دوماهنامه

پهنه‌بندی اگروکلیمایی ایران بر اساس تاریخ کاشت و طول دوره رشد محصول جو (Hordeum vulgare L.) با استفاده از روش‌های پیشرفته تحلیل فضایی

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی آبیاری و آبادانی، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

2 بخش تحقیقات شناسایی خاک و ارزیابی اراضی، مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، سازمان تحقیقات آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

چکیده
کاهش منابع آب، تغییرات شدید اقلیمی و نیاز به بهره‌وری آب بالاتر، اهمیت ارزیابی قابلیت‌های اگروکلیمایی در کشاورزی ایران را افزایش می‌دهد. این پژوهش با تحلیل داده‌های ۷۹۰ ایستگاه، مناطق اگروکلیمایی جو را بر اساس تاریخ کاشت و طول دوره رشد با استفاده از کریجینگ بیزین تجربی با پیش‌بینی رگرسیون و الگوریتم K-Means شناسایی کرد. در این مطالعه، داده‌های اقلیمی و فنولوژیک ۱۷ ساله (۱۳۸۵ تا ۱۴۰۲) برای اطمینان از نمایندگی تغییرات اقلیمی اخیر استفاده شد. تعداد خوشه‌های بهینه تعیین شده با روش آرنج به این صورت بود که سه کلاس برای تاریخ کاشت و چهار کلاس برای طول دوره رشد استخراج گردید. برای ساده‌سازی، هر منطقه زراعی با کدی ترکیبی از کلاس تاریخ کاشت و طول دوره رشد مشخص شده است (مثلاً کد ۲۱ نشان­دهنده کلاس دوم تاریخ کاشت و کلاس اول طول دوره رشد است) و این کدگذاری صرفاً برای دسته‌بندی و مقایسه مناطق است. ترکیب این دو منجر به تولید ۱۲ کلاس نهایی همگن زراعی برای محصول جو شد. نتایج نشان داد که توزیع زمان کاشت و طول دوره رشد، تابع مستقیم گرادیان اقلیمی-ارتفاعی ایران است. نواحی مرطوب خزری و غرب کشور در کلاس‌های 13 (کاشت زودهنگام-دوره رشد طولانی)، 14 (کاشت زودهنگام-دوره رشد بسیار طولانی)، 23 (کاشت میان‌رس-دوره رشد طولانی)، 24 (کاشت میان‌رس-دوره رشد بسیار طولانی) قرار گرفته که دارای کاشت زودهنگام و فصل رشدی طولانی هستند. مناطق خشک و نیمه‌خشک مرکزی، شرقی و جنوب‌شرقی عمدتاً در کلاس‌های ۳۱ تا ۳۳ قرار دارند که کاشت دیرهنگام و دوره رشد کوتاه را نشان می‌دهد. مناسب‌ترین مناطق برای کشت جو در کلاس‌های ۱۱، ۱۲، ۱۳ و ۲۲ با رطوبت و دمای متعادل و فصل رشد پایدار هستند، در حالی‌که کلاس‌های ۳۳ و ۳۴ بیشترین محدودیت اقلیمی و ریسک را دارند. این نتایج می‌تواند سیاست‌گذاران را در شناسایی مناطق کم‌بازده راهنمایی کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Agroclimatic Zoning of Iran Based on Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Planting Date and Length of Growing Period Using Advanced Spatial Analysis Methods

نویسندگان English

Kh. Ahmadaali 1
M. Kazempour 1
E. Fazli 2
A. Liaghat 1
I. Hajirad 1
1 Department of Irrigation and Reclamation Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
2 Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Increasing pressure on limited water resources, pronounced climatic variability, and the growing demand for agricultural production have made accurate agroclimatic assessment an essential component of sustainable agriculture in Iran. Identifying homogeneous agroclimatic zones enables more efficient resource management, optimized cropping calendars, and reduced production risk under variable environmental conditions. Agro-ecological zoning (AEZ) provides a scientific framework to integrate climatic, topographic, and crop phenological factors in order to delineate areas with similar production potential. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), as one of Iran’s major cereal crops, plays a vital role in food security, livestock feed supply, and agricultural livelihoods. Barley yield and stability are highly sensitive to planting date and length of the growing period, both of which are directly influenced by climatic gradients, elevation, and rainfall patterns. Despite the importance of these parameters, national-scale agroclimatic zoning of barley based explicitly on planting date and growing period has received limited attention. Therefore, this study aimed to delineate agroclimatic zones for barley cultivation across Iran using advanced spatial interpolation and clustering techniques, providing a decision-support tool for sustainable crop planning.
 
Materials and Methods
This study adopted a spatial–analytical approach at the national scale of Iran. Point-based data on barley planting date and length of the growing period were obtained from the national Water Requirement System and related agroclimatic databases, covering approximately 790 stations distributed across the country. These data represent long-term average conditions relevant to barley phenology. To transform discrete point data into continuous spatial surfaces, the Empirical Bayesian Kriging Regression Prediction (EBK-RP) method was employed. This geostatistical technique combines regression modeling with Empirical Bayesian Kriging, allowing automatic estimation of semivariogram parameters and improved uncertainty handling, particularly in regions with sparse observations. Elevation derived from a digital elevation model (DEM) was incorporated as a covariate to enhance spatial prediction accuracy. The resulting raster layers for planting date and growing period length were then classified using the K-means clustering algorithm, a widely used unsupervised machine learning technique. The optimal number of clusters for each variable was determined using the elbow method based on within-cluster sum of squares (WCSS). Three clusters were identified for planting date and four clusters for growing period length. Finally, the classified layers were overlaid and combined to generate homogeneous agroclimatic zones for barley cultivation. To improve spatial coherence and reduce classification noise, focal statistics with a majority filter were applied.
 
Results and Discussion
The spatial distribution of barley planting dates and growing period lengths exhibited strong correspondence with Iran’s climatic and altitudinal gradients. Early planting dates were predominantly observed in the humid Caspian coastal region and parts of western and northwestern Iran, where higher precipitation, moderate temperatures, and lower frost risk prevail. In contrast, delayed planting was common in the arid and semi-arid central, eastern, and southeastern regions, reflecting dependence on late and irregular rainfall events. The length of the growing period showed an inverse relationship with temperature and aridity. Longer growing seasons (approximately 230–300 days) were identified in high-altitude and humid regions such as the Caspian lowlands, Alborz and Zagros mountain ranges, and western provinces. Shorter growing periods (around 120–170 days) characterized the hot, dry southern and eastern regions, where high temperatures and moisture stress accelerate crop development and shorten phenological stages. The integration of planting date and growing period classes resulted in twelve agroclimatic zones for barley cultivation. Among these, zones characterized by early to intermediate planting and moderate to long growing periods demonstrated the highest suitability for barley production. These zones are mainly located in northern, western, and parts of northwestern Iran, where climatic conditions provide more stable growth environments. Conversely, zones with late planting and short growing periods, largely distributed across central, eastern, and southeastern Iran, were identified as high-risk areas with significant climatic limitations for barley cultivation. These findings highlight the dominant role of climate, elevation, and moisture availability in shaping barley phenology and production potential. The spatial patterns observed are consistent with previous agro-ecological zoning studies in Iran and other semi-arid regions, reinforcing the reliability of the applied methodology.
 
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that integrating advanced geostatistical modeling (EBK Regression Prediction) with unsupervised clustering (K-means and elbow method) provides a robust framework for national-scale agroclimatic zoning of barley. The results clearly indicate that barley planting date and length of the growing period in Iran are strongly controlled by climatic–altitudinal gradients. Only a limited portion of the country—primarily humid and semi-humid northern and western regions—offers high and stable potential for sustainable barley production, while large arid and semi-arid areas face substantial climatic constraints. The derived agroclimatic zones can serve as a strategic decision-support tool for policymakers, planners, and extension services. They facilitate optimized cropping calendars, targeted selection of barley cultivars, improved water resource management, and risk reduction under climate variability. Ultimately, applying such zoning-based approaches can enhance productivity, promote sustainable land use, and support long-term food security in Iran.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Agro-ecological zones
Barley
Elbow method
Empirical Bayesian Kriging
K-Means
Regression prediction

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Ahmadaali, K., Eskandari Damaneh, H., Ababaei, B., & Eskandari Damaneh, H. (2021). Impacts of droughts on rainfall use efficiency in different climatic zones and land uses in Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06389-1
  2. Ahmadaali, K., Liaghat, A.M., Heydari, N., & Haddad, O.B. (2013). Application of artificial neural network and adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system techniques in estimating of virtual water. International Journal of Computer Applications, 76(6). https://doi.org/5120/13250-0715
  3. Aktaş, B., & Gökdere, H.İ. (2025). Evaluation of grain yield, and quality characteristics of some bread wheat cultivars in different agro-ecological regions of Türkiye. Heliyon, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon. 2024.e41547
  4. Asante, B.O., Temoso, O., Addai, K.N., & Villano, R.A. (2019). Evaluating productivity gaps in maize production across different agroecological zones in Ghana. Agricultural Systems, 176, 102650. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.agsy.2019.102650
  5. Bagheri, A. (2025). Effects of climate change on barley yield in Isfahan Province. Spatial Planning, 15(4), 69-90. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2025.145531.1852
  6. Bhagat, M.A., Kaur, N., & Kaur, S. (2023). Effect of sowing dates on the phenology, grain yield and stress tolerance indices of barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes under subtropical conditions of Punjab. Journal of Agrometeorology, 25(1), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i1.1841
  7. Caldiz, D.O., Haverkort, A.J., & Struik, P.C. (2002). Analysis of a complex crop production system in interdependent agro-ecological zones: a methodological approach for potatoes in Argentina. Agricultural Systems, 73(3), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00085-3
  8. Dadrasi, A., Chaichi, M., Nehbandani, A., Soltani, E., Nemati, A., Salmani, F., ... & Yousefi, A.R. (2023). Global insight into understanding wheat yield and production through Agro-Ecological Zoning. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15898. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43191-x
  9. Ebrahimi-Pak, N., Tafteh, A., Hosseini, N., & Keykhaii, F. (2022). Water requirement system (Samaneh Niyaz Ab). Soil and Water Research Institute. http://niwr.ir (In Persian)
  10. Fischer, G., Shah, M., van Velthuizen, H., & Nachtergaele, F. (2006). Agro-ecological zones assessments. Oxford: Eolss Publishers.
  11. Hajirad, I., Ahmadaali, K., & Liaghat, A. (2025). Crop yield and water productivity modeling using nonlinear growth functions. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 30087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16096-0
  12. Hajirad, I., Mirlatifi, S.M., Dehghanisanij, H., & Mohammadi, S. (2021). Determining yield response factor (ky) of silage maize under different irrigation levels of pulsed and continuous irrigation management. Central Asian Journal of Plant Science Innovation, 1(4), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00880-9
  13. Hatfield, J.L., & Prueger, J.H. (2015). Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather and climate extremes, 10(Part A), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
  14. Ikotun, A.M., Ezugwu, A.E., Abualigah, L., Abuhaija, B., & Heming, J. (2023). K-means clustering algorithms: A comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the era of big data. Information Sciences, 622, 178-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.139
  15. Kodinariya, T.M., & Makwana, P.R. (2013). Review on determining number of Cluster in K-Means Clustering. International Journal, 1(6), 90-95.
  16. Krivoruchko, K., & Gribov, A. (2019). Evaluation of empirical Bayesian kriging. Spatial Statistics, 32, 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2019.100368
  17. Neamatollahi, E., Bannayan, M., Jahansuz, M.R., Struik, P., & Farid, A. (2012). Agro-ecological zoning for wheat (Triticum aestivum), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and corn (Zea mays) on the Mashhad plain, Khorasan Razavi province. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 15(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejrs.2012.05.002
  18. Porter, J.R., & Semenov, M.A. (2005). Crop responses to climatic variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1463), 2021-2035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1752
  19. Rahimi, J., Ebrahimpour, M., & Khalili, A. (2013). Spatial changes of extended De Martonne climatic zones affected by climate change in Iran. Theoretical and applied climatology, 112(3), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0741-8
  20. Ramezani Etedali, H., Ahmadaali, K., Gorgin, F., & Ababaei, B. (2019). Optimization of the cropping pattern of main cereals and improving water productivity: application of the water footprint concept. Irrigation and Drainage, 68(4), 765-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2362
  21. Sivakumar, M.V.K., & Valentin, C. (1997). Agroecological zones and the assessment of crop production potential. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 352(1356), 907-916. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0070
  22. Taati, A., & Sarmadian, F. (2015). Evaluation of land suitability for rainfed barley and wheat in agrecological zones of Abyek area. Land Management Journal, 2(2), 123-136. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/ 10.22092/lmj.2015.101275
  23. Van Wart, J., van Bussel, L.G., Wolf, J., Licker, R., Grassini, P., Nelson, A., ... & Cassman, K.G. (2013). Use of agro-climatic zones to upscale simulated crop yield potential. Field Crops Research, 143, 44-55. https://doi.org/1016/j.fcr.2012.11.023
  24. Yu, H., Huang, M., Zhao, T., Wang, J., Li, Z., Chen, D., ... & Wang, X. (2022). Analysis of agricultural production potential and enhancement strategy in the Qaidam Basin based on the Agro-Ecological Zone method. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 908888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.908888

 

 

 

ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.
دوره 39، شماره 6 - شماره پیاپی 104
بهمن و اسفند 1404
صفحه 552-539

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 دی 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 04 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 25 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 25 اسفند 1404