomatal resistance
  1. Akhani, H., & Ghorbanli, M. (1993). A contribution to the halophytic vegetation and flora of Iran. Towards the Rational Use of High Salinity Tolerant Plants 1: 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1858-3.
  2. Abolhasani, M., Lakzian, A., Joharchi, M. and Jafari, H., Akhgar, A., 1389. The effect of drought stress on the nitrogen fixation system of Sinorhizobium bacteria and the accumulation of compatible metabolites in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plant, Bami. Journal of Water and Soil 24(3): 416-407. (In Persian with English abstract)
  3. Agushi, M., Qajar, M., & Bahmanyar, M. (2014). The effect of zeolite application on the quantitative and qualitative performance of soybeans under moisture stress and non-moisture stress conditions. Journal of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 22(2): 173-187.
  4. Amrian, M., Yusuf Thani, M., & Kochaki, A. (2014). The effect of inoculation with mycorrhizal species and irrigation levels on growth characteristics, yield, water use efficiency and some traits of corn plants. Journal of Agricultural Ecology 6(1): 152-133. (In Persian with English abstract)
  5. Arabic, Z., & Kaboosi, K. (2014). The effect of different levels of irrigation and superabsorbent hydrogel on the morphological characteristics, yield and essential oil of anise plant. Crop Production Journal 8(4): 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60847-9.
  6. Azimi, S., Khoshrosh, M., Darzi, A., & Abedinpour, M. (2017). Evaluation of the effect of different amounts of natural and artificial soil conditioners on biological performance and grain yield of wheat. Iran Water and Soil Research 49(3): 682-673. (In Persian with English abstract)
  7. Behrman Sharifian, A., Sepehri, A., & Barani, H. (2021). Investigating the physical and chemical properties of the soil of the habitat of the species of Lycium depressum in saline and alkaline pastures in the north of Golestan province, Iran, Journal of Biological Protection Plant Biome 9(2): 62-47.
  8. Binkley, D.A.N., & Giardina, C. (1998). Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. In Plant-induced soil changes. Processes and feedbacks 8(3): 89-106.
  9. Broushki, M., & Fakheri, B. (2021). Evaluation of the application of zeolite on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the medicinal plant Karla in low irrigation conditions. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Sciences 52(1): 35-46. (In Persian with English abstract). http://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2021.282202.1649.
  10. Chamanara, S., & Kazemeini, A. (2016). Efficient multiscale approach for the integration of continuous multi-functional green infrastructure in Tehran city, Iran. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 8(2): 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2016.1171773.
  11. Ehsanzadeh, P., & Gholami, A. (2018). Physiological, antioxidant and performance response of three fennel genotypes to external application of proline under moisture stress conditions. Quarterly Journal of Plant Process and Function 8(4): 1-18. https://doi.org/1001.1.23222727.1398.8.32.17.5.
  12. Fakhimi, E., & Motamedi, J. (2020). Effect of mining activities on structure and function of rangeland ecosystem using the landscape function analysis. Journal of Rangeland Science 10(3): 291-301.
  13. Fateh, M., & Surkhi, F. (2018). The effect of drought stress on leaf area index, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and proline content in two varieties of bean. Journal of Environmental Stresses in Agricultural Sciences 12(2): 389-399.
  14. Fedai, A., & Parvizi, Y. (2017). The effect of induction of mycorrhizal fungus strains and phosphorus on the growth and phytochemical compounds of cucumber under drought stress conditions. Quarterly Journal of Medicinal Plants 17(2): 1-4.
  15. Ghanbarian, G., & Yazdanpanah, Z. (2017). Effect of phenological stages on chemical composition of Platychaete aucheri as an important endemic shrub in Iran. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology 41(2): 301-305. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.1007/S40995-016-0032-9.
  16. Haq Nazari, F., Ghanbarian, M., Dashtgol, A., & Naseri, V. (2019). Evaluation of sugarcane yield under the influence of irrigation and fertilizer levels. Agricultural Science Research in Dry Areas 13(2): 88-95.
  17. Jahan, M., & Amiri, M. (2021). The effect of moisture super absorbent hydrogel on yield and some physiological traits of beans, sesame and corn in drought conditions. Journal of Plant Research 34(2): 496-510. https://doi.org/1001.1.23832592.1400.34.2.16.5.
  18. Jalali, G.A., Akbarian, H., Rhoades, C., & Yousefzadeh, H. (2012). The effect of the halophytic shrub Lycium ruthenium (Mutt) on selected soil properties of a desert ecosystem in central Iran. Polish Journal of Ecology 60(4): 845-850.
  19. Jalali, S., & Khademian, R. (2021). Morphological and phytochemical action of dill plant on natural zeolite under drought stress. Journal of Horticultural Plant Nutrition 4(1): 31-46.
  20. Kafi, M., Ganjali, A., & Abbasi, F. (2016). Review of changes in abscisic acid (ABA) leaf tissue and stomatal resistance in drought-resistant and sensitive genotypes of chickpea (Cicer arientinum). Journal of University Sciences Tehran 33(4): 18-19. (In Persian with English abstract)
  21. Kafi, M., Nabati, J., Eskoyan, A., & Eskoyan, A. (2018). Investigating the effect of biological fertilizers on the quality, yield and yield components of two potato varieties. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 9(2): 84-65. (In Persian with English abstract)
  22. Khalili, M., & Tausli, A. (2021). The role of mycorrhizal fungi and hydrogel on water use efficiency and cucumber yield under soilless cultivation conditions. Journal of Soil-Plant Relations 6(4): 93-109.
  23. Kohestani, Sh., & Askari, N. (2018). Investigating the effect of superabsorbent hydrogels on grain corn yield under drought stress conditions, Journal of Plant Production 5(3): 71-78.
  24. Mousavifar, A., Khazaei, R., & Kafi, M. (2017). The effect of drought stress on some photosynthetic characteristics of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) in a greenhouse experiment. Journal of Environmental Stresses in Agricultural Sciences 11(3): 603-614. (In Persian with English abstract)
  25. Naji, S., Zarei, L., Pourjabali, M., & Mohammadi, R. (2017). The extract of Lycium depressum stocks enhances wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds 16(2): 85-93. https://doi.org/1177/1534734617700538.
  26. Pollini, L., Rocchi, R., Cossignani, L., Mañes, J., Compagnone, D., & Blasi, F. (2019). Phenol profiling and nutraceutical potential of Lycium Journal of Leaf Extracts Obtained with Ultrasound and Microwave Assisted Techniques 8(8): 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8080260.
  27. Sajjadi, G., & Tosali, A. (2021). Investigating the effect of hydrogel on increasing drought resistance of the medicinal plant Hibiscus sabdariffa Journal of Iranian Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research 37(4): 584-595. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/IJMAPR.2021.353010.2924.
  28. Sarcheshmepour, M., Friver, M., & Sarmast, M. (2018). The effect of polymers on soil moisture and some growth indicators of corn plants under drought stress conditions. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production 49(3): 152-133. (In Persian with English abstract)
  29. Sharbati, F., Mohammad Asmeili, M., Bahmanesh, B., & Hosseini, S.A. (2016). Investigating the effect of salinity and drought stress on seed germination of Lycium depressum Journal of Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources 4(3): 65-72. (In Persian with English abstract)
  30. Sharifian Behrman, A., Sepehri, A., & Barani, H. (2021). Investigating the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil of the habitat of the species Kam Tigh in the saline and alkaline pastures of the north of Golestan province. Journal of Plant Ecosystem Protection 9(2): 62-47.
  31. Shiran, B., & Hertmani, A. (2021). The effect of mycorrhizal fungus symbiosis on morphological traits, proline and gene expression under drought stress. Modern Genetics Quarterly 16(4): 373-385.
  32. Watan Dost, H., Sharifi, R., & Farzaneh, S. (2016). Seed filling and the composition of some fatty acids of rapeseed oil (Brassica napus) with the use of biofertilizers and interruption of irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production Quarterly 27(4): 15-22.
  33. Zhang, G., Chen, S., Zhou, W., Meng, J., Deng, K., Zhou, H., Hu, N., & Suo, Y. (2018). Rapid qualitative and quantitative analyses of eighteen phenolic compounds from Lycium ruthenicum Murray by UPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS and their antioxidant activity. Journal of Food Chemistry 269: 150-156.
  34. Zhang, T., Kang, Y., & Wan, S. (2013). Shallow sand-filled niches beneath drip emitters made reclamation of an impermeable saline-sodic soil possible while cropping with Lycium barbarum Journal of Agricultural Water Management 119: 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.12.016.
  35. Zhao, J.H., Li, H.X., Zhang, C.Z., Wei, A.N., Yue, Y.I.N., Wang, Y.J., & Cao, Y.L. (2018). Physiological response of four wolfberry (Lycium) species under drought stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17(3): 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62038-6.
CAPTCHA Image
دوره 36، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 84
مهر و آبان 1401
صفحه 477-491
  • تاریخ دریافت: 26 اردیبهشت 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 23 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 26 مرداد 1401
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 30 مرداد 1401