Enhancing the Efficiency of Sorghum bicolor L. in the Remediation of Cadmium-Contaminated Soils through a Bio-Chemical Approach

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

2 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Agriculture and Natural Resources Campus, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

Abstract
Introduction
Cadmium (Cd) contamination of soils is a serious environmental concern due to its persistence, high mobility, and toxicity, posing significant risks to food security and ecosystem stability. The transfer of Cd into the food chain through contaminated crops can lead to severe human health disorders. Phytoremediation has been recognized as an environmentally friendly and cost-effective strategy for the remediation of Cd-contaminated soils. Forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is considered a promising species for phytoremediation because of its extensive root system, rapid growth rate, adaptability to stress conditions, and high biomass production. However, its phytoremediation efficiency may be restricted by limited Cd bioavailability in soil and metal-induced growth inhibition. Biological approaches such as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), including Pantoea agglomerans and Pseudomonas fluorescens, can improve plant performance under Cd stress through mechanisms such as siderophore production, phytohormone synthesis, phosphate solubilization, and stimulation of antioxidant defense systems. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhance root absorption capacity via extensive hyphal networks and may regulate metal distribution and stabilization in the rhizosphere. In addition, chemical chelators such as Na-EDTA can increase Cd solubility and availability for plant uptake, although their application may raise environmental concerns, including potential metal leaching. Although the individual effects of PGPB, AMF, and EDTA on Cd-contaminated soils have been widely reported, information regarding their interactive effects on forage sorghum under Cd stress remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the individual and combined effects of PGPB, AMF, and Na-EDTA on growth traits and Cd phytoremediation efficiency of forage sorghum grown in Cd-contaminated soil.
 
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted in the summer 2024 in a greenhouse at Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran, at the geographical coordinates 34°29′19″ N latitude and 47°05′53″ E longitude. Clay loam soil (pH 7.95, EC 0.435 dS m⁻¹, organic carbon 1.326%) was collected from a nearby field, air-dried, sieved (2 mm), and mixed with sand (2:1 ratio). Soil was spiked with 40 mg kg⁻¹ CdSO₄ and equilibrated for one month. A factorial completely randomized design with four replicates was applied across 48 pots (26 cm diameter, 30 cm height). Treatments included: (1) PGPB at three levels (control (no bacteria inoculation), P. agglomerans 6 g kg⁻¹ seed, Ps. fluorescens 7 mL kg⁻¹ seed); (2) AMF at two levels (control (no mycorrhizal inoculation), 30 g kg⁻¹ seed); and (3) Na-EDTA at two levels (control (zero), 3 mg kg⁻¹ soil). Seeds were inoculated with sugar-water solution (2%) for solid inoculants, followed by Ps. fluorescens, dried, and sown (10 seeds/pot, thinned to 5 plants). Na-EDTA was applied post-emergence. Irrigation was maintained at field capacity, and plants were harvested 93 days after sowing at the onset of the reproductive stage. Measured traits included aerial and root biomass (oven-dried at 80°C for 48 h), plant height, leaf area (ImageJ), Cd concentrations in plant tissues and soil (acid digestion and atomic absorption spectrometry), translocation factor (TF = shoot Cd/soil Cd), root bioconcentration factor (BCF = root Cd/soil Cd), and tolerance index (TI = treated aerial biomass/control aerial biomass). Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 with ANOVA and Duncan’s test (P ≤ 0.05).
 
Results and Discussion
Shoot and root biomass as well as tolerance index were not significantly affected by treatments, indicating that Cd stress likely overshadowed the growth-promoting effects of biological amendments and that sorghum’s intrinsic tolerance mechanisms played a dominant role. Na-EDTA significantly increased plant height by 12% compared with the control, suggesting that chelation reduced Cd toxicity and improved growth conditions. The interaction between bacteria and Na-EDTA significantly influenced leaf area. Single inoculation with Pantoea agglomerans or Pseudomonas fluorescens (without EDTA) increased leaf area by approximately 25.5% compared with the control, likely due to enhanced phytohormone production and nutrient availability. However, the addition of EDTA reduced this positive bacterial effect, possibly because of nutrient imbalance or microbial competition. The most pronounced phytoremediation response was observed under the combined application of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Na-EDTA. This treatment increased Cd concentration in shoots by 91% and in roots by 73.8% relative to the control. Simultaneously, soil bioavailable Cd decreased by 44.7%, confirming substantial Cd extraction from the soil. The translocation factor increased more than three-fold, and root bioconcentration factor increased by 216.7%, demonstrating enhanced Cd uptake and internal transfer capacity. AMF showed limited influence on BCF but reduced Cd translocation to shoots, suggesting a stabilizing role in the rhizosphere and partial immobilization of Cd, consistent with its protective function under heavy metal stress.
 
Conclusion
The combined application of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Na-EDTA markedly enhanced Cd phytoremediation efficiency in forage sorghum by increasing Cd uptake, root accumulation, translocation to shoots, and depletion of bioavailable soil Cd. While biomass production was not significantly altered, improvements in plant height, leaf area, TF, and BCF indicate enhanced functional performance under Cd stress. Single bacterial inoculation primarily improved leaf development and physiological potential, whereas AMF moderated Cd transfer to aerial parts through rhizospheric stabilization. Overall, integrating biological inoculants with controlled chelator application represents a promising strategy for optimizing phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soils. Future research should evaluate long-term field performance, different contamination levels, and environmental safety aspects associated with chelator use.
 
Acknowledgement
Gratitude is extended to Lorestan, Razi, and Kharazmi Universities for providing the necessary facilities and cooperation to carry out this research.
 

Keywords

Subjects

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

  1. Abou Jaoudé, R., Luziatelli, F., Ficca, A.G., & Ruzzi, M. (2024). A plant’s perception of growth-promoting bacteria and their metabolites. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1332864
  2. Akhgar, A., Ahmadinia, E., & Shirani, H. (2020). Effect of phosphate solubilizing fluorescent pseudomonads on cadmium uptake by corn in contaminated soil. Journal of Siol Biology, 8(1), 1-14. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/ paper/403640/en
  3. Al-Dokhi, O., Mukhtar, A., Al-Dosary, A., & Al-Sadoon, M.K. (2015). Ultrastructural differentiation of sperm tail region in Diplometopon zarudnyi (an amphisbaenian reptile). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 22(4), 448-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.05.002
  4. Alhaj Hamoud, Y., Shaghaleh, H., Saleem, M.H., Alshaharni, M.O., Alqurashi, M., Alhelaify, S.S., Alharthy, O.M., Fayad, E., & Rastogi, A. (2025). Eco-friendly role of Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas fluorescens in enhancing rice growth and mitigating cadmium toxicity via uptake modulation and antioxidant regulation. BMC Plant Biology, 25, 718. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06693-6
  5. Alamo-Nole, L., & Estrella-Martinez, B. (2022). Phytoremediation of CdS/Te quantum dots by Ocimum basilicum in the presence of EDTA. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 20, 827–834. https://doi.org/ 1007/s40201-022-00822-1
  6. Anwar, S., Shafaqat, A., Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Zia-ur-Rehman, M., Ibrahim, M., & Abbas, F. (2017). Impact of chelator-induced phytoextraction of cadmium on yield and ionic uptake of maize. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(6), 5521–5530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8246-0
  7. Bashir, S., Javed, S., Al-Anazi, K. M., Farah, M.A., & Ali, S. (2022). Bioremediation of cadmium toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants primed with L-proline, Bacillus subtilis and Aspergillus niger. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12683. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912683
  8. Black, C.A. (Ed.). (1965). Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
  9. Bouyoucos,J. (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54(5), 464–465. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
  10. Cao, X., Dong, Q., Mao, L., Yang, X., Wang, X., & Zou, Q. (2025). Enhanced phytoextraction technologies for the sustainable remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil based on hyperaccumulators—a review. Plants, 14(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010115
  11. Chapman, H.D., & Kelley, W.P. (1930). The determination of the replaceable bases and the base-exchange capacity of soils. Soil Science, 30(5), 391-406.‏ https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193011000-00004
  12. Chellaiah, E.R. (2018). Cadmium (heavy metals) bioremediation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A minireview. Applied Water Science, 8, 154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0796-5
  13. Chen, B., Luo, S., Wu, Y., Ye, J., Wang, Q., Xu, X., Pan, F., Khan, K.Y., Tian, X., Hu, Y., & Yang, X. (2017). The effects of the endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens Sasm05 and IAA on the plant growth and cadmium uptake of Sedum alfredii Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 2538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02538
  14. Chen, Y., Yu, Y., Fang, X., Zhou, Y., & Lu, D. (2024). How Pseudomonas nitroreducens passivates cadmium to inhibit plant uptake. Applied Sciences, 14(7), 2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072857
  15. Chen, J., Guo, J., Li, Z., Liang, X., You, Y., Li, M., He, Y., & Zhan, F. (2022). Effects of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on the growth of and cadmium uptake in maize grown on polluted wasteland, farmland and slopeland soils in a lead-zinc mining area. Toxics, 10(7), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10070359
  16. Chi, Y., Ma, X., Chu, S., You, Y., Chen, X., Wang, J., Wang, R., Zhang, X., Zhang, D., Zhao, T., Zhang, D., & Zhou, P. (2025). Nitrogen cycle induced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria drives “microbial partners” to enhance cadmium phytoremediation. Microbiome, 13, 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-025-02113-x
  17. Chiranjeevi, M., Goudar, G.D., Krishnaraj, P.U., & Yalavarthi, N. (2024). Study on effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) under gnotobiotic conditions. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, 1374802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1374802
  18. Dhawi, F., Datta, R., & Ramakrishna, (2016). Mycorrhiza and heavy metal resistant bacteria enhance growth, nutrient uptake and alter metabolic profile of sorghum grown in marginal soil. Chemosphere, 157, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.112
  19. Fang, X., Lee, X., Twagirayezu, G., Cheng, H., Lu, H., Huang, S., Deng, L., & Ji, B. (2024). A critical review of the effectiveness of biochar coupled with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil cadmium immobilization. Journal of Fungi, 10(3), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10030182
  20. Gouda, S., Kerry, R.G., Das, G., Paramithiotis, S., Shin, H.S., & Patra, J.K. (2018). Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture: A review. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 1473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.016
  21. Grembecka, M., & Szefer, P. (2013). Comparative assessment of essential and heavy metals in fruits from different geographical origins. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(11), 9139–9160. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10661-013-3242-z
  22. Haider, F.U., Liqun, C., Coulter, J.A., Cheema, S.A., Wu, J., Zhang, R., Wenjun, M., & Farooq, M. (2021). Cadmium toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation strategies. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 211, 111887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111887
  23. Javed, S., Anwaar, N., Zahoor, A.F., Haider, M.Z., Azeem, M., Gul, S., & Aftab, A. (2024). Cadmium stress mitigation in different cultivars of spinach (Spinacia oleracea) with foliar application of ascorbic acid. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 71, 40. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443723603324
  24. Jia, W., Lv, S., Feng, J., Li, J., Li, Y., & Li, S. (2016). Morphophysiological characteristic analysis demonstrated the potential of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench) in the phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(18), 18823-18831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7083-5
  25. Kchikich, A., Amraoui, B.E., Nhhala, N., Krid, A., Kchikich, A., Kounnoun, A., El Khalloufi, F., El Khalloufi, A., & Nhiri, N. (2025). Mitigating heavy metals toxicity in sorghum using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Enhancing photosynthesis and antioxidant defense. Protoplasma, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-025-02095-5
  26. Kchikich, A., Roussi, Z., Krid, A., Nhhala, N., Ennoury, A., Benmrid, B., Kounnoun, A., El Maadoudi, M., Nhiri, N., & Mohamed, N. (2024). Effects of mycorrhizal symbiosis and Ulva lactuca seaweed extract on growth, carbon/nitrogen metabolism, and antioxidant response in cadmium-stressed sorghum plant. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 30(4), 605-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-024-01446-5
  27. Kumar, A., Dadhwal, M., Mukherjee, G., Srivastava, A., Gupta, S., & Ahuja, V. (2024). Phytoremediation: Sustainable approach for heavy metal pollution. Scientifica, 2024(1), 3909400. https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2024/3909400
  28. Lambert, R.J.W., Hanlon, G.W., & Denyer, S.P. (2004). The synergistic effect of EDTA/antimicrobial combinations on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 96(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/ 1046/j.1365-2672.2004.02135.x
  29. Lozano-González, J.M., Valverde, S., Montoya, M., Martín, M., Rivilla, R., Lucena, J.J., & López-Rayo, S. (2023). Evaluation of siderophores generated by Pseudomonas bacteria and their possible application as Fe biofertilizers. Plants, 12(23), 4054.
  30. Lindsay, W.L., & Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42(3), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978. 03615995004200030009x
  31. Liu, L., Li, J., Yue, F., Yan, X., Wang, F., Bloszies, S., & Wang, Y. (2018). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and biochar amendment on maize growth, cadmium uptake and soil cadmium speciation in Cd-contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 194, 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.025
  32. National Research Council, Committee on Long-Range Soil, & Water Conservation Policy. (1993). Soil and water quality: An agenda for agriculture. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1995. 00472425002400020029x
  33. Noor, J., Ahmad, I., Ullah, A., Iqbal, B., Anwar, S., Jalal, A., Okla, M.K., Alaraidh, I.A., Abdelgawad, H., & Fahad, S. (2024). Enhancing saline stress tolerance in soybean seedlings through optimal NH₄⁺/NO₃⁻ ratios: A coordinated regulation of ions, hormones, and antioxidant potential. BMC Plant Biology, 24, 572. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05294-z
  34. Nelson, D.W., & Sommers, L.E. (1980). Total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant tissues. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 63(4), 770–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/63.4.770
  35. Olsen, S.R., & Sommers, L.E. (1982). Phosphorus. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties (2nd ed., pp. 403–430). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c24
  36. Prokop, Z., Cupr, P., & Zlevorova-Zlamalikova, V. (2003). Mobility, bioavailability, and toxic effects of cadmium in soil samples. Environmental Research, 91(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-9351(02)00012-9
  37. Qin, H., Wang, Z., Sha, W., Song, S., Qin, F., & Zhang, W. (2024). Role of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant machinery for soil heavy metal detoxification. Microorganisms, 12(4), 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12040700
  38. Rajkumar, M., Ae, N., Prasad, M.N.V., & Freitas, H. (2010). Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42(3), 503-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/ tibtech.2009.12.002
  39. Randriamamonjy, S., Mouret, A., Metzger, E., Gaudin, P., La, C., Capiaux, H., ... & Lebeau, T. (2021). 2D distribution of Pseudomonas fluorescens activities at the soil-root interface of sunflower grown on vineyard soils: Effects on copper uptake. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 163, 108462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio. 108462
  40. Rauf, M., Naveed, M., Munir, M., Ghafoor, A., Sattar, M.N., Ali-Dinar, H., Mohamed, H.A., Bashir, M.A., Asif, M., & Mustafa, A. (2025). Revitalizing cadmium-stressed sunflower: Co-composted biochar improves growth, antioxidant responses, and soil remediation efficiency. BMC Plant Biology, 25, 875. https://doi.org/ 1186/s12870-025-07098-1
  41. Rizvi, A., Zaidi, A., Ameen, F., Ahmed, B., AlKahtani, M.D.F., & Khan, M.S. (2020). Heavy metal induced stress on wheat: phytotoxicity and microbiological management. RSC Advances, 10(64), 38379–38403. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA05610C
  42. Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Adrees, M., Ibrahim, M., Tsang, D.C., Zia-ur-Rehman, M., & Ok, Y.S. (2017). A critical review on effects, tolerance mechanisms and management of cadmium in vegetables. Chemosphere, 182, 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.013
  43. Saini, N., Singh, S., & Chowdhury, P. (2024). Enhancing Vigna radiata growth and reducing metal toxicity with Pseudomonas in hydroponic systems. Current World Environment, 19(3), 1434–1446. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.19.3.32
  44. Saleem, M., Naeem, H., Ahmad, Z.Z., & Muhammad, S. (2018). Impact of lead tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, physiology, antioxidant activities, yield and lead content in sunflower in lead contaminated soil. Environmental Pollution, 242, 1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.117
  45. Shahid, M., Austruy, A., Echevarria, G., Arshad, M., Sanaullah, M., Aslam, M., Nadeem, M., Nasim, W., & Dumat, C. (2014). EDTA-enhanced phytoremediation of heavy metals: A Review. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 23(4), 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2014.831029
  46. Sharma, M., Sharma, S., Paavan, P., Gupta, M., Goyal, S., Talukder, D., Akhtar, M.S., Kumar, R., Umar, A., Alkhanjaf, A.A.M., & Baskoutas, S. (2024). Mechanisms of microbial resistance against cadmium–a review. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 22(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-023-00887-6
  47. Sharma, J.K., Kumar, N., Singh, N.P., & Santal, A.R. (2023). Phytoremediation technologies and their mechanism for removal of heavy metal from contaminated soil: An approach for a sustainable environment. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1076876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1076876
  48. Ullah, S., Ikram, M., Sarfaraz, S., ul Haq, I., Khan, A., Murad, Z., & Munsif, F. (2024). Influence of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) under salt stress. Journal of Crop Health, 76, 1221–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-024-01006-7
  49. S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. (1954). L.A. Richards (Ed.). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Handbook No. 60. U.S. Govt. Print. Office, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1954.00021962004600060019x
  50. Walkley, A., & Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/ 1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  51. Wilkins, D.A. (1978). The measurement of tolerance to edaphic factors by means of root growth. New Phytologist, 80(3), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01595.x
  52. Yoon, J., Cao, X., Zhou, Q., & Ma, L.Q. (2006). Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Science of The Total Environment, 368(2–3), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/ scitotenv.2006.01.016
  53. Zayed, A., Gowthaman, S., & Terry, N. (1998). Phytoaccumulation of trace elements by wetland plants: I. Duckweed. Journal of Environmental Quality, 27(3), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700030032x
  54. Zhang, P., Li, J., Li, T., Li, X., Lu, Y., & Wu, J. (2024). Transcriptome analysis of potassium-mediated cadmium accumulation in sweet sorghum. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 215, 109064. https://doi.org/10.1016/ plaphy.2024.109064
  55. Zhao, S., Yan, L., Kamran, M., Liu, S., & Riaz, M. (2024). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-assisted phytoremediation: A promising strategy for cadmium-contaminated soils. Plants, 13(23), 3289. https://doi.org/ 3390/plants13233289
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.
Volume 40, Issue 1 - Serial Number 105
July and August 2026
Pages 88-73

  • Receive Date 29 August 2025
  • Revise Date 11 June 2026
  • Accept Date 15 June 2026
  • First Publish Date 15 June 2026