دوماهنامه

مطالعه غلظت‌ استات آمونیوم بر پتاسیم عصاره‌گیری شده در تعدادی از خاک‌های آهکی

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهرکرد، شهرکرد، ایران

2 گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

چکیده
یکی از رایج‌ترین عصاره‌گیرها در تعیین پتاسیم قابل استفاده خاک‌های آهکی، استات آمونیوم یک مولار است که به‌طور گسترده در آزمایشگاه‌های خاک مورد استفاده قرار می‌گیرد. هدف این پژوهش، تأثیر غلظت‌های مختلف استات آمونیوم بر مقدار پتاسیم استخراج‌شده بود. تعداد 30 نمونه خاک از خاک‌های کشاورزی (30-0 سانتیمتر) دشت شهرکرد انتخاب شد. پتاسیم قابل استفاده خاک‌ها با استفاده از عصاره‌گیر استات آمونیوم با غلظت‌های 1/0، 25/0، 5/0 و 1 مولار استخراج شد. آزمایش گلخانه‌ای به صورت فاکتوریل و در قالب طرح کاملا تصادفی با دو فاکتور (نوع خاک و مقدار کود پتاسیم)، در 3 تکرار انجام شد. پس از اتمام دوره رویشی، بخش هوایی ذرت برداشت و شاخص‌های گیاهی تعیین شد. نتایج نشان داد که غلظت‌های مختلف استات آمونیوم مقادیر مشابهی پتاسیم استخراج کردند و کاهش غلظت استات آمونیوم تأثیری بر مقدار پتاسیم قابل استفاده نداشت. دامنه تغییرات پتاسیم قابل استفاده در عصاره‌گیر استات آمونیوم با غلظت‌های 1، 5/0، 25/0 و 1/0 مولار به‌ترتیب؛ 581-157، 598- 155، 596- 160 و 590- 168 میلی‌گرم بر کیلوگرم بود. همچنین، نتایج نشان داد که اختلاف بین میانگین پتاسیم استخراج‌شده در غلظت‌های مختلف استات آمونیوم از نظر آماری معنی‌دار نبود. نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد که اثرات خاک و کود پتاسیم در سطح یک درصد اثر معنی‌داری بر وزن خشک، غلظت و جذب پتاسیم گیاه ذرت داشت. علاوه بر این، همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌داری (r = 0.99)، بین مقادیر پتاسیم استخراج‌شده با استفاده از غلظت‌های مختلف استات آمونیوم مشاهده شد. عصاره‌گیر استات آمونیوم با غلظت‌های 1/0، 25/0، 5/0 و 1 مولار، همبستگی معنی‌داری با شاخص عملکرد نسبی و پاسخ گیاه، داشت. نتایج نشان داد که حد بحرانی پتاسیم به روش تصویری کیت-نلسون به‌ترتیب 250، 255، 250 و 250 میلی‌گرم بر کیلوگرم برای غلظت‌های 1/0، 25/0، 5/0 و 1 مولار عصاره‌گیر استات آمونیوم بودند. نتایج نشان داد که کاهش غلظت استات آمونیوم بر میزان پتاسیم استخراج‌شده و تعیین حد بحرانی تأثیری ندارد. لذا توصیه می‌شود جهت عصاره‌گیری پتاسیم قابل استفاده، استات آمونیوم 1/0 مولار استفاده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Study of the Effect of Ammonium Acetate Concentration on Extracted Potassium in Some Calcareous Soils

نویسندگان English

M. Barati 1
A.R. Hosseinpur 1
M.H. Salehi 1
A. Jafari 2
1 Department of Soil Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Potassium is one of the macronutrients essential for plant growth and plays significant physiological and biochemical roles in plant yield. There are four forms of potassium in the soil, listed in order of their availability for plant uptake: soluble potassium, exchangeable potassium, non-exchangeable potassium, and structural potassium. Determining the concentration of available potassium using an efficient extractant that is applicable to different soil types is essential for soil and crop management, such as fertilizer recommendations. One of the most common extractants for available potassium is 1N ammonium acetate (NH4OAc). This extractant is widely used in many soil science studies and fertilizer recommendations due to its ability to extract exchangeable potassium and a portion of non-exchangeable potassium  However, this method may not have sufficient accuracy to measure the potassium readily available for plant uptake. In soils with high amounts of potassium-containing minerals, due to the presence of specific adsorption sites, a large portion of potassium is held strongly at these sites and can be partially extracted during NH4OAc extraction. This issue could be one reason for the weak correlation between NH4OAc-extracted potassium and plant response to potassium fertilizer in such soils. The critical level of available potassium is the threshold below which plant growth is limited. Since the amount of potassium extracted depends on the concentration of the extractant, evaluating the effect of different NH4OAc concentrations on the determining the critical level is important. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of various NH4OAc concentrations on the extraction of available potassium and to determine the critical potassium level in the calcareous soils of Shahrekord Plain.
 
Material and Methods
In order to evaluate different concentrations of NH4OAc of the calcareous soils of the Shahrekord plain, 30 agricultural soil samples were collected from a depth of 0–30 cm. Four different concentrations of NH4OAc including 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 molar were evaluated for extracting available potassium. The greenhouse experiment was carried out as a factorial experiment in a completely randomized design with two factors (soil type and potash fertilizer rate) and three replications. The potash fertilizer (potassium sulfate) was applied at two levels of potassium: 0 and 100 mg K kg⁻¹. At the end of the vegetative period, corn plants were harvested, and plant indices including dry matter weight, potassium concentration, potassium uptake, relative yield, and plant response were determined. To assess the significance of treatment effects in terms of plant indicators, factorial analysis of variance was performed. Then, the correlation between plant indices and potassium extracted using different concentrations of NH4OAc was calculated, and based on the results, the most suitable concentration for extracting available potassium by NH4OAc was determined. The potassium critical level was determined using the Cate-Nelson graphical method for NH4OAc extractants with concentrations of 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 molar.
 
Results and Discussion
The results showed the range of available potassium extracted using NH4OAc extractants at concentrations of 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 molar was 157–581, 155–598, 160–596, and 168–590 mg kg⁻¹, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that the differences among the mean values of potassium extracted at different concentrations of ammonium acetate were not statistically significant. The results of the analysis of variance showed that the main effects of soil type and potassium fertilizer were significant (p<0.01) for dry matter weight, potassium concentration and uptake. However, the interaction between soil and fertilizer was not significant for dry matter weight. Based on the strong correlation between potassium extracted by NH4OAc at concentrations of 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 molar and the relative yield and plant response indices, these concentrations can be considered suitable for use in these soils. By using the Cate-Nelson graphical method, the potassium critical level with concentrations of 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 molar was 250, 250, 255, and 250 mg kg-1 respectively.
 
Conclusion
The results showed that reducing the concentration of ammonium acetate does not affect the efficiency of this extractant. The results showed that the amounts of available potassium extracted with NH4OAc at different concentrations were close to each other, with less than one percent difference. Commonly, NH4OAc 1 M is used for extracting available potassium; however, our results show that lower concentrations of NH4OAc (0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 M) can be effectively used as a substitute to the 1 M solution. Therefore, it is recommended to use 0.1 molar ammonium acetate for the extraction of available potassium. This substitution could result in a considerable reduction in chemical consumption.
 
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Soil Science Department of the University of Shahrekord for providing 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ammonium acetate
Available potassium
Concentration
Corn

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Amorim, M.B., Rogeri, D.A., & Gianello, C. (2021). Potassium available to corn plants extracted by ammonium acetate, ammonium chloride, Mehlich-1 and Mehlich-3 solutions in southern Brazilian soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 52(15), 1790-1797. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2021.1892736
  2. Ahrari, M., Owliaie, H.R., Adhami, E., & Ghiri, M.N. (2017). Study of potassium status and evaluating chemical extractants for estimating available K in some soils of olive orchards of Fars province. Journal of Water and Soil, 31(3), 835-845. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v31i3.54445
  3. Bray, R.H. (1958). The correlation of a phosphorus soil test with the response of wheat through a modified Mitscherlich equation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 22(4), 314-317. https://doi.org/10.2136/ sssaj03615995002200040013x
  4. Black, C.A. (2013). Soil fertility evaluation and control. CRC Press.
  5. Bazargan, K., Marzi, M., Hasheminasab, K.S., Shahbazi, K., & Zare, A.A. (2022). Optimizing ammonium acetate procedure for determining available potassium in Iranian calcareous soils, testing the concentration and contact time. Dryland Soil Research (DLSR), 1(1), 125-136.
  6. Barooni, F., Owliaie, H., Adhami, E., & Najafi Ghiri, M. (2017). Comparison of some extractants for extracting available potassium for rice in some soils of Kohgiluyeh Province. Applied Soil Research, 5(1), 13-24. (In Persian with English abstract)
  7. Cate, R.B., & Nelson, L.A. (1965). A rapid method for correlation of soil test analyses with plant response data. NC State University Agricultural Experiment Station. https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:000226900
  8. Cate Jr, R.B., & Nelson, L.A. (1971). A simple statistical procedure for partitioning soil test correlation data into two classes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 35(4), 658-660. https://doi.org/10.2136/ sssaj1971.03615995003500040048x
  9. Dordipoor, A., & Farshadyrad, A. (2009). Determination of critical level of potassium for wheat and its response to potassium sulfate in some loess soils of Golestan Province. 11th Congress of Soil Science of Iran, Gorgan, Iran. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/291759
  10. Gee, G.W., & Bauder, J.W. (1986). Particle‐size analysis. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods, 5, 383-411.
  11. Ferrando, M.G., Barbazán, M.M., García, F.O., & Mallarino, A.P. (2020). Comparison of the ammonium acetate, Mehlich 3, and sodium tetraphenylboron as extractants to evaluate crop available potassium. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51(8), 997-1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1744625
  12. Fathi, S., Samadi, A., Davari, M., & Asadi Kapourchal, S. (2014). Evaluating different extractants for determining corn available potassium in some calcareous soils of Kurdistan province. Cereal Research, 4(3), 253-266. (In Persian with English abstract). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22520163.1393.4.3.6.4
  13. Havlin, J.L., & Soltanpour, P.N. (1982). Greenhouse and field evaluation of the NH4HCO3‐DTPA soil test for Fe. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 5(4-7), 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168209363007
  14. Havlin, J.L., Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W.L., & Beaton, J.D. (2016). Soil fertility and fertilizers. Pearson Education India.
  15. Hosseinpur, A.R., & Samavati, M. (2008). Evaluation of chemical extractants for the determination of available potassium. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 39(9-10), 1559-1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103 620802006693
  16. Haby, V.A., Russelle, M.P., & Skogley, E.O. (1990). Testing soil for potassium, calcium, and magnesium. In R. L. Westerman (Ed.), Soil Testing and Plant Analysis (3rd ed., pp. 181–227). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser3.3ed.c8
  17. Knudsen, D., Peterson, G.A., & Pratt, P.F. (1982). Lithium, Sodium and Potassium. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. (2nd ed.). American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 225-246.
  18. Khodshenas, M.A., Ghadbeyklou, J., & Dadivar, M. (2021). Evaluation of chemical extractants and determination of the potassium critical level in soils under the bean cultivation. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 34(4), 451-463. (In Persian with English abstract). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22287124.1399.34.4.3.2
  19. Lalitha, M., & Dhakshinamoorthy, M. (2014). Forms of soil potassium-a review. Agricultural Reviews, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0976-0741.35.1.008
  20. Loeppert, R.H., & Suarez, D.L. (1996). Carbonate and gypsum. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 chemical methods, 5, 437-474.
  21. Meena, R.K., Amrutsagar, V.M., Verma, M.K., Seth, V., Meena, R., Kumar, M., & Jat, L.K. (2015). Critical limits of potassium in soil and plant for increased productivity of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 2015, 116.
  22. Muneshwar Singh, R.H., Wanjari, B.L., Abhay Shirale, L., Kumar, U., & Jamra, S.H. (2019). Response of crops to applied potassium and estimation of critical limits in vertisols. Indian Journal of Fertilisers, 15(7), 748-753.
  23. Nelson, D.W., & Sommers, L.E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5, 961-1010.
  24. Nazari, T., Suseraei, N., Barani Motlagh, M., & Dordipour, A. (2021). Determination of potassium critical level using Cate-Nelson method in quinoa plant. The 3rd International Conference on Agricultural Engineering, Agronomy and Plant Breeding Studies, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/1402210
  25. Rhoades, J.D. (1996). Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods, 5, 417-435.
  26. Sumner, M.E., & Miller, W.P. (1996). Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods5, 1201-1229.
  27. Shokri Vahed, H.S. (2018). Evaluation of various concentrations of ammonium acetate in potassium extraction and its critical levels determination in some of paddy soils. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 7(1), 6-11.
  28. Sandana, P., Orena, S., Rojas, J.S., Kalazich, J., & Uribe, M. (2020). Critical value of soil potassium for potato crops in volcanic soils. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 20(3), 1171-1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00202-4
  29. Thomas, G.W. (1982). Exchangeable cations. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 9, 159-165.
  30. Waling, I., Van Vark, W., Houba, V.J.G., & Van der Lee, J.J. (1989). Soil and plant analysis, a series of syllabi: Part 7. Plant Analysis ProceduresWageningen Agriculture University.
  31. Zarrabi, M., & Jalali, M. (2008). Evaluation of extractants and quantity–intensity relationship for estimation of available potassium in some calcareous soils of western Iran. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 39(17-18), 2663-2677. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620802358797

 

ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 31 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 12 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 21 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 21 آبان 1404