ارزیابی احتمال آلودگی آرسنیک در آب زیرزمینی دشت همدان ـ بهار با استفاده از روش‌های زمین آماری

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان

چکیده

در بین عناصر سنگین، آرسنیک به‌عنوان یک عنصر سرطان‌زا شناسایی‌شده است و غلظت‌های زیاد آن در اکوسیستم می‌تواند یک نگرانی بزرگ برای سلامتی عمومی و محیط‌زیست ایجاد کند. هدف از این مطالعه ارزیابی کیفیت آب زیرزمینی دشت همدان ـ بهار از نظر آلودگی به آرسنیک می-باشد. بدین منظور غلظت آرسنیک در 94 نقطه آب زیرزمینی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. جهت تعیین توزیع مکانی آرسنیک از روش‌های مختلف زمین‌آمار استفاده گردید، سپس نتایج حاصل از این روش‌ها با استفاده از روش ارزیابی متقابل و محاسبه شاخص‌های میانگین خطای مطلق (MAE) و میانگین خطای انحراف (MBE) با یکدیگر مقایسه شدند و مناسب‌ترین روش انتخاب گردید. بدین منظور از روش توابع پایه شعاعی RBF با مدل Multiquadric جهت تعیین توزیع مکانی آرسنیک در آب زیرزمینی استفاده شد. علاوه بر این نقشه‌ احتمال آلودگی و افزایش غلظت آرسنیک از حد آستانه نیز با استفاده از مدل کریجینگ شاخص برای آب زیرزمینی تهیه گردید. نتایج نشان داد که در حدود 67 درصد آبخوان دارای احتمال آلودگی کمتر از 50 درصد بود. درحالی‌که 18/21 درصد سطح آبخوان دارای آلودگی متوسط و 9/10 درصد سطح آبخوان دارای احتمال آلودگی زیاد بود. مناطقی که در آن احتمال آلودگی آب زیرزمینی زیاد بود با کاربری کشاورزی و به‌خصوص مناطق زیر کشت سیب‌زمینی هم‌خوانی داشت که می‌تواند به دلیل مصرف زیاد کودهای شیمیایی و مرغی در این مناطق باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessment of Arsenic Contamination Probability of Groundwater in Hamedan-Bahar Basin Using Geostatistical Methods

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mina Touzandejani
  • Alireza Soffianian
  • Norollah Mirghafari
  • Mohsen Soleimani
Isfahan University of Technology
چکیده [English]

Introduction: All living organisms, such as plants, animals and humans depends on the water and life may exist in a place where water is available. Groundwater is the main source of drinking water for more than 5.1 billion people around the world, especially in arid and semi- arid regions such as Iran. Currently, groundwater provided about 60 percent of the worlds drinking water and 77.8 percent of the Iran's drinking water. In recent years, it has been found that groundwater quality is also important as much as its quantity. Nowadays, pollution of groundwater resources from pollutants, especially heavy metals reduces the quality of these resources. Heavy metals are one of the most important environmental pollutant that its entering into the water is raised by agricultural activities, industrial and urban development. Among the heavy metals, arsenic is a toxic and carcinogenic metalloids which are widely distributed in the environment and it has a twentieth abundance of elements in the Earth's crust with an average of 1.8 mg kg-1. Arsenic has been classified in the first group of cancer-causing compounds. It has different effects such as horny skin, liver, skin and bladder cancer, mental disorders, damage to neurons, blood pressure, lower IQ and reducing white blood cells and red blood. The Maximum permissible arsenic in drinking water is 10 micrograms per liter which has been identified by the World Health Organization and America Environmental Protection Agency. According to national standards of Iran, limitation of arsenic in drinking water is 10 micrograms per liter. So far, numerous studies were done to evaluate the environmental contamination of heavy metals, especially arsenic using geostatistical methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of groundwater in terms of Arsenic pollution.
Materials and Methods: study area is Hamedan - Bahar aquifer with an area of 800 square kilometers that is located on the northern slopes of Alvand Mountains. The central part of Hamadan city, Lalejin, Saleh Abad and Bahar city is located in the study area. To conduct this study, concentrations of arsenic was investigated in 94 groundwater points. To determine the spatial distribution of arsenic, different geostatistical methods were used. Then the results of this methods were compared using cross validation technique and MAE & ‌MBE index and the most suitable method was chosen for this purpose. Eventually RBF method by multiquadric model was used. Moreover Contamination probability map was developed using indicator kriging models.
Results and Discussion: Arsenic concentrations were in the range between 5 – 79.5 micrograms per liter. Also The average concentration was 12.4 micrograms per liter. While the threshold for arsenic in water defined 10 micrograms per liter by the World Health Organization (WHO). So an average of arsenic in ground water is higher than limits of international standard. The spatial correlation analysis showed that the concentrations of arsenic in groundwater have no strong spatial dependency. So, for zoning this variable, between the nonparametric methods, radial basis function (RBF) by Multiquadric model was used. This method had lowest MAE and MBE index for arsenic in groundwater. The highest concentration of arsenic was in the industrial zone in the north of Hamadan (Hamedan, Tehran road). In general Excessive concentrations of arsenic are visible in the three areas : The first area is between Hamedan and Tehran Road Industrial Estate, that the high rate of abnormalities was found in this area (79.5 μg/L). Also the suburbs of Saleh-Abad and the Bahar city has high arsenic concentration. In these areas, groundwater levels were high and pollutants can penetrate more easily. The results of the contamination map using an indicator kriging method showed that 21.18% of aquifer moderately contaminated and about 10.9% of the aquifer area have a high contamination possibility. Polluted groundwater is matched with agricultural land especially the potato fields.
Conclusion: The results showed that the average concentration of arsenic in groundwater of Hamedan-Bahar basin is more than WHO and Iran department of environmental guidelines. The highest concentration of arsenic in agricultural lands and consequently in groundwater resources is due to the existence of polluting industries, the geological structure of the area where arsenic concentration naturally is high, cultivation of potatoes and other crops in the region and indiscriminate use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers in agriculture.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Carcinogenic metalloids
  • Indicator kriging
  • Radial basic function
  • spatial distribution
1- Akter A., Ali M.H. 2011. Arsenic contamination in groundwater and its proposed remedial Measures, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 8:433-443.
2-Appelo T. 2006. Arsenic in Groundwater -World Problem. Seminar Utrecht, Netherlands National Committee of the IAH.
3-Arc GIS (version 9.3) help, geostatistical analyst
4-Ardakani S., Jamali M., Maanijou M. 2015. Evaluation of As, Zn, Cr and Mn concentrations in groundwater resources of Razan plain and preparing the zoning map Using geographic information systems, Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(2): 25-38. (in Persian with English abstract)
5-Asghari Moghadam A., Jalali L. 2015. Study of arsenic anomaly and its possible source in groundwater of Khooi plain, Journal of Earth Sciences, 94: 154-147. (in Persian).
6-Asgari K.A., Moazede H. and Qorbanizade H. 2011. Nitrate contamination modeling in zayandehrood groundwater using artificial neural networks, the first international conference on plants, water, soil and air modeling, the International Center for Advanced Science and Technology and Environmental Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. (in Persian).
7-Bagheri M. 2000. Effects of effluent irrigation systems in some physical, chemical properties and soil pollution for several crop under cultivation (Dissertation for MSe degree of Water Resources) Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan Industrial University, 156. (in Persian).
8-Bameri A., Piri H., Ganji F. 2015. Assessment of Groundwater Pollution in Bajestan Plains for Agricultural Purposes Using Indicator Kriging, Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 22(1). (in Persian with English abstract)
9-Bissen M., Frimmel F. H. 2003. Arsenic- a Review, part I: Occurrence, Toxicity, Speciation, Mobality, Acta hydrochim, Hydrobiol, 31(1): 9–18.
10-Faraji H., Azizi Q. 2007. The accuracy of spatial interpolation methods
Case Study Mashhad Kardeh areas rainfall modeling, geographical research, 58: 15-1. (in Persian).
11-Fatehi M., Semiromi M. and Mirnia S. 2012. groundwater resources Management using a numerical model (Case study: Grbaygan plain in Fars province), Iran Water Resources Management Conference 4th, May 2012, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran. (in Persian).
12-Francisca F. M., Carro, M. E. 2009. Assessment of natural in groundwater in Cordoba Province, Argentina, Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 31: 673-682.
13-Garcia M.G., Sracek O., Fernandez D.S., Hidalgo M. 2007. Factors affecting arsenic concentration in groundwaters from Northwestern Chaco-Pampean Plain, Argentina, Environ Geol, 52: 1261-1275.
14-Golmohammadi G., Maroofi S., Mohammadi K. 2009. Runoff Coefficient Regionalization of the Hamedan province using geostatistical methods and GIS, Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 46: 514-501. (in Persian).
15-Habashi H., Hoseini S M., Shatayi S. and Mohammadi J. 2006. Evaluation of the accuracy of the interpolation method to estimate the total nitrogen in the soil using GIS, Geomatics Conference. (in Persian).
16-Hakan, A., Turan, N. A. 2015. Estimation of spatial distribution of heavy metals in groundwater using interpolation methods and multivariate statistical techniques; its suitability for drinking and irrigation, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187: 1-13.
17-HasaniPak A., Sharafaldin M. 2002. Exploratory data analysis, Tehran University Press, second edition, page 987. (in Persian).
18-http://www.hmrw.ir
19-Hudson-Edwards K. A., Jamieson H. E., Charnock J. M., Macklin M.G. 2005. Arsenic speciation in waters and sediments of ephemeral floodplain pools, rios Agrio-Guadiamar, Aznalcollar, Spain Chem Geol, 219(1-4):175-192.
20-International Agency for Research on Cancer (IRAC), Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to human.Vol.1 World Health Organization, 1987.
21-Kardovani P. 2004. Groundwater and surface water issues and exploit them. Resources and Water Issues in Iran, University of Tehran Press, vol.1.(in Persian)
22-Khodakarami L. 2009. Agricultural non-point sources of pollution assessment using GIS and RS, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan Industrial University. (in Persian)
23-Kim J.Y., Davis A.P., Kim K.W. 2003. Stabilization of available arsenic in highly contaminated mine tailings using iron. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 37: 189-195.
24-Kumpiene J., Ore S., Renella G., Mench M., Lagerkvist A., Maurice C. 2006. Assessment of zerovalent iron for stabilization of chromium, copper, and arsenic in soil. Environmental Pollution. 144: 62-69.
25-Lark R.M., Ferguson R.B. 2004. Mapping risk of soil nutrient deficiency or excess by disjunctive and indicator kriging, Geoderma, 118: 39-53.
26-Mohammadi J. 2007. Pedometer. Volume II, spatial statistics, published by the Pelk, First Edition, 453 pages. (in Persian)
27-Mohammadi J. 2003. Zoning and assessment of soil pollution using fuzzy set theory . fuzzy collections and its Applications Conference, 139-133. (in Persian)
28-Mohammadi J. 2001. An overview of the fundamentals of geo-static and Its Application in Soil, Journal of Soil and Water, 15(1): 99-121. ( in Persian)
29-Nazari Y., Abasnejad A. 2015. Source determination and distribution of arsenic in Rhine Plain groundwater (south-east of Kerman) using statistical techniques, Journal of Earth Sciences, 94: 128-117. (in Persian)
30-Nozari H., Zali A. 2013. Studing the status of the groundwater aquifer withdrawals from Hamadan-Bahar basin, Journal of Soil and Water Science, 23(4): 277-290. (in Persian with English abstrct).
31-Rajaei Q, Pourkhabbaz A. R, Hesari Motlagh S. 2012. Assessment of Heavy Metals Health Risk of Groundwater in Ali Abad Katoul Plian, ournal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Summer 2012; 4(2): 163. (in Persian with English abstrct).
32-Rahnama S, Khaledian M. R., Shahnazari A., Forghani A. A. 2011. geostatistically based evaluation of heavy metals concentration in groundwater resources of Central Guilan. Proceedings of the 4th Iran Water Resources Management Conference 2011; 12 .( in Persian)
33-Rahmani A., Sedehi M. 2004. Prediction of changes in Hamedan - Bahar groundwater level Hamedan using time series model, Journal of Water and Wastewater, 51: 42-49. (in Persian with English abstrct).
34-Rodriguez Martin J. A., Arias M. L., Grau J. M. 2006. Heavy metals contents in agriculcural top soils in the Ebro basin (Spain). Application of the multivariate geostatistical methods to study spatial variations, Environmental Pollution, 144: 1001-1012.
35-Sanders A.P., Messier K. P., Shehee M., Rudo K., Serre M.L., Fry R.C. 2012. Arsenic in North Carolina (Public Health Implications), Environment International, (38): 10-16.
36-Saberi N., Mahini A., Mirkarimi H., Abdi O. 2010. The use of geostatistics in study of nitrate and phosphate contamination of drinking water, East region Gorgan, Journal of Geography and Urban Planning, 6: 65-71. ( in Persian)
37-Shahbazi A. 2012. Impact assessment of agricultural activities on heavy metals accumulation in Hamedan province soils. (in Persian with English abstract).
38-Soil contaminants Atlas of Hamedan province, Basic Studies, 2009. Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Technology.
39-Sparks D. L. 2003. Environmental soil chemistry. Access Online via Elsevier.
40-Torabi S. 2012. Avian and bovine fertilizing effects of poultry and cow manure on the concentration of zinc, cadmium and arsenic in two different varieties of wheat in terms of performance. Master's thesis of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Technology. (in Persian with English abstract).
41-World Health Organization (WHO). 1998. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2nd edn, Geneva, World Health Organization.