دوماهنامه

تحلیل ردپای انرژی در تولید برنج، ذرت علوفه‌ای و سیب‌زمینی (مطالعه موردی: سه شهرستان استان لرستان)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مهندسی آب، دانشگاه لرستان، لرستان، ایران

چکیده
افزایش جمعیت و تقاضا برای غذا تغییراتی را در عملیات‌های کشاورزی و بالا رفتن مصرف نهاده‌هایی چون سوخت، برق، کودهای شیمیایی و سموم به همراه داشته است. این پژوهش به تحلیل و مقایسه مصرف آب و انرژی در تولید برنج، ذرت علوفه‌ای و سیب‌زمینی در شهرستان‌های درود، کوهدشت و ازنا در استان لرستان در سال 1403 می‌پردازد. جامعه آماری شامل هزار کشاورز فعال در تولید این محصولات در شهرستان‌های مذکور بوده و حجم نمونه بر اساس فرمول کوکران (با سطح اطمینان 95 درصد و میزان خطای 7 درصد)، 188 نفر برآورد گردید. مقایسه مصرف انرژی ورودی در محصولات سیب‌زمینی، برنج و ذرت علوفه‌ای نتایج متفاوتی را نشان داد به‌طوری‌که، سیب‌زمینی با 123048 مگاژول بر هکتار، بیشترین و ذرت علوفه‌ای با 98644 مگاژول، کمترین میزان مصرف انرژی را دارند. همچنین، ذرت علوفه‌ای با 85/60 درصد بالاترین وابستگی نسبی به انرژی سوخت را دارد، در حالی‌که این نسبت برای برنج 50 درصد و سیب‌زمینی 17/58 درصد است. این یافته بر اهمیت تفکیک منابع انرژی برای درک بهتر الگوهای مصرف در محصولات مختلف تأکید دارد. مقایسه اجزای انرژی ورودی، حاکی از بالابودن سهم سوخت فسیلی در همه محصولات است؛ بیشترین درصد سوخت در ذرت علوفه‌ای (85/60 درصد) و بیشترین میزان عددی مربوط به سیب‌زمینی (09/715084 مگاژول در هکتار) است. پس از سوخت فسیلی، ماشین‌آلات کشاورزی با متوسط سهم 30 درصد و کودهای شیمیایی با میانگین 10 درصد در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار دارند. از نظر مصرف انرژی آب آبیاری، برنج (28/9 درصد) و ذرت علوفه‌ای (06/2 درصد) به‌ترتیب بیشترین و کمترین میزان را دارند. نتایج فوق تأکید می‌نماید که ارتقاء کارایی مصرف انرژی در بخش کشاورزی کشور نیازمند راهکارهایی از جمله استفاده از فناوری‌های نوین آبیاری، اصلاح شیوه‌های مصرف نهاده‌ها، آموزش بهره‌برداران و توسعه کشاورزی پایدار و دانش‌بنیان است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Energy Footprint Analysis in the Production of Rice, Forage Maize, and Potatoes (Case Study: Three Counties in Lorestan Province)

نویسندگان English

F. Azadpour
M. Shakarami
S.Y. Karimi
Department of Water Engineering, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
The agricultural sector’s strong dependence on water and energy resources for ensuring food security for the growing global population amplifies the necessity of enhancing water and energy efficiency in agricultural products, while simultaneously maintaining the health of society and the environment. Sustainable provision of water and energy is one of the main challenges to development in all countries. Since the agricultural sector is one of the largest consumers of water and energy, any disruption in their supply can significantly impact agricultural production levels. Increasing efficiency and optimizing energy consumption management are key strategies for mitigating the environmental effects caused by food production processes. This approach not only creates economic benefits but also plays a crucial role in achieving the long-term sustainability of production systems through the conservation of fossil resources and reduction of air pollution. Consequently, extensive research has been focused on energy management. On the other hand, unsustainable use of agricultural inputs such as chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and fossil fuels leads to serious consequences, including global warming, biodiversity loss, and degradation of soil and air quality. Therefore, sustainable management of these inputs is essential and inevitable for maintaining environmental balance and achieving sustainable development. Thus, the challenges of food security and the need for sustainability of energy resources in modern agriculture have heightened the importance of assessing energy consumption efficiency. Energy footprint analysis serves as an effective tool for identifying high-consumption areas and providing managerial and technological solutions to improve energy efficiency in agricultural production.
 
Materials and Methods
This research was conducted with the aim of examining the personal characteristics of farmers, analyzing energy consumption, and assessing energy indicators in the cultivation of three major crops: rice, forage corn, and potatoes, in the districts of Dorud, Kuhdasht, and Azna, respectively, in Lorestan Province. Data were collected through questionnaires and face-to-face interviews with farmers and analyzed using statistical methods. The input energy indicators included chemical fertilizers, fuel, irrigation water, seeds, and human labor. The main sections of the questionnaires included: (I) general information about the farmer and the farm, such as age, education, work experience, and land area; (II) information regarding the amount of input consumption, including human labor, machinery, chemical inputs, fuel, irrigation water, and seeds; and (III) information regarding crop yield. The statistical population consisted of one thousand active farmers involved in rice production (in Dorud), forage corn (in Kuhdasht), and potatoes (in Azna). To determine the sample size, the Cochran formula was used with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 7%. To calculate the energy equivalent of inputs and outputs, all production inputs and outputs were converted to energy equivalents in terms of megajoules per hectare (MJ/ha). In this research, indicators such as Energy Ratio, Net Energy Yield, Energy Efficiency, and Water Use Efficiency were employed.
 
Results and Discussion
The findings indicated that the majority of farmers were in the age range of 40-50 years, with primary or high school education, and had a minimum of five years of farming experience. Their predominant crop was forage corn. The findings indicated that the highest input energy consumption was observed for potatoes, with 123048 MJ ha⁻¹, of which fuel energy accounted for 58.17%. It was followed by rice with 121117.09 MJ ha⁻¹ (fuel energy share: 50%), and forage maize with 98644 MJ ha⁻¹, where 60.85% of the total energy input was derived from fuel consumption. After fossil fuels, agricultural machinery, with an average share of 30%, and chemical fertilizers, with an average of 10%, ranked nex. The energy share of irrigation water in rice was 11236.39 MJ ha⁻¹ (9.28%), which was significantly higher compared to the other two crops.
 
Conclusion
Overall, the results revealed that potato had the highest total input energy (123048 MJ ha⁻¹) and output energy (151200 MJ ha⁻¹), while forage maize had the lowest input energy (98644 MJ ha⁻¹).

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Energy consumption
Energy productivity
Irrigation water
Lorestan province
Nitrogen fertilizer

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

  1. Ararssa, A., Gebremariam, A., Mulat, W., & Mekonnen, M. (2019). Effects of irrigation management on yield and water productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare) in the upper Blue Nile basin: Case study in northern Gondar. Water Conservation Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00071-8
  2. Beheshti Tabar, I., Keyani, A., & Rafiee, S. (2010). Energy balance in Iran’s agronomy sector (1990–2006). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 849–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.024
  3. Bockari-Gevao, S.M., Ismail, W.I., Yahya, A., & Wan, C. (2005). Energy consumption in lowland rice-based cropping system of Malaysia. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 27(4), 819–826.
  4. Fabiani, S., Vanino, S., Napoli, R., & Nino, P. (2020). Water-energy-food nexus approach for sustainability assessment at farm level: An experience from an intensive agricultural area in central Italy. Environmental Science and Policy, 104, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.008
  5. Fan, X., Zhang, W., Chen, W., & Chen, B. (2020). Land–water–energy nexus in agricultural management for greenhouse gas mitigation. Applied Energy, 265, 114796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114796
  6. Faramzania, M., Akbari, M., & Heidari Sultanabadi, M. (2023). Water and energy productivity of onion crop in sprinkler and surface irrigation methods in some farms of Isfahan province. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 27(4), 131–142. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.47176/jwss.27.4.14833
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2019). Agroforestry. Available online: http://www.fao.org/forestry/ agroforestry/80338/en/
  8. Hasanzadeh, E., & Mazaheri, D. (1996). Assessment of energy balance in wheat, potato, and rice production in the Falavarjan region of Isfahan. In Proceedings of the Iranian Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jcpp.5.15.69
  9. Heidari Sultanabadi, M. (2022). Determination of energy production function in irrigated wheat of Isfahan province. Energy Engineering and Management, 11(1), 116–127. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22052/11.1.116
  10. Heidari, N. (2011). Determination and evaluation of water use efficiency index for agricultural crops under farmers' management in the country. Water and Irrigation Management Journal, 1(2), 43–57. (In Persian with English abstract)
  11. Jafari Telokolaei, M., Shahnazari, A., & Noori Khajeh Balagh, R. (2024). Analysis of physical water productivity and energy indices of major agricultural crops in the Tajan plain. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 38(1), 51–62. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/jwra.2023.363890.1016
  12. Jalili, Kh., Moradi, H., & Bozorg Haddad, O. (2016). Investigating the effects of climate change on groundwater resources of the Islam Abad plain and optimizing land allocation. Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 5(11), 117–131. (In Persian with English abstract)
  13. Jalilian, A., Jahansuz, M., Ghasemi Moteqadder, H., Arisi, S., & Moghaddam, M. (2023). Evaluation of energy indicators in sole, mixed, and agroforestry systems for okra production in Khuzestan province. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 16(7–2), 17–20. (In Persian with English abstract)
  14. Karamian, F., Mirakzadeh, A., & Azari, A. (2023). Analysis of water and energy consumption and environmental impacts of agricultural production in Miandarband plain of Kermanshah province. Journal of Agroecology, 14(4), 693–712.
  15. Kuchaki, A., & Hoseini, M. (1994). Energy efficiency in agricultural ecosystems. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Mashhad.
  16. Lampridi, M., Kateris, D., Sørensen, C., & Bochtis, D. (2020). Energy footprint of mechanized agricultural operations. Energies, 13(3), 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13030769
  17. Mansourian, N. (2005). Investigation of energy productivity in the agricultural sector of Iran (A case study of Khorasan province). Proceedings of the 5th Iranian Conference on Agricultural Economics, Zahedan. (In Persian). Available at: https://civilica.com/?doc=49811
  18. Maysami, M., & Jalali, A. (2020). Evaluation of energy input-output in wheat crop cultivation in agro-industry company of mazare novin Iranian (Agh Ghalla). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30(2), 333–346. (In Persian with English abstract)
  19. Mekonnen, M.M., & Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(5), 1577–1600. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011
  20. Michos, M., Menexes, G., Kalburtji, K., Tsatsarelis, C., Anagnostopoulos, C., & Mamolos, A. (2017). Could energy flow in agro-ecosystems be used as a “tool” for crop and farming system replacement? Ecological Indicators, 73, 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.050
  21. Michos, M., Menexes, G., Mamolos, A., Tsatsarelis, C., Anagnostopoulos, C., Tsaboula, A., & Kalburtji, K. (2018). Energy flow, carbon and water footprints in vineyards and orchards to determine environmentally favourable sites in accordance with Natura 2000 perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.251
  22. Mohammadi, A., & Omid, M. (2010). Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy, 87(1), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy. 07.021
  23. Mohammadi, A., Tabatabaeefar, A., Shahin, S., Rafiee, S., & Keyhani, A. (2008). Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(13), 3566–3570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.07.003
  24. Mohammadi, S., & Meysami, M.A. (2021). Energy consumption pattern in grain maize production in Iran. Proceedings of National Conference on Agricultural Energy. (In Persian with English abstract). https://civilica. com/doc/1585606
  25. Mousavi-Avval, S.H., & Rafiee, S.H. (2023). Energy efficiency trends in Iranian agriculture: A historical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135234
  26. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Abdi, R., & Rafiee, S. (2023). Climate change and energy use in agriculture: An integrated analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 859, 160252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160252
  27. Ozkan, B., Akcaoz, H., & Fert, C. (2004). Energy input–output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy, 29(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-1481(03)00135-6
  28. Pimentel, D., Berger, B., Filiberto, D., Newton, M., Wolfe, B., Karabinakis, E., ... & Nandagopal, S. (2004). Water resources: agricultural and environmental issues. BioScience, 54(10), 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1641/ 0006-3568(2004)054[0909:WRAAEI]2.0.CO;2
  29. Rajabi Hamedani, S., Shabani, Z., & Rafiee, S. (2011). Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in potato production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy, 36(11), 2367–2371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy. 01.013
  30. Roy, R.N., Finck, A., Blair, G.J., & Tandon, H.L.S. (2006). Plant nutrition for food security: A guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Bulletin, 16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479706394537
  31. Shahbazi, N., Majnoon Hosseini, N., Jahansuz, M.R., & Jalilian, A. (2025). Estimating effective inputs on energy and environmental indicators of grain corn and sweet corn production. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 35(1), 356. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059.ijfcs.2025.389066.655124
  32. Sheikhzindin, A., & Ghyasi, H. (2022). Assessment of water footprint and water use efficiency in rice production for sustainability. Journal of Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 33(2), 207–225. (In Persian with English abstract)
  33. Singh, G., Singh, S., & Singh, J. (2004). Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in Punjab. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(3), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-8904(03)00155-9
  34. Statistical Center of Iran. (2021). Statistical Yearbook of Lorestan Province. (In Persian). Available at: https://amar.org.ir
  35. Taghinazhad, J., Vahedi, A., & Ranjbar, F. (2019). Economic assessment of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from wheat production in Ardabil province. Environmental Sciences, 17(3), 137–150. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.29252/envs.17.3.137
  36. Taxidis, E., Menexes, G., Mamolos, A., Tsatsarelis, C., Anagnostopoulos, C., & Kalburtji, K. (2015). Comparing organic and conventional olive groves relative to energy use and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the cultivation of two varieties. Applied Energy, 149, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.128
  37. Yousefi, Z., Vahedi, A., & Askari Bezaye, F. (2021). Energy consumption analysis and environmental impacts of rice production in Guilan province using life cycle assessment. Agricultural Systems and Mechanization Research, 22(78), 55–72. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2020.343427.1359
  38. Zahedi, M., Eshghizadeh, H., & Mondani, F. (2015). Energy efficiency and productivity in potato and sugar beet production systems in Isfahan province. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 5(17), 181–191. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jcpp.5.17.181
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.
دوره 40، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 105
فروردین و اردیبهشت 1405
صفحه 17-1

  • تاریخ دریافت 23 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 16 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 19 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 19 خرداد 1405