دوماهنامه

بررسی تأثیر تنش کمبود رطوبت بر کارایی جذب و مصرف نور ارقام مختلف لوبیاقرمز (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) در یک اقلیم مدیترانه‌ای

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

چکیده
نور یکی از مؤلفه‌های مهم رشد در گیاه بوده و تولید ماده خشک تابعی از نور جذب شده و کارایی مصرف نور است. به‌منظور بررسی تأثیر تنش کمبود رطوبت بر کارایی جذب و مصرف نور سه رقم لوبیا قرمز آزمایشی به‌صورت اسپلیت پلات بر پایه طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه رازی طی سه سال (1400 تا 1402) اجرا شدند. تیمارها شامل آبیاری به‌عنوان عامل اصلی (۱۰۰، 80 و 60 درصد نیاز آبی) و ارقام لوبیا قرمز (افق، یاقوت و درخشان) به‌عنوان عامل فرعی بود. جهت اعمال تیمارهای آبیاری حجم آب مصرفی با استفاده از روش تشتک تبخیر محاسبه شد. مقادیر آب آبیاری در هر تیمار به‌ترتیب 68۰۰، ۵4۴۰ و ۴0۸۰ متر مکعب در هکتار برای سال ۱۴۰۱ و 72۰۰، ۵76۰ و ۴32۰ متر مکعب در هکتار برای سال 1402 تعیین شد. نتایج نشان داد محتوای حجمی رطوبت خاک در تیمارهای آبیاری و ارقام مورد بررسی تغییرات متفاوتی داشت. تنش شدید رطوبت باعث کاهش شاخص سطح برگ، وزن خشک کل و عملکرد دانه شد. بالاترین کارایی مصرف نور در مرحله رویشی و زایشی برای رقم‌ یاقوت در مقایسه با سایر ارقام به‌ترتیب به میزان 36/1، 54/0 گرم بر مگاژول بود. در سال 1401 در مقایسه با سال‌های دیگر به علت پائین­تر بودن میانگین دمای طول دوره رشد (27 درجه سانتی­گراد)، صفات اندازه­گیری شده مقادیر بالاتری داشتند. صرف‌نظر از سال، بالاترین عملکرد دانه (5/192 گرم در متر مربع) متعلق به رقم افق در شرایط آبیاری مطلوب و پائین­ترین عملکرد دانه (9/80 گرم در متر مربع) متعلق به رقم درخشان در شرایط تنش شدید رطوبت بود. بطورکلی رقم افق باتوجه‌به فرم بوته ایستاده و زودرسی علاوه بر صرفه‌جویی در مصرف آب، به‌دلیل عملکرد بالاتر، مناسب مناطقی است که با کمبود آب مواجه هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Studying the Effect of Moisture Deficit Stress on the Light Absorption and Use Efficiency of Different Red Bean Cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a Mediterranean Climate

نویسندگان English

F. Parsapour
F. Mondani
Gh. Mohammadi
Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
The common bean is an important legume cultivated by farmers in various regions using low-input practices. It originated in South and Central America and is now cultivated in all tropical and temperate regions worldwide. Asia accounts for 43% of global bean production, while the Americas (North, Central, and South America) account for 29%, and Africa for 26%. Bean seeds, containing approximately 22% protein, are a valuable alternative to animal protein sources. Iran is an arid and semi-arid country that faces the problem of resource shortages, especially water. Undoubtedly, modifying consumption patterns as well as optimizing the use of agricultural inputs will lead to increased food security.
 
Materials and Methods
The experiments were conducted at the research farm of the Campus of Agricultural and Natural Resources (34°, 19´ N, 47°, 50´ E and altitude 1320 m) of Razi University in the Kermanshah region, located in western Iran, over three years from 2021 to 2023. In terms of climatic divisions, this region is located in the temperate mountainous regions with a Mediterranean climate. The experiments were conducted in a split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments included irrigation water amount as the main factor (providing 100% of the water requirement, equivalent to 7300 m3 ha-1 (IR100%), providing 80% of the water requirement, equivalent to 5840 m3 ha-1 (IR80%), and providing 60% of the water requirement, equivalent to 4380 m3 ha-1 (IR60%) for 2021. Because the amount of water required by the plant is determined according to climatic factors, the amounts of irrigation water in each treatment were determined as 6800, 5440, and 4080 m3 ha-1 for 2022 and 7200, 5760, and 4320 m3 ha-1 for 2023, respectively. Three common red bean cultivars, including Ofogh, Yaghoot, and Derakhshan, were also considered as secondary factors. The soil water status, leaf area index (LAI), light absorption, total dry weight (TDW), light use efficiency (LUE), and grain yield (GY) were measured.
 
Results and Discussion
The soil volumetric water content fluctuated as a function of the amount of water entering the soil (irrigation) and the amount of water leaving the soil (evaporation from the soil surface and transpiration by the plant). Soil volumetric water content varied in different irrigation treatments. Regardless of the red bean cultivars, the highest and lowest soil water content were observed in the IR100% and IR60% treatments during 2021-2023, respectively. The volumetric soil water content also varied for the studied red bean cultivars during the experimental period. Regardless of irrigation treatments, the highest and lowest soil water content were observed for the Ofogh and Derakhshan cultivars, respectively. The Ofogh cultivar had a shorter growth period than the other cultivars, so it required less irrigation water. It seems that the Ofogh cultivar absorbed water from the soil more quickly in the early stages of growth, which led to a sharp decrease in soil moisture content. But at the end of the growing season, as the air gradually cooled, soil moisture content increased again due to a decrease in water absorption by the Ofogh cultivar. The Yaghoot cultivar required more irrigation water than the Ofogh cultivar due to its unlimited growth, and in the middle of its growth period, due to the greater development of leaves in the canopy, it absorbed more water from the soil, which led to a more severe decrease in soil moisture. The changes in soil water content for the Derakhshan cultivar were almost similar to the Yaghoot cultivar. Due to the longer growth period of Derakhshan cultivar compared to other cultivars, more irrigation water was absorbed by this cultivar, which led to a sharp decrease in soil volumetric water content at the end of the growth period. The results showed that soil moisture content varied significantly among irrigation treatments and cultivars. Severe water deficit stress reduced LAI, TDW, and GY. The highest LUE in the vegetative and reproductive stages for the Yaghoot cultivar compared to other cultivars were 1.36 and 0.54 g MJ-1, respectively. In 2022, the evaluated traits were higher than in 2021 and 2023, due to the lower average temperature (27°C) during the growing season. Regardless of year, the highest grain yield (192.5 g m-2) belonged to Ofogh cultivar under optimum irrigation conditions, and the lowest grain yield (80.9 g m-2) belonged to Derakhshan cultivar in severe water stress conditions.
 
Conclusion
The results of this study showed a positive effect of irrigation on the light absorption and LUE of common bean cultivars. Severe water stress reduced the ability of the crop to maintain leaf area during the growth period. Finally, the reduction in light absorption, LUE, and the length of the bean growth period due to drought stress led to lower TDW and GY.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Grain yield
Leaf area index
Soil volumetric moisture
Water deficit stress

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Ahmadi, M., Mondani, F., Khorramivafa, M., Mohammadi, G., & Shirkhani, A. (2018). Evaluation of Nitrogen uptake and productivity of maize cultivars (Zea mays) under Kermanshah climate conditions. Journal of Agroecology, 10(1), 234-247. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v10i1.56935
  2. Alamdari, E. (2018). The effect of deficit irrigation on yield and physiological traits of bean cultivars. Plant Production Technology, 18(1), 47-61. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22084/ 2018.9633.1537
  3. Alizadeh, A. (2013). The principles of applied hydrology. Imam-Reza University.
  4. Alizadeh, A., & Kamali, Gh. (2007a). Water requirements of plants. Astan Ouds Razavi Press. First edition. pp 228.
  5. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. pp 56.
  6. Androcioli, L.G., Zeffa, D.M., Alves, D.S., Tomaz, J.P., & Moda-Cirino, V. (2020). Effect of water deficit on morpho-agronomic and physiological traits of common bean genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance. Water, 12, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010217
  7. Arvin, P., Vafa bakhsh, J., & Mazaheri, D. (2018). Study of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and drought on physiological traits and ultimate yield of cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica L.). Journal of Agroecology, 9(4), 1208-1226. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V9I4.61808
  8. Bai, Z., Mao, S., Han, Y., Feng, L., Wang, G., & Yang, B. (2016). Study on light interception and biomass production of different cotton cultivars. Plos One. 11(5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156335
  9. Bayat, N., Ghanbari, A.A., & Bayramzade, V. (2020). Nanopriming a method for improving crop plants performance: a case study of red beans. Jornal of Plant Nutrition. 1(44), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2020.1806304
  10. Beheshti, A., Koochaki, A., & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2002). The effect of planting pattern on light interception and radiation use efficiency in canopy of three maize cultivars. Seed and Plant, 18(4), 417-431. (In Persian with English abstract). https://22092/spij.2017.110754
  11. Chieb, M., & Gachomo, E.W. (2023). The role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses. BMC Plant Biology, 23(1), 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8
  12. Cortes, A.J., Thiis, D., Chavarro, C., Madrinan, S., & Blair, M.W. (2012). Nucleotide diversity patterns at the drought-related DREB2 encoding genes in wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 125, 1069-1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1896-5
  13. Debaeke, P., & Abdellah, A. (2004). Adaptation of crop management to water limited environments. European Journal of Agronomy, 21(4), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.07.006
  14. Earl, H.J., & Davis, R.F. (2003). Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize. Agronomy Journal, 95, 688-696. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.6880
  15. Emam, Y., & Niknezhad, M. (2004). An introduction to crop physiology. Shiraz University Press.
  16. (2025). The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: The statistical database. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.faostat
  17. Ghanbari, A.A. (2022). Grain yield efficiency index, a criterion for selecting the best bean genotypes in drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 4, 63-71. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/IJFCS.2020.302878.654721
  18. Ghanepour, S., Shakiba, M.R., Tourchi, M., Ostan, Sh., & Ghanbari, A.A. (2012). Interaction of soil Zn and moisture supply on root growth, relative water content, and stomatal conductance of two common bean cultivars. 12th Iranian Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Plant Breeding.
  19. Goudriaan, J., & Van Laar, H.H. (1993). Modelling potential crop growth processes. Kluwer Academic Press.
  20. Hajishabani, H., Mondani, F., & Bagheri, A. (2020). Simulation effects of sowing date on growth and yield of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arientinum) by CROPGRO-CHICKPEA model. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 18, 197-212. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v18i2.82684
  21. Heidari, M., & Karami, V. (2014). Effects of different mycorrhiza species on grain yield, nutrient uptake and oil content of sunflower under water stress. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultura Sciences, 13(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2012.12.002
  22. Hillel, D. (2004). Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press.
  23. Hu, W.H., Yan, X.H., Xiao, Y.A., Zeng, J.J., Qi, H.J., & Ogweno, J.O. (2013). 24-Epibrossinosteriod alleviate drought-induced inhibition of photosynthesis in Capsicum annum. Scientia Horticulturae, 150, 232-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.11.012
  24. Kaboli, S., Hekmatzadeh, A.A., Darabi, H., & Torabi Haghighi, A. (2021). Variation in physical characteristics of rainfall in Iran, determined using daily rainfall concentration index and monthly rainfall percentage index. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 144, 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03553-9
  25. Karimzadeh, H.A., Nezami, A., Kafi, M., & Taddayon, M.R. (2017). Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of pinto bean genptypes in Shahrekord. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 8(1), 113-126. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/ijpr.v8i1.49118
  26. Kermanshah Meteorological Organization. (2025). kermanshahmet.ir
  27. Li, F.W., & Mathews, S. (2016). Evolutionary aspects of plant photoreceptors. Journal Plant Research, 129, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-016-0785-4
  28. Khadivar, J., Avarseji, Z., Alamdari, E.G., & Naeemi, M. (2025). Effect of planting dates and different weed management on yield and morphological traits of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Applied Research of Plant Ecophysiology, 9, 138-150. http://arpe.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-457-fa.html
  29. Li, R., Baum, M., Grando, M., & Ceccarelli, S. (2006). Evaluation of chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters as indicators of drought tolerance in barley. Agricultural Sciences in China, 5(10), 751-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1671-2927(06)60120-x
  30. Mahpara, S., Hussain, T., & Farooq, J. (2014). Drought tolerance studies in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova, 4(160), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1515/cerce-2015-0011
  31. Markazi Agricultural and Natural Resourcrs Reserch and Education Cernter. 2021. http://manrrc.ir
  32. Mondani,, Khani, K., Jalali Honarmand, S., & Saeidi, M. (2019). Evaluating effects of plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria on the radiation use efficiency and yield of soybean (Glycine max) under water deficit stress condition. Agricultural Water Management, 213, 707-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.11.004
  33. Monteith, J.L. (1994). Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 9, 747-766. https://doi.org/10.2307/2401901
  34. Mousavi, A., Ardalan, A., Takian, A., Ostadtaghizadeh, A., Naddafi, K., & Massah Bavani, A. (2020). Climate change and health in Iran: a narrative review. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 18, 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00462-3
  35. Mohammadi, M., Tavakoli, A., Pouryousef, M., & Mohseni Fard, E. (2018). The effect of epibrassinolide on growth and seed yield of bean under optimal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Crops Improvement, 20, 595-608. https://doi.org/10.1071/cp18424
  36. Nohong, B., & Nompo, S. (2015). Effect of water stress on growth, yield, proline and soluble sugars contents of Signal grass and Napier grass species. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 9(5), 14-21.
  37. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran (MJA). 2024. Agricultural Jihad Organization of Kermanshah Province. https://agrodl.ir/statistics/
  38. Pagter, M., Bragato, C., & Brix, H. (2005). Tolerance and physiological responses of fragmites australits to water deficit. Aquatic Botany, 81, 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2005.01.002
  39. Rashidi, Z., Bannayan Aval, M., Azizi, Kh., & Nasiri Mahallati, M. (2022). Effect of drought stress on yield and yield components and radiation use efficiency of three types of red, white and pinto beans. Journal of Plant Production Research, 29(3), 143-164. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-026-00423-0
  40. Seetseng, K.A. (2008). Effect of water application and plant density on canola (Brassica napus) in the free state. M.S. thesis, University of the Free State Bloemfontei. https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2023.v49.i2.3965
  41. Shibles, R.M., & Weber, C.R. (1995). Leaf area, solar radiation interception and dry matter production by soybeans. Crop Science, 5, 575-577. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1965.0011183X000500060027x
  42. Sun, R., Ma, J., Sun, X., Zheng, L., & Guo, J. (2023). Responses of the leaf water physiology and yield of grapevine via different irrigation strategies in extremely arid areas. Sustainability, 15(2887), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042887
  43. Tahmasebi, Z., & Mohammadi-Dehbalaee, H. (2019). Evaluation of black bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris) under drought stress conditions. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 12, 197-207. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2018.1223.1249
  44. Teran, H., & Singh, S.P. (2002). Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Science, 42(1), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.6400
  45. Tohidi, M., Nadery, A., Siadat, S., & Lak, S. (2012). Variables productivity of light interception in grain maize hybrids at various amount of nitrogen. World Appled Science Journal, 16(1), 86-93.
  46. Toscano, S., Ferrante, A., & Romano, D. (2019). Response of Mediterranean ornamental plants to drought stress. Horticulturae, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5010006
  47. Tsubo, M., Walker, S., & Mukhala, E. (2001). Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono/intercropping system with different row orientation. Field Crops Resarch, 71, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00142-3
  48. Uebersax, M.A., Cichy, K.A., Gomez, F.E., Porch, T.G., Heitholt, J., Osorno, J.M., Kamfwa, K., Snapp, S. S., & Bales, S. (2022). Dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) as a vital component of sustainable agriculture and food security—A review. Legume Science, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.155
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.
دوره 40، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 105
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1405
صفحه 37-19

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 فروردین 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 24 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 11 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 11 خرداد 1405