دوماهنامه

بهینه‌سازی مصرف کود در مزارع چغندرقند با روش تشخیص چندگانه عناصر غذایی (CND): نتایج یک مطالعه دو ساله

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات، آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان کرمانشاه، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی، مشهد، ایران

چکیده
استفاده از روش تشخیص چندگانه عناصر غذایی (CND-clr) روش مفیدی برای ارزیابی وضعیت عناصرغذایی چغندرقند است. هدف از این تحقیق ارزیابی و بهینه‌سازی وضعیت تغذیه­ای چغندرقند به‌مدت دو سال زراعی در استان خراسان رضوی با روش CND-clr است. در سال اول 30 مزرعه و در سال دوم 31 مزرعه با دامنه متفاوتی از خصوصیات خاک، انتخاب گردید. در سال‌های اول و دوم، نمونه‌برداری از برگ‌ها برای تعیین غلظت عناصر غذایی انجام شد. در این پژوهش گروه عملکرد زیاد در مزارع چغندرقند، با استفاده از روش CND از طریق ریاضی، آماری و کاربرد تابع تجمعی متمایز گردید. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه خاک در استان خراسان رضوی نشان داد که 67، 5/52، 82، 62، 59 و 53% مزارع به‌ترتیب دچار کمبود فسفر، پتاسیم، آهن، منگنز، روی و مس در خاک بودند. میانگین عملکرد در کل مزارع 5/58 تن بر هکتار بود و عملکرد حد واسط 9/70 تن در هکتار به‌عنوان معیار تفکیک مزارع با وضعیت تغذیه‌ای مطلوب و نامطلوب استفاده شد. بر اساس میانگین شاخص­های CND، 27/%54 مزارع این استان در وضعیت متعادل تغذیه‌ای و 43/45% آن در وضعیت نامتعادل قرار دارند. محدود کننده‌ترین عناصرغذایی پرمصرف در مزارع با عملکرد پایین فسفر (49%) و پتاسیم (44%) و برای عناصر غذایی کم­مصرف مربوط به مس (29%) و منگنز (22%) بود. بنابراین به‌منظور افزایش عملکرد و بهبود کیفیت محصول چغندرقند بایستی توجه ویژه‌ای به کوددهی پتاسیم، فسفر، مس در این مزارع شود. وضعیت نامتعادل تغذیه­ای مزارع شامل 50% کمبود و 50% بیش‌بود عناصر غذایی بود. روش CND با درنظر گرفتن وضعیت تغذیه‌ای متعادل و نامتعادل و همچنین بیش‌بود و کمبود عناصر غذایی، ضمن توصیه کودی مناسب از هدررفت کود و منابع مالی نیز جلوگیری می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Optimization of Fertilizer Use in Sugar Beet Fields in Khorasan Razavi Province Using the Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis (CND) Method: Results of a Two-Year Study

نویسندگان English

J. Ghaderi 1
Sh. Fathi 1
M. Forouhar 2
K. Khalkhal 1
1 Soil and Water Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Iran
2 Soil and Water Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
 In Iran, sugar beet is the second most prominent irrigated crop after forage corn and wheat, occasionally ranking third after sugarcane in specific years. This versatile plant not only serves as a primary source of sugar but also contains essential nutrients beneficial to human health. Its adaptability to diverse environmental conditions allows it to be cultivated across various regions of the country. Sugar beet production plays a significant role in Iran's agricultural sector, with recent data indicating an increase in production levels over the years. However, achieving optimal performance and desired product quality requires a precise understanding of the nutritional status of sugar beet. Therefore, awareness of its nutritional condition is crucial for enhancing both quantity and quality. Soil tests based on critical levels can indicate the adequacy of nutrients, but in some cases, soil testing alone is insufficient to reveal nutrient deficiencies or nutritional imbalances. Under these conditions, plant analysis leads to better identification of deficiencies as well as understanding the concentration of elements and comparing them with reference concentrations to ensure optimal plant growth. One method for interpreting leaf analysis results is the use of compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) method. The CND method offers an effective approach for assessing the nutritional status of sugar beet plants by analyzing nutrient composition in plant tissues against standard values. Its primary objective is to identify nutritional deficiencies, optimize fertilizer use, mitigate adverse environmental impacts from excessive fertilization, and boost crop yields. This research aims to evaluate and optimize the nutritional status of sugar beet over two agricultural years in Khorasan Razavi province using the CND method.
 
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted over two agricultural years on sugar beet crops in Khorasan Razavi province, involving 30 fields in the first year and 31 fields in the second year, with varying soil properties. After selecting the fields, prior to planting and fertilizing the sugar beet, a composite soil sample was taken from each field, covering an area of one hectare and a depth of 0-30 cm. The physical and chemical properties of these samples were measured in the laboratory. Leaf sampling was performed in both years to determine nutrient concentrations, approximately 90 to 120 days after planting, using young, healthy, fully developed leaves. After washing with distilled water, the leaf samples were dried in an oven at 70°C for 48 hours, ground with an electric grinder, and then nutrient concentrations were measured. In this study, the high-yielding group in sugar beet farms was identified using the CND method through mathematical and statistical analysis and the application of the cumulative function.
 
Result
Soil analysis revealed a wide range of physical and chemical characteristics among the selected fields. The findings in this province revealed that 67%, 52.5%, 82%, 62%, 59%, and 53% of the fields were deficient in phosphorus, potassium, iron, manganese, zinc, and copper, respectively. The results showed that the average yield across all fields was 58.5 tons per hectare, and the median yield of 70.9 tons per hectare was used as the threshold to distinguish between fields with favorable and unfavorable nutritional status. Based on the mean CND indices, 54.27% of the fields in this province were in a balanced nutritional state, while 45.43% were imbalanced. The most limiting macronutrients in low-yield farms were phosphorus (49%) and potassium (44%), while for micronutrients, the main limitations were copper (29%) and manganese (22%).
 
Conclusion
An assessment of the nutritional status of sugar beet fields in Khorasan Razavi province reveals significant challenges in nutrient balance. Widespread imbalances, particularly in phosphorus, potassium, and copper, along with soil salinity and alkalinity, highlight the need for a revision in fertilization programs. The CND results emphasize that over 45% of fields require adjustments in fertilizer application patterns to prevent the adverse effects of excesses and critical deficiencies. Additionally, the high yield of some fields (20 farms with an average of 70.9 tons per hectare) proves that achieving nutritional balance not only improves productivity but also reduces financial resource wastage and environmental pollution. The CND method, as a precise tool, enables the detection of nutritional imbalances even in cases where soil nutrient concentrations appear optimal. Therefore, it is recommended that management programs based on soil testing and modern diagnostic methods like CND, along with consideration of local conditions (salinity and lime content), be implemented to ensure sustainable sugar beet production in the region.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND)
Sugar beet
Tissue analysis

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Aitchison, J. (1986). Statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  2. Babazadeh Jafari, S.B., Davatgar, N., Feizian, M., & Shakouri, M. (2024). Determining limitation of nutrients for rice using the compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) method. Journal of Soil and Plant Science, 34(4), 53–73. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/sps.2024.19183
  3. Basirat, M., Haghighatnia, H., & Mousavi, S.M. (2018). Evaluation and determination the nutritional status of Valencia orange orchards in south of Fars Province. Water and Soil, 32(1), 143-154. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v32i1.67597
  4. Berger, K.C., & Truog, E. (1939). Boron determination in soils and plants. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition,11(10), 540-545. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50138a007
  5. Black, C.A., Evans, D.D., & Dinauer, R.C. (1965). Methods of soil analysis (Vol. 9, pp. 653-708). American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.1
  6. Bouyoucos, G.J. (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils 1. Agronomy Journal, 54(5), 464-465. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
  7. Buresh, R.J., Austin, E.R., & Craswell, E.T. (1982). Analytical methods in N-15 research. Fertilizer Research, 3(1), 37-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01063408
  8. Daryashenas, A.M., & Thaqafi, K. (2011). Compositional nutrient diagnosis in sugar beet. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 25(1), 1-12. (In Persian with English abstract). https://www.magiran.com/p891678
  9. Daryashenas, A., Saghafi, K., & Davoodi, M.H. (2020). Diagnosis of macro and micro nutrients balance in sugar beet using ahalanobis distance, aitchison distance, and pan balance. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 34(2), 247-263. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/ijsr.2020.122634
  10. Fox, R.L., Alson, R.A., & Rhoades, H.F. (1964). Evaluating the sulfur status of soils by plants and soil tests. Soil Science Society of America Journal Proceedings, 21(3), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1964. 03615995002800020034x
  11. García-Hernández, J.L., Valdez-Cepeda, R.D., & Murillo-Amador, B. (2006). Preliminary compositional nutrient diagnosis norms in Aloe vera grown on calcareous soil in an arid environment. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 58(1-3), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.09.001
  12. Ghaderi, J., Akhyani, A., & Khalkhal, K. (2025). Nutritional status analysis of sugar beet in Shahroud county using the compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) method. Iranian Journal of Soil Research38(4), 315-330. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/IJSR.2025.367639.765
  13. Ghaderi, J., Tehrani, M.M., Hamedi, F., & Heydari, K. (2023). Evaluation of nutritional balance in sugar beet fields through deviation from optimum percentage (DOP) and compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) methods. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 37(2), 95-115. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/ 10.22092/IJSR.2023.359848.678
  14. Hanway, J.J., & Heidel, H. (1952). Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College soil testing laboratory. Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station, 57, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.31274/agronomy-20210302-001
  15. Jones, J. (2001). Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1201/9781420025293
  16. Khiari, L., Parent, L.E., & Tremblay, N. (2001b). The phosphorus compositional nutrient diagnosis range for potato. Agronomy Journal, 93, 815-819. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.935815x
  17. Khiari, L., Parent, L.E., & Tremblay, N. (2001c). Selecting the high-yield subpopulation for diagnosing nutrient imbalance in crops. Agronomy Journal, 93, 802-808. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0172
  18. Khiari, L., Parent., L.E., & Tremblay, N. (2001a). Critical compositional nutrient indexes for sweet corn at early growth stage. Agronomy Journal, 93, 809-814. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.935809x
  19. Knudsen, D., Peterson, G.A., & Pratt P.F. (1982). Lithium, sodium, and potassium. Pp. 225-246. In Page A.L., R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney (eds). Method of Soil Analysis. Part2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Soil Science Society of America. Book Ser. 5. Madison, WI, USA. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2. 2ed.c13
  20. Lindsay, W.L., & Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42(4), 421-428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.0361599500 4200030009x
  21. Malakooti, M.J., & Ghaibi, M.N. (1997). Determining the critical limit of nutrients for strategic crops and correct fertilizer recommendations in the country. Agricultural Education Publication. 11, 56. (In Persian)
  22. McLean, E.O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, & D. R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 199-224). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c12
  23. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S., & Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
  24. Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., & Keeney, D.R. (1982). Chemical and microbiological properties. In Methods of soil analysis, part 2, no. 9 (2nd ed., pp. 443-444). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c12
  25. Parent, L.-E., & Dafir, M. (1992). A theoretical concept of Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis. Journal of The American Society for Horticultural Science, 117(2), 239-242. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.117.2. 239
  26. Parent, L.E., Cambouris, A.N., & Muhawenimana, A. (1994). Multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in potato crops. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58, 1432-1438. https://doi.org/10.2136/ sssaj1994.03615995005800050022x
  27. Pernet, D., & Tremilli, D. (2001). Modeling sugar beet yield and its components. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sugar Beet Research (pp. 123-130).
  28. Ross, S.M. (1987). Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  29. Ryan, J.R., Stefan, G., & Rashid, A. (2001). Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual (2nd ed.). ICARDA.
  30. Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture. (2022). Center for Statistics, Information Technology and Communications, Deputy of Economic Planning, Ministry of Agriculture-Jihad. (In Persian)
  31. Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture. (2023). Center for Statistics, Information Technology and Communications, Deputy of Economic Planning, Ministry of Agriculture-Jihad. (In Persian)
  32. Walkley, A., & Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

 

ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.
دوره 39، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 102
مهر و آبان 1404
صفحه 360-349

  • تاریخ دریافت 06 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 26 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 30 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 05 مهر 1404