مقایسه روش‌های مختلف اندازه‌گیری کربن آلی در کاربری‌های مختلف خاک‌های آهکی استان لرستان

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه گیلان

2 خرم اباد

3 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

4 اشتوتگارت آلمان

چکیده

آگاهی از تغییرات کربن آلی خاک (SOC) یکی از مؤلفه‌های اصلی در ارزیابی کیفیت خاک است. با توجه به ماهیت کربناتی بسیاری از خاک­های ایران، انتخاب روش مناسب اندازه­گیری کربن آلی خاک ضروری به نظر می‌رسد. هدف از این پژوهش، مقایسه روش­های مختلف اندازه­گیری مقدار کربن خاک­های آهکی در کاربری­های مختلف بود. به این منظور از منطقه رازان واقع در استان لرستان، چهار کاربری جنگل، مرتع، کشاورزی دیم و کشاورزی آبی انتخاب و از هر کاربری 10 نمونه برداشته شد. جهت اندازه­گیری مقدار کربن آلی و معدنی در خاک­ها از روش ارائه شده توسط دارمشتات (2016) استفاده شد. روش­های والکلی-بلک (WB) و LOI برای اندازه­گیری مقادیر کربن آلی انتخاب و نتایج آن­ها با روش احتراق خشک به عنوان یک روش استاندارد مقایسه گردید. نتایج نشان داد که در مقایسه بین کاربری­ها، کاربری جنگل بیشترین مقدار کربن و نیتروژن آلی و کمترین مقدار کربن غیر آلی را دارا بود. مقادیر SOC به دست آمده به روش WB و LOI و مقایسه آن­ها با روش احتراق خشک، نشان داد که روش WB نتایج نزدیک­تری را با روش احتراق خشک داشته است. این مطالعه وجود همبستگی قوی ما بین SOCWB، SOCCN و SOCLOI را با کاربرد دمای °C350 به مدت 16 ساعت در خاک­های آهکی استان لرستان را نشان داد. در این مطالعه همچنین استفاده از روش ترکیبی سوزاندن و آنالیز با دستگاه CN، به عنوان یک جایگزین مناسب برای تیمار با اسید در خاک­های آهکی، معرفی می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of Different Methods for the Determination of Organic Carbon in Calcareous Soils under Different Land Uses of Lorestan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • H. Sepahvand 1
  • M. Feizian 2
  • R. Mirzaeitalarposhti 3
  • T. Mueller 4
1 University of Guilan
2 Lorestan University, Khorrm Abad
3 Shahid Beheshti University
4 Stuttgart, Germany
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Nowadays, because of climate change, there is a great interest in carbon cycle. In most of the soils, the main part of carbon is held as soil organic carbon (SOC) whereas, in soils of the arid and semiarid regions, inorganic carbon, primarily carbonate, is the majority of carbon in the soils. The major minerals found in the soils of arid regions of Iran are calcite (CaCO3) and dolomite (Ca Mg, CO3) which mainly exist in the soils of the southern and southwestern Iran. Thus, quantifying both SOC and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) is essential to know the way of occurrence of the carbon cycle in the soils. The aim of this study was to compare different methods for the determination of organic carbon in calcareous soils under different land uses of Lorestan province.
Materials and Methods: The study area is located in the Polhoro region of Khorram Abad district, Lorestan Province in western Iran. The sampling area spanned sides of the Polhoro region, which has various land uses, including forest land, cropland, and grassland. Dry and irrigated farming were between cultivated lands. In each land uses, a study plot was chosen. At each sampling point, five subsamples were taken at a depth of 0–30 cm (root zone) and mixed to form a composite sample including one central point and four other points by the distance of 15 m in the four cardinal directions. A total of 40 soil samples were taken across an agroecological region in southwest Iran. The soils had a clay-loam and sandy-clay-loam texture classes and pH above 7. Representative samples were analyzed for SOC and SIC measurements by different procedures. The procedures were included the modified traditional Walkley-Black method (WB) for SOC, Loss-on-Ignition (LOI) Procedure given by Nelson and Sommers (1982) for SOC, and CN analyzer (Vario-EL III) for SOC and SIC. The method presented by Boden, VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt (2016) was chosen for organic carbon and carbonate measurement. This method was used as a reference method to compare results of different methods.
Results and Discussion: In the present study, the soil samples of forest land showed the highest values for TOC and TN, but lowest values for TIC. The measured SOC concentration by WB, LOI and CN analysis methods in the top soil varied among land uses. The highest C concentration (4.52%) was observed in the forest land while the lowest concentration (0.52%) was for dry farming land both by the use LOI method. SOC values varied from 0.8 to 2.3 in modified WB, 0.52 to 4.52 in LOI and 0.93 to 2.72 in CN analysis methods between different land uses. The differences in C concentrations between rangeland, forest, irrigated and dry farming lands were statistically significant and showed the following order for the WB and LOI methods: forest land > irrigated farming > rangeland > dry farming. As expected, C concentrations of LOI and WB were highest in the forest, intermediate in irrigated farming and rangeland and lowest in the dry farming. The relative content of SOCLOI differed significantly across forest and irrigated farming land uses while the difference was not significant in the other two methods. A significant difference also observed in the SOC of forest and irrigated farming with dry and range lands obtained by all three methods. The results of the correlation between the bulk soil and SOC in different methods from the Spearman correlation analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between the TN, TC, clay, and silt of the bulk soil with SOC in the separated methods with the correlation coefficient ranging from 0.1 to 0.92. Conversely, the negative correlation was found between TIC and sand content of the bulk soil with the SOC in the different methods. It can be concluded that calcareous nature of these soils could be one of the reasons for low organic carbon in this research. By comparison between the SOC values measured by WB and LOI methods with CN analysis as a reference method, the WB method showed the results were more near to CN analysis than LOI. The high SOCLOI values for the forest and range land in this research may be related to weight loss from some non-SOM. The results of this study demonstrate that the CN method with combination of dry combustion is a potent method for the accurate estimation of SIC and SOC in calcareous soils. The common approach often involves pretreatment with acid to remove carbonate, which may cause remove organic matter in soil samples and also erosion the instrument. Thus, the combustion method could be a good substitute for acid treatment of soil samples.
Conclusion: Three methods were applied for determinations of SOC concentrations in calcareous soils of Polhoro region and the results were compared. There was a wide range of values in soil properties, but in general, TIC was more than SOC. The results show that the Walkley-Black method with external heating can provide precise estimation for soil organic carbon for these soils. This study illustrates that the WB and LOI technique could be comparable with the CN analysis method and regarded as potent methods to produce accurate results for estimating of organic carbon in arid soils. The results supported the elemental analysis as a precise method to the estimation of SOC and TIC in calcareous soils. Further study is suggested for testing TIC by LOI approach on a wider range of arid and semi-arid soils.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Calcareous soils
  • dry combustion
  • loss-on-ignition
  • Walkley-Black method
1- Abella S., and Zimmer B. 2007. Estimating organic carbon from loss-on-ignition in northern Arizona forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71: 545–550.
2- Ayoubi S., Khormali F., Sahrawat K.L., and Rodrigues de Lima A.C. 2011. Assessing Impacts of Land Use Change on Soil Quality Indicators in a Loessial Soil in Golestan Province, Iran. Agricultural Science and Technology 13: 727-742. (In Persian)
3- Beaudoin A. 2003. A comparison of two methods for estimating the organic content of sediments. Journal of Paleolimnology 29: 387–390.
4- Boden VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt. 2016. Determination of organic carbon by combustion and gas analysis. In: Handbook of Agricultural Methods of Experimental and Investigation (VDLUFA-Methodenbuch) (In German).
5- Byers S.C., Mills E.L., and Stewart P.L. 1978. A comparison of methods of determining organic carbon in marine sediments, with suggestions for a standard method. Hydrobiologia 58: 43–47.
6- Celik I. 2005. Land-use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research 83: 270-277.
7- Conyers M.K., Poile G.J., Oates A.A., Waters D., and Chan K.Y. 2011. Comparison of three carbon determination methods on naturally occurring substrates and the implication for the quantification of ‘soil carbon’. Soil Research 49: 27–33.
8- De Vos B., Lettens S., Muys B., and Deckers J.A. 2007. Walkley–Black analysis of forest soil organic carbon: recovery, limitations and uncertainty. Soil Use and Management 23: 221–229.
9- Eswaran H., Reich P.F., Kimble J.M., Beinroth F.H., Padmanabhan E. et al. 2000. Global carbon stocks. In: R L, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA, editors. Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, 15–27.
10- Fang X., Xue Z., Li B., and An S. 2012. Soil organic carbon distribution in relation to land use and its storage in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 88: 6-13.
11- Hajabbasi M.A., Jalalian A., and Karimzadeh H.R. 1997. Deforestation effects on soil physical and chemical properties, Lordegan, Iran. Plant Soil 190: 301-308.
12- ISO 10694. 1995. Soil quality. Determination of organic and total carbon after dry combustion (elementary analysis). International Organization for Standardization. Geneva.
13- Khatirpasha N., Hojjati S.M., Pourmajidiyan M.R., and Asadiyan M. 2018. Impact of land use change on physical, chemical and biological soil properties in the Qalek forest-Ghaemshahr city. Water and Soil Conservation 24: 211-225. (In Persian with English abstract)
14- Khormeli F., Abtahi A. and Stoops G. 2006. Micromorphology of Calcitic Features in Highly Calcareous Soils of Fars Province, Southern Iran. Catena 132: 31-46.
15- Kiyani F., Jalalian A., Pashaii A., and Khademi H.Y. 2006. Effect of Deforestation, degraded lands Murat on loess soil quality indicators in Golestan Province. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 11: 453-463. (In Persian)
16- Kolahchi N., Zahedi Amiri GH., and Khorasani N. 2008. Carbon sequestration in shrubs, perennial grasses and soil in closed range (Heidare) of Hamedan. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 80: 18 -25. (In Persian with English abstract)
17- Lettens S., Van Orshoven J., van Wesemael B., De Vos B., and Muys B. 2005. Stocks and fluxes of soil organic carbon for landscape units in Belgium derived from heterogeneous data sets for 1990 and 2000. Geoderma 127: 11-23.
18- McKeague J. 1976. Manual of soil sampling and methods of analysis. Land Resource Research Inst., Res. Br. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
19- Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page, AL, editor. Methods of soil analyses. Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison (WI): ASA Monograph, P: 539–579.
20- Nelson D.W., Sommers L.E., Sparks D., Page A., Helmke P. et al., 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis Part 3- Chemical Methods, 961–1010.
21- Niu X., and Duiker S. 2006. Carbon sequestration potential by afforestation of marginal agricultural land in the Midwestern U.S. Forest Ecology and Management 223: 415–427.
22- Owliaie H.R., Abtahi A., and Heck R.J. 2006. Pedogenesis and Clay Mineralogical Investigation of Soils Formed on Gypsiferous and Calcareous Materials, on a Transect, Southwestern Iran. Geoderma 134: 62-81.
23- Pribyl D.W. 2010. A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor. Geoderma 156: 75–83.
24- Schimel D., Enting I.G., Heimann M., Wigley T. M. L., Raynaud D., Alves D., and Siegenthaler U. 1995. CO2 and the carbon cycle. In: Climate Change. 1994. Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios. Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Bruce, J., Lee, H., Callander, B. A., Haites, E., Harris, N and Maskell, K (eds). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. England. pp: 35-71.
25- Sleutel S., De Neve S., Singier B., and Hofman G. 2007. Quantification of organic carbon in soils: A comparison of methodologies and assessment of the carbon content of organic matter. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 38: 2647–2657.
26- Sperow M., Eve M., and Paustian K. 2003. Potential soil C sequestration on U.S. agricultural soils. Climate Change 57: 319–339.
27- Szava-Kovats R. 2009. Re-analysis of the Relationship between Organic Carbon and Loss-on-Ignition in Soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 40: 2712–2724.
28- Varamesh S., Hosseini S.M., Abdi N., and Akbarinia M. 2010. Increment of soil carbon sequestration due to forestation and its relation with some physical and chemical factors of soil. Iranian Journal of Forest 2: 25-35. (In Persian with English abstract)
29- Walkley A. 1974. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils- effect of variations in digestion conditions and inorganic soil constituents. Soil Science 63: 251–264.
30- Walkley A., and Black I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29–38.
31- Wang X., Wang J., and Zhang J. 2012. Comparisons of three methods for organic and inorganic carbon in calcareous soils of Northwestern China. PLOS ONE 7:1-6.
32- Wang X.J., and Smethurst P.J. 1996. Herbert A M. Relationships between three measures of organic matter or carbon in soils of eucalypt plantations in Tasmania. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34: 545–553.
33- Wang Y.Q., Zhang X.C., Zhang J.L., and Li S.J. 2009. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in a watershed on the Loess Plateau. Pedosphere 19: 486–495.
34- Zhong B., and Xu Y.J. 2009. Topographic Effects on Soil Organic Carbon in Louisiana Watersheds. Environmental Management 43: 664-672.