فصلنامه

تشخیص وضعیت تغذیه‌ای کلزا (Brassica napus) در اقلیم‌های مختلف ایران قبل از مرحله گلدهی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی (AREEO)، کرج، ایران

2 بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات‌، آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان فارس (AREEO)، شیراز، ایران

3 بخش تحقیقات خاک و آب، مرکز تحقیقات، آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مرکزی (AREEO)، اراک، ایران

چکیده
کلزا با داشتن بیشترین سطح زیر کشت در میان محصولات دانه‌روغنی در ایران، به‌دلیل مدیریت نامتعادل عناصر غذایی با محدودیت عملکرد مواجه است. در این مطالعه، با به‌کارگیری روش تشخیص خاک-گیاه و رویکردهای مدل‌سازی بیوژئوشیمیایی مبتنی بر شاخص‌های تشخیصی، کمبودهای عناصر غذایی در چهار منطقه کشاورزی-اکولوژیکی کشور (البرز، مرکزی، گلستان و اردبیل) بررسی شد. با تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های ۱۲۰ مزرعه از طریق روش‌های انحراف از درصد بهینه (DOP) و شاخص تعادل تغذیه‌ای (NBI)، کمبود گسترده فسفر و روی در تمامی استان‌ها شناسایی گردید. قلیائیت خاک (5/8-5/7=pH) و محتوای کم کربن آلی (کمتر از ۴/۱درصد) به‌واسطه رسوب هیدروکسیدی و رقابت کاتیونی، تثبیت عناصر کم‌مصرف به‌ویژه روی (6/24- =DOP) و آهن (4/16- =DOP) را تشدید می‌کند. افزون‌براین، خاک‌های آهکی باعث تثبیت فسفر به‌صورت کانی‌های فسفات کلسیم می‌شوند. درحالی‌که خاک‌های غنی از رس در اردبیل، پتاسیم تبادلی (K) را حفظ کرده‌اند، اما به‌دلیل تثبیت بین‌لایه‌ای، کمبود منیزیم نشان دادند. مقادیر NBI برای مزارع کلزای مورد مطالعه از ۱۳۳ تا ۱۴۶ متغیر بود. فراتر از این حدود، عملکرد به ازای هر واحد افزایش NBI، ۱۲ تا ۱۸ درصد کاهش یافت که نشان‌دهنده هم‌افزایی عناصر غذایی است. تغییرات منطقه‌ای در مقادیر NBI به‌شدت با نتایج عملکرد مشاهده‌شده، همبستگی داشت. بررسی آماری آستانه‌های NBI برای کاهش عملکرد (133-146، 01/0 p<) نشان داد که نسبت‌های متعادل منیزیم به پتاسیم (2/8 :1) در اردبیل به عملکرد بهتر (۲۸۷۰ کیلوگرم در هکتار) کمک نمود؛ در حالی‌که عملکرد پایین‌تر استان مرکزی (۲۲۴۹ کیلوگرم در هکتار) با کمبود فسفر (39/11 میلی‌گرم در کیلوگرم) و مقادیر بالای NBI (بیش از ۱۳۸) مرتبط بود. این یافته‌ها بر اهمیت توجه به محدودیت‌های عناصر غذایی در خاک‌های آهکی تأکید دارد، زیرا بیش از ۷۵ درصد مزارع کلزای کشور با کمبود فسفر و روی مواجه‌اند. نتایج ما بر ضرورت به‌کارگیری راهبردهای مدیریت عناصر غذایی به‌صورت مکان‌ویژه برای بهبود پایدار عملکرد در اکوسیستم‌های کشاورزی کشور تأکید می‌نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Determining the Nutritional Status of Canola (Brassica napus) in Different Climates of Iran before the Flowering Stage

نویسندگان English

F. Nourgholipour 1
M.S. Tadayon 2
M. Pasandideh 1
M.A. Khodshenas 3
2 Associate Professor of Soil and Water Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Soil and Water Research Department, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Markazi, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction
Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), particularly the low erucic acid and glucosinolate cultivars known as canola, is the third largest oilseed crop in the world after soybean and oil palm. In Iran, canola cultivation covers approximately 173 thousand hectares, making it the largest cultivated area among oilseed crops. Golestan and Khuzestan provinces have the largest cultivated areas. Balanced fertilization is crucial for optimizing canola yield, especially under adverse environmental conditions. Plant tissue analysis serves as a fundamental tool for diagnosing nutrient status and exploits the principle that tissue nutrient concentration reflects soil nutrient availability. Advanced diagnostic methods, such as Deviation from Optimum Percentage (DOP) and Nutrient Nalance Index (NBI), provide quantitative measures of nutrient adequacy and imbalance. The DOP method ranks nutrient deficiencies by comparing observed tissue concentrations with those in high-yielding populations. Meanwhile, the NBI integrates multiple nutrient statuses into a single measure (Σ|DOP|) and provides a comprehensive assessment of overall nutrient health.

Materials and Methods
The study was conducted in four provinces: Alborz, Markazi, Golestan, and Ardabil (Moghan region), to reflect the diverse agro-ecological conditions of the country. Thirty farms were randomly selected in each province.
Alborz province (Karaj region) is located at coordinates 35°48'N and 51°10'E. Markazi province (Arak city) is located at coordinates 34°5'30'N and 49°41'30'E. East Golestan Province (Gonbad Kavus region) is located at coordinates 37°16'N and 55°12'E, while Ardabil Province (Parsabad and Moghan regions) is located at coordinates between 39°12'N and 39°42'N and 47°10'E and 48°21'E.
Soil samples were collected from the fields before planting. Plant tissue samples were taken at the begining of stem elongation stage (two-digit growth code 30), which is a sensitive stage for identifying and eliminating nutrient deficiencies before canola flowering. Plant samples were collected as whole plants from 20 random points per hectare, and 20 plants were sampled from each point. Total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and micronutrients zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), and boron (B) were measured in plant tissue. Grain yield was measured at maturity. To assess nutrient status and identify yield-limiting factors, the key diagnostic index, deviation from optimum percentage (DOP), quantifies the deviation in nutrient concentrations from the optimal values observed in high-yielding populations. The NBI index was also used in this study.

Results and Discussion
In terms of soil properties, there was significant variation in pH, salinity, organic carbon, and nutrient availability across the studied provinces.
In Alborz province, the average organic carbon content was low (0.81%) and the frequency of nutrient deficiencies was high, including nitrogen (N, 73%), phosphorus (P, 47%), potassium (K, 20%), sulfur (S, 87%), magnesium (Mg, 37%), iron (Fe, 83%), copper (Cu, 20%), zinc (Zn, 50%), manganese (Mn, 43%), and boron (B, 60%). In Markazi Province, with an average salinity of 1.47 dS/m, severe deficiencies of nitrogen (90%), phosphorus (75%), and potassium (37%) were observed. In Golestan Province, non-saline soils in this region with an average organic carbon percentage of 1.4% showed deficiencies of nitrogen (27%), phosphorus (94%), potassium (32%), magnesium (100%), iron (32%), copper (22%), manganese (31%), and zinc (81%). In Ardabil Province, high clay content (40%) and salinity (2.4 dS/m) led to deficiencies of phosphorus (50%), potassium (1%), sulfur (99%), magnesium (99%), iron (50%), copper (3%), zinc (87%), and manganese (10%).
DOP standards for nutrient concentrations in canola shoots during stem elongation were determined as follows: nitrogen 3.61%, phosphorus 0.46%, potassium 2.8%, sulfur 0.513%, magnesium 0.44%, calcium 1-2%, iron 226 mg kg-1, copper 1.8 mg kg-1, manganese 78.5 mg kg-1, zinc 45.8 mg kg-1, and boron 54 mg kg-1.
The nutrient balance index (NBI), calculated as the sum of absolute DOP values, was inversely correlated with yield, confirming that greater nutrient imbalances resulted in reduced yield. Statistical analyses confirmed that NBI thresholds between 133 and 146 corresponded to significant yield reductions (p<0.01). Based on these thresholds, yield decreased by 12 to 18% for each unit increase in NBI. It is noteworthy that when NBI exceeds a certain threshold (NBI breakpoint; BPC), yield reduction becomes more evident. Below this threshold, yield is less affected by NBI. Alborz province had the highest BPC (146), followed by Ardabil (139), Markazi (138), and Golestan (133) provinces, respectively. Farmers and advisors can use this range as a guide for fertilizer recommendations.

Conclusion
This study shows that the variability of canola yield in agro-ecological regions of Iran is primarily due to the deficiency of region-specific nutrients, especially phosphorus and zinc, combined with soil alkalinity, low organic carbon, and mineralogical characteristics. By implementing region-specific nutrient management strategies, yield gaps can be closed, and sustainability in semi-arid oilseed systems can be promoted. The Nutrient Balance Index integrates vital nutrient ratios (such as phosphorus:zinc, magnesium:potassium) to detect imbalances.

Acknowledgement
Authors are thankful to and appreciate Soil and Water Research Institute (SWRI) for supporting the project. The results of this article are derived from the national project number 01-10-10-023-970098 of the Soil and Water Research Institute.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Concentration
DOP
Nutritional Status
NBI

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

 

1.          Aghabeygi, M., & Dönmez, C. (2024). Estimating yield response functions to nitrogen for annual crops in Iran. Agronomy, 14(3), 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030436
2.          Agricultural statistics. (2025). Crop products of 2023-2024. The first volume. Bureau of Statistics and Information Technology, Vice President of Planning and Economic Affairs. Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, Iran, 163 pages. (In Persian). https://dpe.maj.ir/uploads/21/2024/Aug/27/AJ1-1401-1402.pdf
3.          Aliyu, K.T., Huising, J., Kamara, A.Y., Jibrin, J.M., Mohammed, I.B., Nziguheba, G., Adam, A.M., & Vanlauwe, B. (2021). Understanding nutrient imbalances in maize (Zea mays L.) using the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) approach in the Maize belt of Nigeria. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 16018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95172-7
4.          Bandehagh, A., Dehghanian, Z., Henry, R., & Hossain, M.A. (2021). Salinity tolerance in Canola: insights from proteomic studies. In Brassica Breeding and Biotechnology. Intech Open. ISBN: 9781839686962. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96649
5.          Banerjee, K., Dutta, S., Das, S., & Sadhukhan, R. (2025). Crop simulation models as decision tools to enhance agricultural system productivity and sustainability – a critical review. Technology in Agronomy, 5, e002. https://doi.org/10.48130/tia-0024-0032
6.          Chaleshtori, A.A., Panahpour, E., Iranipour, R., & Moezzi, A. (2021). Diagnosing the nutritional balance of almond (Prunus sp.) orchards using DRIS and DOP methods. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 40, 1640-1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10214-0
7.          Chapman, H.D., & Pratt, P.F. (1962). Methods of analysis for soils, plants, and waters. Soil Science, 93, 1-68.
8.          Dhaliwal, S.S., Sharma, V., & Verma, G. (2021). Agronomic strategies for improving micronutrient use efficiency in crops for nutritional and food security. In Input Use Efficiency for Food and Environmental Security, 123-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5199-1_5
9.          Dixon, S.L., & Qaderi, M.M. (2025). Canola responds differently to nitrogen forms under temperature and carbon dioxide conditions. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 37(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-024-00350-3
10.       Faizullahzadeh Ardabili, M. (2003). Correlation between sulfur extracted by five methods with responses of Canola plant in some soils of country. Proceedings of the 8th Congress of Soil Sciences of Iran, 9-12 September 2003, Iran. (In Persian)
11.       Gee, G., & Bauder, J. (1986). Particle-size Analysis. In: A. Klute (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 383-411. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser 5.1.2ed.c15
12.       Goodarzi, K., Hosseini Farahi, M., & Kavoosi, B. (2010). Relationship of nutritional balance index (NBI) with yield and quality indices of grape vine (Vitis vinifera L.). Acta Horticulturae, 931, 259-266. https://doi.org/ 10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.931.28
13.       Grant, C.A., & Bailey, L.D. (1990). Fertility management in canola production. In: Proceed. International Canola Conference, April 1990, Atlanta, GA, USA. Potash & Phosphate Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps93-087
14.       Guo, W., Nazim, H., Liang, Z., & Yang, D. (2016). Magnesium deficiency in plants: An urgent problem. The Crop Journal, 4(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.11.003
15.       Horneck, D.A., & Miller, R.O. (1998). Determination of total nitrogen in plant tissue. In: Handbook of methods for plant analysis (Kalra, Y.P., Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (USA), pp.75-84. https://doi.org/ 10.4236/jep.2017.812089
16.       Hosseini, S.M.,  &Tadayon, M.S. (2024). Ionome composition influence wheat yield on saline and calcareous soils: the case of Triticum aestivum L. var. ‘Sirvan’. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01904167.2024.2408398
17.       Jemenez, S.J., Pinochet, Y., Gogocena, J.A., & Betran, M.A.M. (2007). Influence of different vigor cherry rootstocks on leaves and shoot mineral composition. Scientia Horticulturae, 112, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.scienta.2006.12.010
18.       Jones, C., & Olson-Rutz, K. (2016). Soil nutrient management for canola. EB0224. Montana State University Extension, Bozeman, MT. https://www.montana.edu/extension/pspp/documents/SoilNutrientCanola.pdf
19.       Jost, E., Schönhart, M., Mitter, H., Zoboli, O., & Schmid, E. (2025). Integrated modelling of fertilizer and climate change scenario impacts on agricultural production and nitrogen losses in Austria. Ecological Economics, 227, 108398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108398
20.       Kheshtpaz, N., Janmohammadi, M., & Sabaghnia, N. (2024). Foliar spray can improve rapeseed yield components under continuous irrigation. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 54, p.e80539. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632024v5480539
21.       Khiari, L., Parent, L.E., & Tremblay, N. (2001a). Critical compositional nutrient indexes for sweet corn at early growth stage. Agronomy Journal, 93, 809-814. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.934809x
22.       Khiari, L., Parent, L.E., & Tremblay, N. (2001b). Selecting the high‐yield subpopulation for diagnosing nutrient imbalance in crops. Agronomy Journal, 93(4), 802-808. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.934802x
23.       Khouloud, M., Ferji, K., Six, J.L., Beniazza, R., & Lahcini, M. (2025). Clay-based modulation of nutrient release: Ghassoul as nutrient carrier for enhanced fertilizer efficiency. Emergent Materials, 1-17. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s42247-024-00943-3
24.       Kirkegaard, J.A., Lilley, J.M., Berry, P.M., & Rondanini, D.P. (2021). Canola. In Crop Physiology Case Histories for Major Crops, 518-549. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819194-1.00017-7
25.       Landoll, E.K. (2018). Impacts of Soil pH on Winter Canola Cultivars in the Southern Great Plains (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University). https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2023.2275074
26.       Lindsay, W.L., & Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 421-428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978. 03615995004200030009x
27.       Loeppert, R.H., & Suarez, D.L. (1996). Carbonate and Gypsum. In: D.L. Sparks (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods, SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 437-474. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c15
28.       Ma, B.L., Herath, A., & Smith, D.L. (2024). Assessing critical plant sulfur concentration and nitrogen to sulfur ratio in spring canola production. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 187(6), 711-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202400096
29.       Mahmoodi Nezhad Dezfully, S.H., & Mostashari, M. (2022). Evaluation of nutritional status and priority of nutrients requirement of canola by compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) and deviation from optimum percentage (DOP) methods in north of Khuzestan. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 36(1),
30.       Mahmoud Soltani, S., Ebadi, A.A., Tajadoditalab Rashti, K., Sartipi, S., & Shakouri Katigari, M. (2025). Foliar spray of glycine-chelated zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) lowered the effect of macronutrient deficiencies and enhanced rice yield components, yield, and grain biofortification. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 48(1), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2378923
31.       Meena, V., Dotaniya, M.L., Meena, M.D., Jat, R.S., Meena, M.K., Choudhary, R.L., Meena, H.S., Meena, B.L., Meena, L.K., & Rai, P.K. (2024). Conjoint application of nutrients as customized fertilizers influences growth and yield characteristics of Brassica juncea L., augmented profitability and nutrient use efficiency indices. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-02062-8
32.       Meier, U., Bleiholder, H., Buhr, L., Feller, C., Hack, H., Heß, M., Lancashire, P.D., Schnock, U., Stauß, R., Van Den Boom, T., & Weber, E. (2009). The BBCH system to coding the phenological growth stages of plants–history and publications. Journal für Kulturpflanzen, 61(2), 41-52. ISSN 0027-7479
33.       Molnár, Z., Solomon, W., Mutum, L., & Janda, T. (2023). Understanding the mechanisms of Fe deficiency in the rhizosphere to promote plant resilience. Plants, 12(10), 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12101945
34.       Montañés, L., Heras, L., Abadia, J., & Sanz, M. (1993). Plant analysis interpretation based on a new index: deviation from optimum percentage. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 16, 1289-1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/019041693 09364613
35.       Morris, S.J., & Blackwood, C.B. (2007). The ecology of soil organisms. In Soil microbiology, ecology and biochemistry, pp.195-229. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047514-1.50012-3
36.       Mostashari, M., Khosravinejad, A., & Golmohammadi, M. (2018). Comparative study of DOP and CND methods for leaf nutritional‎ diagnosis of Vitis Vinifera in Iran. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 49(5), 576-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1432633
37.       Muhammad, H., Ijaz, M., Sattar, A., Ul-Allah, S., Sher, A., Asif, M., Dilshad, M., Mahmood, K., Riaz, M.W., Zaheer, M.S., & Rizwan, M. (2025). Synergistic effects of PGPRs and fertilizer amendments on improving the yield and productivity of Canola (Brassica napus L.). BMC Plant Biology, 25(1), 50. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12870-025-06062-3
38.       Murphy, B.W. (2015). Impact of soil organic matter on soil properties—a review with emphasis on Australian soils. Soil Research, 53(6), 605-635. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR14246
39.       Naseri Rad, H., Rezvani Moghadam, P., Koocheki, A., & Ashraf Jafari, A. (2021). The effect of cropping systems management and wheat residues on grain yield and efficiency indices of nitrogen and phosphor in autumnal rapeseed. Applied Field Crops Research, 34(2), 142-120. https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2021.352417.1509
40.       Nelson, D., & Sommers, L. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: D.L. Sparks (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, Chemical Methods. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 961-1010. https://doi.org/10.2134/ agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29
41.       Nourgholipour, F., Tohidlu, S., Jafarnejadi, A., Mohammadnejad, Y., Mirzashahi, K., Ghaderi, J., Arzanesh, M., Passandideh, M.H., Bybordi, A., Montajabi, N., Zolfi Bavariani, M., Keshavarz, P., Seilsepour, M., Asadi, A., Izadi, P., Sedighi, S., Davatgar, N., Mohajer, A., & Dadivar, M. (2022). Comparison of farmer-specific fertilization method and the recommended combined fertilization in parts of Iran. Land Management Journal, 10(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.22092/lmj.2022.127564
42.       Nur, M.A., Kamruzzaman, M., & Amin, M.S. (2025). Microbial immobilization and phosphorus transformation in saline soil: Effects of organic amendments. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1-14. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s42729-025-02209-1
43.       Olsen, S.R., & Sommers, L.E. (1982). Phosphorus. In: A.L. Page (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp.403-430.
44.       Parent, L.E., Rozane, D.E., de Deus, J.A.L., & Natale, W. (2020). Diagnosis of nutrient composition in fruit crops: Major developments. In Fruit Crops, 145-156. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818732-6.00012-5
45.       Purakayastha, T.J., Bhaduri, D., Kumar, D., Yadav, R., & Trivedi, A. (2023). Soil and plant nutrition. In Trajectory of 75 years of Indian agriculture after independence, 365-411. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-981-19-7997-2_15
46.       Raiesi, T., Moradi, B., & Mousavi, S.M. (2021). Alterations of P fractions and some biochemical features in rhizosphere soil induced by the root activities of citrus rootstocks with different P acquisition efficiency. Eurasian Soil Science, 55(2), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229322020107
47.       Reddy, M.B., Sravani, P., Kumar, S., Rajawat, M.V.S., Jaiswal, D.K., Dhar, S., Azman, E.A., Garg, K., & Kumar, S. (2024). Nitrogen use efficiency reimagined: advancements in agronomic, ecophysiological, and molecular strategies. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2447840
48.       Reuter, D.J., & Robinson, J.B. (1986). Plant analysis: An interpretation manual. Inkata Press Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Australia. ISBN: 9780643101265.
49.       Rhoades, J. (1982). Soluble salts. In: Page, A.L. (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, 167-179. https://doi.org/10.2134/ agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c10
50.       Roy, R.N., Finck, A., Blair, G.J., & Tandon, H.L.S. (2006). Plant nutrition for food security: A guide for integrated nutrient management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 348.
51.       Sharma, J., Shikhamany, S.D., Singh, R.K., & Raghupathi, H.B. (2005). Diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in Thompson seedless grape grafted on Dog Ridge rootstock by DRIS common. Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 36(11), 2823-2838. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620500305991
52.       Shehu, B.M., Garba, I.I., Jibrin, J.M., Kamara, A.Y., Adam, A.M., Craufurd, P., Aliyu, K.T., Rurinda, J., & Merckx, R. (2023). Compositional nutrient diagnosis and associated yield predictions in maize: A case study in the northern Guinea savanna of Nigeria. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 87(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ saj2.20472
53.       Smith, P., Poch, R.M., Lobb, D.A., Bhattacharyya, R., Alloush, G., Eudoxie, G.D., Anjos, L.H., Castellano, M., Ndzana, G.M., Chenu, C., & Naidu, R. (2024). Status of the world's soils. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 49. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-030323-075629
54.       Sparks, D.L., Page, A., Helmke, P., Loeppert, R., Soltanpour, P., Tabatabai, M., Johnston, C., & Sumner, M. (1996). Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
55.       Statista, (2025). Leading producing countries of rapeseed in 2023/2024. [online] Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263930/worldwide-production-of-rapeseed-by-country
56.       Taalab, A.S., Ageeb, G.W., Siam, H.S., & Mahmoud, S.A. (2019). Some characteristics of calcareous soils. A review. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Science, 8(1), 96-105.
57.       Thapa, D., Westra, S., Oas, V., Kilin, D., & Kilina, S. (2025). Tunable magnetic order in Fe-Mg codoped montmorillonite nanoclay interfaced with amino acids. ACS Omega. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c06483
58.       Walworth, J.L., & Sumner, M.E. (1987). The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Advances in Soil Science, 6, 149-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4682-4_4
59.       Wang, L., Ju, C., Han, C., Yu, Z., Bai, M.Y., & Wang, C. (2025). The interaction of nutrient uptake with biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13827
Wen, G., Ma, B.L., Luce, M.S., Liu, K., Mooleki, P.S., Crittenden, S., Gulden, R., Semach, G., Tiege, P., & Lokuruge, P. (2023). Optimizing nitrogen fertilization for hybrid canola (Brassica napus L.) production across Canada. Field Crops Research, 302, 109048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109048
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 19 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 10 مرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 مرداد 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 27 مرداد 1405