فصلنامه

ارزیابی نقش باکتری‌های محرک رشد گیاه در بهبود محتوای عناصر غذایی و کاهش تجمع نیترات در اسفناج

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، خوزستان، ایران

چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف بررسی کارایی باکتری‌های محرک رشد گیاه در بهبود ویژگی‌های اسفناج، به‌صورت آزمایش فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در گلخانه انجام شد. تیمارها شامل دو سطح کود NPK (100 درصد مقدار توصیه‌شده و 7۰ درصد آن) و چهار سطح مایه‌زنی میکروبی (بدون باکتری، Pseudomonas putida، Phytobacter diazotrophicus و مخلوط دو باکتری) بودند. شاخص‌هایی مانند مقدار نیتروژن، فسفر، پتاسیم، آهن، کلروفیل کل، نیترات و فعالیت آنزیم نیترات رداکتاز اندازه‌گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد که اثر متقابل کود و مایه‌زنی بر تمامی صفات اندازه­گیری شده معنی‌دار بود. بیشترین وزن تر برگ در هر دو سطح 100 و 70 درصد مقدار توصیه شده کود، همراه با مایه­زنی مخلوط دو باکتری به‌دست آمد که به‌ترتیب 7/1 و 2/2 برابر بیشتر از تیمارهای متناظر بدون مایه­زنی باکتری بود. مصرف 100 درصد مقدار توصیه شده کود همراه با مایه­زنی مخلوط دو باکتری، در مقایسه با تیمار متناظر بدون مایه­زنی، موجب افزایش محتوای نیتروژن (۶2 درصد)، فسفر (۲۳ درصد)، پتاسیم (51 درصد) و آهن (32 درصد) برگ شد. پس از این تیمار، بیشترین مقادیر این عناصر در تیمار 70 درصد مقدار توصیه شده کود همراه با مخلوط دو باکتری مشاهده شد. مقدار کلروفیل کل با کاهش مصرف کود کاهش یافت، اما مایه‌زنی باکتری این کاهش را جبران کرد، به‌طوری­که در تیمارهای تلقیح شده با باکتری، تفاوت معنی‌داری با تیمار مصرف 100 درصد مقدار توصیه شده کود مشاهده نشد. بیشترین مقدار کلروفیل در تیمار 100 درصد مقدار توصیه‌شده کود همراه با مایه­زنی مخلوط دو باکتری بدست آمد که 34 درصد بیشتر از تیمار متناظر بدون مایه­زنی بود. بیشترین مقدار نیترات برگ (mg kg-1 6123) در تیمار مصرف 100 درصد مقدار توصیه شده کود و بدون مایه‌زنی باکتری ثبت شد. کمترین مقدار نیترات برگ در تیمار 70 درصد مقدار توصیه شده کود همراه با مخلوط دو باکتری اندازه­گیری شد که نسبت به تیمار متناظر بدون مایه­زنی باکتری، کاهش ۲۵ درصدی داشت. بیشترین فعالیت آنزیم نیترات رداکتاز در تیمار 70 درصد مقدار توصیه شده کود همراه با مایه­زنی مخلوط دو باکتری اندازه­گیری شد که در مقایسه با تیمار متناظر بدون مایه­زنی باکتری، 47 درصد افزایش نشان داد. به‌طور کلی، کاربرد مخلوطPseudomonas putida وPhytobacter diazotrophicus همراه با 70 درصد مقدار توصیه‌شده کود NPK، پس از انجام بررسی­های بیشتر، می­تواند به‌عنوان راهکاری مناسب برای کاهش 30 درصدی مصرف کود شیمیایی، بدون افت چشمگیر عملکرد و با بهبود کیفیت تغذیه‌ای اسفناج، پیشنهاد شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the Role of Plant Growth-promoting Bacteria in Improving Nutrient Content and Reducing Nitrate Accumulation in Spinach

نویسندگان English

naeimeh enayatizamir 1
Nafiseh Rangzan 2
Mahnaz Mokfi 1
1 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Department of Soil Science, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
The heavy reliance on chemical N-P-K fertilizers in intensive vegetable farming has raised significant environmental and health concerns. Nitrate accumulation in leafy greens, especially spinach, is a major food safety challenge. Nitrate is directly linked to nitrogen metabolism and accumulates in plant tissue when its uptake exceeds the plant's capacity to use it for growth and protein synthesis. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) offer a sustainable alternative by enhancing nutrient bioavailability through mechanisms such as phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation, and siderophore production. Growth-promoting bacteria prevent nitrate accumulation in leaves by improving nitrogen uptake and transport. While the efficacy of PGPB is well-documented in cereal crops, their potential to mitigate the negative effects of reduced fertilization in high-demand vegetables like spinach remains under-explored.

Materials and Methods
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of PGPB in improving spinach characteristics under greenhouse conditions using a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized design. The treatments consisted of two levels of N-P-K fertilizer (100% of recommended rate and 70% of the recommended rate) and four levels of microbial inoculation (no bacteria, Pseudomonas putida, Phytobacter diazotrophicus, and a mix of both). The experiment was conducted in 3 kg pots. Six seeds were sown 1 cm below the soil surface and one milliliter of each strain was inoculated under each seed. The soil moisture of the pots was maintained at approximately 75% of field capacity moisture by weight during the experiment. After two weeks, the plants were thinned to three plants. The plants were harvested 50 days after planting. Parameters including leaf nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), iron (Fe), chlorophyll content, nitrate concentration, and nitrate reductase enzyme activity were measured.

Results
The results showed that the interaction effect of fertilizer level and bacterial inoculation was significant for all measured traits. Microbial inoculation, particularly the mix of bacteria, effectively compensated for the yield loss caused by the 30% reduction in chemical fertilizer. The highest leaf fresh weight was obtained in both the 100% and 70% recommended NPK fertilizer treatments when plants were inoculated with the combined bacterial consortium, representing 1.7- and 2.2-fold increases, respectively, compared with the corresponding non-inoculated treatments. Application of 100% of the recommended NPK fertilizer in combination with the mixed bacterial inoculum increased leaf nitrogen (62%), phosphorus (23%), potassium (51%), and iron (32%) contents compared with the corresponding non-inoculated treatment. The second-highest contents of these nutrients were observed in the treatment receiving 70% of the recommended fertilizer rate together with the mixed bacterial inoculum. Total chlorophyll content declined with reduced fertilizer application; however, bacterial inoculation compensated for this reduction, such that no significant difference was observed between the inoculated treatments and the treatment receiving 100% of the recommended fertilizer rate. The highest total chlorophyll content was measured in the treatment receiving 100% of the recommended fertilizer rate together with the mixed bacterial inoculum,
which was 34% higher than the corresponding non-inoculated treatment. The highest leaf nitrate content (6123 mg kg⁻¹) was recorded in the treatment receiving 100% of the recommended fertilizer rate without bacterial inoculation. The lowest leaf nitrate content was measured in the treatment receiving 70% of the recommended fertilizer rate combined with the mixed bacterial inoculum, representing a 25% reduction compared with the corresponding non-inoculated treatment. The highest nitrate reductase activity was measured in the treatment receiving 70% of the recommended fertilizer rate together with the mixed bacterial inoculum, showing a 47% increase compared with the corresponding non-inoculated treatment. There was a negative correlation between nitrate content in the leaf and nitrate reductase activity. The results indicated that chlorophyll content was positively correlated with the contents of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and iron, as well as with nitrate reductase activity. Plant fresh weight was also positively correlated with chlorophyll content, the contents of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and iron, and the activity of nitrate reductase.

Conclusion
Overall, these findings suggest that the combined application of Pseudomonas putida and Phytobacter diazotrophicus with 70% of the recommended NPK fertilizer rate may represent a promising strategy to reduce chemical fertilizer use by 30% without substantial yield loss, while enhancing the nutritional quality of spinach. Nevertheless, further validation under field conditions and diverse environmental settings is required before this approach can be recommended for widespread agricultural use.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Biofertilizer
Iron
Nitrate
Nitrate reductase
Phosphorus

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

 

1.             Aisha, H.A., Hafez, M.M., Mahmoud, A.R., & Shafeek, M.R. (2013). Effect of bio and chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and chemical properties of spinach plant (Spinacia oleracea L.). Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research, 2(1), 16-20.
2.             Bhattacharyya, P.N., & Jha, D.K. (2012). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28(4), 1327-1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9
3.             Bian, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, T., Grundy, S., Yang, Q., & Cheng, R. (2020). A review of environment effects on nitrate accumulation in leafy vegetables grown in controlled environments. Foods, 9(6), 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9060732
4.             Bolhassani, Z., Ronaghi, A.M., Ghasemi, R., & Zarei, M. (2019). Influence of rice-husk derived biochar and growth promoting rhizobacteria on the yield and chemical composition of spinach in soil under salinity stress. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 33(3), 335-348. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/ijsr.2019.122566.380
5.             Bric, J.M., Bostock, R.M., & Silverstone, S.E. (1991). Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57(2), 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.57.2.535-538.1991
6.             Çakmakçı, R., Erat, M., Erdoğan, Ü., & Dönmez, M.F. (2007). The influence of plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria on growth and enzyme activities in wheat and spinach plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170(2), 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200625105
7.             Cataldo, D.A., Haroon, M., Schrader, L.E., & Youngs, V.L. (1975). Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 6(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366547
8.             Compant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010). Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42(5), 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024
9.             Costa-Gutierrez, S.B., Lami, M.J., Caram-Di Santo, M.C., Zenoff, A.M., Vincent, P.A., Molina-Henares, M.A., Espinosa-Urgel, M., & de Cristóbal, R.E. (2020). Plant growth promotion by Pseudomonas putida KT2440 under saline stress: role of eptA. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 104(10), 4577-4592. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00253-020-10516-z
10.         Custic, M., Poljak, M., & Cosic, T. (1994). Nitrate content in leafy vegetables as related to nitrogen fertilization in Croatia. Acta Horticulturae, 371, 407-412. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.371.54
11.         Hosseini Darani, F., Zeinali, H., Shirani Rad, A.H., Khourgami, A., & Nasrollahi, H. (2013). Effect of planting date and nitrogen fertilizer on two varieties (inner and outer) of spinach. Annals of Biological Research, 4, 56-59.
12.         De la Vega-Camarillo, E., Sotelo-Aguilar, J., Rios-Galicia, B., Mercado-Flores, Y., Arteaga-Garibay, R., Villa-Tanaca, L., & Hernández-Rodríguez, C. (2023). Promotion of the growth and yield of Zea mays by synthetic microbial communities from Jala maize. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1167839. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fmicb.2023.1167839
13.         Deng, B., Wu, L., Xiao, H., & Cheng, Q. (2023). Characterization of Pseudomonas sp. En3, an endophytic bacterium from poplar leaf endosphere with plant growth-promoting properties. Forests, 14(11), 2203. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14112203
14.         Döbereiner, J., Day, J.M., & Dart, P.J. (1972). Nitrogenase activity in the rhizosphere of sugarcane and some other tropical grasses. Plant and Soil, 37,191-196.
15.         European Commission. (2023). Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 103–157.
16.         Fischer, M., Falke, D., Pawlik, T., & Sawers, R.G. (2014). Oxygen-dependent control of respiratory nitrate reduction in mycelium of Streptomyces coelicolor A3 (2). Journal of Bacteriology, 196(23), 4152-4162. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.02202-14
17.         Glick, B.R. (2012). Plant growth‐promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica, 2012(1), 963401. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
18.         Gupta, P.K. (2004). Soil, Plant, Water and Fertilizer Analysis. Agrobios (India), 438 p.
19.         Hong, Y., Liu, R., Xiang, W., Lei, P., & Fang, X. (2025). Emergent plants improve nitrogen uptake rates by regulating the activity of nitrogen assimilation enzymes. Plants, 14(10), 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14101484
20.         Jaworski, E.G. (1971). Nitrate reductase assay in intact plant tissues. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 43(6), 1274-1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(71)80010-4
21.         Jia, W., Hong, L., Xu, X., Hong, C., Zhu, W., Zhu, F., & Yao, Y. (2026). Divergent defense strategies induced by Variovorax soli and Microbacterium phyllosphaerae: benefits for strawberry growth and powdery mildew resistance. Horticulturae, 12(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020225
22.         Kalantari, A., Aliasgharzad, N., & Najafi, N. (2022).  Nitrate reductase activity, iron and nitrate concentrations in sinach inoculated with two species of Pseudomonas under different nitrogen levels. Water and Soil Science, 32(2), 25-41. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/ws.2021.29495.2173
23.         Khare, A., More, H., Madliya, S., & Patil, V.D. (2018). Biofortfication of spinach (Spinacia olaracea) with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria–Pseudomonas fluorescens. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 5(8), 669-675.
24.         Koh, E., Charoenprasert, S., & Mitchell, A.E. (2012). Effect of organic and conventional cropping systems on ascorbic acid, vitamin C, flavonoids, nitrate, and oxalate in 27 varieties of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(12), 3144-3150. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf300051f
25.         Moretti, L.G., Crusciol, C.A.C., Leite, M.F.A., Momesso, L., Bossolani, J.W., Costa, O.Y.A., Hungria, M., & Kuramae, E.E. (2024). Diverse bacterial consortia: key drivers of rhizosoil fertility modulating microbiome functions, plant physiology, nutrition, and soybean grain yield. Environmental Microbiome, 19(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-024-00595-0
26.         Negi, R., Sharma, B., Jan, T., Kaur, T., Chowdhury, S., Kapoor, M., Singh, S., Kumar, A., Rai, A.K., Rustaqi, S., Shreaz, Sh., Kour, D., Ahmed, N., Kumar, K., & Yadav, A.N. (2024). Microbial consortia: promising tool as plant bioinoculants for agricultural sustainability. Current Microbiology, 81(8), 222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-024-03755-0
27.         Nunez de Gonzalez, M.T., Osburn, W.N., Hardin, M.D., Longnecker, M., Garg, H.K., Bryan, N.S., & Keeton, J.T. (2015). A survey of nitrate and nitrite concentrations in conventional and organic‐labeled raw vegetables at retail. Journal of Food Science, 80(5), C942-C949. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12858
28.         Oliveira, C.E.D.S., Gato, I.M.B., Jalal, A., Girardi, V.D.A.M., Oliveira, J.R., Tamburi, K.V.,Caetano, G.C., Oliveira, R.M., Aguilar, J.V., de Camargos, L.S., & Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. (2025a). Pseudomonas fluorescens rates increase nitrate reductase activity and reduce shoot nitrate accumulation in hydroponic lettuce. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 48(2), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2399289
29.         Oliveira, C.E.D.S., Sena Oliveira, T.J.S., Jalal, A., Fernandes, G.C., Bastos, A.D.C., da Silva, M.R., Sant’Ana., G.R., Aguilar, J.V., de Camargos, L.S., & Teixeira Filho, M.C.M. (2025b). Inoculation and co-inoculation of lettuce and arugula hydroponically influence nitrogen metabolism, plant growth, nutrient acquisition and photosynthesis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16, 1547821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1547821
30.         Patel, V.K., Vikram, B., Sikarwar, P.S., & Sengupta, J. (2021). Effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and yield of spinach (Spinacea oleracea L.) cv. all green. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 10(1), 2229-2231.
31.         Pikovskaya, R.I. (1948). Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya, 17, 362-370.
32.         Safdar, H., Jamil, M., Hussain, A., Albalawi, B.F.A., Ditta, A., Dar, A., Aimen, A., Ahmad, H.T., Nazir, Q., & Ahmad, M. (2022). The effect of different carrier materials on the growth and yield of spinach under pot and field experimental conditions. Sustainability, 14(19), 12255. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912255
33.         Saharan, B.S., & Nehra, V. (2011). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sciences and Medicine Research, Article LSMR-21.
34.         Salha, Y., Sudalaimuthuasari, N., Kundu, B., AlMaskari, R.S., Alkaabi, A.S., Hazzouri, K.M., Abuqamar, S.F., El-Tarabily, K.A., & Amiri, K.M. (2020). Complete genome sequence of Phytobacter diazotrophicus strain UAEU22, a plant growth-promoting bacterium isolated from the date palm rhizosphere. Microbiology Resource Announcements, 9(25), e00499-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.00499-20
35.         Santamaria, P. (2006). Nitrate in vegetables: toxicity, content, intake and EC regulation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2351
36.         Schwyn, B., & Neilands, J.B. (1987). Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Analytical Biochemistry, 160(1), 47-56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9
37.         Singh, N., & Singh, H. (2020). Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and seed yield of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Asian Journal of Horticulture, 15(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/TAJH/15.1/1-3
38.         Purnima, & Singh, P. (2023). Growth effects of Pseudomonas, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)-a review. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 11(1), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.12944/ CARJ.11.1.05
39.         Sultana, R., Islam, S.M.N., Sriti, N., Ahmed, M., Shuvo, S.B., Rahman, M.H., & Jashim, A.I.I. (2024). Sphingomonas panaciterrae PB20 increases growth, photosynthetic pigments, antioxidants, and mineral nutrient contents in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Heliyon, 10(3), e25596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25596
40.         Sun, W., Shahrajabian, M.H., & Soleymani, A. (2024). The roles of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-based biostimulants for agricultural production systems. Plants, 13(5), 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ plants13050613
41.         Therby-Vale, R., Lacombe, B., Rhee, S.Y., Nussaume, L., & Rouached, H. (2022). Mineral nutrient signaling controls photosynthesis: focus on iron deficiency-induced chlorosis. Trends in Plant Science, 27(5), 502-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.11.005
42.         Thomas, P., & Sekhar, A.C. (2016). Effects due to rhizospheric soil application of an antagonistic bacterial endophyte on native bacterial community and its survival in soil: a case study with Pseudomonas aeruginosa from banana. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00493
43.         Timofeeva, A.M., Galyamova, M.R., & Sedykh, S.E. (2023). Plant growth-promoting soil bacteria: nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and other biological activities. Plants, 12(24), 4074. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12244074
44.         Wellburn, A.R. (1994). The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144(3), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2
45.         Zaman, Q.U., Hamid, F.S., Islam, S.U., Ahmad, F., & Ahmad, N. (2018). Impact of various levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and yield of spinach (Spinacea oleracea L.) under conditions of Mansehra (Pakistan). Open Academic Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 2(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.33094/5.2017.2018.21.5.8
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.
دوره 40، شماره 2
تابستان 1405
صفحه 226-211

  • تاریخ دریافت 03 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 28 تیر 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 24 مرداد 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 24 مرداد 1405