جداسازی و شناسایی باکتری‌های حل‌کننده فسفات مقاوم به دما برای استفاده در کود میکروبی فسفاته

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه تبریز

2 تبریز

چکیده

در فرمولاسیون کودهای میکروبی فسفاته که غالباً به فرم گرانوله تهیه می‌شوند از باکتری‌های حل‌کننده فسفات استفاده می‌شود. از جمله محدودیت‌های تولید این نوع کود، از بین رفتن باکتری‌ها در فرایند تهیه و خشک نمودن گرانول‌ها می‌باشد. بر این اساس در این تحقیق اقدام به جداسازی باکتری‌های حل‌کننده فسفات مقاوم به دما شد و تحمل دمایی و توانایی انحلال فسفات (از منابع سنگ فسفات و تری‌کلسیم فسفات) در باکتری‌های بومی جدا شده از خاک، مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. از پنج باکتری (جدایه‌های RPS4، RPS6، RPS7، RPS8 و RPS9) با قابلیت تولید هاله شفاف تنها دو باکتری (RPS7 و RPS9) قادر به تحمل دمای 55 درجه سلسیوس به مدت 16ساعت بودند. در محیط اسپربر جامد حاوی تری‌‌کلسیم ‌فسفات، باکتری RPS9 و RPS7 به ترتیب با دارا بودن مقادیر 60/2 و 27/2 برای نسبت (HD/CD) بعد از گذشت 12روز، قدرت بالایی در امر انحلال فسفات معدنی نامحلول داشتند. میزان انحلال فسفات کم‌محلول در روش کمی نیز برای دو باکتری RPS9 و RPS7 به ترتیب 8/531 و 1/324 میلی‌گرم بر لیتر بدست آمد. نتایج زنده‌مانی باکتری‌ها نیز نشان داد که زنده‌مانی جمعیت میکروبی در حالت بدون تیمار دمایی تا 6 ماه و در حالت تیمار دمایی به 4 ماه کاهش یافت. شناسایی مولکولی RPS7 و RPS9 حاکی از آن بود که هر دو جدایه متعلق به گونه Pantoea agglomerans هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Isolation and Identification of Temperature Resistant Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria for Use in Phosphatic Microbial Fertilizer

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bahman Khoshru 1
  • Mohammad Reza Sarikhani 2
1 University of Tabriz
2 Tabriz
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Application of chemical and organic carrier and its integration with useful microorganisms including phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) has facilitatedproduction of phosphate microbial fertilizers (PMFs), which are used in granular or powder form. One of the major limitation of thesebiofertilizers is decline or loss of PSB viable cell in the granule preparation process. Accordingly, in this study, isolation of temperature resistant phosphate solubilizing bacteria was performed and temperature tolerance and ability to dissolve phosphate from rock phosphate (RP) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) sources were evaluated.
Materials and Methods: Firstly, each soil samples incubated for 16 hours at 55 °C, then dilution series were prepared and 100 μl of four final dilutions (10-6, 10-7, 10-8, and 10-9) were used to spread on Sperber solid medium. After spreading the microbial suspensions from the dilutions in the Sperber solid culture medium and the appearance of colonies, screening based on the resistance to soil temperature treatment and, subsequently, the ability to grow in a solid Sperber solid medium and dissolution of low solubility phosphate (formation of transparent halo), was done to isolate PSB. In order toprepare PMF, each of screened PSB were cultured in NB, andthen 1 ml of overnight culture wasmixed with 9 ml sterile distilled water and added to the basal formulation of rock phosphate (45 g), bagasse (30 g) and sulfur (15 g) with initial temperature of20°C.Temperature treatments (55 °C for 16 hours) of bacteria were performed in three steps: a) on sampled soils, b) pure-culture of bacteria and c) bacteria added to the carrier. Microbial population in provided microbial fertilizer was countedin two ways a) half of the microbial fertilizer was kept at normal temperature by maintaining the initial conditions, b) another half after the temperature applied (55 ° C for 16 hours). The semi-quantitative and quantitative test of insoluble inorganic phosphate solubility was performed by isolates in solid and liquid Sperber medium. The 16S rRNA molecular method was used to identify the isolated bacteria by general primers 27F and 1492R.
Results and Discussion: Five bacteria (RPS4, RPS6, RPS7, RPS8, RPS9) out of nine isolated bacteria were able to solubilize mineral phosphate (TCP and RP) but only two isolates (RPS7 and RPS9) were resistant to temperature (55 °C for 16 h). In tricalcium phosphate medium, the RPS9 and RPS7 bacteria had a high ability to solubilize insoluble inorganic phosphate with average of 2.60 and 2.27 for a ratio of (HD / CD) after 12 days, respectively. There was no halo in Sperber medium containing rock phosphate. The amount of solution in the quantitative methods was also obtained to be 563.8 and 324.1 mg / l for RPS9 and RPS7 bacteria, respectively. The prepared microbial fertilizer was counted in two ways (a): half of the sample fertilizer was kept at normal temperature by maintaining the initial conditions; (b):after the maintaining temperature at 55 °C for 16 hours, the population of other half was determined. During counting the initial microbial population (zero time) at normal temperature, all bacteria used in microbial carrier had an acceptable population. During examining the populationsof microbial in the initial carrier, RPS4, RPS6, RPS7, RPS8 and RPS9 bacteria were 3.6, 3.5, 3.6, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.5 (×106 CFU/g), respectively. After 4 months the populations were 4.6, 6.3, 9.6, 7.4 and 8.6 (×105) and in the 6th month, the populations were 3.9, 3.8, 12.3, 4. 7 and 9.2 (×104) seeming to be favorable for the tested bacteria. It seems that this survival time for the tested bacteria is desirable. During countingactive population of temperature treated microbial fertilizers, the initial population of the microbial carrier (at zero time) decreased 10 times with respect to the non-treated carrier. Active population ofRPS9 and RPS7 (temperature-resistant treatments) in the zero time was 4.5 and 4.3 (×105), respectively. Although the RPS9 and RPS7 microbial populations were able to survive in non- temperature treatments for 6 months, it was observed that in the treatment, this viability practically reduced to 4 months. Molecular identification of the isolates RPS7 and RPS9 revealed that they belonged to Pantoeaagglomerans.
Conclusions: According to the findings of this research, using phosphate solubilizing bacteria and temperature resistant Pantoeaagglomerans RPS9, recently isolated and identified, can be considered toindustrially produce granular microbial fertilizers. It is worth mentioning thatfurther studies are required to be carried out on the effectiveness of this formulation with these bacteria infield scale.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Formulation of microbial fertilizers
  • PGPR
  • Thermal tolerance
  • Viability
1- Aliasgharzad N. 1997. Microbiology and soil biochemistry (translation). First Edition. Tabriz University Press.
2- Bashan Y., Kamnev A.A., de Bashan L.E. 2013. A proposal for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria that enhance plant growth. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49:1–2
3- Fageria N.K. 2009. The use of nutrients in crop plants.CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.USA. New York.
4- Goldstein A.H. 1986. Bacterial solubilization of mineral phosphates: historical prospective and future prospects. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 1: 51-57.
5- Heydarian Z., and Sarikhani M.R. 1390. Growth promoting bacteria (PGPR) a promising approach to sustainable agriculture. 1th Specialized Conference on Strategies for Achieving Sustainable Agriculture. 5-6th of June, Ahvaz, Iran.
6- Khan M.S., Zaidi A., and Wani P.A. 2007. Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture-a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 27: 29-43
7- Khoshru B. Sarikhani, M.R., and Ebrahimi M. 2017. Isolation of temperature resistant phosphate solubilizing bacteria for use in phosphatic microbial fertilizer. The 15th Congress of Soil Science. 6-8 September. Isfahan. Iran
8- Khoshru B., Sarikhani, M.R., and Aliasgharzad N. 2017. Application and Non-Application of Sulfur in the Formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens Phosphatic Microbial Fertilizer on Corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Austainable Production, 27(3):119-136
9- Khoshru B., Sarikhani, M.R., Aliasgharzad N., and Zare P. 2015. Assessment the important PGPR features of isolates used in biofertilizers Barvar2, Biosuperphosphate, Supernitroplus and Nitroxin. Applied Soil Research, 3(1): 39-52
10- Khoshru B., Sarikhani, M.R., and Aliasgharzad N. 2015. Molecular and biochemical identification of the bacterial isolates used in common biofertilizers in Iran. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 25(4.2): 13-26
11- Malboobi M.A., Owlia P., Behbahani M., Sarokhani E., Moradi S., Yakhchali B., Deljou A., and Morabbi Heravi K. 2009. Solubilization of organic and inorganic phosphates by three highly efficient soil bacterial isolates. The World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 25: 1471-1477
12- Matthews S., and Adzahar M.S. 2016. Application of phosphate solubilising microorganisms to increase the solubilisation of rock phosphates in soil. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science, 44(1), pp.9-18.
13- Motsara M.R., and Roy R.N. 2008. Guide to laboratory establishment for plant nutrient analysis. Rome.
14- Nazery P., Kashani A., Khavazi K., and ardekani M.R. 2010. the effect of microbial bio-fertilizers containing phosphorus on the quantity and quality of white beans. National Conference of Water, Soil, Plant Science & Agricultural Machinery in IAU Dezful Branch.
15- Nobahar A., Sarikhani M.R., and Chalabianlou N. 2017. Buffering Capacity Affects Phosphorous Solubilization Assays in Rhizobacteria. Rhizosphere, 4: 119-125
16- Pande A., Pandey P., Mehra S., Singh M., and Kaushik S. 2017. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and Their Efficiency on the Growth of Maize (Zea mays). International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 5: 929-938
17- Paul E.A. 2007. Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry. 3ed Edition. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier.
18- Rodriguez H., Fraga R., Gonzalez T., and Bashan Y. 2006. Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant growthpromoting bacteria. Plant Soil, 287: 15-21.
19- Saikrithika S., Krishnaswamy V.G., and Sujatha B. 2016. A Study on Isolation of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial (PSB) Strain from Vermicomposted Soil and Their Phosphate Solubilizing Abilities. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 7(2), pp.526-535.
20- Salimpur S., Khvazi K, Nadian H., and Miransari M. 2010. Enhancing phosphorous availability to canola (Brassica napus L.) Using P solubilizing and sulfur oxiding bacteria. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(5):330-334.
21- Sarikhani M.R., Khoshru B., and Oustan S. 2016. Efficiency of Some Bacterial Strains in Potassium Release from Mica and Phosphate Solubilization under In Vitro Conditions. Geomicrobiology Journal, 33:(9).832-838.
22- Selvi K.B., Paul J.J.A., Vijaya V., and Saraswathi K. 2017. Analyzing the Efficacy of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms by Enrichment Culture Techniques. Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Journal.
23- Shakeela S., Padder S.A., and Bhat Z.A, 2017. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria associated with medicinal plant Picrorhiza Kurroa. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(3), p.157.
24- Son H.J., Park G.T., Cha M.S., and Heo M.S. 2006. Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphates by a novelsalt-and pH-tolerant Pantoea agglomerans R-42 isolated from soybean rhizosphere. Bioresource Technology, 97: 204-210.
25- Soltani E.A., Salehrastin N., Khavazi K., Asadi Rahmani H., and Abbaszadeh P. 2008. Separating and study of plant growth promoting (PGP) in some Pseudomonas fluorescent native Iranian soil. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, 21(2): 278.
26- Sperber J.I. 1958. Solution of apatite by soil microorganisms producing organic acids. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 9: 782-787.
27- Zhang J., Wang P., Fang L., Zhang Q.A., Yan C. and Chen J. 2017. Isolation and Characterization of Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria from Mushroom Residues and their Effect on Tomato Plant Growth Promotion. Polish Journal of Microbiology, 66(1), pp.57-65.
CAPTCHA Image