Document Type : Research Article
Authors
1 Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertology, Yazd University
2 Professor, Rangeland and Watershed Department, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desertology, Yazd University
3 Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Agricultural Research,Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Watersheds, as diverse ecosystems, play a fundamental role in water provision, soil conservation, biodiversity, and ecological sustainability. In addition to delivering environmental services, these areas serve as vital resources for supporting the livelihoods and well-being of local communities. However, population growth, climate change, land-use changes, and overexploitation have imposed significant pressures on these ecosystems, jeopardizing their health and natural functionality. The degradation of these areas can lead to serious consequences for water resources, biodiversity, and environmental sustainability. Therefore, identifying and implementing effective strategies to preserve and enhance watershed health is essential. In this regard, the present study utilizes the strategic SWOT model to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats within the Ilam Dam watershed and aims to propose practical solutions for improving and strengthening the health of these valuable ecosystems.
Materials and methods
To achieve optimal strategies for resource management and improving the health of the study area, the SWOT analysis method was employed. This method provides a comprehensive framework for developing operational strategies by identifying existing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Data for this research were collected through field studies, specialized interviews with local experts, and a review of scientific resources and available information. To enhance accuracy and reliability in evaluating and weighting internal and external factors, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Expert Choice software were utilized. Subsequently, the collected data were analyzed using the Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) and External Factor Evaluation (EFE) matrices, leading to the formulation of appropriate strategies. These strategies were categorized into four main types: aggressive, conservative, competitive, and defensive. Finally, to ensure the selection of the best options, the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) was applied. At this stage, each strategy was scored and prioritized based on its attractiveness and feasibility, ensuring the identification of the most effective and actionable strategies.
Results and discussion
According to the results of this study, seven factors were identified as strengths and seven as weaknesses (internal factors), along with seven opportunities and seven threats (external factors). The total score for strengths was 3.33, and for weaknesses, it was 3.57. Additionally, the score for opportunities was calculated at 3.54, while threats scored 3.28. Based on these scores and the internal and external factors evaluation matrix analysis, the WO strategy position was recommended, with specific solutions determined for each strategy. In the SO strategy, the QSPM matrix analysis indicated that optimal management of surface and groundwater resources, along with the establishment of suitable infrastructure for water capture and storage (strategy SO2), was recognized as the top priority. Within the ST strategy, the strategy of leveraging high organizational and local capacity to address the negative impacts of climate change and sustainably engage stakeholders and local communities in decision-making and watershed resource protection (strategy ST4) was prioritized. For the WO strategy, enhancing water and soil conservation programs and developing research and management initiatives through encouragement, support, and both material and spiritual contributions for specialized studies (strategy WO2) was identified as the main priority. Likewise, under the WT strategy, expanding and diversifying educational programs, developing educational content on water crises and climate change, and addressing the consequences of natural resource degradation in the basin, along with planning and approving national and international projects on climate change and dust storm mitigation (strategy WT1), emerged as the top priority. These strategies can provide an effective framework for improving resource management in watersheds and addressing environmental challenges.
Conclusions
The findings of this study clearly demonstrate that strengthening protective, managerial, and educational programs plays a crucial role in improving the health of this watershed. These strategies, by optimizing available opportunities and minimizing weaknesses, can significantly contribute to sustainable development and effective natural resource conservation. In particular, the implementation of these programs requires collaboration and synergy among the local community, governmental and non-governmental organizations, and related agencies. It is recommended that conservation and management planning be accompanied by education and awareness initiatives for the local community, so residents understand the importance of preserving natural resources and are encouraged to participate in conservation efforts. This active community involvement not only enhances the effectiveness of these strategies but also contributes to achieving desirable outcomes and ecosystem sustainability, setting the stage for more effective management and long-term conservation of water and soil resources.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)
Send comment about this article