تأثیر سویه‌های برتر باسیلوس و استافیلوکوکوس جداسازی شده از دیم‌زارها بر شاخص‌های کمی و کیفی گندم در شرایط تنش

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده آب و خاک، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران

2 استاد گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

4 استادیار گروه علوم خاک، دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

چکیده

استفاده از پتانسیل باکتری­های محرک رشد گیاه (PGPR) در جهت کاهش اثرات تنش­های کم‌آبی، شوری و کمک به تغذیه بهینه عناصر غذایی (بخصوص فسفر)، راهکاری علمی و سازگار با محیط زیست در جهت افزایش تولید گندم در کشور می­باشد. پژوهش حاضر به­صورت گلخانه­ای با هدف بررسی تأثیر سویه­های Bacillus pumilus W72، B. safensis W73وStaphylococcus succinus R12N2  بر تعدادی از صفات کمی و کیفی گندم به­صورت آزمایش فاکتوریل (سه فاکتوره شامل: 2 سطح رطوبتی، 6 سطح کود فسفره و 4 سطح جدایه باکتری) و در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با سه تکرار طراحی و اجرا شد. نتایج نشان داد که سطح رطوبتی 80 درصد نسبت به 55 درصد ظرفیت زراعی (FC) باعث افزایش ارتفاع، وزن خشک، نسبت ریشه به اندام هوایی، تعداد خوشه بارور، تعداد دانه، وزن هزار دانه، و غلظت فسفر ریشه، اندام هوایی و دانه شد. همچنین کود سوپر فسفات تریپل در هر سطحی نسبت به شاهد باعث بهبود اغلب صفات اندازه­گیری شده گردید؛ ولی تیمار خاک فسفات به تنهایی (بدون تیمار باکتری) فاقد چنین اثری بود. خاک فسفات همراه با تیمار S. succinus R12N2 در هر دو سطح رطوبتی 55 و 80 درصد FC، و نیز B. pumilus W72وB. safensis W73 تنها در سطح رطوبتی80 درصد FC، نسبت به شاهد باعث افزایش غلظت فسفر ریشه، اندام هوایی و دانه شد. در کل برای کشت گندم در شرایط غیر تنش و تنش کم­آبی، استفاده از تیمار باکتری S. succinus R12N2 مناسب به نظر می­رسد؛ و بررسی کارآیی این سویه در شرایط طبیعی (دیم­زارهای گندم) توصیه می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Super Strains of Bacillus and Staphylococcus Isolated from Dryland Farming on Quantitative and Qualitative Indices of Wheat under Stress Condition

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ebrahim Shirmohammadi 1
  • Hossein Ali Alikhani 2
  • Ahmad Ali Pourbabaee 3
  • Hassan Etesami 4
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Soli Science, Faculty of Water & Soil, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Soli Science, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3 Associate Professor Department of Soli Science, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Soli Science, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Stresses of drought, salinity and deficiency of nutrients especially phosphorus (P) are the most important challenges for wheat production in Iran. One of the ways to achieve more wheat yield production is increasing of this plants tolerance to stresses of water-deficit, salinity and deficiency of essential elements such as P; and/or alleviate destructive effects of these stresses. In this respect, use of PGPR can be useful. Research has shown that PGPR with multiple mechanisms reduces the negative effects of water-deficit and salinity stresses, and also increases the resistance of plants to these stresses, which ultimately leads to increase of plants growth. This study was designed and carried out to investigate the effect of three superior PGPR on qualitative and quantitative indices of wheat under water-deficit stress in saline soil.
Materials and Methods: The soil used in this experiment was collected from longitude of 49° 26' 25'' E, latitude of 35° 52' 26'' N and elevation of 1534 m (located in the Qazvin province of Iran) from depth of 0-30 cm of soil. According to the experimental design, 3.5 kg of soil with applying P-fertilizers treatments was filled to the pots. The factorial arrangement based on completely randomized design (CRD) was used in this study. The treatments were replicated three times. The first factor: soil water content at two levels including 80% and 55% FC (W80 and W55); the second factor: Bacterial inoculants at four levels including control or non-inoculated seeds with bacterium (B0), inoculated seeds with Bacillus pumilus strain W72 (B1), inoculated seeds with B. safensis strain W73 (B2), inoculated seeds with Staphylococcus succinus strain R12N2 (B3); and the third factor: P-fertilizers at six levels including control or non-treated plants with P-fertilizers (F0), and plants treated with (rock phosphate) RP - (F1), RP + 19 mg triple superphosphate (TSP) / kg of soil (F2), RP + 38 mg TSP / kg of soil (F3), RP + 57 mg TSP / kg of soil (F4), with 57 mg TSP / kg of soil (F5), generally there were 144 experimental units (pots). Also, 192 mg RP (containing 13.8% P2O5 or 6.13% P) was mixed per kg of soil in each of RP treatments. Statistical analysis of data was performed using SAS software and comparison of means was evaluated by using the Tukey's test (HSD) at p < 0.05 level. There were 5 plants in each pot and irrigated up to 80% FC with distilled water. With the beginning of stem elongation stage, water-deficit stress was applied and continued until the harvest. During the experiment, pots were kept in greenhouse at 25/20±2°C day/night temperatures and 16 h photoperiod with 23,000 lux light intensity. At the end of the experiment, plants height, fertile clusters, root dry weight /shoot dry weight ratio, total dry weight of plant, grain number, thousand grain weight, also, root, shoot and grain P-concentration were measured.
Results and Discussion: Generally, it can be said that the moisture level of W80 compared to W55 increased all of measured traits in wheat plant. Due to the unique properties of water and its role in biological and non-biological reactions, by reducing soil water content to near of the permanent wilting point (W55), water absorption by the plant hardly occurs. Therefore, the plant needs to consume more energy for water absorption or grow with less water than normal status, which these factors disturb the metabolism of cells and eventually decreases natural activity and growth of plant. Also, it seems that under water stress condition, wheat plant by formation of “Rhizosheaths” around of their own roots, enters to the defensive phase and by this strategy prevents expansion of their own rhizosphere. With attention to the special importance of the rhizosphere in the supply of water, nutrients and activity of microorganisms, as well as the effect of microorganisms secretion and root exudates on the solubility and availability of nutrients. Thus, it is reasonable that qualitative and quantitative traits of plants decrease by reduction of the rhizosphere diameter due to the water-deficit stress. There was no significant difference between application of rock phosphate and control (F0) for most of measured traits of soil and plant; but, application of RP with bacterial treatments (B1 and B2 at W80 and B3 at both level of W55 and W80) compared to the control, often increased measured traits. Also, each level of TSP compared to the control, often increased this trait. Research indicates that RP can be used as a P-fertilizer, but its efficiency depends on its reactivity in the soil. There is ample evidence that RP has not enough efficiency in neutral and alkaline soils; but, it can be used as the P-fertilizer with proper efficiency in acidic soils or alkaline soil with application of PGPR. Often, all of three bacterial treatments (B1, B2 and B3) at level of W80 and B3 treatment at level of W55, compared to control (without bacterial inoculation) improved qualitative and quantitative traits of plant. Research also shows that under stressful and non-stressful conditions, PGPR can improve plant growth by different strategies. However, this microorganism does not always improve plant growth under all conditions. It seems to be due to differences in genetic and function of bacteria and with conditions change, each bacterium may behave differently.
Conclusions In general, for wheat cultivation that may get exposed to moisture stress at one or more stages of its growth (such as dry-farming of wheat), the use of B3 bacterial inoculant (Staphylococcus succinus strain R12N2) seems appropriate for crop management. Because in this study at both W80 (non-water-deficit stress) and W55 (severe water-deficit stress) levels of soil water content, B3 treatment increased qualitative and quantitative of wheat traits. In other words, because of the natural conditions of the dryland farming, the probability of precipitation is different; it seems that B3 treatment can increase wheat production under these conditions. However, the use of this bacterium as a biofertilizer for dryland wheat farming in Iran or other place of the world requires further testing and evaluation in dryland farms of that countries.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB)
  • PGPR
  • Water deficit stress
1-       Ahmadi K., Ebadzadeh H.R., Abdshah H., Kazemian A., and Rafiey M. 2018. Agricultural Statistics Vol. I: Crops in 2016-17 years. 1st ed. Publication of Ministry of Agriculture, Deputy of Planning and Economics, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
2-       Barnawal D., Bharti N., Pandey S.S., Pandey A., Chanotiya C.S., and Kalra A. 2017. Plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria enhance wheat salt and drought stress tolerance by altering endogenous phytohormone levels and TaCTR1/TaDREB2 expression. Physiologia Plantarum 161: 502-514.
3-       Delfim J., Schoebitz M., Paulino L., Hirzel J., and Zagal E. 2018. Phosphorus availability in wheat, in volcanic soils inoculated with phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus thuringiensis. Sustainability 144: 1-15.
4-       Etesami H., and Maheshwari D.K. 2018. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: Action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 156: 225–246.
5-       Glick B. 2012. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 1-15.
6-       Heydarian Z., Yu M., Gruber M., Glick B.R., Zhou R., and Hegedus D.D. 2016. Inoculation of soil with plant growth promoting bacteria producing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase or expression of the corresponding acdS gene in transgenic plants increases salinity tolerance in Camelina sativa. Frontiers in Microbiology 7: 1-17.
7-       Hokmalipour S., Panahyan Kivi M. and Shiri Janaghard M. 2018. The Effect of Seed Inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillum on Yield and some Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics of Safflower at Different Planting Date. Journal of Water and Soil 32(5): 931-942. (In Persian with English abstract)
8-       Inwati D.K., Yadav J., Yadav J.S., Pandey G., and Pandey A. 2018. Effect of different levels, sources and methods of application of nitrogen on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 2398-2407.
9-       Johnston A.E., and Syers J.K. 1998. Nutrient Management for Sustainable Crop Production in Asia. Wallingford, UK, CAB International. 394 pp.
10-   Kader M.A., Main M.H., and Hoque M.S. 2002. Effects of Azetobacter inoculant on the yield and nitrogen uptake by wheat. Journal of Biological Sciences 2: 259-261.
11-   Kadmiri I.M., Chaouqui L., Azaroual S.E., Sijilmassi B., Yaakoubi K., and Wahby I. 2018. Phosphate-solubilizing and auxin-producing rhizobacteria promote plant growth under saline conditions. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 44: 3403-3415.
12-   Kaur G., and Reddy M.S. 2015. Effects of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, rock phosphate and chemical fertilizers on maize-wheat cropping cycle and economics. Pedosphere 25: 428–437.
13-   Kaushal M., and Wani S.P. 2016. Rhizobacterial-plant interactions: Strategies ensuring plant growth promotion under drought and salinity stress. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 231: 68-78.
14-   Khalili-Rad R., and Mirseyed Hosseini H. 2016. Assessing some root morphological properties and efficiency indexes in several phosphorus efficient and inefficient cultivars of wheat Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production 6(3): 65-82. (In Persian with English abstract)
15-   Klute A. (Ed), (1986). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy, ASA and SSSA, Wisconsin, USA: Madison.
16-   Li H., Lei P., Pang X., Li S., Xu H., Xu Z., and Feng X. 2017. Enhanced tolerance to salt stress in canola (Brassica napus L.) seedlings inoculated with the halotolerant Enterobacter cloacae HSNJ4. Applied Soil Ecology 119: 26–34
17-   Malekutey M.J., and Gheybi M.N. 1997. Determination of Critical Level of Nutritional Elements in Strategic Products and the Correct Recommendation of Fertilizer in the country. Agriculture Education Publication, Karaj, 56 pp. (In Persian)
18-   McBeath T.M., McLaughlin M.J., Kirby J.K., and Armstrong R.D. 2012. The effect of soil water status on fertiliser, topsoil and subsoil phosphorus utilisation by wheat. Plant and Soil 358: 337–348.
19-   Moradi M., Siadat S.A., Khavazi K., Naseri R., Maleki A., and Mirzaei A. 2011. Effect of application biofertilizer and phosphorus fertilizers on qualitative and quantitative traits of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 18: 51-66. (In Persian with English abstract)
20-   Musavi R., and Sepehr E. 2014. Phosphorus efficiency of some barley genotypes in the presence of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture 16: 27-40. (In Persian with English abstract)
21-   Nadeem S.M., Zaheer Z.A., Naveed M., and Nawaz S. 2013. Mitigation of salinityinduced negative impact on the growth and yield of wheat by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in naturally saline conditions. Annals of Microbiology 63: 225–232.
22-   Nakbanponte W., Pantlurtumpai N., Sangdee A., Sakulpone N., Sirisom P., and Pimthong A. 2014. Salt tolerant and plant-growth-promoting-bacteria isolated from Zn/Cd contaminated soil: identification and effect on rice under saline conditions. Journal of Plant Interactions 9: 379–387.
23-   Naseri R., and Mirzaei A. 2010. Response of yield and yield components of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to seed inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillum and different nitrogen levels under dry land condition. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 9: 445-449.
24-   Oksinska M.P., Wright S.A.I., and Pietr S.J. 2011. Colonization of wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) by strains of Pseudomonas spp. with respect to their nutrient utilization profiles. European Journal of Soil Biology 47: 364-373.
25-   Ova E.A., Kutman U.B., Ozturk L., and Cakmak I. 2015. High phosphorus supply reduced zinc concentration of wheat in native soil but not in autoclaved soil or nutrient solution. Plant and Soil, DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2483-8.
26-   Page A.L., Miller R.H., and Keeney D.R. (Eds.). 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Agronomy, ASA and SSSA, Wisconsin, USA: Madison.
27-   Parvazi-Shandi S., Pazoki A., Asgharzadeh A., and Azadi A. 2013. Effects of irrigation intervals, plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria and humid acid on yield and yield components of wheat (Kavir cultivar). Modern Science of Sustainable Agriculture 9: 9-16. (In Persian with English abstract)
28-   Payne W.A., Hossner L.R., Onken A.B., and Wendt C.W. 1995. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in pearl millet and its relation to nutrient and transpiration efficiency. Agronomy Journal 87: 425-431.
29-   Pereyra M.A., Garcia P., Colabelli M.N., Barassi C.A., and Creus C.M. 2012. A better water status in wheat seedlings induced by Azospirillum under osmotic stress is related to morphological changes in xylem vessels of the coleoptile. Applied Soil Ecology 53: 94-97.
30-   Pinton R., Varanini Z., and Nannipieri P. 2007. The Rhizosphere Biochemistry and Organic Substances at the Soil-Plant Interface. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
31-   Razzaghi B.K., Alikhani H.A., Etesamia H., and Khoshkholgh-Sima N.A. 2019. Improved growth and salinity tolerance of the halophyte Salicornia sp. by co–inoculation with endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria. Applied Soil Ecology 138: 160–170.
32-   Saleemi M., Kiani M.Z., Sultan T., Khalid A., and Mahmood S. 2017. Integrated effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under rainfed condition. Agriculture and Food Security 6(46): 1-8.
33-   Salem G., Stromberger M.E., Byrne P.F., Manter D.K., El-Fekid W., Weir T.L. 2018. Genotype-specific response of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to irrigation and inoculation with ACC deaminase bacteria. Rhizosphere 8: 1–7.
34-   Sapre S., Gontia-Mishra I., and Tiwari S. 2018. Klebsiella sp. confers enhanced tolerance to salinity and plant growth promotion in oat seedlings (Avena sativa). Microbiological Research 206: 25–32.
35-   Shool A., Shamshiri M.H., Akhgar A.R., and Esmaeilizadeh M. 2014. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescence on vegetative growth of pistachio seedlings (Pistacia vera cv. Qazvini) under four different irrigation regimes. Iranian Jornal of Horticultural Science 45: 297-307. (In Persian with English abstract)
36-   Sperber J.I. 1958. The incidence of apatite-solubilizing organisms in the rhizosphere and soil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 778.
37-   Timmusk S., Abd El-Daim I.A., Copolovici L., Tanilas T., Kannaste A., Behers L., Nevo E., and Seisenbaeva G., Stenström E., and Niinemets Ü. 2014. Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. PLoS One 9: e96086.
38-   Upadhyay S.K., Singh J.S., and Singh D.P. 2011. Exopolysaccharide-Producing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under salinity condition. Pedosphere 21: 214–222.
39-   USDA. 2019. World Agricultural Production. Foreign Agricultural Service. Circular Series WAP 5-19.
40-   Westerman L.R. 1990. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Soil Science Society of America, INC. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
41-   Ziaeyan H., Farahbakhash A.R., Besharati H. and Joukar L. 2016. Interaction effects of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhiza on the growth and phosphorus uptake of Sorghum. Journal of Water and Soil 30(5): 1478-1488. (In Persian with English abstract)
42-   Zabihi H.R., Savagebi G.R., Khavazi K., and Ganjali A. 2009. Response of wheat growth and yield to application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria at various levels of phosphorus fertilization. Iranian Jornal of Field Crops Research 1: 41-51. (In Persian with English abstract)