ارزیابی کارایی مصرف آب و عملکرد سیب‌زمینی (Solanum tuberosum L.) با فراهمی کود فسفر در شرایط کم‌آبیاری و خشک‌کردن جزئی منطقه ریشه

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری زراعت، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

2 دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 گروه بقولات، پژوهشکده علوم گیاهی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

امروزه باتوجه به کمبود منابع آب، توجه بیشتری به استفاده از روش‌های کاهش مصرف آب در کشاورزی می‌شود. این پژوهش در سال 1395 به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با پنج تکرار در گلخانه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، روی گیاه سیب‌زمینی رقم فونتانه، اجرا شد. عوامل مورد بررسی شامل سه سطح آبیاری: آبیاری کامل (100 درصد ظرفیت زراعی)، کم‌آبیاری (70 درصد ظرفیت زراعی)، خشک‌کردن جزئی منطقه ریشه (70 درصد ظرفیت زراعی)، دو زمان اعمال تنش (دو هفته پس از کاشت و 50 درصد گلدهی) و دو سطح کود فسفاته (براساس آزمایش خاک (mg.Kg-125) و افزودن 25 درصد بیشتر از میزان توصیه‌شده (mg.Kg-131) بودند.در تیمارهای آبیاری یک قسمت از گلدان‌ها دو هفته بعد از کاشت، تحت تنش قرار گرفت و قسمت دوم گلدان‌ها تا شروع گلدهی به‌طور کامل آبیاری شدند و در مرحله 50 درصد گلدهی تیمارهای آبیاری روی آن‌ها اعمال شد. با افزایش کود فسفاته از 25 به mg.Kg-131 میزان زیست‌توده گیاه افزایش یافت. تیمار آبیاری کامل و خشک‌کردن جزئی منطقه ریشه، به ترتیب 28 و 4/17 درصد افزایش زیست‌توده نشان دادند. در تیمار کم‌آبیاری کل دوره رشد و سطح فسفر mg.Kg-131 کمترین کارایی مصرف آب مشاهده شد. کارایی مصرف آب تیمار خشک‌کردن جزئی ریشه از زمان گلدهی و mg.Kg-131 فسفر، با تیمار آبیاری کامل در mg.Kg-125 فسفر کارایی مصرف آب مشابه داشتند ولی در این تیمار عملکرد 28 درصد کاهش یافت درصورتی‌که در تیمار کم‌آبیاری نسبت به تیمار آبیاری کامل، کارایی مصرف آب 50 درصد کاهش عملکرد غده در تک بوته نشان داد؛ به‌طور کلی روش خشک‌کردن جزئی ریشه روش‌ مناسب‌تری نسبت روش کم‌آبیاری ازنظر صرفه‌جویی در مصرف آب و حفظ عملکرد است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Water Use Efficiency Evaluation in Deficit Irrigation and Partial Root Zone Drying in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

نویسندگان [English]

  • A. Asadi 1
  • H.R. Khazaie 2
  • J. Nabati 3
1 Ph.D. Student in agronomy Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
3 legume Department,, Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
چکیده [English]

 
Introduction
Due to climate change, one of the limiting factors of crop production is environmental stress which, by disrupting the natural metabolism of the plant, limit plant growth and finally reduce crop production. Drought stress causes the greatest reduction in crop productivity compared to other environmental stresses. Therefore, the use of methods to reduce water consumption in agriculture is more important due to the lack of freshwater resources. Increasing water use efficiency and maintaining plant yield by reducing water consumption has a particular importance for crop production and should be paid special attention. Drought stress reduces photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, biomass, growth and consequently plant yield. The effects of drought stress on the yield of plants such as potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.) etc., which play an important role in the nutrition and food of the world, has a great importance. Achieving the desired soil moisture range is one of the most important approaches to increase water use efficiency and not significantly reduce yield. For this goal, a factorial experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with five replications in the research greenhouse of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
Materials and Methods
Factors studied in this experiment included three levels of irrigation 1- full irrigation (100% of field capacity), 2- medium drought stress (70% of field capacity), 3- partial root-zone drying (70% of field capacity), time of induction of water stress (two weeks after planting and 50% at flowering time) and two levels of phosphate (CaH4[Po4]2 H2O) fertilizer (based on soil analysis (25 mg.kg-1) and adding 25% more than recommended (31 mg.kg-1)) at the beginning of the period phosphate was mixed with soil inside the pot in greenhouse condition. Fontane potato cultivar was used in this study. In irrigation treatments, one part of the pots was stressed two weeks after planting and the second part of the pots were fully irrigated until the beginning of flowering and irrigation treatments were applied at 50% flowering stage. From the prepared samples, membrane stability index, osmotic potential, and relative water content were measured in the laboratory and at the end of experiment, plant height, tuber weight, biomass and plant water use efficiency were measured. Minitab 18 software was used to analyze the data.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that with increasing phosphate fertilizer from 25 mg.kg-1 to 31 mg.kg-1, plant biomass increased significantly and in all treatments biomass increased between 2 to 28% . Partial root-zone drying treatment showed a 17.4% increase in biomass. In the medium drought stress treatment, the total growth period and phosphorus level of 31 mg.kg-1, the lowest water use efficiency was observed, and there was no significant difference in the medium drought stress treatment of the total growth period and the phosphorus level of 25 mg.kg-1. Partial root-zone drying treatment of roots from flowering time and 31 mg.kg-1 P, with full irrigation treatment 25 mg.kg-1 P have the same water use efficiency, but the performance of this treatment  compared to full irrigation treatment was reduced by 28%. Water use efficiency in partial root-zone drying (intermittent irrigation) has increased compared to traditional irrigation, which indicates a more optimum use of water in the medium drought stress method. Full irrigation treatment had the highest tuber weight per plant and partial root-zone drying during the growing season treatment had the lowest tuber weight per plant (65%) compared to full irrigation. The partial root-zone drying treatment after flowering, ranked second after full irrigation treatment, for tuber weight per plant and more tuber weight per plant compared to other drought treatments. Using 31 mg.kg-1 phosphate, tuber weight per plant in full irrigation treatment reached 332 g.plant-1 which increased by 13% and was significantly different from all treatments. With increasing phosphate level from 25 mg.kg-1 to 31 mg.kg-1, in the partial root-zone drying treatment from flowering time, tuber weight per plant increased by 28% to 207 g.plant-1. Tuber weight per plant in other drought treatments decreased with increasing phosphate level from 25 mg.kg-1 to 31 mg.kg-1, although this decrease was not statistically significant.
 
Conclusion
Compared to deficit irrigated methods, partial root-zone drying from the beginning of growth and full irrigation has the ability to use available nitrogen at the end of the growing season and has more greenery than other drought treatments. This effect probably explains the filling of the gland tubers at the end of the growing season and thus the keeping of yieldyield production. The best methods for saving water consumption and maintaining the yield, the partial root-zone drying methods is better than the medium drought stress method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Membrane stability
  • Relative humidity
  • Water use efficiency
  1. Bayat, H., Mardani, H., Arouie, H., & Salahvarzi, Y. (2011). Effects of salicylic acid on morphological and physiological characteristics of cucumber seedling (Cucumis sativus Super Dominus) under drought stress. Journal of Plant Production 18(3): 63-76. (In Persian with English abstract)
  2. Chai, Q., Gan, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, H.L., Waskom, R.M., Niu, Y., & Siddique, K.H. (2016). Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36(1): 1-21.
  3. Chaki, M., Begara-Morales, J.C., & Barroso, J.B. (2020). Oxidative stress in plants. Antioxidants 9(6):481. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060481.
  4. Dashti, , Kafi, M., Tavakoli, H., & Mirza, M. (2014). The effect of water deficit stress on water relations, photosynthesis and accumulation of osmolate in Nowruzak medicinal plant. Iranian Journal of Crop Research 12: 813-821. (In Persian with English abstract)
  5. Eskandari, A., Khazaei, H.R., Nezami, A., & Kafi, M. (2011). Study of the effect of irrigation regime on yield and some qualitative characteristics of three potato cultivars (Solanum tuberosum). Journal of Soil and Water, Agricultural Sciences and Industries 25(2): 247-240. (In Persian with English abstract)
  6. Fahad, S., Bajwa, A.A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S.A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A., Sadia, S., Nasim, W., Adkins, S., Saud, S., & Ihsan, M.Z. (2017). Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01147.
  7. Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wahid, A., & Siddique, K.H. (2012). Drought stress in plants: an overview. Plant Responses to Drought Stress 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0.
  8. Golestani-Kermani, , Nouri-Emamzadei, M.R., Shayannejad, M., Shahnazari, A., & Mohammadkhani, A. (2013). Effects of water stress on quantitative and qualitative properties of potato crop (Agria c.v.) in deficit irrigation and partial root zone drying techniques. Science and Engineering Irrigation 37(3): 123-135. (In Persian with English abstract)
  9. Gültekin, , & Ertek, A. (2018). Effects of deficit irrigation on the potato tuber development and quality. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 2(3): 93-98. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.18015.
  10. Heath, L., & Packer, L. (1968). Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 125(1): 189-198.
  11. Heidari, , Puryousef, M., & Tavakoli, A. (2014). The effect of drought stress on photosynthesis, its related parameters and relative water content of Pimpinella anisum L. Iranian Journal of Biology 27: 829-839. (In Persian with English abstract)
  12. Hussain, A., Hussain, S., Khaliq, A., Ashraf, U., Anjum, S.A., Men, S., & Wang, L. (2018). Chilling and drought stresses in crop plants: implications, cross talk, and potential management opportunities. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00393.
  13. Kasman, , & Duman, Y.S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Economic Modelling 44: 97-103. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022.
  14. Liu, , Rubaek, C.H., Liu, F., & Andersen, M.N. (2015). Effect of partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in potato. Agriculture Water Management 59: 66-76.
  15. Nadeem, M., Ahmad, M., Zahir, Z.A., Javaid, A., & Ashraf, M. (2014). The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnology Advances 32(2): 429-448. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005.
  16. Obidiegwu, E., Bryan, G.J., Jones, H.G., & Prashar, A. (2015). Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00542.
  17. Quandahor, , Lin, C., Gou, Y., Coulter, J.A., & Liu, C. (2019). Leaf morphological and biochemical responses of three potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars to drought stress and aphid (Myzus persicae Sulzer) infestation. Insects 10(12): 435. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10120435.
  18. Roosta, H.R., Nazari F., & Shahnazari, A. (2010). Comparative effects of conventional irrigation (CI) and partial root zone drying (PRD), and various sources of nitrogen on growth and yield in potato under field condition. Advance in Environmental Biology 4(1): 117-124.
  19. Rosen, J., Kelling, K.A., Stark, J.C., & Porter, G.A. (2014). Optimizing phosphorus fertilizer management in potato production. American Journal of Potato Research 91(2): 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-014-9371-2.
  20. Shi, , Fan, M., Iwama, K., Li, F., Zhang, Z., & Jia, L. (2015). Physiological basis of drought tolerance in potato grown under long-term water deficiency. International Journal of Plant Production 9(2): 305-320.
  21. Shock, C.C., Wang, F.X., Flock, R., Feibert, E.B.G., Shock, C.A., & Pereira, A. (2013). Irrigation monitoring using soil water tension. file:///C:/Users/JAFARN~1/AppData/Local/Temp/em8900.pdf
  22. Sun, , Cui, X., & Liu, F. (2015). Effect of irrigation regimes and phosphorus rates on water and phosphorus use efficiencies in potato. Scientia Horticulturae 190: 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.017.
  23. Thalmann, , & Santelia, D. 2017. Starch as a determinant of plant fitness under abiotic stress. New Phytologist 214(3): 943-951. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14491.
  24. Yactayo, , Ramírez, D.A., Gutiérrez, R., Mares, V., Posadas, A., & Quiroz, R. (2013). Effect of partial root-zone drying irrigation timing on potato tuber yield and water use efficiency. Agricultural Water Management 123: 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.03.009.
  25. Zare Mehrjerdi, M., Bagheri, A., Bahrami, A.R., Nabati, J., & Masoumi, A. (2016). The effect of drought stress on osmotic regulation, proline variability and root and leaf soluble sugars and its relationship with drought tolerance in twelve chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes. Iranian Crop Science 47(3): 462-451. (In Persian)

 

CAPTCHA Image